Uluslararası Kalkınma, Devlet ve Toplum

Year 2017, Volume: 2 Issue: 4, 309 - 327, 28.12.2017

Erdem Yörük

https://doi.org/10.25229/beta.364090

Abstract

Bu makale, değişen tanımları, farklı varsayımları ve
çeşitli kuramlar bünyesinde içerilen ya da etkisi azaltılan bir dizi dışsal
etkeni belirterek “devlet”, “toplum” ve “devlet-toplum” ilişkileri kavramlarının
uluslararası kalkınma kuramları içerisindeki gelişimini tahlil etmektedir. Bu
analizde, sırası ile klasik kalkınma kuramları, modernleşme perspektifi,
bağımlılık kuramı, dünya-sistemi perspektifi, sınıf-temelli kalkınma kuramları,
neo-liberal kuramlar, devlet-merkezli yaklaşımlar ve post-modern kuramlar ve
küreselleşmeci kuramlar ele alınmaktadır. Her bir yaklaşıma ait toplum-devlet
kavramsallaştırması eleştirel bir şekilde değerlendirilmektedir.

Keywords

Uluslararası kalkınma, devlet, toplum, teori

International Development, State and Society

Abstract

This article analyzes the theoretical development of the
concepts of “the state,” “society” and “state-society” relations, by specifying
the changing definitions, differing assumptions, and the variety of exogenous
factors that were either included or mitigated in the various theories of
international development. In this analysis, respectively, classical
development theories, modernization perspective, dependency theory,
world-system perspective, class-based development theories, neo-liberal
theories, state-centered approaches, post-modern theories and globalizationist
theories are considered. Conceptualizations of state and society in each of
these approaches are evaluated critically.

Keywords

International development, state, society, theory

References

• Arrighi, G. (1990). The developmentalist illusion: A reconceptualization of the semiperiphery. In Martin W. G. (Eds.), Semiperipheral States in the World Economy. New York: Greenwood Press. Baran, P. (1952). On the political economy of backwardness. The Manchester School of Economy and Social Studies, 20(1), 66-84. Retrieved from https://marx21.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/baran-1952-on-the-political-economy-of-backwardness.pdf Cardoso, F. H. (1972). Dependency and development in Latin America. New Left Review, 74, 83-95. Castells, M. (2004). The power of identity. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. Chase-Dunn, C. & Rubinson, R. (1977). Toward a structural perspective on the world-system. Politics and Society, 7(4), 453 - 476. doi:10.1177/003232927700700403 Chatterjee P. (1993). The nation and its fragment, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Chibber, V. (2003). Locked in place: State-building and late industrialization in India.  Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.  Durkheim, E. (1964). Division of labor in society. New York, NY: Free Press of Glencoe. Frank, G. A. (1966). The development of underdevelopment. Monthly Review. Gereffi, G., Korzeniewicz, M., & Korzeniewicz, R. P. (1994). Introduction: global commodity chains. In Gereffi G. & Korzeniewicz M. (Eds.), Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism. Westport, CT: Praeger. Harvey, D. (1989). Conditions of post-modernity: An Enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Oxford, OX: Blackwell Publishers. Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., & Perraton J. (1999). Global transformations: Politics, economics and culture. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Krueger, A. O. (1990). Government failures in development. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(3), 9-23. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1942926 Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45(1), 1-28. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1811581 Marx, K. & Engels, F. (2001). The German ideology: Part one, with selections from parts two and three, together with Marx's "Introduction to a critique of political economy." New York, NY: International Publishers. Moore, B. (1993). Social origins of dictatorship and democracy: Lord and peasant in the making of the modern world. Boston, MA: Beacon Press. Munck, R. (2005). Globalization and social exclusion: A transformationalist perspective. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press. Rostow, W. W. (1960). The stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto. Cambridge, CBG: Cambridge University Press. Rueschemeyer, D., Stephens, E., & Stephens, J. (1992). Capitalist development and democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Sachs, W. (Ed.). (1996). The Development Dictionary. London, LDN: Zed Books. Skocpol, T. (1985). Bringing the state back in: strategies of analysis in current search. In Evans, P. et al (Eds.), Bringing the state back in, Cambridge CBG: Cambridge University Press. Stiglitz, J. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company. Streeten, P (1987). Structural adjustment: A survey of the issues and options. In Corbridge S. (Ed.) Development studies: A reader. Oxford, OX: Oxford University Press. Tipps, D. C. (1973). Modernization theory and the comparative study of societies: A critical perspective. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 15(2), 199-226. Wallerstein, I. (1974). The rise and future demise of the world capitalist system: Concepts for comparative analysis. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 16(4), 387-415. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/178015. Wallerstein, I. (1991). Unthinking social science: The limits of nineteenth-century paradigms. Cambridge, CBG: Polity Press. Weber, M. (1958). Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism, New York, NY: Scribner