Bazı Nektarin Çeşitlerinde Yapraktan Kalsiyum ve Potasyum Uygulamalarının Meyve Verimi ve Kalite Özelliklerine Etkisi

Year 2020, Volume: 49 Issue: (Özel Sayı 1) 2. Uluslararası Tarım Kongresi, 145 - 151, 31.12.2020

Oğuzhan Çalışkan , Derya Kılıç , Gökhan Öztürk

Abstract

Bu çalışma, Gardeta, Gartairo ve Garofa nektarin çeşitlerinde hasat öncesi yapraktan AminoQuelant-Kalsiyum, AminoQuelant-Potasyum ve AminoQuelant-Kalsiyum+AminoQuelant-Potasyum uygulamalarının meyve kalitesine etkilerini belirlemek amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Yaprak uygulamaları; Garofa çeşidinde tam çiçeklenmeden 39 gün sonra, Gartairo çeşidinde 40 gün sonra ve Gardeta çeşidinde 36 gün sonra yapılmaya başlanmış ve birer hafta arayla 3 kez yinelenmiştir. Çalışmada, ağaç başına verim (kg) yanında meyve ağırlığı (g), meyve eni (mm), meyve boyu (mm), meyve yüksekliği (mm), meyve eti sertliği (kg-kuvvet), çekirdek ağırlığı (g), et-çekirdek oranı, suda çözünebilir kuru madde miktarı (SÇKM; %), pH ve asitlik (%) değerleri incelenmiştir. Ayrıca, meyve kabuk ve et rengi değerleri Minolta renk ölçer (L, a*, b*, C ve h°) ile ölçülmüştür. En yüksek ağaç başına verime AminoQuelant-Kalsiyum+AminoQuelant-Potasyum uygulaması (30.40 kg/ağaç) sahip olurken, en düşük verim kontrolden (17.20 kg) elde edilmiştir. En iri meyveler Aminoquelant-Kalsiyum uygulamasında (139.54 g) saptanırken, en küçük meyveler kontrolde (112.28 g) belirlenmiştir. AminoQuelant-Potasyum (4.00 kg-kuvvet) ve AminoQuelant-Kalsiyum+AminoQuelant-Potasyum (3.85 kg-kuvvet) meyve sertliğini artıran önemli uygulamalar olmuşlardır. SÇKM içeriği, %13.76 (AminoQuelant-Kalsiyum) ile %12.30 (kontrol) arasında değişmiştir. En koyu meyve kabuk ve et rengi değerleri (düşük chroma ve h°) AminoQuelant-Kalsiyum uygulamasından elde edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, nektarin çeşitlerinde yapraktan AminoQuelant-Kalsiyum ve AminoQuelant-Potasyum’un birlikte yapıldığı uygulamaların hem meyve verimi hem de meyve kalite özelliklerini olumlu yönde etkiledikleri belirlenmiştir.

Keywords

Prunus , nektarin , yapraktan besleme , verim , meyve iriliği

Effect of Foliar Calcium and Potassium Applications on Fruit Yield and Quality Characteristics of Some Nectarine Cultivars

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the effects of fruit quality on pre-harvest foliar AminoQuelant-Calcium, AminoQuelant-Potassium and AminoQuelant-Calcium+AminoQuelant-Potassium applications in Gardeta, Gartairo and Garofa nectarine cultivars. The foliar treatments were applied 39 days after full bloom in Garofa, 40 days after Gartairo and 36 days after Gardeta and repeated by one-week intervals in 3 times. In the study; fruit weight (g), fruit width (mm), fruit height (mm), fruit firmness (kg-force), seed weight (g), flesh/seed ratio, total soluble solids (TSS; %), pH and acidity (%) values, and also yield per tree were estimated. In addition, fruit skin and flesh color values were measured with Minolta color meter (L, a*, b*, C and h°). According to results of the study, while the highest yield per tree was obtained the application of AminoQuelant-Calcium+AminoQuelant-Potassium (30.40 kg/tree), the lowest yield was obtained from the control (17.20 kg). The largest fruits were detected in AminoQuelant-Calcium application (139.54 g), whereas the smallest fruits were detected in control (112.28 g). Applications of AminoQuelant-Potassium (4.00 kg-force) and AminoQuelant-Calcium+ AminoQuelant-Potassium (3.85 kg-force) had the highest fruit firmness. TSS content ranged from 13.76% (AminoQuelant-Calcium) to 12.3% (control). The darkest fruit skin and flesh values (low chroma and h°) were obtained from the application of AminoQuelant-Calcium. As a result, the connective application of foliar AminoQuelant-Calcium and AminoQuelant-Potassium in nectarine cultivars showed positive effect on both fruit yield and fruit quality characteristics.

Keywords

Prunus , nectarine , foliar fertilization , yield , fruit size

References

• Ali, I., Abbasi, N.A., Hafiz, I.A., 2014. Physiological response and quality attributes of peach fruit cv. Florida King as affected by different treatments of calcium chloride, putrescine and salicylic acid. Pak. J. Agri. Sci. 51:33-39.
• Anonymous, 2019. http://www.fao.org/faostat /en/#data/qc (Erişim Tarihi: 06.11.2019).
• Anonim, 2019-a. http://www.yms.org.tr/tr/ista tistikler-degerlendirme-raporlari.html. (Erişim Tarihi: 07.11.2019).
• Anonim, 2019-b. https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/ medas/?kn=104&locale=tr (Erişim Tarihi: 07.11.2019).
• Anonim, 2019-c. http://altintar.com/uploads/ belgeler/01560778904_altintar-katalog-2019. pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 10.11.2019).
• Batjer, L.P., Westwood, W.N., 1957. Seasonal trend of several nutrient elements in leaves and fruit of Elberta peach. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 71:116-126.
• Ben Mimoun, M., Ghrab, M., Ghanem M., Elloumi, O., 2009. Effects of potassium foliar spray on olive, peach and plum. Part 2: Peach and Plum Experiments. Research findings: Optimizing crop nutrition. 19:14-17.
• Chen-Bing, W., Kuan-Ying L., Jun-Qiang, C.N., 2011. Effect of foliar spraying KH₂PO₄ on photosynthetic characteristics and fruit quality of nectarine (Prunus persica var. nectarina Maxim). Acta Agriculturae Borealli Occidentalis Sinica. 2001-08.
• Crisosto, C.H., Day, K.R., Johnson R.S., Garner, D., 2000. Influence of in-deason foliar calcium sprays on fruit quality and surface discoloration incidence of peaches and nectarines. J. Amer. Pom. Soc. 54: 118-122.
• Crisosto, C.H., Costa, G., 2008. Preharvest factors affecting peach quality. The Peach: Botany, Production and Uses (eds. D.R. Layne and D. Bassi). CAB International, pp:536-549.
• Cuquel, F.L., Vargas Motta, A.C., Tutida, I., May De Mio, L.M., 2011. Nitrogen and potassium fertilization affecting the plum postharvest quality. Rev. Bras. Frutic. (Especial):328-336.
• Dbara, S., Gader, T., Mimoun, B., 2016. Improving yield and fruit quality of peach cv. ‘Flordastar’ by potassium foliar spray associated to regulated deficit irrigation. Agriculture and Biotechnology, 28:1631-1637.
• El-Razek, E.A., Saleh, M.M.S., 2012. Improve productivity and fruit quality of Florida Prince peach trees using foliar and soil applications of amino acids. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 12:1165-1172.
• Erogul, D., 2014. Effect of preharvest calcium treatments on sweet cherry fruit quality. Not Bot Horti Agrobo, 42(1):150-153.
• Ghanem, M., Ben Mimoun, M., 2010. Effects of potassium foliar sprays on Royal Glory peach trees. Acta Hortic. 868:261-266.
• Inglese, P., Gullo G., Pace, L.S., 2002. Fruit growth and olive oil quality in relation to foliar nutrition and time of application. Acta Hort. 586:507-509.
• Kader, A.A., 1999. Fruit maturity, ripening, and quality relationships. Acta Hortic. 485:203-208.
• Kamal, H.M., Eissa, M.A., Albayaty, A.A., 2014. Effect of calcium and boron foliar application on postharvest quality of Florida Prince peach fruit. Journal of Horticultural Science & Ornamental Plants 6:34-40.
• Kaşka N., Güleryüz M., Kaplankıran M., Kafkas S., Ercişli S., Eşitken A., Aslantaş R., Akçay E., 2005. Türkiye meyveciliğinde üretim hedefleri. Türkiye Ziraat Mühendisleri 6. Teknik Kongresi, 3-7.01.2005, s:519-549.
• Ruiz, R., 2006. Effects of different potassium fertilizers on yield, fruit quality and nutritional status of “Fairlane” nectarine trees and on soil fertility. Acta Hort. 721:185-190.
• Sharma, S.K., Pratima, P., 2018. Effect of pre-harvest gibberellic acid and calcium application on post-harvest behavior of subtropical peaches. Current Agriculture Research Journal 6:78-84.
• SAS Institute, 2005. SAS Online Doc, Version 9.1.3. SAS Inst., Cary, NC, USA.
• Tagliavini, M., Marangoni, B., 2002. Major nutritional issues in deciduous fruit orchards of north Italy. HortTechnol. 12:26-31.
• Tzoutzoukou, C.G., Bouranis, D.L., 1997. Effect of preharvest application of calcium on the postharvest physiology of apricot fruit. Journal of Plant Nutrition 20:295-309.
• Wang, D., Deng, X., Wang, B., Zhang, N., Zhu, C., Jaio, Z., Li, R., Shen, Q., 2019. Effects of foliar application of amino acid liquid fertilizers, with or without Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9, on cowpea yield and leaf microbiota. Plos One 14(9):e0222048.