Research Article

Comparison of VT-based and CNN-based Models on Teeth Segmentation

Volume: 13 Number: 2 June 30, 2025
EN

Comparison of VT-based and CNN-based Models on Teeth Segmentation

Abstract

Semantic segmentation is a crucial task in computer vision with a wide array of applications across various fields, especially in medical imaging. One of the most important applications of semantic segmentation is in the field of dentistry, where teeth segmentation plays a significant role in diagnosing and treating oral health issues. Accurate segmentation of teeth in dental images is vital for detecting abnormalities, planning treatments, and monitoring the progress of dental procedures. In this paper, a comprehensive comparative analysis is presented, focusing on the use of Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-based and Vision Transformer (VT)-based models for image segmentation within the context of dentistry. The paper presents a comparison of eight different models, contributing to the literature on dental image segmentation and showcasing practical applications in clinical dental settings. The research presented in this study uses several state-of-the-art segmentation models, namely U-Net, LinkNet, and Swin U-Net, along with different backbones to perform teeth segmentation on publicly available two datasets: one representing adults and the other children. The experiments were conducted to determine which models and backbones provided the best segmentation performance for each dataset. The study also emphasizes that the segmentation modeling process should be handled separately since the alignment of child and adult teeth is different. The U-Net model with the ResNet101 backbone achieved the best performance on the adults dataset, while for the children dataset, the U-Net model with the same ResNet101 backbone also demonstrated superior results. The highest Dice scores obtained were 0.9543 for the adults dataset and 0.9019 for the children dataset, indicating the effectiveness of these models in accurately segmenting teeth. The findings from this research demonstrate the potential of deep learning techniques in improving the accuracy and efficiency of dental diagnosis and treatment planning. Codes used throughout the study will be publicly available at https://github.com/FidanVural/Teeth-Segmentation-in- Panoramic-Radiography/tree/main

Keywords

Thanks

TÜBİTAK-BİLGEM

References

  1. [1] Y. Zhao et al., “TSASNet: Tooth segmentation on dental panoramic X-ray images by Two-Stage Attention Segmentation Network,” Knowl Based Syst, vol. 206, p. 106338, 2020.
  2. [2] A. Haghanifar, M. M. Majdabadi, S. Haghanifar, Y. Choi, and S.-B. Ko, “PaXNet: Tooth segmentation and dental caries detection in panoramic X-ray using ensemble transfer learning and capsule classifier,” Multimed Tools Appl, vol. 82, no. 18, pp. 27659–27679, 2023.
  3. [3] Y. Ariji et al., “Automatic detection and classification of radiolucent lesions in the mandible on panoramic radiographs using a deep learning object detection technique,” Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 424–430, 2019.
  4. [4] M. Fukuda et al., “Evaluation of an artificial intelligence system for detecting vertical root fracture on panoramic radiography,” Oral Radiol, vol. 36, pp. 337–343, 2020.
  5. [5] B. C. Uzun Saylan et al., “Assessing the effectiveness of artificial intelligence models for detecting alveolar bone loss in periodontal disease: a panoramic radiograph study,” Diagnostics, vol. 13, no. 10, p. 1800, 2023.
  6. [6] L. Schneider et al., “Federated vs local vs central deep learning of tooth segmentation on panoramic radiographs,” J Dent, vol. 135, p. 104556, 2023.
  7. [7] S. Park et al., “Deep learning-based automatic segmentation of mandible and maxilla in multi-center ct images,” Applied Sciences, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 1358, 2022.
  8. [8] N. Kumbasar, M. T. Güller, Ö. Miloğlu, E. A. Oral, and I. Y. Ozbek, “Deep-learning based fusion of spatial relationship classification between mandibular third molar and inferior alveolar nerve using panoramic radiograph images,” Biomed Signal Process Control, vol. 100, p. 107059, 2025.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Bioengineering (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

July 11, 2025

Publication Date

June 30, 2025

Submission Date

March 23, 2024

Acceptance Date

February 24, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 13 Number: 2

APA
Vural, Ş. F., & Kumbasar, N. (2025). Comparison of VT-based and CNN-based Models on Teeth Segmentation. Balkan Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 13(2), 148-156. https://doi.org/10.17694/bajece.1457754
AMA
1.Vural ŞF, Kumbasar N. Comparison of VT-based and CNN-based Models on Teeth Segmentation. Balkan Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering. 2025;13(2):148-156. doi:10.17694/bajece.1457754
Chicago
Vural, Şilan Fidan, and Nida Kumbasar. 2025. “Comparison of VT-Based and CNN-Based Models on Teeth Segmentation”. Balkan Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 13 (2): 148-56. https://doi.org/10.17694/bajece.1457754.
EndNote
Vural ŞF, Kumbasar N (June 1, 2025) Comparison of VT-based and CNN-based Models on Teeth Segmentation. Balkan Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 13 2 148–156.
IEEE
[1]Ş. F. Vural and N. Kumbasar, “Comparison of VT-based and CNN-based Models on Teeth Segmentation”, Balkan Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 148–156, June 2025, doi: 10.17694/bajece.1457754.
ISNAD
Vural, Şilan Fidan - Kumbasar, Nida. “Comparison of VT-Based and CNN-Based Models on Teeth Segmentation”. Balkan Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 13/2 (June 1, 2025): 148-156. https://doi.org/10.17694/bajece.1457754.
JAMA
1.Vural ŞF, Kumbasar N. Comparison of VT-based and CNN-based Models on Teeth Segmentation. Balkan Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering. 2025;13:148–156.
MLA
Vural, Şilan Fidan, and Nida Kumbasar. “Comparison of VT-Based and CNN-Based Models on Teeth Segmentation”. Balkan Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, vol. 13, no. 2, June 2025, pp. 148-56, doi:10.17694/bajece.1457754.
Vancouver
1.Şilan Fidan Vural, Nida Kumbasar. Comparison of VT-based and CNN-based Models on Teeth Segmentation. Balkan Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering. 2025 Jun. 1;13(2):148-56. doi:10.17694/bajece.1457754

Cited By

All articles published by BAJECE are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This permits anyone to copy, redistribute, remix, transmit and adapt the work provided the original work and source is appropriately cited.Creative Commons Lisansı