Review
BibTex RIS Cite

SIFIR ATIK TEDARİK ZİNCİRİNE GENEL BİR BAKIŞ

Year 2024, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 262 - 279, 31.12.2024
https://doi.org/10.46452/baksoder.1572222

Abstract

Bu çalışma, sıfır atık tedarik zinciri yaklaşımını çevresel sürdürülebilirlik ve kaynak verimliliği açısından incelemeyi ve iş dünyasındaki uygulamalarını değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Sıfır atık, tedarik zincirinin üretimden dağıtıma kadar her aşamasında atıkların en aza indirilmesine, geri dönüşümün teşvik edilmesine ve kaynakların yeniden kullanımının artırılmasına odaklanan bir stratejidir. Çalışma, sıfır atık stratejilerinin uygulanmasında karşılaşılan zorlukları, yasal düzenlemelerin ve teşviklerin rolünü, gelecekteki eğilimleri ve yenilikçi çözümleri ele almaktadır. Ayrıca, bu stratejilerin iş dünyasında uygulanabilirliğini artırmak için altyapı yatırımlarının ve farkındalık çalışmalarının önemine dikkat çekilmektedir.
Sonuçlar, sıfır atık stratejilerinin başarıyla hayata geçirilmesi için kamu-özel sektör iş birliğiyle yapılacak altyapı yatırımlarının önemini vurgulamaktadır. Ayrıca, tüketicilerin geri dönüşüm ve yeniden kullanım konusunda eğitilmesi gerektiğine ve hükümetlerin yasal düzenlemeleri genişletmesi ve teşvikleri artırması gerektiğine dikkat çekilmektedir. Şirketler için ise maliyetlerin düşürülmesi, döngüsel ekonomi prensiplerinin benimsenmesi ve akıllı teknolojilerin entegrasyonu gibi stratejiler önerilmektedir.
Bu çalışma, sıfır atık tedarik zinciri literatüründeki bir boşluğu doldurarak, bu stratejilerin farklı sektörlerde nasıl uygulanabileceğine ve karşılaşılan zorlukların nasıl aşılabileceğine odaklanmaktadır. Özellikle gelişmekte olan ülkelerde sıfır atık stratejilerinin uygulanmasına ve dijital teknolojilerin bu süreçlere entegrasyonuna yönelik daha fazla araştırma yapılması gerektiği belirtilmektedir. Böylece çalışma, literatüre teorik katkılar sunarken, aynı zamanda gerçek dünyada uygulanabilir pratik öneriler de geliştirmektedir

Ethical Statement

I declare that this research does not require ethical committee approval.

References

  • Bocken, N. M. P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124
  • Braungart, M., McDonough, W., & Bollinger, A. (2007). Cradle-to-cradle design: Creating healthy emissions – a strategy for eco-effective product and system design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(13-14), 1337-1348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.08.003
  • Dutta, P., Kumar, V., Choudhary, A., & Tripathi, S. (2021). Collaborative efforts for sustainability in supply chain management: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 124989.
  • Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130-141. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.323
  • Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2013). Towards the circular economy: Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. Ellen MacArthur Foundation.
  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Capstone Publishing. European Commission. (2008). Directive 2008/98/EC on waste (Waste Framework Directive). Official Journal of the European Union. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32008L0098
  • Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy – A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757-768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
  • Geyer, R., Lindner, A., & Ingwersen, W. W. (2008). Closing the material loop: Best-in-class life cycle assessment for a leading PET recycling process. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52(10), 1188-1196.
  • Hazen, B. T., Boone, C. A., Ezell, J. D., & Jones-Farmer, L. A. (2014). Data quality for data-driven supply chain management: A decision support perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 154, 72-80.
  • Hopewell, J., Dvorak, R., & Kosior, E. (2009). Plastics recycling: Challenges and opportunities. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1526), 2115-2126. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0311
  • Hubbard, G. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: Beyond the triple bottom line. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(3), 177-191. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.564
  • Interface. (2019). Net-Works: Turning waste into opportunity. Interface. Retrieved from https://interface.com
  • Jensen, P. L., & Jørgensen, K. (2013). Strategies for zero waste: Public–private partnerships and local initiatives. Sustainability, 5(11), 4824-4844.
  • Kang, H. Y., & Schoenung, J. M. (2005). Electronic waste recycling: A review of U.S. infrastructure and technology options. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 45(4), 368-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.06.001
  • Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
  • Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A., & Seppälä, J. (2018). Circular economy: The concept and its limitations. Ecological Economics, 143, 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041
  • Kozlowski, A. (2017). Sustainable supply chain management in the textile industry: A focus on Germany. Sustainability, 9(8), 1524.
  • Kroger. (2019). Zero Hunger | Zero Waste Initiative. Kroger. Retrieved from https://thekrogerco.com
  • Kumar, V., & Singh, A. (2020). The impact of regulations and incentives on the adoption of circular economy practices: A case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264, 121569.
  • Kusiak, A. (2018). Smart manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1-2), 508-517. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1351644
  • Leblanc, R. (2015). Reducing waste and recycling in the supply chain: The role of reverse logistics. Journal of Business Logistics, 36(1), 21-32.
  • Lee, J., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H. A. (2015). A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters, 3(1), 18-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001
  • Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2017). Business models for sustainability: Towards a conceptual framework. Organization & Environment, 29(1), 54-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615599806
  • Mann, P., Menendez, P., Polanczyk, A., & Chen, X. (2023). Integrating circular economy principles into supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 339, 130870.
  • McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. North Point Press.
  • Morrow, M. C. (2007). Corporate sustainability and stakeholder management. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(2), 157-169.

AN OVERVIEW OF ZERO WASTE SUPPLY CHAIN

Year 2024, Volume: 8 Issue: 2, 262 - 279, 31.12.2024
https://doi.org/10.46452/baksoder.1572222

Abstract

This study aims to examine the zero-waste supply chain approach in terms of environmental sustainability and resource efficiency, while evaluating its application in the business world. Zero waste refers to a strategy that focuses on minimizing waste, promoting recycling, and encouraging the reuse of resources throughout the supply chain, from production to distribution. The study explores the challenges in implementing zero-waste strategies, the role of legal regulations and incentives, as well as future trends and innovative solutions. It also emphasizes the importance of infrastructure investments and awareness-raising efforts to increase the applicability of these strategies in business environments.
The results underline the significance of infrastructure investments through public-private partnerships to ensure the successful implementation of zero-waste strategies. Furthermore, it highlights the need for educating consumers on recycling and reuse and emphasizes that governments should expand legal regulations and increase incentives. For companies, strategies such as cost reduction, adopting circular economy principles, and integrating smart technologies are recommended.
This study fills a gap in the literature on the zero-waste supply chain by focusing on how these strategies can be implemented across various sectors and how the associated challenges can be overcome. It specifically points out the need for further research on the implementation of zero-waste strategies in developing countries and the integration of digital technologies into these processes. Thus, the study not only provides theoretical contributions to the literature but also develops practical recommendations for real-world applications.

References

  • Bocken, N. M. P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124
  • Braungart, M., McDonough, W., & Bollinger, A. (2007). Cradle-to-cradle design: Creating healthy emissions – a strategy for eco-effective product and system design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(13-14), 1337-1348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.08.003
  • Dutta, P., Kumar, V., Choudhary, A., & Tripathi, S. (2021). Collaborative efforts for sustainability in supply chain management: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 124989.
  • Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130-141. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.323
  • Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2013). Towards the circular economy: Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. Ellen MacArthur Foundation.
  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Capstone Publishing. European Commission. (2008). Directive 2008/98/EC on waste (Waste Framework Directive). Official Journal of the European Union. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32008L0098
  • Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy – A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757-768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
  • Geyer, R., Lindner, A., & Ingwersen, W. W. (2008). Closing the material loop: Best-in-class life cycle assessment for a leading PET recycling process. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52(10), 1188-1196.
  • Hazen, B. T., Boone, C. A., Ezell, J. D., & Jones-Farmer, L. A. (2014). Data quality for data-driven supply chain management: A decision support perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 154, 72-80.
  • Hopewell, J., Dvorak, R., & Kosior, E. (2009). Plastics recycling: Challenges and opportunities. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1526), 2115-2126. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0311
  • Hubbard, G. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: Beyond the triple bottom line. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(3), 177-191. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.564
  • Interface. (2019). Net-Works: Turning waste into opportunity. Interface. Retrieved from https://interface.com
  • Jensen, P. L., & Jørgensen, K. (2013). Strategies for zero waste: Public–private partnerships and local initiatives. Sustainability, 5(11), 4824-4844.
  • Kang, H. Y., & Schoenung, J. M. (2005). Electronic waste recycling: A review of U.S. infrastructure and technology options. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 45(4), 368-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.06.001
  • Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
  • Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A., & Seppälä, J. (2018). Circular economy: The concept and its limitations. Ecological Economics, 143, 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041
  • Kozlowski, A. (2017). Sustainable supply chain management in the textile industry: A focus on Germany. Sustainability, 9(8), 1524.
  • Kroger. (2019). Zero Hunger | Zero Waste Initiative. Kroger. Retrieved from https://thekrogerco.com
  • Kumar, V., & Singh, A. (2020). The impact of regulations and incentives on the adoption of circular economy practices: A case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264, 121569.
  • Kusiak, A. (2018). Smart manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1-2), 508-517. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1351644
  • Leblanc, R. (2015). Reducing waste and recycling in the supply chain: The role of reverse logistics. Journal of Business Logistics, 36(1), 21-32.
  • Lee, J., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H. A. (2015). A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters, 3(1), 18-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001
  • Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2017). Business models for sustainability: Towards a conceptual framework. Organization & Environment, 29(1), 54-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615599806
  • Mann, P., Menendez, P., Polanczyk, A., & Chen, X. (2023). Integrating circular economy principles into supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 339, 130870.
  • McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. North Point Press.
  • Morrow, M. C. (2007). Corporate sustainability and stakeholder management. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(2), 157-169.
There are 26 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Supply Chain Management
Journal Section Review Article
Authors

Deniz Çınar 0009-0000-0373-901X

Publication Date December 31, 2024
Submission Date October 23, 2024
Acceptance Date December 13, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 8 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Çınar, D. (2024). AN OVERVIEW OF ZERO WASTE SUPPLY CHAIN. Uluslararası Batı Karadeniz Sosyal Ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi, 8(2), 262-279. https://doi.org/10.46452/baksoder.1572222

All articles sent to the journal are checked by the plagiarism program before the evaluation process.

USOBED works under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

cc by nc sa 4.0 ile ilgili görsel sonucu