Life Cycle Assessment in Historic Buildings: A Bibliometric Exploration of Global Research Trends

Year 2025, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 118 - 130, 30.09.2025

Sadik Akşar , Rengin Beceren Öztürk , Arzu Cahantimur

https://doi.org/10.30516/bilgesci.1763443

Abstract

Efforts to mitigate the environmental impact of the construction sector increasingly rely on analytical tools aligned with sustainability principles. Among these, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) plays a critical role by quantitatively evaluating the environmental effects of buildings across all life stages, thereby informing design and decision-making processes. However, existing literature predominantly focuses on LCA applications in new constructions, while historic buildings—often recognized as cultural heritage assets—remain underrepresented in this context. This study systematically investigates global academic trends in LCA applications within historic buildings through bibliometric analysis. 310 publications indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection between 2001 and 2025 were examined, based on the keywords “historic building” and “life cycle assessment.” Bibliometric tools such as VOSviewer and the Bibliometrix R package were employed to visualize keyword co-occurrence, source coupling, and author collaboration networks. Thematic classification was conducted semi-automatically using high-frequency keywords. Findings reveal that topics such as energy efficiency, carbon emissions, adaptive reuse, and sustainable restoration dominate the literature, whereas significant research gaps persist in areas like social sustainability, traditional material data, and policy support. The study aims to contribute to interdisciplinary scholarship by promoting scientifically grounded evaluations of the environmental performance of historic buildings and advancing sustainable conservation strategies.

Keywords

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) , Historic Buildings , Sustainable Conservation , Bibliometric Analysis , Cultural Heritage , Environmental Impact

Tarihi Binalarda Yaşam Döngüsü Değerlendirmesi: Küresel Araştırma Eğilimlerinin Bibliyometrik Analizi

Abstract

İnşaat sektörünün çevresel etkilerinin azaltılmasına yönelik çabalar, sürdürülebilirlik ilkeleriyle uyumlu analitik araçlara giderek daha fazla dayanmaktadır. Bu bağlamda, Yaşam Döngüsü Değerlendirmesi (YDD), binaların tüm yaşam evrelerindeki çevresel etkilerini niceliksel olarak değerlendirmesiyle kritik bir rol üstlenmekte ve tasarım ile karar alma süreçlerine rehberlik etmektedir. Ancak mevcut literatürün büyük bir kısmı YDD uygulamalarını ağırlıklı olarak yeni yapılar üzerinde yoğunlaştırmakta; kültürel miras niteliği taşıyan tarihi yapılar ise bu bağlamda yeterince temsil edilmemektedir. Bu çalışma, tarihî binalarda YDD uygulamalarına ilişkin küresel akademik eğilimleri bibliyometrik analiz yöntemiyle sistematik olarak incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Web of Science Core Collection veri tabanında 2001-2025 yılları arasında yayımlanmış ve “tarihi bina” ile “yaşam döngüsü değerlendirmesi” anahtar kelimeleriyle belirlenen 310 yayın taranmıştır. Anahtar kelime birlikteliği, kaynak bağlantısı ve yazar işbirliği ağlarının görselleştirilmesi için VOSviewer ve Bibliometrix R paketi gibi bibliyometrik araçlar kullanılmıştır. Tematik sınıflandırma ise yüksek frekanslı anahtar kelimeler temelinde yarı otomatik olarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bulgular, enerji verimliliği, karbon emisyonları, uyarlanabilir yeniden kullanım ve sürdürülebilir restorasyon gibi konuların literatürde baskın olduğunu ortaya koyarken, sosyal sürdürülebilirlik, geleneksel malzeme verileri ve politika desteği gibi alanlarda kayda değer araştırma boşluklarının bulunduğunu göstermektedir. Çalışmanın, tarihî yapıların çevresel performanslarının bilimsel temelli değerlendirilmesini teşvik ederek disiplinlerarası akademik bilgiye katkı sağlaması ve sürdürülebilir koruma stratejilerinin geliştirilmesine öncülük etmesi hedeflenmektedir.

Keywords

Yaşam Döngüsü Değerlendirmesi (YDD) , Tarihi Binalar , Sürdürülebilir Koruma , Bibliyometrik Analiz , Kültürel Miras , Çevresel Etki

References

• Bakindi, A., Wiberg, A. H., Norman, J., Marsh, E., & Allen, S. (2025). Hybrid life cycle assessment (H-LCA) for buildings and construction materials: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Building and Environment, 272, 112630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112630
• Batal, L. (2019). Use of LCA for buildings. Master Thesis in Energy-efficent and Environmental Buildings Faculty of Engineering, Lund University.
• Bjørn, A., Owsianiak, M., Molin, C., & Laurent, A. (2018). Main Characteristics of LCA. In Life Cycle Assessment (pp. 9–16). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3_2
• Bonoli, A., & Franzoni, E. (2019). Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) analysis of renders and paints for the restoration of historical buildings. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 296(1), 012022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/296/1/012022
• Buyle, M., Audenaert, A., Billen, P., Boonen, K., & van Passel, S. (2019). The Future of Ex-Ante LCA? Lessons Learned and Practical Recommendations. Sustainability, 11(19), 5456. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195456
• Christensen, T. H., Damgaard, A., Levis, J., Zhao, Y., Björklund, A., Arena, U., Barlaz, M. A., Starostina, V., Boldrin, A., Astrup, T. F., & Bisinella, V. (2020). Application of LCA modelling in integrated waste management. Waste Management, 118, 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.08.034
• Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
• Dsilva, J., Zarmukhambetova, S., & Locke, J. (2023). Assessment of building materials in the construction sector: A case study using life cycle assessment approach to achieve the circular economy. Heliyon, 9(10), e20404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20404
• Endo, Y., & Takamura, H. (2021). Evaluation of Life-Cycle Assessment Analysis: Application to Restoration Projects and New Construction in Alpine Climate, Japan. Sustainability, 13(7), 3608. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073608
• Fnais, A., Rezgui, Y., Petri, I., Beach, T., Yeung, J., Ghoroghi, A., & Kubicki, S. (2022). The application of life cycle assessment in buildings: challenges, and directions for future research. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 27(5), 627–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-022-02058-5
• Franzoni, E., Volpi, L., & Bonoli, A. (2020). Applicability of life cycle assessment methodology to conservation works in historical building: The case of cleaning. Energy and Buildings, 214, 109844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109844
• Furness, M., Bello-Mendoza, R., Dassonvalle, J., & Chamy-Maggi, R. (2021). Building the ‘Bio-factory’: A bibliometric analysis of circular economies and Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment in wastewater treatment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 323, 129127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129127
• Guinée, J. (2016). Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: What Is It and What Are Its Challenges? In Taking Stock of Industrial Ecology (pp. 45–68). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20571-7_3
• Hu, M., & Świerzawski, J. (2024). Assessing the environmental benefits of adaptive reuse in historical buildings. A case study of a life cycle assessment approach. Sustainable Environment, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2024.2375439
• Hu, M., Kleijn, R., Bozhilova-Kisheva, K. P., & di Maio, F. (2013). An approach to LCSA: the case of concrete recycling. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18(9), 1793–1803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0599-8
• Karoglou, M., Kyvelou, S. S., Boukouvalas, C., Theofani, C., Bakolas, A., Krokida, M., & Moropoulou, A. (2019). Towards a Preservation–Sustainability Nexus: Applying LCA to Reduce the Environmental Footprint of Modern Built Heritage. Sustainability, 11(21), 6147. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216147
• Konaré, Z. M., Ajayi, D. D., Ba, S., & Aremu, A. K. (2023). Application of life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) in the gold mining sector: a systematic review. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 28(6), 684–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-023-02160-2
• Kumar, D., Maurya, K. K., Mandal, S. K., Mir, B. A., Nurdiawati, A., & Al-Ghamdi, S. G. (2025). Life Cycle Assessment in the Early Design Phase of Buildings: Strategies, Tools, and Future Directions. Buildings, 15(10), 1612. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15101612
• Mahmad, M. S., Suratkon, A., & Ismail, S. (2024). Embodied carbon consideration for maintenance & repair appraisal in heritage building: a review. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1347(1), 012024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1347/1/012024
• Marsh, E., Allen, S., & Hattam, L. (2023). Tackling uncertainty in life cycle assessments for the built environment: A review. Building and Environment, 231, 109941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109941
• Najjar, M. K., Figueiredo, K., Evangelista, A. C. J., Hammad, A. W. A., Tam, V. W. Y., & Haddad, A. (2022). Life cycle assessment methodology integrated with BIM as a decision-making tool at early-stages of building design. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(4), 541–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1637098
• Nubi, O., Murphy, R., & Morse, S. (2024). Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Waste to Energy Systems in the Developing World: A Review. Environments, 11(6), 123. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11060123
• Potrč Obrecht, T., Röck, M., Hoxha, E., & Passer, A. (2020). BIM and LCA Integration: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 12(14), 5534. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145534
• Przytuła, I., & Burchart, D. (2024). Sustainability Assessment Methods for the Transport Sector Considering the Life Cycle Concept—A Review. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188148
• Resch, E., Andresen, I., Cherubini, F., & Brattebø, H. (2021). Estimating dynamic climate change effects of material use in buildings—Timing, uncertainty, and emission sources. Building and Environment, 187, 107399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107399
• Sala, S., Farioli, F., & Zamagni, A. (2013). Life cycle sustainability assessment in the context of sustainability science progress (part 2). The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18(9), 1686–1697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0509-5
• Schau, E. M., Traverso, M., & Finkbeiner, M. (2012). Life cycle approach to sustainability assessment: a case study of remanufactured alternators. Journal of Remanufacturing, 2(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/2210-4690-2-5
• van der Giesen, C., Cucurachi, S., Guinée, J., Kramer, G. J., & Tukker, A. (2020). A critical view on the current application of LCA for new technologies and recommendations for improved practice. Journal of Cleaner Production, 259, 120904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120904
• Venkatesh, G. (2019). Critique of selected peer-reviewed publications on applied social life cycle assessment: focus on cases from developing countries. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 21(2), 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1644-x