Determination of the Ideal Protocol Stack for the Transmission of Health Data over 6LoWPAN IoT Networks

Abstract

It is expected that almost every day electronic devices will be connected to the existing internet infrastructure in the context of Internet of Things (IoT). These devices will enable to sense and actuate the physical world. It is foreseen that miniaturized e-health devices will enable monitoring vital health of patients. There exist some studies on networking these e-health devices within the Internet. In this realm, several network protocols are being standardized. 6LoWPAN of IETF is one of these efforts where some set of protocols can be stacked over IEEE 802.15.4 radio. However, it is not clear that which ideal protocol stack for transmission of health data can be adopted well. The novelty of this work is that we studied determination of ideal protocol stack for transmitting health data over 6LoWPAN IoT networks. So then, we carried extensive simulations over Cooja simulator. The compelling results are presented in this work. The results show that 6LoWPAN IoT health networks can be used to serve vital health data of patients.

Keywords

• internet of things,6lowpan,coap,medium access control,radio duty cycling

Project Number

Tübitak - 116E025, BAP - 16103002

References

1. [1] L. Atzori, A. Iera, and G. Morabito, “The internet of things: A survey,” Comput. networks, vol. 54, no. 15, pp. 2787–2805, 2010.
2. [2] V. Gazis, “A Survey of Standards for Machine-to-Machine and the Internet of Things,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 482–511, 2017.
3. [3] Z. Shelby and C. Bormann, “Introduction, in 6LoWPAN: The Wireless Embedded Internet,” in 6LoWPAN, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2009, pp. 1–25.
4. [4] D. A. Gandhi and M. Ghosal, “Intelligent Healthcare Using IoT:A Extensive Survey,” Proc. Int. Conf. Inven. Commun. Comput. Technol. ICICCT 2018, no. Icicct, pp. 800–802, 2018.
5. [5] H. Ahmadi, G. Arji, L. Shahmoradi, R. Safdari, M. Nilashi, and M. Alizadeh, The application of internet of things in healthcare: a systematic literature review and classification, vol. 18, no. 4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2018.
6. [6] A. Elsts et al., “Enabling Healthcare in Smart Homes: The SPHERE IoT Network Infrastructure,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 164–170, 2018.
7. [7] E. L. Lydia, K. Shankar, M. Ilayaraja, and K. S. Kumar, “Technological Solutions for Health Care Protection and Services Through Internet Of Things(IoT),” Int. J. Pure Appl. Math., vol. 118, no. 7 Special Issue, pp. 277–282, 2018.
8. [8] K. Kabilan, N. Bhalaji, and S. Chithra, Analysis of 6LOWPAN and CoAP protocols for maternal health care, vol. 521. Springer Singapore, 2019.

9. [9] J. Hwa Jung, D. Kyu Choi, J. In Kim, and S. Joo Koh, “Mobility management for healthcare services in coap-based iot networks,” Int. Conf. Inf. Netw., vol. 2019-Janua, pp. 7–12, 2019.
10. [10] A. Sehgal, “Using the contiki cooja simulator,” Comput. Sci. Jacobs Univ. Bremen Campus Ring, vol. 1, p. 28759, 2013.
11. [11] A. Dunkels, O. Schmidt, N. Finne, J. Eriksson, F. Österlind, and N. T. M. Durvy, “The contiki os: The operating system for the internet of things,” Online], http//www. contikios. org, vol. 605, 2011.
12. [12] M. Kovatsch, M. Lanter, and Z. Shelby, “Californium: Scalable cloud services for the internet of things with coap,” in 2014 International Conference on the Internet of Things (IOT), 2014, pp. 1–6.
13. [13] M. Kovatsch, S. Duquennoy, and A. Dunkels, “A low-power CoAP for Contiki,” Proc. - 8th IEEE Int. Conf. Mob. Ad-hoc Sens. Syst. MASS 2011, pp. 855–860, 2011.