Gömülü Sistem Cihazları ile Kuantum Ağların Dağıtık Simülasyonu

Year 2024, Volume: 17 Issue: 2, 90 - 94, 24.12.2024

Osman Ceylan , İhsan Yılmaz

https://doi.org/10.54525/bbmd.1484477

Abstract

Günümüz kuantum ağ yapısı mimari bakımdan klasik ağ yapıları referans alarak kurulmuştur. Fakat kuantum ağı oluşturan aygıtların parçacık kontrol mekanizmaları nedeniyle klasik aygıtlara göre daha maliyetlidir. Deneysel bir kuantum ağın gerçekleştirme maliyetini arttıran bu sebepten dolayı bir kuantum ağ kurmadan önce olurluk benzetimleri yapılmaktadır. Fakat kuantum dolaşıklığın mevcut benzetim yöntemlerindeki üstel artan veri depolama kapasitesi gerektirdiğinden dolayı güçlükler yaşanmaktadır. Bu çalışmada bu probleme bir çözüm olarak kuantum ağların deneysel olarak birden fazla klasik cihaz yardımıyla dağıtık benzetim kullanarak daha az maliyetli olarak nasıl gerçekleştirilebileceği önerilmektedir. Bu amaç için geliştirilen eklenti yazılımı ile farklı ağ senaryolarında elde edilen sonuçlar dağıtık benzetim modelinin mevcut modellere göre daha etkin olduğunu göstermektedir.

Keywords

Kuantum Ağlar, Dağıtık Yürütme Modeli, Kuantum Benzetim

Distributed Simulation of Quantum Networks with Embedded System Devices

Abstract

Today's quantum network structure was established architecturally by taking classical network structures as a reference. However, devices that create quantum networks are more costly than classical devices due to their particle control mechanisms. For this reason, which increases the cost of implementing an experimental quantum network, feasibility simulations are performed before establishing a quantum network. However, difficulties arise because quantum entanglement requires exponentially increasing data storage capacity in existing simulation methods. In this study, as a
solution to this problem, it is suggested how quantum networks can be experimentally implemented in a less costly manner using distributed simulation with the help of multiple classical devices. The results obtained in different network scenarios with the plug-in software developed for this purpose show that the distributed simulation model is more effective than existing models.

Keywords

Quantum Networks, Distributed Simulation Model, Quantum Simulation

References

• Ovartchaiyapong, P., Lee, K. W., Myers, B. A., ve Jayich, A. C. B., Dynamic strain-mediated coupling of a single diamond spin to a mechanical resonator., Nature communications, 2014, 5(1).
• Sangouard, N., Simon, C., De Riedmatten, H., ve Gisin, N., Quantum repeaters based on atomic ensembles and linear optics., Reviews of Modern Physics, 2011, 83(1), 33-80.
• Briegel, H. J., Dür, W., Cirac, J. I., ve Zoller, P., Quantum repeaters: the role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication., Physical Review Letters, 1998, 81(26), 5932.
• Zukowski, M., Zeilinger, A., Horne, M., ve Ekert, A., "Event-ready-detectors" Bell experiment via entanglement swapping., Physical review letters, 1993, 71(26).
• Dür, W., Briegel, H. J., Cirac, J. I., ve Zoller, P., Quantum repeaters based on entanglement purification., Physical Review A, 1999, 59(1), 169.
• Yuan, Z. S., Chen, Y. A., Zhao, B., Chen, S., Schmiedmayer, J., ve Pan, J. W., Experimental demonstration of a BDCZ quantum repeater node., Nature, 2008, 454(7208), 1098-1101.
• Zhao, B., Chen, Z. B., Chen, Y. A., Schmiedmayer, J., ve Pan, J. W., Robust creation of entanglement between remote memory qubits., Physical review letters, 2007, 98(24), 240502.
• Van Enk, S. J., Cirac, J. I., ve Zoller, P., Photonic channels for quantum communication., Science, 1998, 279(5348), 205-208.
• Gisin, N., ve Thew, R., Quantum communication., Nature photonics, 2007, 1(3), 165-171.
• Spiller, T. P., ve Munro, W. J., Towards a quantum information technology industry., Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 2005, 18(1), V1.
• Dowling, J. P., & Milburn, G. J., Quantum technology: the second quantum revolution., Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2003, 361(1809), 1655-1674.
• Lloyd, S., Universal quantum simulators. Science, 1996, 273(5278), 1073-1078.
• Hartmann, L., Kraus, B., Briegel, H. J., ve Dür, W., Role of memory errors in quantum repeaters., Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 2007, 75(3), 032310.
• Dür, W., ve Briegel, H. J., Entanglement purification and quantum error correction., Reports on Progress in Physics, 2007, 70(8), 1381.
• Lafiamme, R., Miquel, C., Paz, J. P., ve Zurek, W. H., Perfect quantum error correction code., Physical Review Letters, 1996, 77(1), 198-201.
• Kimble, H. J., The quantum internet., Nature, 2023, 453(7198), 1023-1030.
• Elliott, C., Colvin, A., Pearson, D., Pikalo, O., Schlafer, J., ve Yeh, H., Current status of the DARPA quantum network., Quantum Information and computation III, 2005, Vol. 5815, pp. 138-149.
• Peev, M., Pacher, C., Alléaume, R., Barreiro, C., Bouda, J., Boxleitner, W., ve Zeilinger, A., The SECOQC quantum key distribution network in Vienna., New journal of physics, 2009, 11(7), 075001.
• Sasaki, M., Fujiwara, M., Ishizuka, H., Klaus, W., Wakui, K., Takeoka, M., ve Zeilinger, A., Field test of quantum key distribution in the Tokyo QKD Network., Optics express, 2011, 19(11), 10387-10409.
• Chen, L., Xue, K., Li, J., Yu, N., Li, R., Sun, Q., ve Lu, J., SimQN: A network-layer simulator for the quantum network investigation., IEEE Network, 2023, 37(5), 182-189.
• Coopmans, T., Knegjens, R., Dahlberg, A., Maier, D., Nijsten, L., de Oliveira Filho, J., ve Wehner, S., Netsquid, a network simulator for quantum information using discrete events., Communications Physics, 2021, 4(1), 164.
• Satoh, R., Hajdušek, M., Benchasattabuse, N., Nagayama, S., Teramoto, K., Matsuo, T., ve Van Meter, R., Quisp: a quantum internet simulation package., In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) (pp. 353-364). IEEE.
• DiAdamo, S., Nötzel, J., Zanger, B., ve Beşe, M. M., Qunetsim: A software framework for quantum networks., IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering, 2021, 2, 1-12.
• Joubert, T., Hodson, D. D., ve Grimaila, M. R., An Examination into SQUANCH and its Conversion to Julia., In 2023 Congress in Computer Science, Computer Engineering, & Applied Computing (CSCE) (pp. 772-779). IEEE.
• Ceylan, O. S., ve Yılmaz, İ., QDNS: Quantum Dynamic Network Simulator Based on Event Driving., In 2021 International Conference on Information Security and Cryptology (ISCTURKEY) (pp. 45-50). IEEE.
• Smith, K. N., Perlin, M. A., Gokhale, P., Frederick, P., Owusu-Antwi, D., Rines, R., ve Chong, F., Clifford-based circuit cutting for quantum simulation., In 2023 Proceedings of the 50th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (pp. 1-13).
• Dahlberg, A., ve Wehner, S., SimulaQron—a simulator for developing quantum internet software., Quantum Science and Technology, 2018, 4(1), 015001.
• Wu, X., Kolar, A., Chung, J., Jin, D., Zhong, T., Kettimuthu, R., ve Suchara, M., SeQUeNCe: a customizable discrete-event simulator of quantum networks., Quantum Science and Technology, 2021, 6(4), 045027.
• Ceylan, O. S., ve Yılmaz, İ., Kuantum ağ benzetimlerının dağıtık yürütülmesi., Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Ünviersitesi, Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, Çanakkale, Türkiye, 2024.
• Shor, P. W., ve Preskill, J., Simple proof of security of the BB84 quantum key distribution protocol., Physical review letters, 1984, 85(2), 441.
• Ekert, A. K., Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem., Physical review letters, 1991, 67(6), 661.
• Ceylan, O. S., ve Yılmaz, İ., Gömülü Aygıtlar Kullanarak Kuantum Ağların Dağıtılmış Benzetimi., In 2023 Ankara Internatıonal Congress On Scıentıfıc Research-VIII. (pp. 762-763).