Prevalence of workplace violence against health staff in Malatya

Abstract

This study was performed to determine the prevalence of physical, psychological and sexual violence against health staff working at health care institutions and the associated factors in Malatya, Turkey. Participants were randomly chosen by stratified sampling method according to profession. Data were collected via the questionnaires adapted by the violence survey form prepared by WHO. 588 health staff gave back the form after they answered the questions. The coverage rate was 90.5%. Overall workplace violence prevalence in the last year was 67.2%. The most prevalent violence type was mobbing (60.4%). It was followed by physical violence (23.1%), and sexual violence (1.2%). Regarding professions, physicians were exposed to physical violence, psychological violence more than the others (p<0.05). The most frequently reported perpetrators in overall violence were patients' relatives (58.7%) and patients themselves (20%). Of the health staff who experienced violence only 24% reported the attacks to the related legal authorities. The research has shown that workplace violence against health staff is a common problem in Malatya. However, reporting of violence or seeking formal help for violence is not common. Further studies should be conducted to more closely to examine the problem.

Keywords

• Health staff, prevelance, occupational injury, workplace, violence

References

1. Aktuğlu K, Hancı H (1999). Violence threat in emergency services (Accessed on 2010 Jun 02)).
2. Ayrancı U, Yenilmez C, Günay Y, Kaptanoğlu C (2002). The frequency of being exposed to violence in the various health institutions and health profession groups. Anatolian J Psychiat 3, 147-154.
3. Ayrancı U (2005). Violence toward health care workers in emergency departments in west Turkey. J Emerg Med 28, 361-365.
4. Badger F, Mullan B (2004). Aggressive and violent incidents: perceptions of training and support among staff caring for older people and people with head injury. J Clin Nurs 13, 526-533.
5. Beth R K (2002). Recognition and Prevention of Hospital Violence. Dimens Crit Care Nurs 21, 236-241.
6. Di Martıno V, Hoel H, Cooper CL (2003). Preventing violence and harassment in the workplace, european foundation for the improvement of living and working conditions, Dublin. (http://www.eurofound.europa.eu /pubdocs /2002/109/en/1/ef02109en.pdf (Accessed on 2009 May 06).
7. Ergün ŞF, Karadakovan A (2005). Violence towards nursing staff in emergency departments in one Turkish city. Int Nurs Rev 52, 154-160.
8. Gough P, Goss M R, Jordan S (2001). Violence in the workplace: The nurse's experience: commentary: could guidelines 323, 1362-1370.

9. Hesketh KL, Duncan SM, Estabrooks CA, et al (2003). Workplace violence in alberta and british columbia hospitals. Health Policy 63, 311-21.
10. Jean H, Gregory GO (2002). Violence prevention in healthcare organizations within a total quality management framework. J Nurs Admin 32, 479-486.
11. Karaoğlu L, Celbis O, Ercan C, Ilgar M, Pehlivan E, Gunes G, Genc MF, Egri M(2005). Physical, emotional and sexual violence during pregnancy in Malatya, Turkey. Eur J Publ Health 12, 2-8.
12. Kingma M (2001). Workplace violence in the health ssector: a problem of epidemic proportion. Int Nurs Rev 48, 129-30.
13. Kwok RP, Law YK, Li KE, Ng YC et al. (2006). Prevalence of workplace violence against nurses in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J 12, 4-5.
14. Lin Y-H, Liu H-E (2004). The Impact of workplace violence nurses in south Taiwan. Int J Nurs Stud 42, 773-778.
15. Occupationalty Health and Safety (2003). Official Gazzette, URL:http://www.isguvenligi.net/mevzuat/4857_isig_ yonetmelikleri/is_sagligi_ve_guvenligi_yonetmeligi.pdf (Accessed on 2009 jun 23). From:
16. Ozen S (2007). Verbal Violence in Workplace. J Ind Relat Hum Resour 9, 1-5.
17. Saines JC (1999). Violence and agression in A&E reccommendation for action. Accid Emerg Nurs 7, 8- 12.
18. Uzun Ö (1999). Status of violence towards nurses at working place. VII. National Nursing Congres, Erzurum 217-221.