Use of the Stard Statement in Reporting Diagnostic Test Research in Turkish Medical Directory

Abstract

Tanı Doğruluğu Çalıșmalarının Stard Kriterlerine Göre Türk Tıp Dizini Özelinde Değerlendirilmesi

Abstract

Aim: When diagnostic testing studies are examined, it is seen that due importance is not attached to planning and conducting studies that evaluate the discriminating power of tests and reporting the results of such studies. Recent increase in the number of meta-analysis studies has indicated the need to create standards for the reporting of results. Based on this need, two statements making up such standards were developed and published in 2003 under the names of QUADAS and STARD. STARD criteria were adapted to Turkish by Genç et al. in 2012. The aim of our study is to identify the quality of the diagnostic accuracy studies published in Turkish Medical Directory by using the Turkish version of the STARD statement and to determine the rate of satisfaction of each criterion by year. Materials and Methods: To find appropriate studies, the articles that were published on ULAKBİM Medical Database [Turkish Medical Directory] between 2007 and 2010 and included the words, “sensitivity, specificity, discrimination receiver operating characteristic, ROC, diagnostic accuracy” were searched, and 459 articles were determined. As a result of the electronic search, 459 articles were determined. Then those studies were re-evaluated based on the specified criteria. Finally, 75 appropriate articles were chosen. Those studies were evaluated according to the Turkish STARD statement, and percentage of satisfaction was found for each criterion. Results: The most compliant articles with the STARD statement satisfied 21 items out of 25 whereas the least compliant articles satisfied only 6 items. Moreover, 9% of 75 articles have less than 50% relevance to the STARD statement while 81% of 75 articles are in 50-75% relevance range. A great majority of the studies (91%) provide measures related to diagnostic accuracy, but only 32% give confidence intervals regarding them. In the evaluated articles, the criteria concerning the subjects included in the studies were mostly satisfied at a high rate (84% in average). These rates of satisfaction are similar over the years. In 96% of the evaluated studies, the clinical applicability of the results was discussed. This is the criterion satisfied most. Conclusions: To conclude, the rate of satisfaction of the STARD criteria by the diagnostic accuracy studies published on the ULAKBİM Medical Database [Turkish Medical Directory] between 2007 and 2010 is adequate, though not very high. The introduction of the Turkish version of the STARD statement may serve as a very important tool for the standardization of the diagnostic accuracy studies published in Turkish. This may lead to an improvement in the quality of the diagnostic accuracy studies in the Turkish literature.

Keywords

• STARD Statements
• Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
• Systematic Review

References

1. 1. Genç Y. Tanı Testi Çalışmalarında Metodolojik Standartların Kullanılması. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası. 2003;56:4: 259-264.
2. 2. Reid MC, Lachs MS, Feinstein AR. Useof methodological standards in diagnostic test research: Getting better but still not good. JAMA 1995;274:645-651.
3. 3. Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S.et al. Empirical evidence of deign-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA 1999;282:1061-1066.
4. 4. Littenberg B, Moses LE. Estimating diagnostic accuracy from multiple conflicting reports: A new meta-analytic method. Med Decis Making 1993; 13:313- 321.
5. 5. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE. et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative. Clinical Chemistry 2003; 49:1 1-6.
6. 6. Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB.et al. The development of QUADAS: A tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003; 3:25.
7. 7. Whiting PF, Weswood ME, Rutjes AW.et al. Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006; 6:9.
8. 8. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE. et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: Explanation and elaboration. Clinical Chemistrym 2003;49:1 718.

9. 9. Genç Y., Albayrak R., Ateș C. et al. Tanı Doğruluğu Çalıșmalarının Kalitelerinin Değerlendirilmesi: STARD Kriterlerinin Türkçe Uyarlaması, Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 2012; 65:137-145
10. 10. Smidt N, Rutjes AWS, Van der Windt AWM.et al. Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies. Radiology 2005;235:347-353..