Year 2018, Volume 8 , Issue 1, Pages 1 - 17 2018-06-23

Protasis and Apophansis in Aristotle’s Logic

Murat KELİKLİ [1]


This essay examines how Aristotle creates propositions. It evaluates his use of quality and quantity in his theory of syllogism. In De Interpretatione, Aristotle used the term, ‘apophansis’, but he preferred ‘protasis’ in Analytica Priora. While Aristotle classified these as affirmative and negative due to their qualities, he embraced a different point of view about classifications based on quantity. Differences in apophansis are evaluated on the basis of their singular and universal structures, and their predications are also taken into consideration. As he studied protasis, however, he re-arranged the classifications of apophansis and re-shaped them according to their predicative properties. The structural difference between De Interpretatione and Analytica Priora are revealed through a careful examination of Aristotle’s use of these two concepts.

Proposition, protasis, apophansis, singular, universal, Aristotelian logic
  • Aristotle (1938). Categories. On Interpretation. Prior Analytics. (Trans. H. P. Cooke & H. Tredennick). Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
  • Aristotle (1949). Aristotelis Categoriae et Liber de Interpretatione. (Ed. L. Minio-Paluello). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Aristotle (1964). Aristotelis Analytica Priora et Posteriora. (Eds. W. D. Ross & L. Minio-Paluello). Clarendon Press.
  • Aristotle (2014). Complete Works of Aristotle, vol. 1. (Ed. J. Barnes). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Corcoran, J. & Boger, G. (2011). Protasis in Prior Analytics: Proposition or Premise? Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 17, 151-152.
  • Crivelli, P. & Charles, D. (2011). ‘ΠΡΟΤΑΣΙΣ’ in Aristotle’s Prior Analytics. Phronesis, 56 (3), 193-203.
  • Hamilton, W. (1860). Lectures on Metaphysics and Logic, vol. 2. London: Blackwood.
  • Hamlyn, D. W. (1961). Aristotle on Predication. Phronesis, 6 (2): 110-126.
  • Ibn-Sīnā. (1984). Remarks and Admonitions: Part One: Logic. (Trans. S. C. Inati). Toronto: Pointifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
  • Łukasiewicz, J. (1957). Aristotle's Syllogistic from the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Venn, J. (1881). Symbolic Logic. London: Macmillan & Co.
  • Whitaker, C. W. A. (2002). Aristotle's De Interpretatione: Contradiction and Dialectic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Williamson, C. (1988). How Many Syllogisms Are There? History and Philosophy of Logic, 9, 77-85.
Primary Language en
Subjects Philosophy
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Author: Murat KELİKLİ
Institution: Bartın University
Country: Turkey


Dates

Publication Date : June 23, 2018

APA Keli̇kli̇, M . (2018). Protasis and Apophansis in Aristotle’s Logic . Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy , 8 (1) , 1-17 . DOI: 10.18491/beytulhikme.435938