Evaluation of the Reliabilty of Endoscopic Examination For Determining Gastritis

Year 2019, Volume: 72 Issue: 3, 339 - 342, 23.10.2020

Özcan Dere , Ilgaz Kayılıoğlu

https://izlik.org/JA85TS76JY

Abstract

Objectives: This study was planned for evaluating the reliability of endoscopic examination findings in patients with dyspepsia. It can also be considered as a pilot study for broader, population studies.

Materials and Methods: All files of the patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy because of dyspeptic symptoms were included in the study. All files were analysed to acquire data including, demographics, history of the patients, comorbidities, and findings of all medical tests, especially endoscopic findings. Endoscopic and histopathological diagnoses were evaluated with descriptive and comparative statistics.

Results: A total of 90 patient files were included. Mean age of the patients was 50.21±16.26. Group 1 included all patients who were diagnosed endoscopically as “Antral gastritis”, whereas group 2 consisted of the patients with no findings of any gastritis. Group 1 was formed of 72 patients where as group 2 had 18 patients. Total number of patients with histopathologically diagnosed chronic gastritis was 83 (92.2%). Correlation between endoscopic and histopathological examination of the stomach was found significant (κ=0.392; p<0.001). Endoscopic diagnosis of antral gastritis was also related with Helicobacter pylori infection in patients (p=0.003).

Conclusion: We found that in our sample, the gastritis detection rate with endoscopic and histopathological examination was 80% and 92%, respectively. It seems that the reasons behind the very low rates of functional dyspepsia should be investigated. Endoscopic mucosal findings are significantly related to histopathological diagnosis of chronic gastritis. However, it is also noted that these relations tends to fade when we exclude cases with mild inflammation.

Keywords

Gastritis , Gastroscopy , Pathology

Ethical Statement

Çalışma için Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Etik Kurulu’ndan onay alınmıştır (onay no: 190198).

Supporting Institution

-

Project Number

-

Thanks

-

Endoskopik Olarak Konan Gastrit Tanısının Güvenilirliğinin Değerlendirilmesi

https://izlik.org/JA85TS76JY

Abstract

Project Number

-

References

• 1. Sivak MV. Gastrointestinal endoscopy: past and future. Gut. 2006;55:1061- 1064.
• 2. Choi IJ. Endoscopic gastric cancer screening and surveillance in high-risk groups. Clin Endosc. 2014;47:497-503.
• 3. Bazaldua OV, Schneider FD. Evaluation and management of dyspepsia. Am Fam Physician. 1999;60:1773-1784.
• 4. Drossman DA, Li Z, Andruzzi E, et al. U.S. householder survey of functionalgastrointestinal disorders. Prevalence, sociodemography, and health impact. Dig Dis Sci. 1993;38:1569-1580.
• 5. Uyanıkoğlu A, Coşkun M, Binici DN, ve ark. Erzurum yöresi gastroskopi ve patoloji sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesi. Türkiye Klinikleri J Gastroenterohepatol. 2011;18:70-74.
• 6. Talley NJ, Silverstein MD, Agreus L, et al. AGA technical review: evaluation of dyspepsia. American Gastroenterological Assoction. Gastroenterology. 1998;114:582-595.
• 7. Fisher RS, Parkman HP. Management of nonulcer dyspepsia. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1376-1381.
• 8. Yıldız İ, Koca YS. Genel cerrah tarafından yapılan üst gasrooinstestinal sistem endoskopi uygulamalarının retrospektif analizi: Tek hekim deneyimi. SDÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2016;7:15-17.
• 9. Misiewicz JJ. The Sydney System: a new classification of gastritis. Introduction. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1991;6:207-208.
• 10. Cho JH, Chang YW, Jang JY, et al. Close observation of gastric mucosal pattern by standard endoscopy can predict Helicobacter pylori infection status. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;28:279-284.