Psikoterapi Süpervizyonunda Paralel Süreç:Bir Vaka Çalışması

Abstract

Paralel süreç kavramı, psikoterapi süpervizyonu sürecinde, hem terapi hem de süpervizyon ikililerindeki ilişkisel örüntülerin bilinçdışı bir şekilde tekrarlanmasına denmektedir. Birçok terapist ve süpervizör paralel süreci süpervizyonda önemli bir araç ve değerli bir iletişim biçimi olarak görmektedir. Paralel süreç kavramı alanda dikkat çeken bir konu olmasına rağmen, görgül bir şekilde yeterli olarak desteklenmemiştir. Bu makale paralel süreç kavramı üzerine bir literatür derlemesi ve örnek olarak bir vaka sunumu içermektedir.

Keywords

• Paralel Süreç, Psikoterapi, Süpervizyon, Süpervizyon İkilisi, Terapötik İkili

Parallel Process in Psychotherapy Supervision: A Case Study

Abstract

The concept of “Parallel Process” is widely recognized in psychotherapy supervision literature (Morissey & Tribe, 2001; Raichelson, Herron, Primevera, & Ramirez, 1997; Grey & Fiscalini, 1987). Supervision of psychotherapy is essentially a triadic process where a therapist is supervised in his/her work with one or more clients (Tracey, Bludworth, & Glidden-Tracey, 2012). The concept refers to unconscious replication of relational patterns both in therapeutic dyad (consisting of therapist and the patient) and supervisory dyad (consisting of supervisor and supervisee/therapist) (McNeill & Worthen, 1989). Many authors perceived parallel process as an important tool in supervision and a valuable form of communication (McNeill & Worthen, 1989; Morrissey & Tribe, 2001). Interventions focused on parallel process may improve the quality of supervisory process (Morrissey & Tribe, 2001). Parallel process received attention in the field, though, empirical support was relatively deficient (Grey & Fiscalini, 1987; Raichelson, et al., 1997; Tracey, et al., 2012). Parallel process has its origins in psychoanalytic concepts of transference and countertransference (Sumeral, 1994; McNeill & Worthen, 1989; Morissey & Tribe, 2001). However, some authors avoided to render parallel process within the realm of countertransference (e.g. Searles, 1955). On the other hand, existence of parallel process is confirmed without affirming the unconscious aspects (Raichelson, et al., 1997; Tracey, et al., 2012). Parallel process is defined as a unidirectional process in which the process is triggered by the unconscious of the patient (Grey & Fiscalini, 1987; Searles, 1955). However, some authors refer it as a bidirectional process, where the starting point may be either the patient or the supervisor (Doerhman, 1976; Tracey, et al., 2012). In conjunction with the complex nature of supervision and therapy, parallel process is to be portrayed as a circular dynamic rather than a process with a start point (Morissey & Tribe, 2001). Some authors claim that it is an interlocking processes of the supervisor, therapist, and patient triad, a "game" that the triad play (Grey & Fiscalini, 1987).

Keywords

• Parallel Process,Psychotherapy,Supervision,Supervisory Dyad,Theur,Therapeutic Dyad

References

1. Berne, E. (1964). Games People Play. New York: Grove.
2. Carroll, M. (1996). Counseling Supervision Theory, Skills and Practice. London: Cassell.
3. Doehrman, M. J. G. (1976). Parallel Processes in Supervision and Psychotherapy. Bulletin of the Mellinger Clinic, 40, 3-104.
4. Ekstein, R., ve Wallerstein, R. S. (1958). The Teaching and Learning of Psychotherapy. New York: International Press.
5. Feltham, C., ve Dryden, W. (1994). Developing Counselor Supervision. London: Sage.
6. Grey, A., ve Fiscalini, J. (1987). Parallel Process as Transference-Countertransference Interaction. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 4(2), 131-144.
7. Grinberg, L. (1979). Countertransference and Projective Counteridentification. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 15, 226-247.
8. McNeill, B. W., ve Worthen, V. (1989). The Parallel Process in Psychotherapy Supervision. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 20(5), 329-333.

9. Meerloo, J. A. M. (1952). Some Psychological Processes in Supervision of Therapists. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 6, 467-470.
10. Morissey, J., ve Tribe, R. (2001). Parallel Process in Supervision. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 14(2), 103-110, doi: 10.1080/09515070110058567
11. Mothersole, G. (1998). Levels of Attention in Clinical Supervision. Transactional Analysis Journal, 28(4), 285-296.
12. Mothersole, G. (1999). Parallel Process. The Clinical Supervisor, 18(2), 107-121. doi: 10.1300/J001v18n02_08.
13. Lesser, R. M. (1983). Supervision: Illusions, Anxieties, and Questions. Comtemporary Psychoanalysis, 18, 1-19.
14. Raichelson, S. H., Herron, W. G., Primevera, L. H., ve Ramirez, S. M. (1997). Incidence and Effects of Parallel Process in Psychotherapy Supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 15(2), 37-48, doi: 10.1300/J001v15n02_03
15. Sachs, D. M., ve Shapiro, S. H. (1976). On Parallel Processes in Therapy and Teaching. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 45, 394-415.
16. Searles, H. F. (1955). The Informational Value of Supervisor’s Emotional Experiences. Psychiatry, 18, 135-146.
17. Sumeral, M. B. (1994). Parallel Process in Supervision. Eric Digest, 94(15).
18. Tracey, T. J. G., Bludworth, J.,ve Glidden-Tracey, C. E. (2012). Are There Parallel Processes in Psychotherapy Supervision? An Emprical Examination. Psychotherapy, 49(3), 330-343.
19. Watkins, C. E. J. (2012). Some Thoughts about Parallel Process and Psychotherapy Supervision: When is a Parallel just a Parallel? Psychotherapy, 49(3), 344-346.