Abstract
As is suggested by its title the main purpose of this study is a presentation, analysis and evaluation of al-Ghazâlî’s
ideas on justice and social justice. However, in the meantime we shall have an opportunity to shed some light on an aspect of
his intellectual legacy that has remained almost unnoticed: prioritization of what is social, or giving priority to what is social
in human behaviour, and in its religious, legal and moral evaluation. This can very briefly be summarised as considering
transitive virtues more valuable or praiseworthy than the intransitive ones, and considering transitive vices more vicious or
blameworthy than the intransitive ones. We shall try also to put two of al-Ghazâlî’s significant approaches to religion, law and
ethics in the perspective of social justice, or vice versa. One of these is his remarkable but not duly and properly appreciated
approach to fardh1 kifâya. The other is his well-known approach to Maqâsid al-Sharî’a and Masâlih. What is important about
them here is that they are going to be treated as references for an idea of social responsibility or collective obligation/duty.
Keywords
Al-Ghazâlî Justice Social Justice Priority of what is Social Transitive Virtues Intransitive Virtues Transitive Vices Intransitive Vices Fardh Kifâya Maqâsid al-Sharî’a Masâlih Social Responsibility Collective Obligation Zakât
References
- Referans1
- Referans2
- Referans3
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | August 15, 2018 |
| IZ | https://izlik.org/JA37XR23SA |
| Published in Issue | Year 2018 Volume: 5 Issue: 2 |