BibTex RIS Cite

The Influence of Cogito and Position of God to Subjects of Knowledge and Belief in Descartes’ Philosophy

Year 2015, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 1 - 15, 13.07.2015
https://doi.org/10.18491/bijop.75523

Abstract

Metaphysics of Descartes is the first and preparation science of his philosophy. Because, Descartes makes epistemology. Descartes proves principles of this philosophy by metaphysics. These principles provide subject and assurance for accuracy of epistemology. Descartes says that cogito is the subject of epistemology and existence of God is the assurance for accuracy of it. Descartes calls these existences as substances in his metaphysics. These substances are two main, and the most important, existences of the philosophy of Descartes. This philosophy can not be made unless these two existences a reproven. Cogito is the contemplating and God is the creator existence of this philosophy. The relationship between these two existences in Descartes’ metaphysics influences how knowledge and belief are considered. That is why the importance of relationship between these two existences in Descartes’ philosophy is discussed in this paper. How does human being, who does everything as a thinking existence, form his relationship with knowledge and belief. The objective of this study is to understand the subject of knowledge and belief, by evaluating factors liying behind them, in Descartes’ philosophy.

References

  • Abruzzes, J. (2007). The Structure of Descartes’s Ontological Proof. British Journal for History of philosophy, 15 (2), 253-282.
  • Bagger, C. (2002). The Ethics of Belief: Descartes and the AugustinianTradition. The Journal of Religion, 82, 205-224.
  • Beyssade, J.-M. (1997). Descartes: Felsefi Bir Devrim mi? Cogito, 10, 63-81.
  • Bockover, M. I. (2007). Metaphors of Self in Confucius and Descartes. Religion East and West, 7, 107-120.
  • Cottinghom, J. (2002). Descartes and Voluntaries of Belief, The Monist, 85 (2), 343-360.
  • Cottingham, J. (1988). The Rationalists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Cunning, D. (2003). Descartes on the Immutability of the Divine Will. Religious Studies,39, 79-92.
  • Descartes, R. (1984). Metot Üzerine Konuşma (çev. K. S. Sel). İstanbul: Sosyal Yayınlar.
  • Descartes, R. (1998). Metafizik Düşünceler (çev. M. Karasan). İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları
  • Descartes, R. (1983). Felsefenin İlkeleri (çev. M. Akın). İstanbul: Say Yayınları.
  • Sarkar, H. (2003). Descartes’ Cogito. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schiffer, S. (1976). Descartes on His Essence. The Philosophical Review, 85 (1), 21-43.
  • Stout, R. (1998). Descartes’ Hidden Argument for the Existence of God. British Journal of the History of Philosophy, 6 (2), 155-168.
  • Treanor, N. (2004). The Cogito and the Metaphysics of Mind. Philosophical Studies, 130, 247-271.
Year 2015, Volume: 5 Issue: 1, 1 - 15, 13.07.2015
https://doi.org/10.18491/bijop.75523

Abstract

References

  • Abruzzes, J. (2007). The Structure of Descartes’s Ontological Proof. British Journal for History of philosophy, 15 (2), 253-282.
  • Bagger, C. (2002). The Ethics of Belief: Descartes and the AugustinianTradition. The Journal of Religion, 82, 205-224.
  • Beyssade, J.-M. (1997). Descartes: Felsefi Bir Devrim mi? Cogito, 10, 63-81.
  • Bockover, M. I. (2007). Metaphors of Self in Confucius and Descartes. Religion East and West, 7, 107-120.
  • Cottinghom, J. (2002). Descartes and Voluntaries of Belief, The Monist, 85 (2), 343-360.
  • Cottingham, J. (1988). The Rationalists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Cunning, D. (2003). Descartes on the Immutability of the Divine Will. Religious Studies,39, 79-92.
  • Descartes, R. (1984). Metot Üzerine Konuşma (çev. K. S. Sel). İstanbul: Sosyal Yayınlar.
  • Descartes, R. (1998). Metafizik Düşünceler (çev. M. Karasan). İstanbul: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları
  • Descartes, R. (1983). Felsefenin İlkeleri (çev. M. Akın). İstanbul: Say Yayınları.
  • Sarkar, H. (2003). Descartes’ Cogito. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schiffer, S. (1976). Descartes on His Essence. The Philosophical Review, 85 (1), 21-43.
  • Stout, R. (1998). Descartes’ Hidden Argument for the Existence of God. British Journal of the History of Philosophy, 6 (2), 155-168.
  • Treanor, N. (2004). The Cogito and the Metaphysics of Mind. Philosophical Studies, 130, 247-271.
There are 14 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Naciye Atış This is me

Publication Date July 13, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2015 Volume: 5 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Atış, N. (2015). The Influence of Cogito and Position of God to Subjects of Knowledge and Belief in Descartes’ Philosophy. Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, 5(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.18491/bijop.75523