BASİT TOPLAMLI AĞIRLIKLANDIRMA VE AĞIRLIKLI ÇARPIM YÖNTEMİ KULLANILARAK BİR MOBİLYA ÜRETİM İŞLETMESİNDE MATKAP SEÇİMİ

Öz

Mobilya sektörü; ahşap, metal ve plastik gibi malzemeleri tüketicilerin istek/ihtiyaçlarına göre tasarlayarak çeşitli ihtiyaçlarını gidermeye yönelik ürünler üreten büyük bir sektördür. Bu sektörde firmaların hedeflerine ulaşabilmesi ve performansını arttırabilmesinde kullanılan araç-gereçler önemli bir yere sahiptir. Üretim sürecinde doğru araç-gereç seçimi; maliyetleri azaltması, verimliliği arttırması ve doğru ürün tasarımı ile müşteri memnuniyeti sağlaması açısından önemlidir. Bu çalışmada mobilya sektöründe faaliyet gösteren bir işletme için matkap seçimi problemi ele alınmıştır. Çok Kriterli Karar Verme (ÇKKV) tekniklerinden Basit Toplamlı Ağırlıklandırma ve Ağırlıklı Çarpım Yöntemi birlikte kullanılarak işletmeye en uygun matkabın seçilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu matkap seçimi için literatür taraması ve uzmanlarla yapılan görüşmeler sonucunda 6 ana kriter belirlenmiştir. Ölçüt ağırlıklarının belirlenmesinde basit puanlama tekniği kullanılmış ve alternatifler iki farklı ÇKKV yöntemi ile sıralanmıştır. Çalışmanın sonucunda firmaya en uygun olan matkap (A5) seçimi gerçekleştirilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Basit Toplamlı Ağırlıklandırma,
• ÇKKV
• , Üretim İşletmesi

DRILL SELECTION IN A FURNITURE PRODUCTION FACILITY WITH SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING AND WEIGHTED PRODUCT METHOD

Abstract

The furniture industry is a large sector that designs materials such as wood, metal and plastic according to the wishes / needs of consumers and produces products to meet their various needs. The tools and equipment used for companies to achieve their goals and increase their performance have an important role in this sector. Choosing the right tools and equipment in the production process is important in terms of reducing costs, increasing efficiency and ensuring customer satisfaction with the right product design. In this study, the problem of choosing a drill for a company that operating in the furniture industry is discussed. It is aimed to choose the most suitable drill for the business by using the Simple Additive Weighting and Weighted Product Method. As a result of literature review and interviews with experts, 6 main criteria were determined for this drill selection. Simple scoring technique was used to determine the criterion weights, and alternatives were listed using two different MCDM methods. As a result of the study, the most suitable drill (A5) was selected for the company.

Keywords

• Furniture
• Handdrill
• Production
• MCDM

References

1. Abadi, S., Huda, M., Teh, K. S. M., Haron, Z., Ripin, M. N., Hehsan, A., & Maseleno, A. (2018), Hazard Level of Vehicle Smoke by Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making With Simple Additive Weighting Method, International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 10(4), 58-71.
2. Abadi, S., Huda, M., Jasmi, K. A., Noor, S. S. M., Safar, J., Mohamed, A. K., & Hartati, S. (2018), Determination of the Best Quail Eggs Using Simple Additive Weighting, International Journal of Engineering and Technology (UAE), 7(2.27), 225-230.
3. Abdullah, L., Adawiyah R., C. W. (2014), Simple Additive Weighting Methods of Multi Criteria Decision Making and Applications: A Decade Review, International Journal of Information Processing and Management (IJIPM), 5(1), 34-49.
4. Adela, H., Jasmi, K. A., Basiron, B., Huda, M., & Maseleno, A. (2018), Selection of Dancer Member Using Simple Additive Weighting, International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3), 1096-1107.
5. Adianto, T. R., Arifin, Z., & Khairina, D.M. (2017), Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Rumah Tinggal Di Perumahan Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) (Studi Kasus : Kota Samarinda). Prosiding Seminar Ilmu Komputer dan Teknologi Informasi, 2(1),197–201.
6. Adriyendi, A.(2015), Multi-Attribute Decision Making Using Simple Additive Weighting and Weighted Product in Food Choice.”, 6(1).8-14.
7. Afrianda CA., & Sarno, R. (2018), Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Methods in Singer Selection Process. In 2018 International Conference on Information and Communications Technology 234-239 .
8. Afshari, A., Mojahed, M., & Yusuff, R. M. (2010), Simple Additive Weighting Approach to Personnel Selection Problem. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 1(5), 511.

9. Ahsan, M., & Indawati, N. (2019), Implementation Weighted Product Method to Determine Multiple Intelligence Child, In Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1375(1).
10. Akdulum, A., & Kayır, Y. (2020), Değiştirilebilir Uçlu Matkap Uygulamaları Üzerine Bir Derleme, Karabük Üniversitesi Makine Mühendisliği Dergisi, 1(1), 20-34.
11. Aktan, C. C.,(1998), Değişim ve Devlet,, TİSK yayınları, Ankara.
12. Aminudin, N., Sundari, E., Shankar, K., Deepalakshmi, P., Fauzi, R. I., & Maseleno, A. (2018), Weighted Product and Its Application to Measure Employee Performance. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(2.26), 102-108.
13. Andaç T., (2008), Kayseri İli Mobilya Tüketici Tercihleri Üzerinde Bir Araştırma, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Orman Endüstri Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalı, Kahramanmaraş.
14. Aydın, E. (2019), CFRP/Al İstifli Delmede Matkap Uç Açısının İtme Kuvveti (Fz) ve Takım Aşınması Üzerine Etkilerinin Araştırılması, Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(3), 1574-1583.
15. Aydın, E., & Nalbant, M. (2020), CFRP/Al-7075 İstifli Delmede Matkap Uç Açılarının Delinebilirlik Üzerine Etkisi, Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(2), 917-932.
16. Azar, Fred S. (2000), Multiattribute Decision-Making: Use of Three Scoring Methods to Compare the Performance of Imaging Techniques for Breast Cancer Detection, Department of Computer & Information Science Technical Reports, 1 (10), 1-24.
17. Chang, Y. H., & Yeh, C. H. (2001), Evaluating Airline Competitiveness Using Multiattribute Decision Making. Omega, 29(5), 405-415.
18. Çakır, S. & Perçin, S. (2013), Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Teknikleriyle Lojistik Firmalarında Performans Ölçümü, Ege Akademik Bakış, 13(4), 449-459.
19. Çelik N., (2012), Türkiye'de Mobilya Sektörü Gelişim Planı İçin Bir Karar Modeli Önerisi, Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi, 4(1), 224.
20. Demirci, S. (2005), Türkiye Mobilya Endüstrisinin Sorunları ve Çözüm Önerileri. Politeknik Dergisi, 8(4), 369-379.
21. Diana, D., & Seprina, I. (2019), Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk Menentukan Penerima Bantuan Sosial Menerapkan Weighted Product Method (WPM), JEPIN (Jurnal Edukasi dan Penelitian Informatika), 5(3), 370-377.
22. Duman, İ. (2019), Çok Ölçütlü Karar Verme Yöntemleriyle Hava Savunma Sistemi Seçimi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Kütahya Dumlupınar Üniversitesi/Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
23. Eniyati, S. (2011), Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Pengambilan Keputusan Untuk Penerimaan Beasiswa Dengan Metode SAW (Simple Additive Weighting), Dinamik, 16(2).
24. Ergün, M., Korucuk, S., & Memiş, S. (2020), Sürdürülebilir Afet Lojistiğine Yönelik İdeal Afet Depo Yeri Seçimi: Giresun İli Örneği, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(1), 144-165.
25. Eryürek, Ö. F., & Tanyaş, M. (2003), Hata Türü ve Etkileri Analizi Yönteminde Maliyet Odaklı Yeni Bir Karar Verme Yaklaşımı, İTÜ İşletme Fakültesi, Endüstri Mühendisliği Bölümü Dergisi, 2(6), 31–40.
26. Fajarwati, I., Fitriasari, N. S., & Siregar, H. (2018), Perbandingan Metode Weighted Product (WP), Weighted Sum Model (WSM) Dan Multi Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Tenaga Kerja, JATIKOM: Jurnal Aplikasi dan Teori Ilmu Komputer, 1(1), 25-32.
27. Farrior, J. (1985), C-wire Hand Drill for Small-Hole Stapedectomy, Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, 93(1), 138-141.
28. Fauzan, R., Indrasary, Y., & Muhtia, N. (2017). Sistem Pendukung Penerimaan Beasiswa Bidik Misi di POLIBAN dengan Metode SAW Berbasis Web, JOIN (Jurnal Online Informatika) , 2(2), 79 – 83.
29. Fitriasari, N. S., Fitriani, S. A., & Sukamto, R. A. (2017), Comparison of Weighted Product Method and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution Method: Complexity and Accuracy, In 2017 3rd International Conference on Science in Information Technology, 453-458.
30. Gökçe, H., Yavuz, M., Gökçe, H., & Şeker, U. (2017), Orijinal Matkap Geometrisinde Delme Performansının Sonlu Elemanlar Yöntemi ile Doğrulanması, Gazi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi , 3(1), 27-34.
31. Hartini, D. C., Ruskan, E. L., & Ibrahim, A. (2013), Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Hotel Di Kota Palembang Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), Jurnal Sistem Informasi (JSI), 5(1), 546-565.
32. Hatta, H. R., Rizaldi, M., & Khairina, D. M. (2016), Penerapan Metode Weighted Product Untuk Pemilihan Lokasi Lahan Baru Pemakaman Muslim Dengan Visualisasi Google Maps, Jurnal Nasional Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi, 2(3), 85-94.
33. Irawan, Y. (2020), Decision Support System for Employee Bonus Determination with Web-Based Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Method in PT. Mayatama Solusindo, Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science, 2(1), 7-13.
34. Jaberidoost, M., Olfat, L., Hosseini, A., Kebriaeezadeh, A., Abdollahi, M., Alaeddini, M., & Dinarvand, R. (2015), Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Risk Assessment in Iran Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (Ahp) and Simple Additive Weighting (Saw) Methods, Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, 8(1), 1-10.
35. Janah, N. (2016), Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Menentukan Penerima Bantuan Program Keluarga Harapan (Pkh) Bidang Pendidikan Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW).
36. Kaliszewski, I., & Podkopaev, D. (2016), Simple Additive Weighting—A Metamodel for Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis Methods, Expert Systems with Applications, 5(4), 155-161.
37. Kayır, Y., Demirer, E., & Güneş, S. (2018), Takma Uçlu Matkap ve Kesme Parametrelerinin Seçimi için Bir Uzman Sistem, El-Cezeri Journal of Science and Engineering, 5(3), 797-806.
38. Kaynak, Y. (2006), Matkap ile Delik Delme Esnasında Kesme Parametrelerinin Kesme Kuvveti ve Sıcaklığın Değişimine Etkisinin Deneysel Olarak İncelenmesi, Marmara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 60-66.
39. Khadijah, S., Natarsyah, S., & Fitriani, R. (2015), Penetapan Prioritas Pemberian Hibah Alat Dan Mesin Pertanian Dengan Metode SAW, Progresif: Jurnal Ilmiah Komputer, 11(1).
40. Khairina, D. M., Asrian, M. R., & Hatta, H. R. (2016), Decision Support System for New Employee Recruitment Using Weighted Product Method. In 2016 3rd International Conference on Information Technology, Computer, and Electrical Engineering, 297-301.
41. Khairul, Simaremare, M. & Siahaan, A. P. U., (2016), Decision Support System in Selecting the Appropriate Laptop Using Simple Additive Weighting, International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering & Research, 2(12), 215-222.
42. Kocabıçak, A. C. (2019), Kaplamalı ve Kaplamasız Hss Matkap Uçlarının Deney Tasarımı Yöntemiyle Performansının Optimizasyonu, Doktora Tezi, Marmara Universitesi.
43. Kusrini, A. K., & Kusrini, K. (2016), Analsis Dan Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Guru Menggunakan Metode SAW Pada sd Negeri 1 Wonoroto
44. Berbasis Website, Semnasteknomedia Online, 4(1), 3-3.
45. Linxin, Z., Jialin, C., & Deyin, Q. (2006), Physical Ergonomics Analysis for Power Hand Drill. In 2006 7th International Conference on Computer-Aided Industrial Design and Conceptual Design, 1-5.
46. Marpaung, N. (2018), Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Menentukan Kenaikan Gaji Karyawan, Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi, 4(2), 171-178.
47. Mazziotta, M., & Pareto, A. (2016), A well-being Index Based on the Weighted Product Method, In Topics in Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 253-259.
48. Melia, Y. (2016), Multi Attribute Decision Making Using Simple Additive Weighting and Weighted Product in Investment, International Academic Journal of Business Management, 3(7), 1-15.
49. Memariania A, Aminib A, & Alinezhadc A. (2009), Sensitivity Analysis of Simple Additive Weighting Method (saw): The Results of Change in the Weight of One Attribute on the Final Ranking of Alternatives, Journal of Industrial Engineering, 4(13), 8.
50. Meral, G., Dilipak, H., Sarıkaya, M., & Şeker, U. (2017), Matkap Uç ve Kanal Geometrisi Tasarımının Kesme Kuvvetleri Üzerindeki Etkilerinin Taguchi Yöntemiyle Analizi, Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(2), 435-439.
51. Mukodimah, S., Muslihudin, M., Andoyo, A., Hartati, S., & Maseleno, A. (2018), Fuzzy Simple Additive Weighting and Its Application to Toddler Healthy Food, International Journal of Pure Application Math, 118 (7), 1-7.
52. Muslihudin, M., & Latifah, F. (2015), Decison Support System Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Pada Perusahaan Menggunakan Metode SAW, Magister Teknik Informatika, Jurusan Sistem Informasi, STMIK Pringsewu.
53. Muslihudin, M., Kurniawan, D., & Widyaningrum, I. (2017), Implementasi Model Fuzzy SAW Dalam Penilaian Kinerja Penyuluh Agama (Studi Kasus: Kementerian Agama Kabupaten Pringsewu), Jurnal Technology Acceptance Model, 8(1), 39-44.
54. Muslihudin, M., Susanti, T. S., Maseleno, A., & Pringsewu, S. (2018), The Priority of Rural Road Development Using Fuzzy Logic Based Simple Additive Weighting, International Journal of Pure Apllications Math, 118(8), 9-16.
55. Muslihudin, M., Devika, G., Manickam, P., Shankar, K., Putra, D. P., Putra, E. P. S., & Maseleno, A. (2019), Expert System in Determining Baby Disease Using Web Mobile-Based Weighted Product Method, International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(1), 3299-3308.
56. Nababan, L., & Tuti, E. (2018, August). Determination Feasibility of Poor Household Surgery by Using Weighted Product Method, In 2018 6th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management, 1-6.
57. Nugroho, S., & Wulandari, F. T. (2016), Penerapan Metode MADM-SAW Dalam Penentuan Produk Kerajinan Unggulan Kabupaten Klaten. Simetris, Jurnal Teknik Mesin, Elektro dan Ilmu Komputer, 7(1), 163-168.
58. Nurmalini, N., & Rahim, R. (2017), Study Approach of Simple Additive Weighting For Decision Support System, International Journal of Social Research Science Technology, 3(3), 541-544.
59. Ofluoglu, A., Baki, B., & Ar, I. (2017), Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Model for Warehouse Location in Disaster Logistics. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, 4(2), 89-106.
60. Oktafianto, A. S., Kawangit, R. M., Don, A. G., Huda, M., & Dhea, A. (2018), Determining Housing Location Using Weighted Product, International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4), 3563-3568.
61. Ömürbek, N., Karaatlı, M., & Balcı, H. F. (2016), Entropi Temelli MAUT ve SAW Yöntemleri ile Otomotiv Firmalarının Performans Değerlemesi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(1), 227-255.
62. Ömürbek, N., Karaatli, M., & Cömert, H. G. (2016), AHP-SAW ve AHP-ELECTRE Yöntemleri ile Yapı Denetim Firmalarının Değerlendirmesi, Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 14(27), 171-199.
63. Özbek, A. (2015). Gönüllü Kuruluşlarda Çalışanların Electre Yöntemine Göre Değerlendirilmesi, Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 14(54).
64. Özdağoğlu, A., Yakut, E., & Bahar, S. (2017), Machine Selection in a Dairy Product Company with Entropy and Saw Methods Integration. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(1), 341-359.
65. Özkaya, K., Kalınkara, V., & Polat, O. (2017), Mobilya Sektörü Çalışanlarında Fiziksel Zorlanmanın Belirlenmesi. Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi, 5, 1-12.
66. Pangestu, W. A., Renaldo, R., & Sari, N. Y. (2017), Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menentukan Tataletak Perkantoran Polres Pesawaran Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting, Jurnal Technology Acceptance Model, 6, 60-65.
67. Podvezko, Valentinas, (2011), “The Comparative Analysis of MCDA Methods SAW and COPRAS”, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 22 (2), 134-146.
68. Pranolo, A., & Widyastuti, S. M. (2014), Simple Additive Weighting Method on Intelligent Agent for Urban Forest Health Monitoring. In 2014 International Conference on Computer, Control, Informatics and Its Applications, 132-135.
69. Pratiwi, D., Lestari, J. P., & Agushita, D. (2014), Decision Support System to Majoring High School Student Using Simple Additive Weighting Method, International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, 10(3), 153-159.
70. Prayogi, S. Y. (2016), Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting Dalam Pemilihan Tablet PC Untuk Pemula, Journal of Computer Engineering, System and Science, 1(1), 35-40.
71. Prihasto, B., Irawan, M. I., & Masduqi, A. (2014), Fuzzy Madm Method for Decision Support System Based on Artificial Neural Network to Water Quality Assessment in Surabaya River, Journal of Soft Computing and Decision Support System, 1(1), 24-29.
72. Purba, R., & Sihotang, H. T. (2019), Decision Support Systems Recipient Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) In Durian Kec. Pantai Labu Kab. Deli Serdang with the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Method: Decision Support Systems Recipient Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) In Durian Kec. Pantai Labu Kab. Deli Serdang with the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Method, Jurnal Mantik, 3(3), 91-98.
73. Putra, D. W. T., & Punggara, A. A. (2018), Comparison Analysis of Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Weigthed Product (WP) in Decision Support Systems, Web of Conferences ,215, 1003.
74. Rahayu, D., & Mukodimah, S. (2019), Decision Support System Of Achieved Students Using Weighted Product Method, International Journal of Information System and Computer Science, 3(2), 72-77.
75. Ramly, A. A. B. A. (2009), Ergonomics Evaluation and Design of the Hand Tolls Used in Manufacturing Industries, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka.
76. Rohman, F., & Setiawan, A. B. (2015), Sistem Penilaian Dosen Teladan Menggunakan Metode SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) di Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri. In Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi dan Multimedia, 6.
77. Roni, R., Sumijan, S., & Santony, J. (2019), Metode Weighted Product dalam Pemilihan Penerima Beasiswa Bagi Peserta Didik. Jurnal Rekayasa Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi, 3(1), 87-93.
78. Safii, M. (2017), Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Beasiswa PPA Dan BBM Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), Jurnal Riset Sistem Informasi dan Teknik Informatika, 2(1), 75-83.
79. Savaşkan, M., Taptık, Y., & Ürgen, M. (2010), Deney Tasarımı Yöntemi ile Matkap Uçlarında Performans Optimizasyonu, İtü Dergisi/d, 3(6).
80. Savitha, K., & Chandrasekar, C. (2011), Vertical Handover Decision Schemes Using SAW and WPM for Network Selection in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks, ArXiv preprint arXiv:1109.4490.
81. Savitha, K. ve Chandrasekar, C. (2011), Trusted Network Selection Using SAW and TOPSIS Algorithms for Heterogeneous Wireless Networks, International Journal of Computer Applications, 26(8), 22-29.
82. Setyani, R. E., & Saputra, R. (2016), Flood-prone Areas Mapping at Semarang City by Using Simple Additive Weighting Method, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 227, 378-386.
83. Shakouri, H., Nabaee, M., & Aliakbarisani, S. (2014), A Quantitative Discussion on The Assessment of Power Supply Technologies: DEA and SAW as Complementary Methods for the “Grammar”, Energy, 64, 640-647.
84. Shrinivasa, D., Dixit, A. C., Ashok, B. C., Jayashankar, N., Krishna, S. M., & Rishi, J. P. (2019), A Detailed Elucidation on Surface Sensing Hand Power Drill, International Journal of Mechanical Handling and Automation, 5(2), 1-7.
85. Simanaviciene R. ve Ustinovicius, L. (2012), A New Approach to Assessing The Biases of Decisions Based on Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods, Electronics And Electrical Engineering System Engineering, Computer Technology, No 1(117), s. 29-32.
86. Simarmata, J., Limbong, T., Aritonang, M., & Sriadhi, S. (2018), Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Guru Bidang Studi Komputer Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (saw), Journal of Computer Engineering, System and Science, 3(2), 186-190.
87. Siregar, K., Ishak, A., & Purba, T. D. M. (2019), Reducing Waste in Production Process With Lean Six Sigma Approach and Weighted Product Method, Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 505(1).
88. Sun, Xiaoqian ve Li, Yongchang (2010), An Intelligent Multi-Criteria Decision Support System for Systems Design, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 3718-3723.
89. Supçiller, A. A., & Deligöz, K. (2018), Tedarikçi Seçimi Probleminin Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleriyle Uzlaşik Çözümü. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 355-368.
90. Supriyono, H., & Sari, C. P. (2018), Developing Decision Support Systems Using the Weighted Product Method for House Selection. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 1977(1).
91. Taufik, I., Saleh, A., Slamet, C., Maylawati, D. S., Ramdhani, M. A., & Muhammad, B. A. (2019), Decision Support System Design for Determining Brown Sugar Quality with Weighted Product Method, In Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1280(2).
92. Tzeng, G. H., & Huang, J. J. (2011), Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods And Applications, CRC press.
93. Utomo, P., Cahyono, S. D., & Tristono, T. (2019), Selection of Talented Archery Athletes Using Weighted Product Method. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1211 (1), 12037.
94. Wang, M., Liu, S., Wang, S., & Lai, K. K. (2010), A Weighted Product Method for Bidding Strategies in Multi-Attribute Auctions, Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 23(1), 194-208.
95. Wao, J. O. (2018). Weighted Product Method in the Value Engineering Process for Construction Project, International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 6(12).
96. Windarto, A. P. (2017), Penilaian Prestasi Kerja Karyawan PTPN III Pematangsiantar Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), Jurasik (Jurnal Riset Sistem Informasi dan Teknik Informatika), 2(1), 84-95.
97. Wulandari, F. T., & Nugroho, S. (2015), Penentuan Produk Kerajinan Unggulan Dengan Menggunakan Madm-Saw. Prosiding SNATIF, 175-180.
98. Yaman, K., Bıçakçı, N., & Özgedik, A. (2017), Matkap Boyunun Delik Toleranslarına Etkisinin İncelenmesi. Politeknik Dergisi, 20(4), 765-775.
99. Yiğit, C. (2020), Ti6Al4V Malzemesinin Farklı Geometrideki Matkaplarla Delinmesi Esnasında Matkap Sıcaklığının İncelenmesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Karabük Üniversitesi, İmalat Mühendisliği.
100. Yoni, D. C., & Mustafidah, H. (2016), Penerapan Metode WP (Weighted Product) Untuk Pemilihan Mahasiswa Lulusan Terbaik di Fakultas Teknik Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Jurnal Informatika, 4(1), 22-27.
101. Zavadskas, E. K., Vilutiene, T., Turskis, Z., & Tamosaitiene, J. (2010), Contractor Selection For Construction Works By Applying Saw‐G And Topsıs Grey Techniques, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11(1), 34-55.