Research Article

HOBBESIAN UNDERSTANDING OF WAR AND PEACE, STATE AND SOCIETY

Volume: 3 Number: 2 December 31, 2020
TR EN

HOBBESIAN UNDERSTANDING OF WAR AND PEACE, STATE AND SOCIETY

Abstract

Peace and war are perennial themes in international relations, attention paid to both victors and the vanquished. Related to this, in his great work Leviathan, Hobbes develops a theory of rights which has not garnered the attention that it warrants. One particular reason for this concerns the rights Hobbes describes for subjects being regarded as lacking credibility or strength once a sovereign is instituted, due to the absolute power of the sovereign. The rights that subjects hold are considered to be natural rights, which exist in the state of nature and only to be relinquished once the sovereign is in place. The scholarly narrative views Hobbesian subjects, as giving up all their natural rights to the sovereign. Focusing upon the union pact as well as other novel concepts, I use inductive arguments to arrive at the Hobbesian proposition that change from one civil government to another can be made through war, i.e., by passing through the state of nature in which life is nasty, brutish and short.

Keywords

References

  1. Bobbio, N. (1993). Thomas Hobbes and the natural law tradition. University of Chicago Press.
  2. Brown, C. W. (1987). Thucydides, Hobbes, and the Derivation of Anarchy. History of Political Thought, 8(1)
  3. D. Baumgold (Ed.), Three-Text Edition of Thomas Hobbes's Political Theory: The Elements of Law, De Cive and Leviathan (pp. 206-233). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chapter 20 of The Elements of Law / Chapter 6 of De Cive / Chapter 18 of Leviathan. (2017). doi:10.1017/9781316651544.018
  4. Forsyth, M. (1979). Thomas Hobbes and the external relations of states. British Journal of International Studies, 5(3), 196-209.
  5. Johnson, L. M. (2020). Thucydides, Hobbes, and the Interpretation of Realism. Cornell University Press.
  6. Mouffe, C. (2009). Democracy in a multipolar world. Millennium, 37(3), 549-561.
  7. Peters, R. S. (1967). Hobbes, Thomas. The encyclopedia of philosophy.
  8. Sabine, G. H. (1951). A History of Political Theory (New York, 1937).

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Süreyya Yiğit *
United Kingdom

Publication Date

December 31, 2020

Submission Date

September 3, 2020

Acceptance Date

January 4, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 3 Number: 2

APA
Yiğit, S. (2020). HOBBESIAN UNDERSTANDING OF WAR AND PEACE, STATE AND SOCIETY. Bandırma Onyedi Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2), 141-149. https://doi.org/10.38120/banusad.789936
AMA
1.Yiğit S. HOBBESIAN UNDERSTANDING OF WAR AND PEACE, STATE AND SOCIETY. BANU SSRJ. 2020;3(2):141-149. doi:10.38120/banusad.789936
Chicago
Yiğit, Süreyya. 2020. “HOBBESIAN UNDERSTANDING OF WAR AND PEACE, STATE AND SOCIETY”. Bandırma Onyedi Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi 3 (2): 141-49. https://doi.org/10.38120/banusad.789936.
EndNote
Yiğit S (December 1, 2020) HOBBESIAN UNDERSTANDING OF WAR AND PEACE, STATE AND SOCIETY. Bandırma Onyedi Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi 3 2 141–149.
IEEE
[1]S. Yiğit, “HOBBESIAN UNDERSTANDING OF WAR AND PEACE, STATE AND SOCIETY”, BANU SSRJ, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 141–149, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.38120/banusad.789936.
ISNAD
Yiğit, Süreyya. “HOBBESIAN UNDERSTANDING OF WAR AND PEACE, STATE AND SOCIETY”. Bandırma Onyedi Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi 3/2 (December 1, 2020): 141-149. https://doi.org/10.38120/banusad.789936.
JAMA
1.Yiğit S. HOBBESIAN UNDERSTANDING OF WAR AND PEACE, STATE AND SOCIETY. BANU SSRJ. 2020;3:141–149.
MLA
Yiğit, Süreyya. “HOBBESIAN UNDERSTANDING OF WAR AND PEACE, STATE AND SOCIETY”. Bandırma Onyedi Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol. 3, no. 2, Dec. 2020, pp. 141-9, doi:10.38120/banusad.789936.
Vancouver
1.Süreyya Yiğit. HOBBESIAN UNDERSTANDING OF WAR AND PEACE, STATE AND SOCIETY. BANU SSRJ. 2020 Dec. 1;3(2):141-9. doi:10.38120/banusad.789936