Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Türkiye Ekonomisine İlişkin Bir Makroekonometrik Model Üzerinde Bifurkasyon Analizi

Year 2021, Volume: 15 Issue: 2, 289 - 310, 31.08.2021
https://doi.org/10.46520/bddkdergisi.987445

Abstract

Bifurkasyon teorisi, dinamik sistemlerin analizi için önemli bir araçtır. Dinamik makroekonomik
sistemler, belirli koşullar altında parametre değerleri değiştiğinde belirli türlerde
bifurkasyonlar gösterebilir. Bu çalışmada, Aysoy ve Kıpıcı (2005) tarafından geliştirilen
Türkiye Ekonomisi Makroekonometrik Modeli kullanılarak, Türk ekonomisinde
bifurkasyona yol açan faktörler incelenmiştir. Modelin, tahmin edilen parametreleri %95
güven aralığında değiştiğinde sabit durum ve periyot katlayan-2 bifurkasyonları sergilediği
görülmüştür. Enflasyon oranı parametresindeki değişim, her iki bifurkasyon türüne yol
açarken, devalüasyon oranı ve beklenen enflasyon parametrelerindeki değişim sadece
kararlı durumda bifurkasyonuna yol açmaktadır.

References

  • 1. Aysoy, C. & Kıpıcı, A. N. (2005). A Quarterly Macroeconometric Model of the Turkish Economy. Central Bank Review, 5(2), 39-71.
  • 2. Bala, V. (1997). A Pitchfork Bifurcation in the Tatonement Process. Economic Theory, 10, 521-530.
  • 3. Barnett W. A. & Eryilmaz, U. (2013). Hopf Bifurcation in the Clarida, Gali, and Gertler Model. Economic Modelling, 31: 401-404.
  • 4. Barnett, W. A. & Duzhak, E.A. (2007). Non-Robust Dynamic Inferences from Macroeconometric Models: Bifurcation Stratification of Confidence Regions. MPRA Paper 6005, University Library of Munich.
  • 5. Barnett W. A. & Eryilmaz, U. (2014). An Analytical and Numerical Search for Bifur- Cations in Open Economy New Keynesian Models. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 20(2), 482-503.
  • 6. Barnett, W. A. & He, Y. (1999). Stability Analysis of Continuous Time Macroeconometric Systems. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, 3(4), 169-188.
  • 7. Barnett, W. A. & He, Y. (2002). Stabilization Policy as Bifurcation Selection: Would Stabilization Policy Work if the Economy Really Were Unstable? Macroeconomic Dynamics, 6, 713-747.
  • 8. Barnett, W. A. & He, Y. (2006). Singularity Bifurcations. Journal of Macroeconomics, 28(1), 5-22.
  • 9. Benhabib, J. & Nishimura, K. (1979). The Hopf Bifurcation and the Existence and Stability of Closed Orbits in Multisector Models of Optimal Economic Growth. Journal of Economic Theory, 21, 421-444.
  • 10. Boldrin, M. & Woodford, M. (1990). Equilibrium Models Displaying Endogenous Fluctuations and Chaos: A Survey. Journal of Monetary Economics, 25, 189-222.
  • 11. Bulutay, T. (1967) Ekonometrik Bir Deneme (Teori ve Türk Ekonomisine Uygulama). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi.
  • 12. Clarida, R., Gali, J. & Gertler, M. (2002). A Simple Framework for International Monetary Policy Analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics, 49(5), 879-904.
  • 13. Dobrescu, L. I. & Opris, D. (2007). Neimark-Sacker Bifurcation for the Discrete- Delay Kaldor Model. MPRA Paper No. 5415.
  • 14. Dockner, E. J. & Feichtinger, G. (1991). On the Optimality of Limit Cycles in Dynamic Economic Systems. Journal of Economics, 51, 31-50.
  • 15. Galí, J. & Monacelli T. (2005). Monetary Policy and Exchange Rate Volatility in a Small Open Economy. Review of Economic Studies, 72(3), 707-734.
  • 16. Gandolfo, G. (1996). Economic Dynamics. Springer-Verlag.
  • 17. Grandmont, J. M. (1985). On Endogenous Competitive Business. Econometrica, 53, 995-1045.
  • 18. Nishimura, K. & Takahashi, H. (1992). Factor Intensity and Hopf Bifurcations. In: Dynamic Economic Models and Optimal Control, G. Feichtinger (Ed.), 135- 149.
  • 19. Scarf, H. (1960). Some Examples of Global Instability of Competitive Equilibrium. Internal Economic Review, 1(3), 157-172.
  • 20. Uygur, E. (1991). Central Bank Quarterly Econometric Model of Turkey: A First Draft. In: The Use of Econometric Models in Central Banks’ Decision Making Problems. Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, 323-401.

Bifurcation Analysis on a Macroeconometric Model for Turkey’s Economy

Year 2021, Volume: 15 Issue: 2, 289 - 310, 31.08.2021
https://doi.org/10.46520/bddkdergisi.987445

Abstract

References

  • 1. Aysoy, C. & Kıpıcı, A. N. (2005). A Quarterly Macroeconometric Model of the Turkish Economy. Central Bank Review, 5(2), 39-71.
  • 2. Bala, V. (1997). A Pitchfork Bifurcation in the Tatonement Process. Economic Theory, 10, 521-530.
  • 3. Barnett W. A. & Eryilmaz, U. (2013). Hopf Bifurcation in the Clarida, Gali, and Gertler Model. Economic Modelling, 31: 401-404.
  • 4. Barnett, W. A. & Duzhak, E.A. (2007). Non-Robust Dynamic Inferences from Macroeconometric Models: Bifurcation Stratification of Confidence Regions. MPRA Paper 6005, University Library of Munich.
  • 5. Barnett W. A. & Eryilmaz, U. (2014). An Analytical and Numerical Search for Bifur- Cations in Open Economy New Keynesian Models. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 20(2), 482-503.
  • 6. Barnett, W. A. & He, Y. (1999). Stability Analysis of Continuous Time Macroeconometric Systems. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, 3(4), 169-188.
  • 7. Barnett, W. A. & He, Y. (2002). Stabilization Policy as Bifurcation Selection: Would Stabilization Policy Work if the Economy Really Were Unstable? Macroeconomic Dynamics, 6, 713-747.
  • 8. Barnett, W. A. & He, Y. (2006). Singularity Bifurcations. Journal of Macroeconomics, 28(1), 5-22.
  • 9. Benhabib, J. & Nishimura, K. (1979). The Hopf Bifurcation and the Existence and Stability of Closed Orbits in Multisector Models of Optimal Economic Growth. Journal of Economic Theory, 21, 421-444.
  • 10. Boldrin, M. & Woodford, M. (1990). Equilibrium Models Displaying Endogenous Fluctuations and Chaos: A Survey. Journal of Monetary Economics, 25, 189-222.
  • 11. Bulutay, T. (1967) Ekonometrik Bir Deneme (Teori ve Türk Ekonomisine Uygulama). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi.
  • 12. Clarida, R., Gali, J. & Gertler, M. (2002). A Simple Framework for International Monetary Policy Analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics, 49(5), 879-904.
  • 13. Dobrescu, L. I. & Opris, D. (2007). Neimark-Sacker Bifurcation for the Discrete- Delay Kaldor Model. MPRA Paper No. 5415.
  • 14. Dockner, E. J. & Feichtinger, G. (1991). On the Optimality of Limit Cycles in Dynamic Economic Systems. Journal of Economics, 51, 31-50.
  • 15. Galí, J. & Monacelli T. (2005). Monetary Policy and Exchange Rate Volatility in a Small Open Economy. Review of Economic Studies, 72(3), 707-734.
  • 16. Gandolfo, G. (1996). Economic Dynamics. Springer-Verlag.
  • 17. Grandmont, J. M. (1985). On Endogenous Competitive Business. Econometrica, 53, 995-1045.
  • 18. Nishimura, K. & Takahashi, H. (1992). Factor Intensity and Hopf Bifurcations. In: Dynamic Economic Models and Optimal Control, G. Feichtinger (Ed.), 135- 149.
  • 19. Scarf, H. (1960). Some Examples of Global Instability of Competitive Equilibrium. Internal Economic Review, 1(3), 157-172.
  • 20. Uygur, E. (1991). Central Bank Quarterly Econometric Model of Turkey: A First Draft. In: The Use of Econometric Models in Central Banks’ Decision Making Problems. Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, 323-401.
There are 20 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Finance
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Ünal Eryılmaz This is me 0000-0002-9056-4963

Publication Date August 31, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021 Volume: 15 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Eryılmaz, Ü. (2021). Türkiye Ekonomisine İlişkin Bir Makroekonometrik Model Üzerinde Bifurkasyon Analizi. BDDK Bankacılık Ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi, 15(2), 289-310. https://doi.org/10.46520/bddkdergisi.987445