Dönüşerek Varlığını Sürdüren NATO’nun 2000’lerdeki Yeni Rolü: DEAŞ/Terörizmle Mücadele ve Türkiye

Abstract

Soğuk Savaş sonrası dönemde ortak savunma örgütü olan NATO’nun 2000’lerde terörle mücadele örgütüne dönüşümünü inceleyen çalışmanın hareket noktası, örgütün dağılmak yerine dönüşerek varlığını sürdürdüğü varsayımıdır. Bu bağlamda çalışmanın temel araştırma sorusu; Soğuk Savaş döneminin bir ürünü olan NATO’nun dönemin sonlanmasına ve Sovyetlerin dağılmasına rağmen neden dağılmadığı ve nasıl varlığını sürdürdüğüdür. Makalede geliştirilen üç temel argümandan ilki; NATO’nun 1990’larda kriz yönetimi rolünü üstlenirken, 2000’lerde terörle mücadeleye yönelmesidir. Diğeri NATO’nun bu dönüşümle üstlendiği yeni rollerin ortaya çıkardığı çeşitli sorunlardır. Üçüncüsü ise söz konusu dönüşümün bir yandan ABD-AB bağlantısının zayıflatırken öte yandan NATO-Türkiye ilişkilerinin sorgulanmasına yol açan çelişkili bir süreç halini aldığıdır.

Keywords

• NATO,Kriz Yönetimi,Terörle Mücadele,AB,Türkiye

The Survival of NATO by Transforming into a New Role in 2000s: War on Terrorism-ISIS and Turkey

Abstract

This article analyzes the transformation of NATO from the common defense organization to anti-terrorism in the 2000s. The starting point is the assumption that NATO maintained its survival by transforming rather than disintegrating. The main research question is why NATO has not disintegrated despite the end of the Cold War and how it managed to survive. Three fundamental arguments have been developed: First, NATO continues to exist beyond the post-Cold War breakdown by first taking on the role of crisis management in the 1990s and moving towards the fight against terrorism in the 2000s. Secondly, NATO’s transformation has led to new challenges. Thirdly, the transformation of NATO weakened the US-EU link and has led to the questioning of NATO-Turkey relations on the other.

Keywords

• NATO,Crisis Management,War on Terrorism,EU,Turkey

References

1. “About EUFOR”, European Union External Action, http://www.euforbih.org/eufor/index.php/about-eufor/background, (Erişim Tarihi: 03.04.2016).
2. “Allied Joint Doctrine for Non-Article 5 Crisis Response Operation-Ratification Draft 1”, (AJP-3,4 (A)), 2010, kam.lt/download/14142/ajp-3.4(a)%20rd1.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 02.02.2017).
3. “Common Security and Defence Policy: EU Battle Groups”, European Union External Action, April 2013, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/esdp/91624.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 04.06.2016).
4. “European Union Military Rapid Response Concept”, The Council of the European Union, 17 December 2014, http://www.statewatch.org/news/2014/dec/eu-council-eeas-military-rapid-response-concept-17036-14.pdf, (Erişim tarihi 14.04.2016).
5. “History”, Ministry of Defense of BiH, 5/1372008, http://mod.gov.ba/OS_BIH/struktura/Komanda_za_podrsku/KOiD/PSOTC/about_us/history/?id=26697, (Erişim Tarihi: 03.04.2016).
6. “History of the NATO-led Stabilisation Force (SFOR) in Bosnia and Herzegovina”, NATO, http://www.nato.int/sfor/docu/d981116a.htm, (Erişim Tarihi: 10.02. 2016).
7. “ISAF's Mission in Afghanistan (2001-2014)”, NATO, 1 Eylül 2015, http://www.nato.int/cps/eu/natohq/topics_69366.htm, (Erişim Tarihi: 22.07.2016).
8. “Istanbul Cooperation Initiative (ICI)”, NATO, 18 Kasım 2011, http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_58787.htm?, (Erişim Tarihi: 05.09.2016).

9. “İstanbul NATO Zirvesi”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt: 59, Sayı: 3, 2004, s. 255-260.
10. “NATO and the Fight against Terrorism”, NATO Briefing, http://www.nato.int/nato_static/assets/pdf/pdf_publications/20120116_response_to_terrorism2008-e.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 02.10.2016).
11. “NATO Mediterranean Dialogue”, NATO, 13 February 2015, http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_60021.htm?, (Erişim Tarihi: 14.06.2016).
12. “NATO’s Role in Kosovo”, NATO, 9 March 2017, http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_48818.htm, (Erişim Tarihi: 12.04.2017).
13. “NATO’s Military Concept for Defence against Terrorism”, NATO, 19 August 2016, http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_69482.htm, (Erişim Tarihi: 05.01.2016).
14. “NATO’s policy guidelines on counter-terrorism: Aware, Capable and Engaged for a Safer Future”, NATO, http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_87905.htm, (Erişim Tarihi: 14.03.2016).
15. “North Atlantic Treaty”, NATO, 4 April 1949, http://www.nato.int/nato_static/assets/pdf/stock_publications/20120822_nato_treaty_en_light_2009.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 02.01.2016).
16. “Operation Active Endeavour”, NATO, 27 October 2016, http://www.nato.int/cps/eu/natohq/topics_7932.htm, (Erişim Tarihi: 02.12.2016).
17. “Partnership for Peace Programme”, NATO, 7 June 2017, http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_50349.htm#, (Erişim Tarihi: 22.04.2016).
18. “Partnership for Peace Programme”, STO NATO, https://www.sto.nato.int/Pages/partnership-for-peace.aspx, (Erişim Tarihi: 22.04.2016).
19. “Prague Summit Declaration”, NATO, Issued on 21 Nov. 2002, Press Release (2202) 127, 21 November 2002, http://www.nato.int/cps/po/natohq/official_texts_19552.htm?, (Erişim Tarihi: 03.02.2016).
20. “Press Conference by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg Following the Meeting of NATO Heads of State and/or Government in Brussels on 25 May”, NATO, 25 May 2017, http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_144098.htm?selectedLocale=en, (Erişim tarihi 25. 05.2017). “The Alliance's Strategic Concept”, NATO, 24 April 1999, http://www.nato.int/cps/on/natohq/official_texts_27433.htm, (Erişim Tarihi: 22.03.2017).
21. “The General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina”, Peacemaker, 14 December 1995, http://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/BA_951121_DaytonAgreement.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 10.02.2016).
22. “The Istanbul Cooperation Initiative (ICI)”, NATO Fact Sheet, April 2014, http://www.nato.int/nato_static/assets/pdf/pdf_2014_04/20140331_140401-factsheet-ICI_en.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 05.09.2016).
23. “The National Security Strategy of the United States of America”, The White House, 17 September 2002, https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/63562.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 03.04.2016), p. 1-32.
24. “The Prague Summit and NATO’s Transformation”, NATO, Haziran 2002, http://www.nato.int/docu/rdr-gde-prg/rdr-gde-prg-eng.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 04.12.2016).
25. “Truman Doctrine (1947)”, Liberal Arts, https://liberalarts.utexas.edu/coretexts/_files/resources/texts/1947%20Truman%20Doctrine.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 12.04.2016). Active Engagement, Modern Defence: Strategic Concept for the Defence and Security of the Members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, NATO Summit in Lisbon, 19-20 November 2010, http://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_publications/20120214_strategic-concept-2010-eng.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 12.01.2017).
26. COTTEY, Andrew, “Beyond Humanitarian Intervention: The New Politics of Peacekeeping and Intervention”, Contemporary Politics, Vol: 14, Issue: 4, p. 429-446.
27. ERHAN, Çağrı, “ABD ve NATO’yla İlişkiler”, Baskın Oran, der., Türk Dış Politikası, Kurtuluş Savaşından Bugüne Olgular, Belgeler, Yorumlar, Cilt I, (1919-1980), İstanbul 2001.
28. EROL, Mehmet S.-Oktay Bingöl, “Afganistan’da Geçiş Safhası ve 2014 Sonrası Öngörüler”, Gazi Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 5, Sayı: 10, s. 173-187.
29. EROL, Mehmet S.-Şafak Oğuz, “Hybrid Warfare Studies and Russia’s Example in Crimea”, Gazi Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 9, Sayı: 17, s. 261-278.
30. ETGES, Andreas, “Western Europe”, Richard H. Immerman-Petra Goedde, eds., The Oxford Handbook of The Cold War, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2013.
31. FOWKES, Ben, Eastern Europe 1945-1969: From Stalinism to Stagnation, Routledge, London-New York 2000.
32. GOLDGEIER, James M., The Future of NATO, Council on Foreign Relations, Council Special Report No: 51, New York 2010.
33. GREENWOOD, Christopher, “Humanitarian Intervention: The Case of Kosovo”, Finnish Yearbook of International Law, Vol: 10, 1999, p. 141-175.
34. HARTLEY, Keith et al., “NATO Burden-Sharing: Past and Future”, Journal of Peace Research, Vol: 36, Issue: 6, 1 November 1999, p. 665-680.
35. HARDING, Luke, “NATO and Russia Playing Dangerous Game with Military Build-up”, The Guardian, 27 October 2016, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/oct/27/military-build-up-along-russias-border-no-cause-for-alarm, (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2016).
36. HENDRICKSON, Ryan C., “Dönüşü Olmayan Karar”, NATO Dergisi, Issue: 3, Fall 2005, http://www.nato.int/docu/review/2005/issue3/turkish/history.html, (Erişim Tarihi: 11.02.2016).
37. HOUDAIGUI, Rachid El, “NATO’s Mediterranean Dialogue: What are new possible approaches?”, OCP Policy Center, Policy Brief, June 2016, http://www.ocppc.ma/sites/default/files/OCPPC-PB1616v2.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 25.08.2016).
38. IKENBERRY, John G., “American Grand Strategy in the Age of Terror”, Survival, Vol: 43, Issue: 4, Winter 2001, p. 19-34.
39. JAYNE, Discenza, “The Development of a New Paradigm of Humanitarian Intervention: Assessing the Responsibility to Protect”, Political Science Honors Projects, Paper 41, 2013, http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/poli_honors/41, (Erişim Tarihi: 02.01.2017).
40. KAPLAN, Lawrence A., “The United States and the Origins of NATO 1946–1949”, The Review of Politics, Vol: 31, Issue: 2, April 1969, p. 210-222.
41. KAPLAN, Lawrence S., The United States and NATO: The Formative Years, The University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 1984.
42. KARAOSMANOĞLU, Ali L., “NATO’nun Dönüşümü”, Mustafa Aydın, der., Güvenlik Çalışmaları, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları 403, İstanbul 2012.
43. KATZENSTEIN, Peter J., “Collective Identity in a Democratic Community: The Case of NATO”, Peter J. Katzenstein, ed., The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, Columbia University Press, New York 1996.
44. KİBAROĞLU, Mustafa, Türkiye-NATO İlişkileri, SETA, İstanbul 2017.
45. KRAUTHAMMER, Charles, “The Obama Doctrine: Leading from Behind”, The Washington Post, 28 April 2011, https://goo.gl/JVaiwf, (Erişim Tarihi: 01.01. 2016).
46. MASTANDUNO, Michael, “US Foreign Policy and the Pragmatic Use of International Institutions”, Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol: 59, Issue: 3, 2005, p. 317-333.
47. MASTERS, James, “NATO Bolsters Presence in Eastern Europe as Russia Tension Rises”, CNN, 27 October 2016, http://edition.cnn.com/2016/10/27/europe/nato-russia-troops/index.html, (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2016).
48. MATEI, Sorin, Nato as an Instrument of Amerıcan Foreign Policy, The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, 1994, (Unpublished Master’s Thesis), http://www.visiblepast.net/matei/research/nato.html, (Erişim Tarihi: 05.11.2016).
49. MORELLO, Carol-Adam Taylor, “Trump Says U.S. Won’t Rush to Defend NATO Countries If They Don’t Spend More on Military”, The Washington Post, 21 July 2016, https://goo.gl/KHNbwq, (Erişim Tarihi: 04.09.2016).
50. OĞUZLU, Tarık, “NATO ve Türkiye: Dönüşen İttifakın Sorgulayan Üyesi”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, Cilt: 9, Sayı: 34, Yaz 2012, s. 99-124.
51. RISSE-KAPPEN, Thomas, Cooperation Among Democracies: The European Influence on U.S. Foreign Policy, Princeton University, 1995.
52. ROBERTS, Adam, “Humanitarian Intervention: The Case of Kosovo”, Survival, Vol: 41, No: 3, Autumn 1999, p.102-23.
53. RYNNING, Sten, NATO Renewed: The Power and Purpose of Transatlantic Cooperation, Palgrave Macmillan, New York 2005.
54. STIVACHTIS, Yannis A.-Benjamin Jones, “NATO’s Mediterranean Dialogue: An Assessment”, Research Institute for European and american Studies, RIEAS Research Paper, No: 137, November 2009, http://www.rieas.gr/images/rieas137.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 20.07.2016), pp. 1-21. Strategic Concept: Active Engagement, Modern Defence, in Lisbon 2010, http://www.nato.int/lisbon2010/strategic-concept-2010-eng.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 03.04.2016).
55. SOKOLSKY, Richard, “The New NATO-Russia Military Balance: Implications for European Security”, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Task Force White Paper, 13 March 2017, http://carnegieendowment.org/2017/03/13/new-nato-russia-military-balance-implications-for-european-security-pub-68222, (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2016).
56. TIGNER, Brooks, “EU 28 Create Operational and Planning HQ for CSDP Non-combat Missions”, IHS Jane’s Defense Weekly, 7 March 2017, http://www.janes.com/article/68532/eu-28-create-operational-and-planning-hq-for-csdp-non-combat-missions, (Erişim Tarihi: 12.03.2017).
57. TONELSON, Alan, “NATO Burden-Sharing: Promises, promises”, Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol: 23, Issue: 3, 2000.
58. UZGEL, İlhan, “ABD ve NATO’yla İlişkiler”, Baskın Oran, der., Türk Dış Politikası, Kurtuluş Savaşından Bugüne Olgular, Belgeler, Yorumlar, Cilt II, (1980-2001), İstanbul 2001.
59. UZGEL, İlhan, “İstanbul NATO Zirvesi”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt: 59, Sayı: 3, 2004, s. 255.
60. UZGEL, İlhan, “ABD ve NATO’yla İlişkiler”, Baskın Oran, der., Türk Dış Politikası, Kurtuluş Savaşından Bugüne Olgular, Belgeler, Yorumlar, Cilt: III, (2001-2012), İstanbul 2013, s. 307.
61. WEBB, Whitney, “U.S. to Deploy 4,000 Troops to Russian Border Next Month”, MintPress News, 23 December 2016, http://www.mintpressnews.com/u-s-to-deploy-4000-troops-to-russian-border-next-month/223435/, (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2016).
62. ZEVELEV, Igor, “NATO’s Enlargement and Russian Perceptions of Eurasian Political Frontiers”, NATO, 1998, http://www.nato.int/acad/fellow/98-00/zevelev.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 03.02.2016).