Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

TÜRK DEVLETLERİ TEŞKİLATI’NDA CARİ DENGE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİĞİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: EŞİKLİ DOĞRUSAL OLMAYAN BİR ANALİZ

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 64, 77 - 95, 30.06.2025

Öz

Bu çalışma, Türk Devletleri Teşkilatı’na (TDT) üye ülkelerin 1991–2023 dönemi cari denge sürdürülebilirliğini, hem geleneksel doğrusal birim kök testleri hem de son dönemde geliştirilen KSS ve TAR gibi doğrusal olmayan durağanlık yöntemlerini kullanarak incelemektedir. Analiz sonuçları, incelenen ülkelerin cari denge serilerinin basit bir birim kök sürecinden ziyade eşik (rejime bağlı) durağanlık gösterdiğini, dolayısıyla farklı risk düzeylerindeki dengesizliklerin farklı politika araçlarıyla yönetilmesi gerektiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu kapsamda, TDT üyesi ülkelerin düşük, orta ve yüksek risk düzeylerine göre farklılaştırılmış bir politika çerçevesi benimsemeleri, dış dengesizliklerin etkin bir şekilde yönetilmesine ve sürdürülebilir ekonomik büyümeye katkı sağlayabilir.

Kaynakça

  • Apergis, N., Katrakilidis, K. P., & Tabakis, N. M. (2000). Current account deficit sustainability: The case of Greece. Applied Economics Letters, 7(9), pp.599–603.
  • Baharumshah, A. Z., Lau, E. and Fountas, S. (2003), On the sustainability of current account deficits: evidence from four ASEAN countries, Journal of Asian Economics, 14, pp. 465-487.
  • Bai, J. P. (2003). Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models. . Journal of Applied Econometrics. 18 (1), 1-22.
  • Bektaş, V. (2017). Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde Cari Açıkların Sürdürülebilirliği: Bir Panel Veri Analizi. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17(1), 51-66.
  • Bozoklu, Şeref,and Yılancı, Veli. (2014). Current account sustainability in emerging markets: An analysis with linear and nonlinear panel unit root tests. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 28(4), 251-264.Çeçen, A. a. (2014). Capital flows and current account dynamics in Turkey: A nonlinear time series analysis. Economic Modelling 39, 240–246.
  • Chen, S. (2011). Current Account Deficits and Sustainability: Evidence from The OECD Countries. Economic Modelling 28(4), 1455-1464.
  • Chien-Fu Jeff Lin, Timo Teräsvirta. Testing the constancy of regression parameters against continuous structural change. Journal of Econometrics 62(2), pp.211-228.Chortareas, G. E. (2004).
  • An Investigation of Current Account Solvency in Latin America Using Non Linear Nonstationarity Tests. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 8(1).
  • Cuestas, Juan C. (2013). The current account sustainability of European transition economies. Journal of Common Market Studies 51(2). pp 232-245
  • Dickey, D. A.,Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366a), pp.427–431.Dornbusch, R. F. (1990). Macroeconomics. McGraw-Hill, International Edition.
  • Freund, Caroline and Warnock, Frank. (2007). 4 Current Account Deficits in Industrial Countries: The Bigger They Are, the Harder They Fall?. G7 Current Account Imbalances: Sustainability and Adjustment, edited by Richard H. Clarida, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007, pp. 133-168. arkets Finance and Trade, 42(1). pp.33–49. Garg Bhavesh, K. P. (2021). Testing the intertemporal sustainability of current account in the presence of endogenous structural breaks: Evidence from the top deficit countries. Economic Modelling 97, 365-379.
  • Enders, Walter, Granger, Clive. W. J. (1998). Unit-root tests and asymmetric adjustment with an example using the term structure of interest rates. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 16(3), pp.304–311.
  • Hasdemir Esra and Tolga Omay and Zulal S Denaux, (2019). ‘Testing the Current Account Sustainability for BRICS Countries: Evidence from a Nonlinear Framework’’, Economics Bulletin, Volume 39(1), pp.310-320. Holmes, M. (2006). ‘Do Latin American Countries have an Incentive to Default on Their External Debts? A Perspective Based on Long-Run Current Account Behaviour’. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Vol. 42, pp. 33–49.
  • Holmes, M.J., Otero, J. and Panagiotidis, T. (2010), On the Stationarity of Current Account Deficits in the European Union. Review of International Economics, 18, pp.730-740.
  • George Kapetanios, Yongcheol Shin, Andy Snell.(2003).Testing for a unit root in the nonlinear STAR framework. Journal of Econometrics 112(2), pp.359-379.
  • Kwiatkowski, Deniz, Peter C.B. Phillips, Peter Schmidt, Yongcheol Shin. Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?Journal of Econometrics 54(1-3), pp. 159-178.
  • Kwiatkowski, D.P. (1992). Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity Against the Alternative of a Unit Root: How Sure Are We that Economic Time Series Have a Unit Root? . Journal of Econometrics 54(1-3), 159-178.
  • Labonte, Marc. (2005). Is the U,S, Current Account Deficit Sustainable? Report. CRS
  • Liu, Peter C, and Evan Tanner. (1996). International Intertemporal Solvency in Industrialized Countries: Evidence and Implications. Southern economic journal 62(3): pp. 739–749
  • Matsubayashi, Yoichi (2005). Are US current account deficits unsustainable? Testing for the private and government intertemporal budget constraints. Japan and the World Economy, 17(2), pp.223-237.
  • Phillips, Peter C. B., Perron, Pierre. (1988). Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression. Biometrika. 75 (2), pp.335–346.
  • Taştan,Serkan and Kıvanç Halil Arıç (2015). Is Current Account of Turkey Sustainable? Evidence from Nonlinear Unit Root Tests. Romanian Economic Journal XVIII: 57, pp. 95-114.
  • Teräsvirta, Timo. (1994). Specification, estimation, and evaluation of smooth transition autoregressive models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89(425), pp.208–218.

ASSESSING CURRENT ACCOUNT SUSTAINABILITY IN THE ORGANIZATION OF TURKIC STATES: A THRESHOLD NONLINEAR ANALYSIS

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 64, 77 - 95, 30.06.2025

Öz

This paper examines the sustainability of the current account balance among countries in the Organization of Turkic States (OTS) from 1991 to 2023, employing both traditional linear unit root tests and the more recent KSS and TAR nonlinear stationarity procedures. The results show that each country’s current account balance follows a threshold (regime-dependent) stationarity pattern rather than a simple unit root process, suggesting that standard, uniform policy prescriptions may be inadequate. Consequently, implementing a differentiated policy framework—tailored to low-, medium-, and high-risk scenarios—could enable more effective management of external imbalances and foster sustainable economic growth across OTS member countries.

Kaynakça

  • Apergis, N., Katrakilidis, K. P., & Tabakis, N. M. (2000). Current account deficit sustainability: The case of Greece. Applied Economics Letters, 7(9), pp.599–603.
  • Baharumshah, A. Z., Lau, E. and Fountas, S. (2003), On the sustainability of current account deficits: evidence from four ASEAN countries, Journal of Asian Economics, 14, pp. 465-487.
  • Bai, J. P. (2003). Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models. . Journal of Applied Econometrics. 18 (1), 1-22.
  • Bektaş, V. (2017). Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde Cari Açıkların Sürdürülebilirliği: Bir Panel Veri Analizi. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17(1), 51-66.
  • Bozoklu, Şeref,and Yılancı, Veli. (2014). Current account sustainability in emerging markets: An analysis with linear and nonlinear panel unit root tests. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 28(4), 251-264.Çeçen, A. a. (2014). Capital flows and current account dynamics in Turkey: A nonlinear time series analysis. Economic Modelling 39, 240–246.
  • Chen, S. (2011). Current Account Deficits and Sustainability: Evidence from The OECD Countries. Economic Modelling 28(4), 1455-1464.
  • Chien-Fu Jeff Lin, Timo Teräsvirta. Testing the constancy of regression parameters against continuous structural change. Journal of Econometrics 62(2), pp.211-228.Chortareas, G. E. (2004).
  • An Investigation of Current Account Solvency in Latin America Using Non Linear Nonstationarity Tests. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 8(1).
  • Cuestas, Juan C. (2013). The current account sustainability of European transition economies. Journal of Common Market Studies 51(2). pp 232-245
  • Dickey, D. A.,Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366a), pp.427–431.Dornbusch, R. F. (1990). Macroeconomics. McGraw-Hill, International Edition.
  • Freund, Caroline and Warnock, Frank. (2007). 4 Current Account Deficits in Industrial Countries: The Bigger They Are, the Harder They Fall?. G7 Current Account Imbalances: Sustainability and Adjustment, edited by Richard H. Clarida, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007, pp. 133-168. arkets Finance and Trade, 42(1). pp.33–49. Garg Bhavesh, K. P. (2021). Testing the intertemporal sustainability of current account in the presence of endogenous structural breaks: Evidence from the top deficit countries. Economic Modelling 97, 365-379.
  • Enders, Walter, Granger, Clive. W. J. (1998). Unit-root tests and asymmetric adjustment with an example using the term structure of interest rates. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 16(3), pp.304–311.
  • Hasdemir Esra and Tolga Omay and Zulal S Denaux, (2019). ‘Testing the Current Account Sustainability for BRICS Countries: Evidence from a Nonlinear Framework’’, Economics Bulletin, Volume 39(1), pp.310-320. Holmes, M. (2006). ‘Do Latin American Countries have an Incentive to Default on Their External Debts? A Perspective Based on Long-Run Current Account Behaviour’. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Vol. 42, pp. 33–49.
  • Holmes, M.J., Otero, J. and Panagiotidis, T. (2010), On the Stationarity of Current Account Deficits in the European Union. Review of International Economics, 18, pp.730-740.
  • George Kapetanios, Yongcheol Shin, Andy Snell.(2003).Testing for a unit root in the nonlinear STAR framework. Journal of Econometrics 112(2), pp.359-379.
  • Kwiatkowski, Deniz, Peter C.B. Phillips, Peter Schmidt, Yongcheol Shin. Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?Journal of Econometrics 54(1-3), pp. 159-178.
  • Kwiatkowski, D.P. (1992). Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity Against the Alternative of a Unit Root: How Sure Are We that Economic Time Series Have a Unit Root? . Journal of Econometrics 54(1-3), 159-178.
  • Labonte, Marc. (2005). Is the U,S, Current Account Deficit Sustainable? Report. CRS
  • Liu, Peter C, and Evan Tanner. (1996). International Intertemporal Solvency in Industrialized Countries: Evidence and Implications. Southern economic journal 62(3): pp. 739–749
  • Matsubayashi, Yoichi (2005). Are US current account deficits unsustainable? Testing for the private and government intertemporal budget constraints. Japan and the World Economy, 17(2), pp.223-237.
  • Phillips, Peter C. B., Perron, Pierre. (1988). Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression. Biometrika. 75 (2), pp.335–346.
  • Taştan,Serkan and Kıvanç Halil Arıç (2015). Is Current Account of Turkey Sustainable? Evidence from Nonlinear Unit Root Tests. Romanian Economic Journal XVIII: 57, pp. 95-114.
  • Teräsvirta, Timo. (1994). Specification, estimation, and evaluation of smooth transition autoregressive models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89(425), pp.208–218.
Toplam 23 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Uluslararası İlişkiler (Diğer)
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Nermin Yaşar Başkaraağaç 0000-0002-4159-4146

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 12 Mart 2025
Kabul Tarihi 8 Mayıs 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Sayı: 64

Kaynak Göster

APA Yaşar Başkaraağaç, N. (2025). ASSESSING CURRENT ACCOUNT SUSTAINABILITY IN THE ORGANIZATION OF TURKIC STATES: A THRESHOLD NONLINEAR ANALYSIS. Avrasya Etüdleri(64), 77-95.
AMA Yaşar Başkaraağaç N. ASSESSING CURRENT ACCOUNT SUSTAINABILITY IN THE ORGANIZATION OF TURKIC STATES: A THRESHOLD NONLINEAR ANALYSIS. Avrasya Etüdleri. Haziran 2025;(64):77-95.
Chicago Yaşar Başkaraağaç, Nermin. “ASSESSING CURRENT ACCOUNT SUSTAINABILITY IN THE ORGANIZATION OF TURKIC STATES: A THRESHOLD NONLINEAR ANALYSIS”. Avrasya Etüdleri, sy. 64 (Haziran 2025): 77-95.
EndNote Yaşar Başkaraağaç N (01 Haziran 2025) ASSESSING CURRENT ACCOUNT SUSTAINABILITY IN THE ORGANIZATION OF TURKIC STATES: A THRESHOLD NONLINEAR ANALYSIS. Avrasya Etüdleri 64 77–95.
IEEE N. Yaşar Başkaraağaç, “ASSESSING CURRENT ACCOUNT SUSTAINABILITY IN THE ORGANIZATION OF TURKIC STATES: A THRESHOLD NONLINEAR ANALYSIS”, Avrasya Etüdleri, sy. 64, ss. 77–95, Haziran2025.
ISNAD Yaşar Başkaraağaç, Nermin. “ASSESSING CURRENT ACCOUNT SUSTAINABILITY IN THE ORGANIZATION OF TURKIC STATES: A THRESHOLD NONLINEAR ANALYSIS”. Avrasya Etüdleri 64 (Haziran2025), 77-95.
JAMA Yaşar Başkaraağaç N. ASSESSING CURRENT ACCOUNT SUSTAINABILITY IN THE ORGANIZATION OF TURKIC STATES: A THRESHOLD NONLINEAR ANALYSIS. Avrasya Etüdleri. 2025;:77–95.
MLA Yaşar Başkaraağaç, Nermin. “ASSESSING CURRENT ACCOUNT SUSTAINABILITY IN THE ORGANIZATION OF TURKIC STATES: A THRESHOLD NONLINEAR ANALYSIS”. Avrasya Etüdleri, sy. 64, 2025, ss. 77-95.
Vancouver Yaşar Başkaraağaç N. ASSESSING CURRENT ACCOUNT SUSTAINABILITY IN THE ORGANIZATION OF TURKIC STATES: A THRESHOLD NONLINEAR ANALYSIS. Avrasya Etüdleri. 2025(64):77-95.