Ölçeklerin değerlendirilmesinde niçin Rasch analizi kullanılmalıdır?
Abstract
Keywords
References
- Chang WC, Chan C. Rasch analysis for outcomes measures: Some methodological considerations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76: 334-339.
- McHorney CA, Haley SM, Ware JE Jr. Evaluation of the MOS SF-36 physical functioning scale (PF-10): II. Comparison of relative precision using Likert and Rasch scoring methods. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50:451-461.
- Merbitz C, Morris J, Grip JC. Ordinal scales and foundations of misinference. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989;70:308-332.
- Wright BD, Linacre JM. Observations are always ordinal; Measurements, however, must be interval. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989;70:857-860.
- Health and Public Policy Committee, American College of Physicians. Comprehensive functional assessment for elderly patients. Ann Intern Med 1988;109:70-72.
- Feinstein AR, Josephy BR, Wells CK. ScientiŞc and clinical problems in indexes of functional disability. Ann Intern Med 1988; 105:413-420.
- Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD ve ark. The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:127-132.
- Tennant A, Hillman M, Fear J ve ark. Are we making the most of the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire? Br J Rheumatol 1996;35:574-578.
- Tatum DS. Research problems-Rasch solutions. Popular Measurement 1998;1:6-8.