The Place Of Cesarean Section In Modern Obstetrics

Year 1967, Volume: 20 Issue: 2, 324 - 339, 30.06.1967

Turhan Bayçu

https://izlik.org/JA27ZP63WS

Abstract

Considering the new conceptions about the indications for cesarean sections, the actual tendencies and our clinical evaluations are discussed and, the changes of these indications in time have been tried to be shown.

Keywords

Cesarean section , Modern obstetrics , Indications

Ethical Statement

-

Supporting Institution

Ankara University Faculty of Medicine Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic

Project Number

-

Thanks

-

Modern Obstetrikte Sezaryenin Yeri

https://izlik.org/JA27ZP63WS

Abstract

Yeni bilgilerin ışığı altında, sezaryen endikasyonları hakkında, bugünkü temayüller ve klinik görüşlerimiz tartışılmış; özellikle bu endikasyonların, zamanın seyri içinde nasıl değişikliğe uğradıkları gösterilmek istenmiştir.

Keywords

Sezaryen , Modern obstetrik , Endikasyonlar

Ethical Statement

-

Supporting Institution

Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Kadın Hastalıkları - Doğum Kliniği

Project Number

-

Thanks

-

References

• 1 — BAYÇU, T. : Sezaryen ve anestezi; Jin. Obst. 2 : 143, 1962.
• 2 — BENSON, R., SHUBECK, F., CLARK, W., and Coll. : Fetal compromise during elective cesarean section; Am. J. Ob. Gyn. 91 : 645, 1965.
• 3 — CLOUD, I. : Cesarean section on the dead and moribund; Obst. Gyn. 16 : 27, 1960.
• 4 — CHOME, E. : Les césariennes abdominales; Encycl. M. Chir. 5100 D70 : 4, 1957.
• 5 — ÇANGA, S., YAVUZ, H., ARIDOGAN, N. : 401 sezaryen operasyon vak'asının analizi; XIX. M. T. Tıp kongresi tebliği, İzmir 1966.
• 6 — DEKRULF, H., ROCKWOOD, P., BAKER, N. : Postmortem cesarean section with survival of infant; J. A. M. A. 163 : 938, 1957.
• 7 — DILLON, J., TILLIS. J., and coll. : Fifteen year survey of multiple cesarean sections; Am. J. Ob. Gyn. 90 : 907, 1964.
• 8 — EASTMAN, N., HELLMAN, L. : Williams Obstetrics 13. ed. Appleton, Newyork 1966.
• 9 — GORDON, C. : Cesarean section death; Am. J. Ob. Gyn. 63 : 284, 1952.
• 10 — GREENHILL, J. : Obstetrics 13. ed. Saunders, Phil. London 1965.
• 11 — HARRIS, J., ROSENBLUM, G., GINSBURG, B., and coll : Reevaluation of cesarean section indications; West. J. Surg. 59 : 337, 1951.
• 12 — JENSEN, P., AARO, L. : Cesarean section, review of 10 years series; Mayo Clin. Proc. 40 : 338, 1965.
• 13 — KIMBALL, A., OLIVER, R.: Extra - amniotic cesarean section in prevention of fetal hyaline membrane disease; Am. J. Ob. Gyn. 90 : 919, 1964.
• 14 — LACOMME, M., LEWIN, D.: Accouchement naturel ou césarienne chez les femmes antérieurement césarisées; Gyn. Obst. 61 : 437, 1962.
• 15 — LANTUEJOUL, P.: Les enfants nés par césarienne; Sem. Hôp. Paris 26 : 4690, 1950.
• 16 — LANTUEJOUL, P.: L’épreuve du travail; Presse méd, 60 : 647, 1952.
• 17 — OBOLENSKY, W., ZÜRCHER, W.: Hysterography as objective method in assessing scar formation after cesarean section; Geburtsh. u. Frauenh. 23 : 225, 1963.
• 18 — POIDEVIN, L.: Caesarean section scars; Thomas C. Springfield, Ill. 1965.
• 19 — SEPTIEN, J. BANNUET, F.: Histologic study and evaluation of uterine scars following various types; Acta Gin. Madrid 12 : 449, 1961.
• 20 — VARA, P.: Fetal indications for cesarean section; Arch. Gynak. 198 : 261, 1963.
• 21 — VELASCO, V., GUERRERO, R., and coll.: Post - cesarean section hysterographic control; Am. J. Ob. Gyn. 90 : 222, 1964.
• 22 — VITSKY, M.: Cesarean section on the dead and critically injured; Am. J. Ob. Gyn. 90 : 17,1964.
• 23 — WEIL, A., GRABER, V.: The management of the near - term pregnant patient who dies undelivered; Am. J. Ob. Gyn. 73 : 754, 1957.
• 24 — WILSON, L.: Unification of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Am. J. Ob. Gyn. 62 : 241, 1951.