Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis

Diagnostic Value of Different Biopsy Techniques in Diffuse Lung Intersetitial Diseases

Volume: 67 Number: 1 March 18, 2015
EN TR

Diagnostic Value of Different Biopsy Techniques in Diffuse Lung Intersetitial Diseases

Abstract

Aim: In most of the diffuse interstitial lung diseases (DILD), bronchoalveolar lavage findings are not specific. When all of the non-invasive methods are insufficient, more invasive methods may be needed for DILD diagnosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of bronchoscopic and surgical biopsies in DILD. Material-Methods: One hundred and forty subjects (80F/60M; mean age=53.25±16.14 years) with DILD were evaluated retrospectively. The diagnostic methods and the results of biopsy samples obtained via fiberoptic bronchoscopy and surgery were recorded. Statistical analyses were performed by using the SPSS version 11.0, any p value <0.05 was considered significant. Results: The diagnoses of subjects were idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) (n=76), sarcoidosis (n=37) and ILDs due to other reasons (n=27). Totally 110 bronchoscopic biopsies (64 transbronchial lung biopsies (TBLB) and 49 bronchial mucosal biopsies (BMB)) were taken. Surgical biopsies were performed in 31 cases (surgical lung biopsy (n=13) (SLB), mediastinoscopy (n=10), extrapulmonary biopsy (n=8)). The rates of definitive diagnosis for TBLB, BMB, SLB and mediastinoscopy were 26.4% (n=17), 16.3% (n=8), 92.3% (n=12) and 100% (n=10), respectively. In sarcoidosis, TBLB, BMB and SLB were positive in 50% (p=0.07), 42.8% and 75% of subjects. In IIP cases, these techniques yielded positive results in 18.9%, 8.3% and 100% of subjects, respectively. Conclusion: Transbronchial lung biopsy was more successful in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis than other ILDs. In IIP subjects without any definite diagnosis, surgical lung biopsy is needed.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Behr J. Approach to the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease. Clin Chest Med. 2012; 33(1):1-10.
  2. 2. American Thoracic Society. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: diagnosis and treatment. International consensus statement. American Thoracic Society (ATS), and the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000; 161(2 Pt 1):646-664.
  3. 3. American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society International Multidisciplinary Consensus Classification of the Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias. This joint statement of the American Thoracic Society (ATS), and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) was adopted by the ATS board of directors, June 2001 and by the ERS Executive Committee, June 2001. American Thoracic Society; European Respiratory Society. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 15; 165(2):277-304.
  4. 4. Spectrum of fibrosing diffuse parenchymal lung disease. Morgenthau AS, Padilla ML. Mt Sinai J Med. 2009; 76:2-23.
  5. 5. Kayacan O. Approach of diffuse interstitial lung diseases. Tuberk Toraks. 2004; 52(3):285-299.
  6. 6. Popper HH. Which biopsies in diffuse infiltrative lung diseases and when are these necessary? Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 200; 56(5):446-452.
  7. 7. Zsiray M, Appel J, Lantos A. Transbronchial biopsy in diffuse infiltrative lung diseases. Orv Hetil. 1999 30; 140(22):1239-1243.
  8. 8. Shi JH, Xu WB, Liu HR, et al. The diagnostic value of transbronchial lung biopsy in diffuse parenchymal lung diseases. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2008; 31:22-25.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Chest Diseases

Journal Section

Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis

Publication Date

March 18, 2015

Submission Date

July 12, 2014

Acceptance Date

March 17, 2015

Published in Issue

Year 2014 Volume: 67 Number: 1

APA
Demir, N., Öztürk, A., Unculu, S., Karnak, D., & Kayacan, O. (2015). Diagnostic Value of Different Biopsy Techniques in Diffuse Lung Intersetitial Diseases. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, 67(1), 17-20. https://izlik.org/JA24GH89UY
AMA
1.Demir N, Öztürk A, Unculu S, Karnak D, Kayacan O. Diagnostic Value of Different Biopsy Techniques in Diffuse Lung Intersetitial Diseases. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası. 2015;67(1):17-20. https://izlik.org/JA24GH89UY
Chicago
Demir, Nalan, Ayperi Öztürk, Serap Unculu, Demet Karnak, and Oya Kayacan. 2015. “Diagnostic Value of Different Biopsy Techniques in Diffuse Lung Intersetitial Diseases”. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 67 (1): 17-20. https://izlik.org/JA24GH89UY.
EndNote
Demir N, Öztürk A, Unculu S, Karnak D, Kayacan O (March 1, 2015) Diagnostic Value of Different Biopsy Techniques in Diffuse Lung Intersetitial Diseases. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 67 1 17–20.
IEEE
[1]N. Demir, A. Öztürk, S. Unculu, D. Karnak, and O. Kayacan, “Diagnostic Value of Different Biopsy Techniques in Diffuse Lung Intersetitial Diseases”, Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 17–20, Mar. 2015, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA24GH89UY
ISNAD
Demir, Nalan - Öztürk, Ayperi - Unculu, Serap - Karnak, Demet - Kayacan, Oya. “Diagnostic Value of Different Biopsy Techniques in Diffuse Lung Intersetitial Diseases”. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 67/1 (March 1, 2015): 17-20. https://izlik.org/JA24GH89UY.
JAMA
1.Demir N, Öztürk A, Unculu S, Karnak D, Kayacan O. Diagnostic Value of Different Biopsy Techniques in Diffuse Lung Intersetitial Diseases. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası. 2015;67:17–20.
MLA
Demir, Nalan, et al. “Diagnostic Value of Different Biopsy Techniques in Diffuse Lung Intersetitial Diseases”. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası, vol. 67, no. 1, Mar. 2015, pp. 17-20, https://izlik.org/JA24GH89UY.
Vancouver
1.Nalan Demir, Ayperi Öztürk, Serap Unculu, Demet Karnak, Oya Kayacan. Diagnostic Value of Different Biopsy Techniques in Diffuse Lung Intersetitial Diseases. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası [Internet]. 2015 Mar. 1;67(1):17-20. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA24GH89UY