Research Article

The Relationship between Content and Implementation of Negotiated Agreements in Former Yugoslavia

Number: 4 June 20, 2020
EN

The Relationship between Content and Implementation of Negotiated Agreements in Former Yugoslavia

Abstract

This article presents a framework that need to be considered in the design and analysis of negotiated agreements dealing with ‘ethnic conflict’ and civil wars. Such agreements implemented from above with third-party interventions must include consideration of how they affect: i) the local rationality structure (both intra- and inter-ethnic relations); ii) structural conditions; iii) institutional conditions and relations; and iv) the space for contestation of implementation. If left unattended these dimensions may recreate tension for years to come, block implementation and generate risk of relapse into violent conflict. The framework is applied in the analysis of negotiations drawn from the case of former Yugoslavia and demonstrates how several of the dimensions become relevant at different stages in different contexts.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

School of Global Studies, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.

References

  1. A.D Smith, National Identity, London: Penguin Books, 1991.
  2. A. Salihu, M. Hajrullahu and J. Xharra, ‘Radicals Test the Ground in Drenica’ Balkan Crisis Report No 498, 20 May 2004. London: Institute for War & Peace Reporting, 2004.
  3. Biljana Vankovska, ‘The Role of the Ohrid Framework Agreement and the Peace Process in Macedonia’, in S. Bianchini, J. Marko, C. Nation, and A M. Uvalic (Eds.), Regional Cooperation, Peace Enforcement, and the Role of the Treaties in the Balkans, Ravenna: A. Longo Editore, 2007, pp. 41–63.
  4. D. Janjić, Kosovo under the Reign of Slobodan Milosevic, Belgrade: Forum for Ethnic Relations, Institute of Social Sciences, 2009. Daniel Druckman and Cecilia Albin, ‘Distributive Justice and the Durability of Peace Agreements’, Review of International Studies, 37, 2011, pp. 1137–1168.
  5. Daniel Lindvall, The Limits of the European Vision in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis: Stockholm Studies in Sociology, New Series 40, 2009.
  6. Dayton 1995: http://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/ BA_951121_DaytonAgreement.pdf (please add accessed date)
  7. Deiniol Jones, Cosmopolitan Mediation? Conflict Resolution and the Oslo Accords, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1999.
  8. Desirée Nilsson, ‘Anchoring the Peace: Civil Society Actors in Peace Accords and Durable Peace’, International Interactions, 38(2), 2012, pp. 243–266.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 20, 2020

Submission Date

January 20, 2020

Acceptance Date

May 24, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Number: 4

APA
Schulz, M., & Sörensen, J. S. (2020). The Relationship between Content and Implementation of Negotiated Agreements in Former Yugoslavia. Journal of Balkan and Black Sea Studies, 4, 79-108. https://izlik.org/JA64CH86CY
AMA
1.Schulz M, Sörensen JS. The Relationship between Content and Implementation of Negotiated Agreements in Former Yugoslavia. BALKAR. 2020;(4):79-108. https://izlik.org/JA64CH86CY
Chicago
Schulz, Michael, and Jens Stilhoff Sörensen. 2020. “The Relationship Between Content and Implementation of Negotiated Agreements in Former Yugoslavia”. Journal of Balkan and Black Sea Studies, nos. 4: 79-108. https://izlik.org/JA64CH86CY.
EndNote
Schulz M, Sörensen JS (June 1, 2020) The Relationship between Content and Implementation of Negotiated Agreements in Former Yugoslavia. Journal of Balkan and Black Sea Studies 4 79–108.
IEEE
[1]M. Schulz and J. S. Sörensen, “The Relationship between Content and Implementation of Negotiated Agreements in Former Yugoslavia”, BALKAR, no. 4, pp. 79–108, June 2020, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA64CH86CY
ISNAD
Schulz, Michael - Sörensen, Jens Stilhoff. “The Relationship Between Content and Implementation of Negotiated Agreements in Former Yugoslavia”. Journal of Balkan and Black Sea Studies. 4 (June 1, 2020): 79-108. https://izlik.org/JA64CH86CY.
JAMA
1.Schulz M, Sörensen JS. The Relationship between Content and Implementation of Negotiated Agreements in Former Yugoslavia. BALKAR. 2020;:79–108.
MLA
Schulz, Michael, and Jens Stilhoff Sörensen. “The Relationship Between Content and Implementation of Negotiated Agreements in Former Yugoslavia”. Journal of Balkan and Black Sea Studies, no. 4, June 2020, pp. 79-108, https://izlik.org/JA64CH86CY.
Vancouver
1.Michael Schulz, Jens Stilhoff Sörensen. The Relationship between Content and Implementation of Negotiated Agreements in Former Yugoslavia. BALKAR [Internet]. 2020 Jun. 1;(4):79-108. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA64CH86CY