Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

The fragments of old Uyghur Buddhāvataṁsaka-sūtra (13th, 14th and 19th leaves)

Year 2020, Issue: 70 (Aralık), 7 - 27, 01.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.32925/tday.2020.43

Abstract

Sanskrit Buddhāvataṁsaka-sūtra “flower ornament scripture”,
which forms the subject of the paper, is a Buddhist scripture translated
into Chinese with the name of Huayan jing. On the basis of this scripture,
the Huayan school of Buddhism emerged in China. This school is one
of the thirteen Buddhist schools that emerged in China and is known
as “Hwaŏm” in Korean and “Kegon” in Japanese. These fragments are
today preserved at the Turfan Collection in Berlin Brandenburg Sciences
and Humanities, registered under the archive numbers U 1323 (T I D),
U 1326 (T I 2) and U 1329 (T I L 4) respectively. These fragments
comprise the 13th, 14th, and 19th leaves of an Old Uyghur manuscript,
consisting of at least thirty chapters of the text of the Faxiang school,
which developed from the Yogācāra school of Buddhism, also known
as East Asian Buddhism. This paper contains the transcription and
transliteration of aforementioned Old Uyghur fragment, translations
into Turkish, notes and glossary with an analytical index.

References

  • Adams, D. Q. (2013). A dictionary of Tocharian B: Revised and greatly enlarged vol. 1-2. Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi.
  • Aramaki, N. (2007). The Huayan tradition in its earliest period. Reflecting mirrors perspectives on Huayan Buddhism. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 169-187.
  • Arat, R. R. (1940-42). Uygurlarda ıstılahlara dair. Türkiyat Mecmuası, 7-8, 56-81.
  • Chiu, K. P. (2016). Thomé H. Fang, Tang Junyi and Huayan thought: A Confucian appropriation of Buddhist ideas in response to scientism in twentieth-century China. Leiden & Boston: Brill.
  • Clauson, S. G. (1972). An etymological dictionary of pre-thirteenth-century Turkish. Oxford: Oxford at the Clarendon Press.
  • Cook, F. H. (1977). Hua-yen Buddhism: The jewel net of Indra. London: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Copp, P. (2012). Chinese religion in the Sui and Tang dynasties. The Wiley-Blackwell companion to Chinese Religions. New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing, 75-98.
  • Çetin, E. (2012). Uygurca kiçig erŋek, Karahanlı Türkçesi çıçalak ve Türkiye Türkçesi serçe parmak sözleri üzerine. Turkish Studies – International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 7/4, 1217-1227.
  • Edgerton, F. (1953). Buddhist hybrid Sanskrit grammar and dictionary. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Erdal, M. (1991). Old Turkic word formation: A functional approach to the lexicon vol. I-II. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
  • Gharib, B. (1995). Sogdian dictionary: Sogdian-Persian-English. Tehran: Farhangan. Hamar, I. (2014). Huayan explorations of the realm of reality. The Wiley-Blackwell companion to East and Inner Asian Buddhism. New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing, 145-165.
  • Hirakawa, A. (1997). A Buddhist Chinese-Sanskrit dictionary. Tōkyō: Reiyukai. Monier-Williams, M. (1899). A Sanskrit-English dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Nadalyayev, V. M., Nasilov, D. M., Tenişev, E. R. ve Şçerbak, A. M. (1969). Drevnetyurkskiy slovar’. Leningrad: Izdat. Nauka, Leningradskoe Otd.
  • Ölmez, M. (2017). Eski Uygurca ikilemeler üzerine. Türk Dili Araştırmaları Yıllığı - Belleten, 65/2, 243-311.
  • Özertural, Z. (2012). Alttürkische Handschriften Teil 16: Mahāyāna-sūtras und Kommentartexte. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.
  • Poceski, M. (2004). Huayan school. Encyclopedia of Buddhism, volume I. New York: Thomson Gale, 341-347.
  • Poucha, P. (1955). Institutiones linguae Tocharicae. Pars I: Thesaurus linguae Tocharicae dialecti A. Praha: Statni Pedagogicke Nakladatelstvi.
  • Rhys Davids, T. W. ve Stede, W. (1921-1925). The Pali text society’s Pali-English dictionary. London: The Pali Text Society.
  • Röhrborn, K. (1977-1998). Uigurisches Wörterbuch. Sprachmaterial der vorislamischen türkischen Texte aus Zentralasien, 1-6. Wiesbaden: Steiner.
  • Röhrborn, K. (2010). Uigurisches Wörterbuch. Sprachmaterial der vorislamischen türkischen Texte aus Zentralasien, Neubearbeitung. I. Verben. Band. 1: ab- - äzüglä-. Stuttgart: Steiner.
  • Tezcan, S. (1974). Das uigurische Insadi-Sūtra. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. Tokyürek, H. (2019). Eski Uygur Türkçesinde Budizm ve Manihaizm terimleri. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
  • Toparlı, R., Vural, H. ve Karaatlı, R. (20072). Kıpçak Türkçesi sözlüğü. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
  • Wei, D. (2007). A fundamental feature of the Huayan philosophy. Reflecting mirrors perspectives on Huayan Buddhism. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 189-194.
  • Wilkens, J. (2007). Das Buch von der Sündentilgung. Edition des alttürkisch-buddhistischen Kšanti Kılguluk Nom Bitig. Turnhout: Brepols.

Eski Uygurca Buddhāvataṁsaka-sūtra tefsirine ilişkin fragmanlar (13, 14 ve 19. Yapraklar)

Year 2020, Issue: 70 (Aralık), 7 - 27, 01.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.32925/tday.2020.43

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın konusunu oluşturan Sanskritçe Buddhāvataṁsaka-
sūtra “çiçek bezeme sūtrası” Çinceye Huayan jing adıyla tercüme
edilen Budist bir eserdir. Bu eser temelinde Çin’de Budizm’in Huayan
ekolü ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu ekol Çin’de gelişen on üç Budist ekolden biri
olup Korecede Hwaŏm ve Japoncada Kegon adıyla bilinir. Bu yazı daha
önce neşri gerçekleştirilmemiş Eski Uygurca Buddhāvataṁsaka-sūtra
tefsirine ilişkin fragmanlar hakkındadır. Bugün bu fragmanlar Berlin
Brandenburg Bilimler Akademisi Turfan Koleksiyonu’nda sırasıyla U
1323 (T I D), U 1326 (T I 2) ve U 1329 (T I L 4) arşiv numaralarıyla korunmaktadır.
Bunlar Doğu Asya Budizmi olarak da bilinen Budizm’in
Yogācāra kolundan gelişen Faxiang ekolüne ait metin parçalarının bulunduğu
en az otuz bölümden oluşan bir derleme eser niteliğinde Eski
Uygurca bir yazma eserin 20. bölümün 13, 14 ve 19. yapraklarını oluşturmaktadır.
Bu çalışma mevzubahis yaprakların yazı çevirimini, harf
çevirisini, Türkiye Türkçesine aktarmasını, metne ilişkin notlarını ve
dizin-sözlüğünü içermektedir.

References

  • Adams, D. Q. (2013). A dictionary of Tocharian B: Revised and greatly enlarged vol. 1-2. Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi.
  • Aramaki, N. (2007). The Huayan tradition in its earliest period. Reflecting mirrors perspectives on Huayan Buddhism. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 169-187.
  • Arat, R. R. (1940-42). Uygurlarda ıstılahlara dair. Türkiyat Mecmuası, 7-8, 56-81.
  • Chiu, K. P. (2016). Thomé H. Fang, Tang Junyi and Huayan thought: A Confucian appropriation of Buddhist ideas in response to scientism in twentieth-century China. Leiden & Boston: Brill.
  • Clauson, S. G. (1972). An etymological dictionary of pre-thirteenth-century Turkish. Oxford: Oxford at the Clarendon Press.
  • Cook, F. H. (1977). Hua-yen Buddhism: The jewel net of Indra. London: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Copp, P. (2012). Chinese religion in the Sui and Tang dynasties. The Wiley-Blackwell companion to Chinese Religions. New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing, 75-98.
  • Çetin, E. (2012). Uygurca kiçig erŋek, Karahanlı Türkçesi çıçalak ve Türkiye Türkçesi serçe parmak sözleri üzerine. Turkish Studies – International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 7/4, 1217-1227.
  • Edgerton, F. (1953). Buddhist hybrid Sanskrit grammar and dictionary. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Erdal, M. (1991). Old Turkic word formation: A functional approach to the lexicon vol. I-II. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
  • Gharib, B. (1995). Sogdian dictionary: Sogdian-Persian-English. Tehran: Farhangan. Hamar, I. (2014). Huayan explorations of the realm of reality. The Wiley-Blackwell companion to East and Inner Asian Buddhism. New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing, 145-165.
  • Hirakawa, A. (1997). A Buddhist Chinese-Sanskrit dictionary. Tōkyō: Reiyukai. Monier-Williams, M. (1899). A Sanskrit-English dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Nadalyayev, V. M., Nasilov, D. M., Tenişev, E. R. ve Şçerbak, A. M. (1969). Drevnetyurkskiy slovar’. Leningrad: Izdat. Nauka, Leningradskoe Otd.
  • Ölmez, M. (2017). Eski Uygurca ikilemeler üzerine. Türk Dili Araştırmaları Yıllığı - Belleten, 65/2, 243-311.
  • Özertural, Z. (2012). Alttürkische Handschriften Teil 16: Mahāyāna-sūtras und Kommentartexte. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.
  • Poceski, M. (2004). Huayan school. Encyclopedia of Buddhism, volume I. New York: Thomson Gale, 341-347.
  • Poucha, P. (1955). Institutiones linguae Tocharicae. Pars I: Thesaurus linguae Tocharicae dialecti A. Praha: Statni Pedagogicke Nakladatelstvi.
  • Rhys Davids, T. W. ve Stede, W. (1921-1925). The Pali text society’s Pali-English dictionary. London: The Pali Text Society.
  • Röhrborn, K. (1977-1998). Uigurisches Wörterbuch. Sprachmaterial der vorislamischen türkischen Texte aus Zentralasien, 1-6. Wiesbaden: Steiner.
  • Röhrborn, K. (2010). Uigurisches Wörterbuch. Sprachmaterial der vorislamischen türkischen Texte aus Zentralasien, Neubearbeitung. I. Verben. Band. 1: ab- - äzüglä-. Stuttgart: Steiner.
  • Tezcan, S. (1974). Das uigurische Insadi-Sūtra. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. Tokyürek, H. (2019). Eski Uygur Türkçesinde Budizm ve Manihaizm terimleri. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
  • Toparlı, R., Vural, H. ve Karaatlı, R. (20072). Kıpçak Türkçesi sözlüğü. Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
  • Wei, D. (2007). A fundamental feature of the Huayan philosophy. Reflecting mirrors perspectives on Huayan Buddhism. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 189-194.
  • Wilkens, J. (2007). Das Buch von der Sündentilgung. Edition des alttürkisch-buddhistischen Kšanti Kılguluk Nom Bitig. Turnhout: Brepols.
There are 24 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Linguistics
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Uğur Uzunkaya This is me 0000-0003-4534-9305

Tümer Karaayak 0000-0002-2322-9663

Publication Date December 1, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Issue: 70 (Aralık)

Cite

APA Uzunkaya, U., & Karaayak, T. (2020). Eski Uygurca Buddhāvataṁsaka-sūtra tefsirine ilişkin fragmanlar (13, 14 ve 19. Yapraklar). Türk Dili Araştırmaları Yıllığı - Belleten(70 (Aralık), 7-27. https://doi.org/10.32925/tday.2020.43