Ses Sembolizmi Terminolojisi üzerine Bir Deneme

Deniz Demiryakan; Ümit Özgür Demirci

doi:10.66119/babur.1925823

EN TR

An Essay on the Terminology of Sound Symbolism

Abstract

This study arises from the need to establish a systematic, consistent, and explanatory terminological framework in Turkish for the core concepts and terms used in the field of sound symbolism. Concepts such as sound symbolism, iconicity, phonaestheme, ideophone, onomatopoeia, systematicity, motivation, and arbitrariness are closely related to one another, yet they must be theoretically distinguished. In Turkish linguistic scholarship, however, these concepts are often either used in their foreign forms or rendered inconsistently across different studies. This has led to blurred conceptual boundaries within the field and has hindered the establishment of coherence among terms in terms of root, meaning, and usage. The primary aim of this study is to compile the prominent terms used in sound symbolism and its related conceptual domain, to define them within their relevant theoretical contexts, to make their interrelations visible, and to develop Turkish equivalents for each of them. To this end, the study does not merely list the terms found in the major sources of the field; rather, it examines each concept within its definitional, semiotic, and linguistic framework and organizes them in the form of an explanatory alphabetical glossary of terminology. The main principle followed in proposing Turkish equivalents is to preserve both conceptual fidelity and root/stem coherence. In this way, the study aims to ensure that terms belonging to the same conceptual family can also be derived in Turkish within a parallel structural and semantic network. The study reaches the conclusion that the terminological structure of the field of sound symbolism, which is currently scattered and at times ambiguous in Turkish, can be substantially organized through a glossary model that prioritizes internal consistency. In this respect, the study does not claim to present a final and closed system of terminology; rather, it proposes a systematic yet open basis for discussion within Turkish linguistic scholarship. Ultimately, the text constitutes an explanatory terminological attempt intended to contribute to a clearer, more relational, and more sustainable use of the fundamental concepts of sound symbolism in Turkish.

Keywords

sound symbolism, terminology, iconicity, phonaestheme, ideophone, Turkish term proposal

Ses Sembolizmi Terminolojisi üzerine Bir Deneme

Abstract

Bu çalışma, ses sembolizmi alanında kullanılan temel kavramların ve terimlerin Türkçede sistemli, tutarlı ve açıklayıcı bir terminoloji çerçevesi içinde karşılanması gereksiniminden doğmuştur. Ses sembolizmi, görüntügöstergesellik, sesbirimselanlam, sesçağrışımsal gösterge, yansıma sözcük, dizgesellik, nedenlilik ve nedensizlik gibi birbirine yakın fakat kuramsal olarak ayrıştırılması gereken kavramlar, Türkçe dilbilim yazınında çoğu zaman ya yabancı karşılıklarıyla kullanılmakta ya da farklı çalışmalarda değişken karşılıklarla yer almaktadır. Bu durum, alanın kavramsal sınırlarının belirsizleşmesine ve terimler arasında anlam ve kullanım bakımından birlik sağlanamamasına yol açmaktadır. Çalışmanın temel amacı, ses sembolizmi ve onunla ilişkili kavram alanında öne çıkan terimleri derlemek, bunları ilgili kuramsal bağlamları içinde tanımlamak, aralarındaki ilişkileri görünür kılmak ve her biri için Türkçe karşılık önerileri geliştirmektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda çalışma, alanın başlıca kaynaklarında geçen terimleri yalnızca listelemekle yetinmemiş; her kavramı tanımsal, göstergebilimsel ve dilbilimsel çerçevesi içinde ele alarak açıklamalı ve alfabetik bir terminoloji sözlükçesi biçiminde düzenlemiştir. Terim önerilerinde izlenen temel ilke, kavramsal sadakat ile kök/gövde bütünlüğünü birlikte korumaktır. Böylece bir kavram ailesine ait terimlerin Türkçede de aynı yapısal ve anlamsal ağ içinde türetilebilmesi hedeflenmiştir. Çalışmanın ulaştığı sonuç, ses sembolizmi alanı için Türkçede dağınık ve yer yer belirsiz durumda bulunan terminolojik yapının iç tutarlılığı gözeten bir sözlükçe modeliyle önemli ölçüde düzenlenebileceğidir. Bu yönüyle çalışma, kesin ve kapanmış bir terimler dizgesi sunmaktan çok Türkçe dilbilim yazını için tartışmaya açık fakat sistemli bir başlangıç zemini önermektedir. Sonuç olarak çalışma, ses sembolizmi alanındaki temel kavramların Türkçede daha açık, ilişkisel ve sürdürülebilir bir biçimde kullanılabilmesine katkı sağlamayı amaçlayan açıklamalı bir terminoloji denemesi niteliği taşımaktadır.

Keywords

ses sembolizmi, terminoloji, görüntügöstergesellik, sesbirimselanlam, sesçağrışımsal gösterge

References

Abelin, Å. (1999). Studies in Sound Symbolism (Gothenburg Monographs in Linguistics 17). Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi, Göteborg Üniversitesi, Dil Bilimi Bölümü, İsveç.
Ahlner, F. ve Zlatev, J. (2010). Cross-modal iconicity: A cognitive semiotic approach to sound symbolism. Sign Systems Studies, 38(1–4), 298–348.
Aksan, D. (2015). Her Yönüyle Dil. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
Anderson, E. R. (1998). A Grammar of Iconism. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
Arbib, M. A. (2005). From monkey-like action recognition to human language: An evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X05000038
Arbib, M. A., Liebal, K. ve Pika, S. (2008). Primate vocalization, gesture, and the evolution of human language. Current Anthropology, 49, 1053–1076. https://doi.org/10.1086/593015
Asano, M., Imai, M., Kita, S., Kitajo, K., Okada, H. ve Thierry, G. (2015). Sound symbolism scaffolds language development in preverbal infants. Cortex, 63, 196–205.
van der Auwera, J. ve Plungian, V. A. (1998). Modality's semantic map. Linguistic Typology, 2, 79–124.
B. Özönder, S. (1998). Üç İtigsizler: Giriş-Metin-Tercüme. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. M. ve Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

Batı, U. ve Ünal Terek, G. (2010). Marka adları üzerine dilbilimsel ve kavramsal bir inceleme: Türk reklamcılık ortamlarında marka adı yaratım süreçleri ve stratejileri. Marmara İletişim Dergisi, 17, 228–254.
Benjamini, Y. ve Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300.
Bergen, B. (2004). The psychological reality of phonaesthemes. Language, 80(2), 290–311.
Berlin, B. (1994). Evidence for pervasive synesthetic sound symbolism in ethnozoological nomenclature. (Editör: L. Hinton, J. Nichols ve J. Ohala). Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 76–93.
Blasi, D. E., Wichmann, S., Hammarström, H., Stadler, P. F. ve Christiansen, M. H. (2016). Sound–meaning association biases evidenced across thousands of languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(39), 10818–10823.
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. London: George Allen-Unwin Ltd.
Boersma, P. (2001). PRAAT, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5, 341–345.
Bolinger, D. L. (1950). Rime, assonance, and morpheme analysis. Word, 6(2), 117–136.
Botha, R. (2008). Prehistoric shell beads as a window on language evolution. Language & Communication, 28, 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2007.05.002
Bottini, R., Crepaldi, D., Casasanto, D., Crollen, V. ve Collignon, O. (2019). Sound and vision convergence in early visual cortex reveals a multisensory bouba/kiki effect. Cortex, 119, 464–475.
Bouchard, D. (2013a). Arbitrary signs and the emergence of language. (Editör: C. Lefebvre, B. Comrie ve H. Cohen). New Perspectives on the Origins of Language (Studies in Language Companion Series 144). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 407–440.
Bouchard, D. (2013b). The Nature and Origin of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bouzouggar, A., Barton, N., Vanhaeren, M., D'Errico, F., Collcutt, S., Higham, T., Hodge, E., Parfitt, S., Rhodes, E., Schwenninger, J.-L., Stringer, C. B., Turner, E., Ward, S., Moutmir, A. ve Stambouli, A. (2007). 82,000-year-old shell beads from North Africa and implications for the origins of modern human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 9964–9969. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703877104
Boyer, P., Bedoin, N. ve Honoré, S. (2000). Relative contributions of kind- and domain-level concepts to expectations concerning unfamiliar exemplars: Developmental change and domain differences. Cognitive Development, 15, 457–479.
Bremner, A. J., Caparos, S., Davidoff, J., de Fockert, J., Linnell, K. J. ve Spence, C. (2013). "Bouba" and "Kiki" in Namibia? A remote culture make similar shape–sound matches, but different shape–taste matches to Westerners. Cognition, 126(2), 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.007
Brinton, L. J. (2000). The Structure of Modern English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Brogaard, B. ve Gatzia, D. E. (2017). Is color experience cognitively penetrable? Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(1), 193–214.
Bybee, J. L. (1985). Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Chastaing, M. (1958). La brillance des voyelles. Archivum Linguisticum, 10, 1–10.
Childs, G. T. (1994). African ideophones. (Editör: L. Hinton, J. Nichols ve J. J. Ohala). Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 178–204.
Chomsky, N. ve Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.
Chuenwattanapranithi, S., Xu, Y., Thipakorn, B. ve Maneewongvatana, S. (2008). Encoding emotions in speech with the size code: A perceptual investigation. Phonetica, 65, 210–230.
Corballis, M. (2003). From hand to mouth: The gestural origins of language. (Editör: M. H. Christiansen ve S. Kirby). Language Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 201–218.
Croft, W. (1991). Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: The Cognitive Organization of Information. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Cuskley, C., Simner, J. ve Kirby, S. (2015). Phonological and orthographic influences in the bouba–kiki effect. Psychological Research, 79, 389–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0709-2
Ćwiek, A., Fuchs, S., Draxler, C., Asu, E. L., Dediu, D., Hiovain, K., … ve Winter, B. (2022). The Bouba/Kiki effect is robust across cultures and writing systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 377(1841), 20200390.
Çağatay, S. (1977). Türk Lehçeleri Örnekleri (VIII. yüzyıldan XVIII. yüzyıla kadar yazı dili). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Yayınları.
de Boer, B. ve Zuidema, W. (2010). Multi-agent simulations of the evolution of combinatorial phonology. Adaptive Behavior, 18, 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712309345789
De Carolis, L. (2020). Experimental Assessment of Sound Symbolism and Evolutionary Considerations. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi.
De Saussure, F. (1916). Cours de Linguistique Générale. Paris: Payot.
Demircan, Ö. (1997). Türkçede nedenli göstergeler: Yansımalarda anlamlama. VII. Uluslararası Türk Dilbilimi Konferansı Bildirileri, 7–9 Ağustos 1996. Ankara, s. 191–206. http://turkoloji.cu.edu.tr/DILBILIM/demircan_01.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 8 Haziran 2016).
Diffloth, G. (1972). Notes on expressive meaning. Chicago Linguistics Society, 8, 440–447.
Dingemanse, M. (2011). Ezra Pound among the Mawu: Ideophones and iconicity in Siwu. (Editör: P. Michelucci, O. Fischer ve C. Ljungberg). Semblance and Signification. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 39–54.
Dingemanse, M. (2012). Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6, 654–672.
Dingemanse, M. ve Akita, K. (2016). An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration. Journal of Linguistics, 53(3), 501–532.
Dingemanse, M., Blasi, D. E., Lupyan, G., Christiansen, M. H. ve Monaghan, P. (2015). Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(10), 603–615.
Doke, C. M. (1935). Bantu Linguistic Terminology. London: Longmans.
Dövencioğlu, D. N., Üstün, F. S., Doerschner, K. ve Drewing, K. (2022). Hand explorations are determined by the characteristics of the perceptual space of real-world materials from silk to sand. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 14785.
Drijvers, L., Zaadnoordijk, L. S. ve Dingemanse, M. (2015). Sound-symbolism is disrupted in dyslexia. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 602–607.
Durmuş, M. (2006). Sesbirim-anlambirim arasındaki ilişkiler düzeyi ve Melih Cevdet Anday'ın şiirlerinde sesbirimsel yinelemeler. Hürriyet Gösteri, 278, 76–80.
Erben Johansson, N., Anikin, A., Carling, G. ve Holmer, A. (2020). The typology of sound symbolism: Defining macro-concepts via their semantic and phonetic features. Linguistic Typology, 24(2), 253–310. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2020-2034
Ercilasun, A. B. (2007). Türk dilinde ek-ses ilişkisi. (Yay. Haz.: E. Arıkoğlu). Makaleler. Ankara: Akçağ Yayınları, 340–346.
Erdal, M. (2004). A Grammar of Old Turkic. Leiden: Brill.
Eren, H. (1999). Türk Dilinin Etimolojik Sözlüğü. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
Fay, N., Arbib, M. ve Garrod, S. (2013). How to bootstrap a human communication system. Cognitive Science, 37, 1356–1367. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12048
Finch, G. (1988). Linguistic Terms and Concepts. London: Palgrave.
Firestone, C. ve Scholl, B. J. (2016). Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for "top-down" effects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, e229.
Forchheimer, P. (1953). The Category of Person in Language. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co.
Fort, M., Martin, A. ve Peperkamp, S. (2015). Consonants are more important than vowels in the bouba-kiki effect. Language and Speech, 58(2), 247–266.
Foucault, M. (1989). The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London: Routledge.
François, A. (2008). Semantic maps and the typology of colexification. Lacito (CNRS), 106, 106–163.
Fryer, L., Freeman, J. ve Pring, L. (2014). Touching words is not enough: How visual experience influences haptic–auditory associations in the "Bouba–Kiki" effect. Cognition, 132(2), 164–173.
Fónagy, I. (1961). Communication in poetry. Word, 17, 194–218.
Fónagy, I. (1983). La Vive Voix: Essais de Psycho-phonétique. Paris: Payot.
Gabain, A. von. (2007). Eski Türkçenin Grameri. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
Galantucci, B., Garrod, S. ve Roberts, G. (2012). Experimental semiotics. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6, 477–493. https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.351
Gallese, V. ve Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 493–501.
Gasser, M., Sethuraman, N. ve Hockema, S. (2011). Iconicity in expressives: An empirical investigation. (Editör: S. S. Fuchs, H. Tiede ve F. Clancy). Papers on Language and Linguistics. Chicago: The University of Chicago, 163–180.
Gelman, S. A. (2003). The Essential Child: Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gülensoy, T. (2007). Köken Bilgisi Sözlüğü (c. 1–2). Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
Gülensoy, T. (2011). Türkiye Türkçesindeki Türkçe Sözcüklerin Köken Bilgisi Sözlüğü I–II. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
Hamano, S. (1998). The Sound-Symbolic System of Japanese. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Hamilton, J. R. (2015). İyi ve Kötü Prens Öyküsü. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
Hansen, T., Olkkonen, M., Walter, S. ve Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2006). Memory modulates color appearance. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 1367–1368. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1794
Herman, L. M. (2009). Language learning and cognitive skills. (Editör: W. F. Perrin, B. Wursig ve J. G. M. Thewissen). Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals (2. Baskı). New York: Academic Press, 657–663.
Hinton, L., Nichols, J. ve Ohala, J. J. (1994). Introduction: Sound symbolic processes. (Editör: L. Hinton, J. Nichols ve J. J. Ohala). Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–12.
Hirata, S., Ukita, J. ve Kita, S. (2011). Implicit sound symbolism in Japanese and English. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(5), 929–933.
Hochberg, Y. ve Tamhane, A. (1987). Multiple Comparison Procedures. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70. https://doi.org/10.2307/4615733
Householder, F. W. (1946). On the problem of sound and meaning, an English phonestheme. Word, 2(1), 83–84.
Hung, S. M., Styles, S. J. ve Hsieh, P. J. (2017). Can a word sound like a shape before you have seen it? Sound-shape mapping prior to conscious awareness. Psychological Science, 28(3), 263–275.
Ido, S. G. (1999). Turkish mimetic word formation. Asian and African Studies, 8(1), 67–73.
Imai, M. ve Kita, S. (2014). The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369, 20130298. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0298
Imai, M., Kita, S., Nagumo, M. ve Okada, H. (2008). Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning. Cognition, 109(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.015
Imai, M., Miyazaki, M., Yeung, H. H., Hidaka, S., Kantartzis, K., Okada, H. ve Kita, S. (2015). Sound symbolism facilitates word learning in 14-month-olds. PLOS ONE, 10(2), e0116494.
İmer, K., Kocaman, A. ve Özsoy, A. S. (2011). Dilbilim Sözlüğü. İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
Iwasaki, N., Vinson, D. P. ve Vigliocco, G. (2007). What do English speakers know about gera-gera and yota-yota? A cross-linguistic investigation of Japanese mimetics. Japanese Language and Literature, 41(1), 3–29.
Jakobson, R. ve Waugh, L. R. (1979). The Sound Shape of Language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Jendraschek, G. (2001). Semantic and structural properties of Turkish ideophones. Turkic Languages, 5, 88–103.
Jenkins, L. (2000). Biolinguistics: Exploring the Biology of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kaminski, J., Call, J. ve Fischer, J. (2004). Word learning in a domestic dog: Evidence for "fast mapping." Science, 304, 1682–1683. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1097859
Kantartzis, K., Imai, M. ve Kita, S. (2011). Japanese sound symbolism facilitates word learning in English-speaking children. Cognitive Science, 35, 575–586.
Kaplan, H. (2014). Harften sese, harften görüntüye Bâkî'de ses-ahenk-görüntü. Türklük Bilimi Araştırmaları, 36, Güz.
Karaağaç, G. (2013a). Dil Bilimi Terimleri Sözlüğü. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
Karaağaç, G. (2013b). Türkçenin Dil Bilgisi. İstanbul: Akçağ Yayınevi.
Karaağaç, G. (2015). Türkçenin Alıntılar Sözlüğü. Ankara: Akçağ Yayınları.
Karaağaç, G. (2017a). Türkçe Üzerine Çeviriler. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
Karaağaç, G. (2017b). Türkçe Üzerine Yazılar. Ankara: Akçağ Yayınları.
Karaağaç, G. (2018). Türkçe Verintiler Sözlüğü. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
Karahan, L. (2008). Tekrar gruplarında ünlü düzeni-anlam ilişkisi üzerine düşünceler. (Editör: E. Arıkoğlu). Prof. Dr. Ahmet B. Ercilasun Armağanı. Ankara: Akçağ Yayınları, 140–148.
Keller, R. (1998). A Theory of Linguistic Signs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kılıç, F. ve Dövencioğlu, D. N. (2023). Dokunsal algıda yukarıdan aşağı etkilerden belleğin rolü. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 26(51), 44–56.
Kiran, Z. (1996). Dilbilim Akımları (2. Baskı). Ankara: Onur Yayınları.
Kirby, S. ve Hurford, J. (2002). The emergence of linguistic structure: An overview of the iterated learning model. (Editör: A. Cangelosi ve D. Parisi). Simulating the Evolution of Language. Londra: Springer Verlag, 121–148.
Klamer, M. (2001). Expressives and iconicity in the lexicon. (Editör: O. Fischer ve M. Nänny). The Motivated Sign. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 299–320.
Knoeferle, K., Li, J., Maggioni, E. ve Spence, C. (2017). What drives sound symbolism? Different acoustic cues underlie sound-size and sound-shape mappings. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 5562.
Kocaoğlu, T. (2004). Türk ve dünya dillerinde ses-anlam eşitliğine dayalı karşıt denklikler. V. Uluslararası Türk Dili Kurultayı Bildirileri II. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları, 1985–2004.
Köhler, W. (1929/1992). Gestalt Psychology. New York: Liveright.
Koriat, A. ve Levy, I. (1977). The symbolic implications of vowels and of their orthographic representations in two natural languages. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 6(2), 93–103.
Korkmaz, Z. (1992). Gramer Terimleri Sözlüğü. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
Kovic, V., Plunkett, K. ve Westermann, G. (2010). The shape of words in the brain. Cognition, 114(1), 19–28.
Léger, L., Boumlak, H. ve Tijus, C. (2008). BASETY: Extension and typicality of the specimens for 21 categories of objects. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012885
Lessing, F. D. (2017). Moğolca-Türkçe Sözlük. (Çev. G. Karaağaç). Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
Liberman, A. (2007). An Analytic Dictionary of English Etymology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Lockwood, G. ve Dingemanse, M. (2015). Iconicity in the lab: A review of behavioral, developmental, and neuroimaging research into sound-symbolism. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1246.
Lupyan, G. (2015). Cognitive penetrability of perception in the age of prediction: Predictive systems are penetrable systems. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6, 547–569.
Lupyan, G., Rahman, R. A., Boroditsky, L. ve Clark, A. (2020). Effects of language on visual perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(11), 930–944.
Magnus, M. (2010). Gods in the Word: Archetypes in the Consonants. CreateSpace.
Malkiel, Y. (1994). Regular sound development, phonosymbolism, and folk etymology. (Editör: L. Hinton, J. Nichols ve J. J. Ohala). Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 249–259.
Markell, R. J. ve Hamp, E. P. (1960). Connotative meaning in English sound symbolism. Phonetica, 5(4), 207–222.
Maurer, D., Pathman, T. ve Mondloch, C. J. (2006). The shape of boubas: Sound–shape correspondences in toddlers and adults. Developmental Science, 9(3), 316–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00495.x
Miyazaki, M., Hidaka, S., Imai, M., Yeung, H. H., Kantartzis, K., Okada, H. ve Kita, S. (2013). The facilitatory role of sound symbolism in infant word learning. (Editör: M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz ve I. Wachsmuth). Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, 3080–3085.
Monaghan, P., Mattock, K. ve Walker, P. (2012). The role of sound symbolism in language learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1152–1164. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027747
New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand, L. ve Matos, R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet : LEXIQUE™. L'Année Psychologique, 101, 447–462. https://doi.org/10.3406/psy.2001.1341
Newen, A. ve Vetter, P. (2017). Why cognitive penetration of our perceptual experience is still the most plausible account. Consciousness and Cognition, 47, 26–37.
Newman, S. S. (1933). Further experiments in phonetic symbolism. American Journal of Psychology, 45, 53–75.
Nielsen, A. K. S. ve Rendall, D. (2011). The sound of round: Evaluating the sound-symbolic role of consonants in the classic Takete-Maluma phenomenon. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022268
Nielsen, A. K. S. ve Rendall, D. (2013). Parsing the role of consonants versus vowels in the classic Takete-Maluma phenomenon. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030553
Nobile, L. (2015). Phonemes as images: An experimental inquiry into shape–sound symbolism applied to the distinctive features of French. (Editör: M. K. Hiraga, W. J. Herlofsky, K. Shinohara ve K. Akita). Iconicity: East Meets West. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.14.04nob
Nordberg, B. (1986). Onomatopoeia. (Editör: R. Asher). Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Nuckolls, J. B. (1999). The case for sound symbolism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 28, 225–252.
Ogden, C. K. ve Richards, I. A. (1923). The Meaning of Meaning. New York: Harvest/Harcourt Brace World Inc. (Kullanılan baskı: 1946)
Ohala, J. J. (1994). The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch. (Editör: L. Hinton, J. Nichols ve J. J. Ohala). Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 325–347.
Ohala, J. J. (1997). Sound symbolism. Proceedings of the 4th Seoul International Conference on Linguistics [SICOL], 11–15 August 1997, s. 98–103.
Olkkonen, M., Hansen, T. ve Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2008). Color appearance of familiar objects: Effects of object shape, texture, and illumination changes. Journal of Vision, 8(5), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1167/8.5.13
Omuralieva, A. (2020). Türkiye Türkçesinde ses yansımalı fiillerin yapısı. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(2), 141–155.
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J. ve Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The Measurement of Meaning (No. 47). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Oudeyer, P.-Y. (2013). Self-organization: Complex dynamical systems in the evolution of speech. (Editör: P.-M. Binder ve K. Smith). The Language Phenomenon (The Frontiers Collection). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 191–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36086-2
Ozturk, O., Krehm, M. ve Vouloumanos, A. (2013). Sound symbolism in infancy: Evidence for sound–shape cross-modal correspondences in 4-month-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114(2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.05.004
Ölmez, M. (1998). Etimoloji sözlükleri. Kebikeç, 6, 775–784.
Paivio, A. (1975). Perceptual comparisons through the mind's eye. Memory & Cognition, 3, 635–647. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198229
Parise, C. V. ve Spence, C. (2011). Assessing the relationship between automatic crossmodal correspondences and multisensory integration. Multisensory Research, 24, 385–410.
Peirce, C. S. (1931). Collected Papers (c. 1–6; Editör: C. Hartshorne ve P. Weiss). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Penney, J. H. (2004). Indo-European Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pepperberg, I. M. (2000). The Alex Studies: Cognitive and Communicative Abilities of Grey Parrots. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Perlman, M., Dale, R. ve Lupyan, G. (2015). Iconicity can ground the creation of vocal symbols. Royal Society Open Science, 2, 150152. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150152
R Development Core Team. (2008). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Viyana: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Ramachandran, V. S. ve Hubbard, E. M. (2001). Synaesthesia: A window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(12), 3–34.
Riou, B., Lesourd, M., Brunel, L. ve Versace, R. (2011). Visual memory and visual perception: When memory improves visual search. Memory & Cognition, 39, 1094–1102. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0075-2
Rizzolatti, G. ve Arbib, M. A. (1998). Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences, 21, 188–194.
Roberts, G., Lewandowski, J. ve Galantucci, B. (2015). How communication changes when we cannot mime the world: Experimental evidence for the effect of iconicity on combinatoriality. Cognition, 141, 52–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.04.001
Sakamoto, M. ve Watanabe, J. (2016). Cross-modal associations between sounds and drink tastes/textures: A study with spontaneous production of sound-symbolic words. Chemical Senses, 41(3), 197–203.
Sakamoto, M. ve Watanabe, J. (2017). Exploring tactile perceptual dimensions using materials associated with sensory vocabulary. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 569.
Sakamoto, M. ve Watanabe, J. (2018). Bouba/Kiki in touch: Associations between tactile perceptual qualities and Japanese phonemes. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 295.
Sapir, E. (1929). A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 225–239.
Saussure, F. de. (1998). Genel Dilbilim Dersleri. (Çev. B. Vardar). İstanbul: Multilingual Yayınları.
Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S. ve Lewin, R. (1996). Kanzi: The Ape at the Brink of the Human Mind. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Schmidtke, D. S., Conrad, M. ve Jacobs, A. M. (2014). Phonological iconicity. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 80. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00080
Schuessler, A. (2007). ABC Etymological Dictionary. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
Sekuler, R., Sekuler, A. B. ve Lau, R. (1997). Sound alters visual motion perception. Nature, 385(6614), 308.
Shibatani, M. (1990). The Languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Siddiqi, D. (2009). Syntax within the Word: Economy, Allomorphy, and Argument Selection in Distributed Morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Siddiqi, D. ve Harley, H. (Editörler). (2016). Morphological Metatheory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Sidhu, D. M. ve Pexman, P. M. (2017). Five mechanisms of sound symbolic association. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(5), 1719–1732.
Simner, J., Mulvenna, C., Sagiv, N., Tsakanikos, E., Witherby, S. A., Fraser, C., Scott, K. ve Ward, J. (2006). Synaesthesia: The prevalence of atypical cross-modal experiences. Perception, 35, 1024–1033. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5469
Sonesson, G. (1997). Iconicity in the ecology of semiosis. (Editör: M. Nänny ve O. Fischer). Form Miming Meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 59–80.
Spector, F. ve Maurer, D. (2009). Synesthesia: A new approach to understanding the development of perception. Developmental Psychology, 45, 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014171
Spector, F. ve Maurer, D. (2013). Early sound symbolism for vowel sounds. i-Perception, 4, 239–241. https://doi.org/10.1068/i0535
Spence, C. (2011). Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(4), 971–995. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-010-0073-7
Steels, L. (2008). The symbol grounding problem has been solved, so what's next? (Editör: M. de Vega). Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 223–244.
Stevens, K. N. ve House, A. S. (1963). Perturbation of vowel articulations by consonantal context: An acoustical study. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 6, 111–128.
Svantesson, J.-O. (2017). Sound symbolism: The role of word sound in meaning. WIREs Cognitive Science, Mart, s. 1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28328102
Şirin, H. (2009). Köktürk ve Ötüken Uygur Kağanlığı Yazıtları Söz Varlığı İncelemesi. Konya: Kömen Yayınları.
Tallerman, M. (2011). Language Origins: Perspectives on Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tanz, C. (1971). Sound symbolism in words relating to proximity and distance. Language and Speech, 14(3), 266–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383097101400307
Taş, İ. (2015). Kutaġu Bilig'de Söz Yapımı. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
TDK. (1998). Türkçe Sözlük I–II. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
TDK. (2015). Büyük Türkçe Sözlük. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
Tsur, R. (2006). Size-sound symbolism revisited. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 905–924.
Türk Dil Kurumu. (2015). Türkçe Sözlük. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
Ullmann, S. (1972). Semantics: An Introduction to the Science of Meaning. London: Oxford Basil Blackwell.
Vanhaeren, M., d'Errico, F., Stringer, C. B., James, S. L., Todd, J. A. ve Mienis, H. K. (2006). Middle Paleolithic shell beads in Israel and Algeria. Science, 312, 1785–1788. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128139
Vardar, B. (2001). Dilbilimin Temel Kavram ve İlkeleri. İstanbul: Multilingual Yayınları.
Vardar, B. (2002). Açıklamalı Dilbilim Terimleri Sözlüğü. İstanbul: Multilingual.
Voeltz, F. K. E. ve Kilian-Hatz, C. (Editörler). (2001). Ideophones. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Watanabe, J., Hayakawa, T., Matsui, S., Kano, A., Shimizu, Y. ve Sakamoto, M. (2012). Visualization of tactile material relationships using sound symbolic words. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7283, 175–180.
Westbury, C. (2005). Implicit sound symbolism in lexical access: Evidence from an interference task. Brain and Language, 93, 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2004.07.006
Whalen, D. H. ve Levitt, A. G. (1995). The universality of intrinsic F0 of vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 23, 349–366.
Wicker, F. W. (1968). Mapping the intersensory regions of perceptual space. American Journal of Psychology, 81, 178–188.
Winter, B. ve Perlman, M. (2021). Size sound symbolism in the English lexicon. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 6(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1646
Witzel, C., Valkova, H., Hansen, T. ve Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2011). Object knowledge modulates colour appearance. i-Perception, 2(1), 13–49.
Wong, L. S., Kwon, J., Zheng, Z., Styles, S. J., Sakamoto, M. ve Kitada, R. (2022). Japanese sound-symbolic words for representing the hardness of an object are judged similarly by Japanese and English speakers. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 830306.
Yoshida, M. (1968). Dimensions of tactual impressions (1). Japanese Psychological Research, 10(3), 123–137.
Zeimbekis, J. (2013). Color and cognitive penetrability. Philosophical Studies, 165, 167–175.
Zülfikar, H. (1995). Türkçede Ses Yansımalı Kelimeler: İnceleme-Sözlük. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Lexicography and Semantics, Linguistics (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Deniz Demiryakan ^*
0000-0002-3565-3314
Türkiye

Ümit Özgür Demirci
0000-0003-4384-8194
Türkiye

Publication Date

June 30, 2026

Submission Date

April 8, 2026

Acceptance Date

April 21, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 5 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.66119/babur.1925823

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA73ZK45PB

APA

Demiryakan, D., & Demirci, Ü. Ö. (2026). Ses Sembolizmi Terminolojisi üzerine Bir Deneme. BABUR Research, 5(1), 31-57. https://doi.org/10.66119/babur.1925823

AMA

1.Demiryakan D, Demirci ÜÖ. Ses Sembolizmi Terminolojisi üzerine Bir Deneme. BABUR Research. 2026;5(1):31-57. doi:10.66119/babur.1925823

Chicago

Demiryakan, Deniz, and Ümit Özgür Demirci. 2026. “Ses Sembolizmi Terminolojisi üzerine Bir Deneme”. BABUR Research 5 (1): 31-57. https://doi.org/10.66119/babur.1925823.

EndNote

Demiryakan D, Demirci ÜÖ (June 1, 2026) Ses Sembolizmi Terminolojisi üzerine Bir Deneme. BABUR Research 5 1 31–57.

IEEE

[1]D. Demiryakan and Ü. Ö. Demirci, “Ses Sembolizmi Terminolojisi üzerine Bir Deneme”, BABUR Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 31–57, June 2026, doi: 10.66119/babur.1925823.

ISNAD

Demiryakan, Deniz - Demirci, Ümit Özgür. “Ses Sembolizmi Terminolojisi üzerine Bir Deneme”. BABUR Research 5/1 (June 1, 2026): 31-57. https://doi.org/10.66119/babur.1925823.

JAMA

1.Demiryakan D, Demirci ÜÖ. Ses Sembolizmi Terminolojisi üzerine Bir Deneme. BABUR Research. 2026;5:31–57.

MLA

Demiryakan, Deniz, and Ümit Özgür Demirci. “Ses Sembolizmi Terminolojisi üzerine Bir Deneme”. BABUR Research, vol. 5, no. 1, June 2026, pp. 31-57, doi:10.66119/babur.1925823.

Vancouver

1.Deniz Demiryakan, Ümit Özgür Demirci. Ses Sembolizmi Terminolojisi üzerine Bir Deneme. BABUR Research. 2026 Jun. 1;5(1):31-57. doi:10.66119/babur.1925823

An Essay on the Terminology of Sound Symbolism

Abstract

Keywords

Ses Sembolizmi Terminolojisi üzerine Bir Deneme

Abstract

Keywords

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite