Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

David Lewis’ Best System Analysis and CP Laws

Year 2019, , 1 - 12, 28.03.2019
https://doi.org/10.18491/beytulhikme.1429

Abstract

In this paper, I aim to explore Lewis’s best system analysis and how it can accommodate laws with exceptions. The Best System Account has been introduced to provide an alternative view for both minimalist and counterfactual theories of regularities. Simple regularity theory faces problems in which there is some generalization that seems to be a law or some regularities that are established accidentally. It tries to exclude the accidental generalization from the account. However, the best system analysis can solve the problem of how to distinguish between laws and accidents.

References

  • Brandon, D.-M. (2001). Lossy Laws. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Brewka, G. (1991). Nonmonotonic Reasoning: Logical Foundations of Commonsense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Callender, C. & Cohen, J. (2010). Special Sciences, Conspiracy and the Better Best System Account of Lawhood. Erkenntnis, 73, 427-447.
  • Cohen, J. & Callender, C. (2009). A Better Best System Account of, C. (2009). A Better Best System Account of Lawhood. Philosophical Studies, 145, 1-34.
  • Delgrande, J. P. (1998). On First-Order Conditional Logics. Artificial Intelligence, 105, 105-137.
  • Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Oxford, Blackwell.
  • Lewis, D. (1986). Postscript to “A Subjectivist’s Guide to Objective Chance”. Philosophical Papers, vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 114-132.
  • Pelletier, F. J. & Asher, N. (1997). Generics and Defaults. Handbook of Logic and Language. (Eds. J. van Benthem & A. ter Meulen). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1125-1177.
  • Schrenk, M. (2006). A Theory for Special Science Laws. Selected Papers Contributed to the Sections of GAP.6. (Eds. H. Bohse & S. Walter). Paderborn: Mentis.
  • Schrenk, M. (2007). The Metaphysics of Ceteris Paribus Laws. Frankfurt am Main: Ontos.
  • Schrenk, M. (2008). A Lewisian Theory for Special Science Laws. Selected Papers Contributed to the Sections of GAP.6. (Eds. D. Bohse & K. Dreimann, & S. Walter). 6th International Congress of the Society for Analytic Philosophy. Paderborn: Mentis.
  • Schurz, G. (2002). Ceteris Paribus Laws: Classification and Deconstruction. Erkenntnis, 57, 351-372.
  • Unterhuber, M. (2014). Do Ceteris Paribus Laws Exist? A Regularity-Based Best System Analysis. Erkenntnis, 79, 1833-1847.
  • Weatherson, B. (2014). David Lewis. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/david-lewis.
Year 2019, , 1 - 12, 28.03.2019
https://doi.org/10.18491/beytulhikme.1429

Abstract

References

  • Brandon, D.-M. (2001). Lossy Laws. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Brewka, G. (1991). Nonmonotonic Reasoning: Logical Foundations of Commonsense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Callender, C. & Cohen, J. (2010). Special Sciences, Conspiracy and the Better Best System Account of Lawhood. Erkenntnis, 73, 427-447.
  • Cohen, J. & Callender, C. (2009). A Better Best System Account of, C. (2009). A Better Best System Account of Lawhood. Philosophical Studies, 145, 1-34.
  • Delgrande, J. P. (1998). On First-Order Conditional Logics. Artificial Intelligence, 105, 105-137.
  • Lewis, D. (1973). Counterfactuals. Oxford, Blackwell.
  • Lewis, D. (1986). Postscript to “A Subjectivist’s Guide to Objective Chance”. Philosophical Papers, vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 114-132.
  • Pelletier, F. J. & Asher, N. (1997). Generics and Defaults. Handbook of Logic and Language. (Eds. J. van Benthem & A. ter Meulen). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1125-1177.
  • Schrenk, M. (2006). A Theory for Special Science Laws. Selected Papers Contributed to the Sections of GAP.6. (Eds. H. Bohse & S. Walter). Paderborn: Mentis.
  • Schrenk, M. (2007). The Metaphysics of Ceteris Paribus Laws. Frankfurt am Main: Ontos.
  • Schrenk, M. (2008). A Lewisian Theory for Special Science Laws. Selected Papers Contributed to the Sections of GAP.6. (Eds. D. Bohse & K. Dreimann, & S. Walter). 6th International Congress of the Society for Analytic Philosophy. Paderborn: Mentis.
  • Schurz, G. (2002). Ceteris Paribus Laws: Classification and Deconstruction. Erkenntnis, 57, 351-372.
  • Unterhuber, M. (2014). Do Ceteris Paribus Laws Exist? A Regularity-Based Best System Analysis. Erkenntnis, 79, 1833-1847.
  • Weatherson, B. (2014). David Lewis. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/david-lewis.
There are 14 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Philosophy
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Ömer Fatih Tekin 0000-0002-1142-2706

Publication Date March 28, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019

Cite

APA Tekin, Ö. F. (2019). David Lewis’ Best System Analysis and CP Laws. Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, 9(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.18491/beytulhikme.1429