GÜNEY ÇİN DENİZİ’NDE TAHKİM: ÇİN-FİLİPİNLER REKABETİ

Abstract

Jeopolitik ve stratejik olarak Güney Çin Denizi önemli bir role sahiptir.  Çin, Tayvan, Vietnam, Filipinler, Malezya ve Brunei’nin Güney Çin Denizi’nde birbirlerine yönelik iddiaları bulunmaktadır. Bu nedenle Güney Çin Denizi, Doğu Asya’nın en tartışmalı ve karmaşık diplomatik konusunu oluşturmaktadır. 1974 yılından itibaren Güney Çin Denizi’ndeki anlaşmazlıklar giderek artmıştır. 2013 yılında, Filipinler tek taraflı olarak Çin’in bölgedeki faaliyetlerinin uluslararası hukuka aykırı olduğu gerekçesiyle Daimi Tahkim Mahkemesi’ne (PCA) başvurmuş ve takip eden üç yıl içinde mahkeme, Filipinler lehine karar vermiştir. Çin’in Daimi Hakemlik Mahkemesi’ne cevap olarak nasıl tepki vereceği altı çizilerek belirtilmektir. Sonuç olarak, uygulanabilir çözümler Güney Çin Denizi’ndeki anlaşmazlıkları ve çatışmaları çözmek için her iki tarafa da önerilmektedir.

Keywords

• Çin,Filipinler,Daimi Tahkim Mahkemesi,Güney Çin Denizi,Doğu Asya

Arbitration in the South China Sea: China-Philippines Competition

Abstract

Geopolitically and strategically, the South China Sea enjoys a significant role. China, Taiwan, Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, and Brunei all have rival claims in the South China Sea. Therefore, the South China Sea is the most controversial and complex diplomatic issue in East Asia. The disputes in the South China Sea since 1974 have steadily increased. In 2013, the Philippines unilaterally brought the arbitration case to the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA), saying that in the region Chinese activities were against international law. The aim of this study is to highlight the Chinese reaction how to respond the PCA. As a result, in this study workable solutions are proposed to both sides to settle disputes and conflicts in the South China Sea.

Keywords

• China,the Philippines,the Permanent Court of Arbitration,the South China Sea,East Asia

References

1. “China and Russia conduct war games in South China Sea”, DW, http://www.dw.com/en/china-and-russia-conduct-war-games-in-south-china-sea/a-19546393, (Erişim Tarihi: 31.03.2017).
2. “China hits back at US over South China Sea claims”, BBC, http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38729207, (Erişim Tarihi: 31.03.2017).
3. “Duterte cancels visit to disputed South China Sea island after warning from Beijing”, theguardian, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/13/duterte-cancels-visit-to-disputed-south-china-sea-island-after-warning-from-beijing, (Erişim Tarihi: 31.03.2017).
4. “Flight-tests check routes to Nansha airfields”, China Military, http://english.chinamil.com.cn/news-channels/2016-07/13/content_7151603.htm, (Erişim Tarihi: 30.03.2017).
5. “Manila Takes a Stand”, The Wall Street Journal, https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887323539804578261140985134254, (Erişim Tarihi: 30.03.2017).
6. BUSZYNSKI, Leszek, “The Origins and development of the South China maritime dispute”, Leszek Buszynski-Christopher B. Roberts, der., The South China Sea Maritime Dispute: Political, Legal and Regional Perspectives, Routledge, 2015.
7. CASTRO, Renato Cruz de, “The 2012 Scarborough Shoal stand-off. From stalemate to escalation of the South China dispute”, Leszek Buszynski-Christopher B. Roberts, der., The South China Sea Maritime Dispute: Political, Legal and Regional Perspectives, Routledge, 2015.
8. CLINTON, Hillary, “America’s Pacific Century”, http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/10/11/americas_pacific_century? page=0,0, (Erişim Tarihi: 01.04.2017).

9. HAGT, Eric-Matthew Durnin, “Space, China’s Tactical Frontier”, Journal of Strategic Studies, Cilt: 34, Sayı: 5, Şubat 2011, s. 733-761.
10. JU Hailong, China’s Maritime Power and Strategy History, National Security and Geopolitics, World Scientific Publishing, 2015.
11. MCCAIN, John, “Defining American Interests in Asia”, http://csis.org/files/attachments/120514_TPP _McCain_Transcript.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 04.04.2017).
12. NYE, Joseph, “A New Great Power Relationship?”, CHİNA-US Focus:Foreign Policy, 2013, http://www.chinausfocus.com/foreign-policy/a-new-great-power-relationship, (Erişim Tarihi: 04.04.2017).
13. LI, Mingjiang-Loh Mıng Hui Dylan, “China’s fluid assertiveness in the South China Sea dispute”, Andrew T. H. Tan, der., Security and Conflict in East Asia, Routledge, 2015.
14. RICH, Motoko, “Rodrigo Duterte, in Japan, Calls for U.S. Troops to Exit Philippines in 2 Years”, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/27/world/asia/philippines-president-rodrigo-duterte-japan.html?_r=0, (Erişim Tarihi: 01.04.2017).
15. TAY, Simon S. C., Asia Alone: The Dangerous Post-Crisis Divide from America, John Wiley Sons (Asia) Pte. Ltd, 2010.
16. THUCYDIDES, The Peloponnesian War, çev., Martin Hammond, Oxford World’s Classics, Oxford University Press, 2009.
17. XIAOYANG, Cao, “The US Asia-Pacific Rebalance Strategy versus China’s Belt and Road Initiative”, Jie Zhang, der., China’s Belt and Road Initiatives and Its Neighboring Diplomacy, World Scientific Publishing, 2017.