Kaz Dağları ve Çevresinde Anadolu Sıvacıkuşu' nun (Sitta krueperi) Habitat Uygunluk Modellemesi

Abstract

Biyoçeşitlilik kaybı, habitat parçalanması ve iklim değişikliği, türlerin dağılımlarını etkileyen başlıca çevresel baskılar arasında yer almaktadır. Özellikle belirli habitat koşullarına bağımlı türlerin çevresel değişimlere karşı daha hassas olması, potansiyel yaşam alanlarının belirlenmesini koruma biyolojisi açısından önemli hale getirmektedir. Bu çalışmada, Doğu Akdeniz bölgesine endemik bir kuş türü olan Küçük Sıvacı Kuşu (Sitta krueperi)'nin Kaz Dağları ve çevresindeki potansiyel habitat uygunluğu ve dağılım örüntüleri MaxEnt (Maximum Entropy) yöntemi kullanılarak modellenmiştir. Türün arazi çalışmaları sırasında elde edilen 30 varlık kaydı ile biyoklimatik, topoğrafik ve uzaktan algılama temelli çevresel değişkenler modele dahil edilmiştir. Çevresel değişkenler arasındaki çoklu bağlantı Pearson korelasyon analizi ile değerlendirilmiş ve yüksek korelasyon gösteren değişkenler analiz dışında bırakılmıştır. Model kalibrasyonunda verilerin %70’i eğitim ve %30’u test verisi olarak kullanılmış, analizler 10 tekerrür halinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Model performansı yüksek bulunmuş olup eğitim ve test verileri için AUC değerleri sırasıyla 0,947 ve 0,927 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Jackknife analizleri, Ağustos NDVI, Mart NDVI, yıllık ortalama sıcaklık (BIO1), Topografik Pozisyon İndeksi (TPI) ve Topografik Islaklık İndeksi (TWI/CTI) değişkenlerinin tür dağılımını en güçlü şekilde etkilediğini göstermiştir. Yanıt eğrileri, habitat uygunluğunun yüksek bitki örtüsü yoğunluğuna sahip alanlarda arttığını, sıcaklık artışı ve yüksek nem koşullarında ise azaldığını ortaya koymuştur. Habitat uygunluk haritaları, tür için en uygun alanların orta yükseltilerdeki ibreli orman ekosistemlerinde yoğunlaştığını göstermiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar, S. krueperi’nin dağılımının büyük ölçüde vejetasyon yapısı, topoğrafik özellikler ve iklimsel koşullar tarafından şekillendirildiğini ortaya koymakta olup türün korunmasına yönelik planlama ve yönetim çalışmalarına bilimsel bir temel sağlamaktadır.

Keywords

• Sitta krueperi
• habitat uygunluk modellemesi
• NDVI
• Kaz Dağları

Thanks

Bu çalışma, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsünde hazırlanan “Kaz Dağları ve Çevresinde Anadolu Sıvacıkuşunun (Sitta krueperi) Habitat Uygunluk Modellemesi” başlıklı yüksek lisans tezinden üretilmiştir. Yazarlar, tez çalışmasının yürütülmesine sağlanan akademik ve kurumsal destekler için Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesine teşekkür eder.

Habitat Suitability Modelling for the Krüper's Nuthatch (Sitta krueperi) in the Kaz Mountains and Surrounding Area

Abstract

Biodiversity loss, habitat fragmentation and climate change are among the primary environmental pressures affecting species distributions. The fact that species dependent on specific habitat conditions are particularly sensitive to environmental changes makes the identification of potential habitats crucial from a conservation biology perspective. In this study, the potential habitat suitability and distribution patterns of the Krüper’s nuthatch (Sitta krueperi), a bird species live to the Eastern Mediterranean region, were modelled using the MaxEnt (Maximum Entropy) method in the Kaz Mountains and surrounding areas. Thirty sightings of the species obtained during field surveys, along with bioclimatic, topographic and remote sensing-based environmental variables, were incorporated into the model. The multiple relationships between environmental variables were assessed using Pearson correlation analysis, and variables showing high correlation were excluded from the analysis. In model calibration, 70% of the data was used for training and 30% for testing, with analyses conducted in 10 replicates. The model performance was found to be high, with AUC values of 0.947 and 0.927 calculated for the training and test data, respectively. Jackknife analyses indicated that the August NDVI, March NDVI, annual mean temperature (BIO1), Topographic Position Index (TPI) and Topographic Wetness Index (TWI/CTI) variables had the strongest influence on species distribution. Response curves revealed that habitat suitability increases in areas with high vegetation cover density, whilst it decreases under conditions of rising temperature and high humidity. Habitat suitability maps indicated that the most suitable areas for the species are concentrated in coniferous forest ecosystems at medium elevations. The results obtained demonstrate that the distribution of S. krueperi is largely shaped by vegetation structure, topographic features and climatic conditions, thereby providing a scientific basis for planning and management efforts aimed at the species’ conservation.

Keywords

• Sitta krueperi
• MaxEnt
• habitat suitability
• species distribution modelling
• NDVI
• Kaz Mountains.

Thanks

This article was derived from the Master’s thesis entitled “Habitat Suitability Modelling for the Krüper’s Nuthatch (Sitta krueperi) in the Kaz Mountains and Surrounding Area,” prepared at the Institute of Graduate Studies, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University. The authors gratefully acknowledge Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University for the academic and institutional support provided during the thesis research.

References

1. Abrams, M., Crippen, R., & Fujisada, H. (2020). ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model (GDEM) and ASTER Global Water Body Dataset (ASTWBD). Remote. Sens., 12, 1156.https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12071156.
2. Albayrak, T., & Erdoğan, A. (2005). Observations on some behaviours of Krüper’s Nuthatch (Sitta krueperi), a little-known West Palaearctic bird. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 29, 177–181.
3. Albayrak, T., & Erdoğan, A. (2006). Breeding ecology of Krüper’s Nuthatch (Sitta krueperi) near Antalya, Turkey. Israel Journal of Zoology, 51, 309–314.
4. Albayrak, T., & Erdoğan, A. (2010). A GIS-based approach to assess the population size of Krüper’s Nuthatch (Sitta krueperi) at a newly found breeding area in Inner Anatolia.Zoology in the Middle East, 49(1), 27–32.
5. Albayrak, T., & Erdoğan, A. (2018). Distribution, density and important hotspots of Krüper’s Nuthatch (Sitta krueperi) in Turkey and Lesvos Island, Greece. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 42(5), 578–584. https://doi.org/10.3906/zoo-1711-27
6. Albayrak, T., Bairlein, F., & Erdoğan, A. (2010). Habitat parameters and breeding density of Krüper’s Nuthatch (Sitta krueperi) in southern Turkey. Polish Journal of Ecology, 58(3),549–552.
7. Albayrak, T., Erdoğan, A., & Fırat, M. Z. (2011). A model of habitat suitability for Krueper’s Nuthatch Sitta krueperi. Bird Study, 58(1), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2010.512953
8. Albayrak, T., González, J., Drovetski, S. V., & Wink, M. (2012). Phylogeography and population structure of Krüper’s Nuthatch Sitta krueperi from Turkey based on microsatellites and mitochondrial DNA. Journal of Ornithology, 153, 405–411.

9. Altunel, A. O. (2023). The effect of DEM resolution on topographic wetness index calculation and visualization: An insight to the hidden danger unraveled in Bozkurt in August, 2021. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 8(2), 165-172.
10. Amatulli, G., Domisch, S., Tuanmu, M., Parmentier, B., Ranipeta, A., Malczyk, J., & Jetz, W. (2018). A suite of global, cross-scale topographic variables for environmental and biodiversity modeling. Scientific Data, 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.40.
11. Bonthoux, S., Lefèvre, S., Herrault, P., & Sheeren, D. (2018). Spatial and Temporal Dependency of NDVI Satellite Imagery in Predicting Bird Diversity over France. Remote. Sens., 10, 1136. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10071136.
12. Booth, T. (2022). Checking bioclimatic variables that combine temperature and precipitation data before their use in species distribution models. Austral Ecology.https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.13234.
13. Ďuračiová, R., & Pruzinec, F. (2022). Effects of Terrain Parameters and Spatial Resolution of a Digital Elevation Model on the Calculation of Potential Solar Radiation in the Mountain Environment: A Case Study of the Tatra Mountains. ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf., 11, 389.https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11070389.
14. Efe, R., Sönmez, S., Cürebal, İ. & Soykan, A. (2015). Subalpine Ecosystem and Possible Impact of Climate Change on Vegetation of Kaz Mountain (Mount Ida - NW Turkey).In: Öztürk, M. et al. (Eds.), Climate Change Impacts on High-Altitude Ecosystems. Springer, Cham.
15. Elith, J., & Leathwick, J. R. (2009). Species distribution models: Ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 40, 677–697.
16. Elith, J., Phillips, S. J., Hastie, T., Dudík, M., Chee, Y. E., & Yates, C. J. (2011). A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Diversity and Distributions, 17(1), 43–57.
17. Fick, S., & Hijmans, R. (2017). WorldClim 2: new 1‐km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, 37.https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5086.
18. Gesch, D., Oimoen, M., Danielson, J., & Meyer, D. (2016). VALIDATION OF THE ASTER GLOBAL DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL VERSION 3 OVER THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES. ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 143-148. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xli-b4-143-2016. Guisan, A., & Thuiller, W. (2005). Predicting species distribution: Offering more than simple habitat models. Ecology Letters, 8(9), 993–1009.
19. Harrap, S., & Quinn, D. (1996). Tits, Nuthatches and Treecreepers. Christopher Helm.
20. Hobi, M., Dubinin, M., Graham, C., Coops, N., Clayton, M., Pidgeon, A., & Radeloff, V. (2017). A comparison of Dynamic Habitat Indices derived from different MODIS products as predictors of avian species richness. Remote Sensing of Environment, 195, 142-152.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.04.018.
21. Huang, S., Tang, L., Hupy, J., Wang, Y., & Shao, G. (2020). A commentary review on the use of normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) in the era of popular remote sensing. Journal of Forestry Research, 32, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-02001155-1.
22. McCune, B., & Keon, D. (2002). Equations for potential annual direct incident radiation and heat load. 603 - 606.https://doi.org/10.1658/11009233(2002)013[0603:efpadi]2.0.co;2.
23. Naqibzadeh, A., Sarhangzadeh, J., Sotoudeh, A., Mashkur, M., & Thomalsky, J. (2021). Habitat Suitability Modeling for Wildlife Management Objectives by Using Maximum Entropy Method. Journal of Human, Earth, and Future. https://doi.org/10.28991/hef-2021-0204-05.
24. Öztürk, M., Celik, A., Uysal, İ., et al. (2011). Ecological Conditions and Vegetation of the Alpine Zone of Kazdağı (Mt. Ida) National Park, Turkey. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 19, 829–833.
25. Perktaş, U., Gür, H., Sağlam, İ. K., & Quintero, E. (2015). Climate-driven range shifts and demographic events over the history of Krüper’s Nuthatch Sitta krueperi. Bird Study, 62(1), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2014.977220
26. Pettorelli, N., Vik, J. O., Mysterud, A., Gaillard, J. M., Tucker, C. J., & Stenseth, N. C. (2005). Using the satellite-derived NDVI to assess ecological responses to environmental change.Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(9), 503–510.
27. Phillips, S., Anderson, R., & Schapire, R. (2006). Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling, 190, 231-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026.
28. Radeloff, V., Dubinin, M., Coops, N., Allen, A., Brooks, T., Clayton, M., Costa, G., Graham, C., Helmers, D., Ives, A., Kolesov, D., Pidgeon, A., Rapacciuolo, G., Razenkova, E., Suttidate, N., Young, B., Zhu, L., & Hobi, M. (2019). The Dynamic Habitat Indices (DHIs) from MODIS and global biodiversity. Remote Sensing of Environment.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.12.009.
29. Smith, A., & Santos, M. (2019). Testing the ability of species distribution models to infer variable importance. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/715904.
30. Trevisani, S., Teza, G., & Guth, P. (2023). Hacking the topographic ruggedness index. Geomorphology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2023.108838.
31. Uuemaa, E., Ahi, S., Montibeller, B., Muru, M., & Kmoch, A. (2020). Vertical Accuracy of Freely Available Global Digital Elevation Models (ASTER, AW3D30, MERIT, TanDEMX, SRTM, and NASADEM). Remote. Sens., 12, 3482. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12213482.
32. Uysal, İ. (2010). An Overview of Plant Diversity of Kazdağı (Mt. Ida) Forest National Park, Turkey. Journal of Environmental Biology, 31, 141–149.
33. Winzeler, H., Owens, P., Read, Q., Libohova, Z., Ashworth, A., & Sauer, T. (2022). Topographic Wetness Index as a Proxy for Soil Moisture in a Hillslope Catena: Flow Algorithms and Map Generalization. Land. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11112018.