A Comparative Study of SC and MC Underwater Acoustic Communication Systems

Year 2021, Volume: IDAP-2021 : 5th International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing symposium Issue: Special, 27 - 34, 20.10.2021

Burak Besceli Mehmet Murat Güçlü Efecan Polat Timurhan Devellioğlu Taha Moğol Nuh Mehmet Küçükusta Enver Faruk Tanrıkulu Ali Özen

https://doi.org/10.53070/bbd.990807

Cited By: 1

Abstract

In this study, comparative performance analyzes of single carrier (SC) and multi carrier (MC) underwater acoustic communication (UWAC) schemes are performed in underwater acoustic channel environments. Computer simulation studies are carried out to compare SC and MC UWAC communication systems in multi-path underwater acoustic channel environments based on bit error rate (BER) and mean square error (MSE) accomplishment benchmarks. From the acquired outcomes, it is perceived that the MC-UWAC communication scheme has approximately 3 dB better achievement than the SC-UWAC communication scheme.

Keywords

underwater acoustic communications, channel equalization, underwater acoustic channel, SC-UWAC, MC-UWAC

References

• Baggeroer A. (1984), Acoustic telemetry – an overview, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 9, 229-235.
• Besceli B. (2021), Investigation and Implementation of SC and MC Underwater Acoustic Communication Syetems in Multipath Underwater Acoustic Channel Environments, Bachelor Degree Thesis, Nuh Naci Yazgan University – HARGEM, Kayseri, TURKEY, June 2021.
• Erdoğan M., Şenol H., Panayırcı E. and Uysal M. (2012), Sparse Underwater Acoustic Channel Estimation in Colored Gaussian Noise, IEEE 20th Signal Processing and Communications Applications SIU 2012, 1-4.
• Kaya A. and Yauchi T. (1989), An acoustic communication system for subsea robot, OCEANS’89, 765-770.
• Kuzlu M. (2010), Implementation of Underwater Communication with DSP, Ph.D. Thesis, Kocaeli University, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, September 2010, Kocaeli, Turkey.
• Mahmutoğlu Y. (2013), Performance Analysis of Underwater Acoustic Channels with Decision Feedback Equalizer, Ms.C. Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, May 2013, Trabzon, Turkey.
• Quazi A. and Konrad W. (1982), Underwater Acoustic Communications, IEEE Communication Magazine, 24-29.
• Stojanovic M. (2006), On the Relationship Between Capacity and Distance in an Underwater Acoustic Channel, First ACM International Workshop on Underwater Networks (WUWNeT’06), Los Angeles.
• Stojanovic M., Catipovic J. A. and Proakis J. G. (1994), Adaptive multichannel combining and equalization for underwater acoustic communications, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 3, 1621-1631.
• Suzuki M. and Sasaki T. (1992), Digital acoustic image transmission system for deep sea research submersible, OCEANS’92, 567-570.
• Yaşar S., Sinop H., Tek Y. İ., Tuna E. B., Karaerik K. and Özen A. (2020), Investigation of the Performance of Single Carrier Visible Light Communication Systems in Multi-Path Fading Optical Channels, IEEE 28th Signal Processing and Communications Applications SIU 2020, pp. 1-4.
• Yılmaz A., Çekli E., Kuzlu M. and Uysal E. (2008), Akustik Sualtı İletişimi DSP Uygulaması, Elektrik - Elektronik ve Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Sempozyumu (ELECO 2008), Bursa, pp. 26-30.
• Zielinski A. (2004), Communications Underwater, Inv. P, Journal of Hydroacoustics, vol. 7, pp. 235-252.