İnvitro Kazanç Analizleriyle İşitme Cihazı Seçimi Hearing Aid Selection By Insertion Gain Measurements

Abstract

Keywords

• -

İnvitro Kazanç Analizleriyle İşitme Cihazı Seçimi

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmada ilk kez işitme cihazı önerilen sensörinöral işitme kayıplı hastalarda invitro kazanç ölçümleri yapılarak optimum kazanç sağlayan işitme cihazlarının belirlenmesi amaçlandı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Ellisekiz hastada işitme cihazı invitro kazanç analizleri yapıldı. Bulgular: Hem subjektif hem de objektif yöntemlerle seçilen işitme cihazlarıyla yüksek performans elde edildi. Takip dönemi boyunca cihazından şikayet eden hasta olmadı. Sonuç: İşitme cihazı invitro kazanç ölçümü pratik ve objektif bir değerlendirme yöntemidir. Bu ölçümler yardımı ile seçilen işitme cihazlarından beklenen performans alınabilmektedir.

Keywords

• Sensörinöral işitme kaybı, işitme cihazı, işitme cihazı invitro kazanç ölçümleri

References

1. Leijon A, Eriksson- Mangold M, Bech-Karl- sen A. Preferred Hearing Aid Gain and Bass-cut in Relation to Prescriptive Fitting. Scand Audiol 1984;13:157-161.
2. Lundborg T, Risberg A, Holmqvist C et al. Rehabilitative Procedures in Sensorineural Hearing Loss. Scand Audiol 1982;11:161- 166.
3. Akyýldýz N. Ýþitme Cihazlarý. Kulak hastalýklarý ve Mikrocerrahisi. Ankara: Bilimsel Týp Yayý- nevi 2002: 567-588.
4. Esmer N, Akýner MN, Karasalihoðlu AR ve ark. Klinik Odyoloji. Ankara: Özýþýk Matba- cýlýk;1995.
5. Ringdahl A, Leijon A, Liden G. Analysis of Hearing Aid Fittings Using Insertion Gain Measurements. Scand Audiol 1984; 13: 179-185.
6. Humes LE. An Evaluation of Several Rati- onales for Selecting Hearing Aid Gain. J Speech and Hearing Disorders 1986; 51: 272-281.
7. Humes LE, Barlow NN, Garner CB et al. Prescribed Clinician-Fit Versus As-Worn Co- upler Gain in a Group of Elderly Hearing- Aid Wearars. J Speech, Language, and Hea- ring Research 2000; 43: 879-892.
8. Kuk FK. Amplification Devices for the Hea- ring-Impaired Individual. In Cummings CW, Fredricson JM, Harker LA, Krause CJ, Schuller DE. DS, eds. Otolaryngology-He- ad and Neck Surgery, second ed., St Louis: Mosby, 1993: 3127-3141.

9. Leijon A, Eriksson- Mangold M, Bech-Karl- sen A. Preferred Hearing Aid Gain and Bass-cut in Relation to Prescriptive Fitting. Scand Audiol 1984; 13: 157-161.
10. Leijon A, Lindkvist A, Ringdahl A et al. Pre- ferred Hearing Aid Gain in Everyday Use after Prescriptive Fitting. Amplification and Aural Rehabilitation 1990; 11: 299-305.
11. McPherson B, Hickson L, Baumfield A. Cli- nical Reliability of Insertion Gain Measure- ments with Assistive Listening Devices. Scand Audiol 1992; 21:51-54.
12. Norman M, James P. Insertion Gain Measure- ments Using Two Low-Powered Analogue Hearing Aids. British J Audiology 2000; 34: 375-377.
13. Snik AFM, Hombergen GCHJ. Hearing Aid Fitting of Preschool and Primary School Children : An evaluation using the inserti- on gain measurement. Scand Audiol 1993; 22: 245-250.
14. Surr RK, Fabry DA. Comparison of Three Hearing Aid Fittings Using the Speech In- telligibility Rating (SIR) Test. Amplification and Aural Rehabilitation 1991; 12: 32-38.
15. Valente M, Meister M, Smith P et al. Intra- tester Test-Retest Reliability of Insertion Gain Measures. Amplification and Aural Rehabilitation 1990; 11: 181-184.
16. Ringdahl A, Leijon A. The Reliability of In- sertion Gain Measurements Using Probe Microphones in the Ear Canal. Scand Audi- ol 1984; 13: 173-178.
17. Ringdahl A, Leijon A, Liden G et al. Hearing Aid Prescription Rules Using Insertion Ga- in Measurements. Scand Audiol 1984; 13: 211-218.
18. Popelka GR, Gates GA. Hearing aid Evalu- ation and Fitting. The Otolaryngologic Cli- nics of North America 1991; 24: 415-428.
19. Byrne D, Dilon H. The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) New Procedure for Se- lecting the Gain and Frequency Response of a Hearing Aid. Ear and Hearing 1986; 7: 257-265.
20. Thornton ARD, Bell IE, Goodsell S et al. The Use of Flexible Probe Tubes in Inserti- on Gain Measurement. British J Audiology 1987; 21: 295-300.