Implementation of a Low-Cost, Real-Time Assessment System for Primary School Classrooms

Abstract

The integration of technology in educational surroundings has evolved from a supplemental enhancement to an essential element of modern education. In response to this shift, there is a growing need for cost-effective tools that can increase student engagement and streamline the assessment process for primary students. This study presents the design and implementation of a low-cost, real-time assessment system tailored specifically for primary school classrooms. Utilizing Arduino-based receivers and student-operated remote controllers, the system provides an affordable and scalable alternative to traditional student response systems. Field tests were conducted with 26 students aged 9 to 10 in a public primary school, where the system's effectiveness was evaluated through teacher observations and student feedback. Results indicate that the system significantly increased student participation, focus, and enjoyment during assessments compared to traditional paper-based methods. Despite some challenges, the system demonstrates great potential as a practical tool for resource-constrained educational environments, with future development focusing on addressing scalability and technical limitations.

Keywords

• Interactive learning
• Low-cost educational tools
• Real-time assessment system

References

1. [1] R. E. Anderson, "Implications of the information and knowledge society for education," International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education, pp. 5-22, 2008.
2. [2] D. Passey, "Technology‐enhanced learning: Rethinking the term, the concept and its theoretical background," British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 972-986, 2019.
3. [3] P. Black and D. Wiliam, "Assessment and classroom learning," Assessment in Education: principles, policy & practice, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 7-74, 1998.
4. [4] J. W. Gikandi, D. Morrow, and N. E. Davis, "Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature," Computers & education, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 2333-2351, 2011.
5. [5] M. Martyn, "Clickers in the classroom: An active learning approach," Educause quarterly, vol. 30, no. 2, p. 71, 2007.
6. [6] B. Clarke et al., "Conducting a cost-effectiveness analysis of an early numeracy intervention," School Psychology Review, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 359-373, 2020.
7. [7] S.-Y. Chien, G.-J. Hwang, and M. S.-Y. Jong, "Effects of peer assessment within the context of spherical video-based virtual reality on EFL students’ English-Speaking performance and learning perceptions," Computers & Education, vol. 146, p. 103751, 2020.
8. [8] N. Bergdahl, J. Nouri, U. Fors, and O. Knutsson, "Engagement, disengagement and performance when learning with technologies in upper secondary school," Computers & Education, vol. 149, p. 103783, 2020.

9. [9] B. Swetha, R. P. Rao, V. Rojit, and V. Kumar, "A low-cost classroom response system," presented at the 2017 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), 2017.
10. [10] I. A. Zualkernan, "Design and implementation of a low-cost classroom response system for a future classroom in the developing world," IxD&A, vol. 15, pp. 68-84, 2012.
11. [11] R. Davidrajuh, "Java bluetooth wireless technology for evaluating student performance in classroom," Communications of the IIMA, vol. 5, no. 4, 2005.
12. [12] J. V. Alviar and A. E. Gamorez, "Perceptions of the Senior High School Students on the Use of Classroom Response System in Learning Mathematics," International Journal of Social Science And Human Research, vol. 05, no. 10, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i10-25.
13. [13] J. B. Ibarra, M. V. Caya, T. J. D. Maglaki, A. C. A. Manuel, and C. A. N. Yumul, "Android-based student response system as a learning tool in the classroom," in 2018 IEEE 10th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment and Management (HNICEM), 2018: IEEE, pp. 1-4.
14. [14] J. Lu, M. Joy, G. Newton, J. Robert, M. Yousef, and S. McKenna, "Use of a student response system in primary schools—An empirical study," International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 324-330, 2019.
15. [15] Y.-C. J. Wu, T. Wu, and Y. Li, "Impact of using classroom response systems on students' entrepreneurship learning experience," Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 92, pp. 634-645, 2019.
16. [16] I. Murat and A. Emrah. News about Turkey from BBC, CNN, TG and FOX, Kaggle, doi: 10.34740/KAGGLE/DSV/7325213.
17. [17] M. Tufail and N. Zehra, "Investigating the Involvement of Parents in Their Children’s Education at Primary School Level," Journal of Education and Social Studies, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 412-423, 2023.
18. [18] M. Sihotang, U. Utari, and T. Sihotang, "The Impact of Evaluation Methods on Students' Learning Achievement in Primary School Mathematics Education: A Mixed-Methods Study," Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Humaniora, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1-17, 01/30 2022, doi: 10.35335/jiph.v11i1.12.
19. [19] K. Çökük and İ. Kozikoğlu, "School readiness of primary school students in mixed-age classrooms: School readiness of primary school students," International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1597-1619, 2021.
20. [20] A. Ghanem and R. AlTawy, "Garage door openers: A rolling code protocol case study," in 2022 19th Annual International Conference on Privacy, Security & Trust (PST), 2022: IEEE, pp. 1-6.
21. [21] Q. Yang, L. Huang, Q. Yang, and L. Huang, "433/315 MHz Communication," Inside Radio: An Attack and Defense Guide, pp. 123-171, 2018.