Akıllı Kentlerde Yaşam Kalitesi Sakarya Büyükşehir Belediyesi’nin Akıllı Kent Uygulamaları Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 2, 382 - 416, 30.11.2022

Akın Özdemir

https://doi.org/10.54838/bilgisosyal.1171335

Öz

Amaç - Bu çalışma, “akıllı kent stratejileri, kentsel yaşam kalitesinin iyileştirilmesine nasıl katkı sağlayabilir?” sorusuna yanıt bulmayı amaçlamaktadır.
Yöntem/Metodoloji/Dizayn - Türkiye’deki yerel yönetimler arasında ilk akıllı kent stratejisine sahip Sakarya Büyükşehir Belediyesi (SBB), bu özgün yanı ile tekli vaka incelemesine değer bulunmuştur. SBB bünyesinde, çeşitli kademelerde çalışan 23 personelle gerçekleştirilen yüz yüze görüşmelerin yanı sıra hazırlanan stratejik plan (SASEP) ve kurumun resmi haber bülteni (Gündüz-Gece) içerik analizi tekniğiyle incelenmiştir. Ek olarak alan araştırması sürecinde, araştırmacı tarafından tutulan gözlem notlarından içerik analizinde elde edinilen bulguların yorumlanması için faydalanılmıştır.
Sonuçlar - SBB’nin veri odaklı bir akıllı kent stratejisine sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bu strateji sayesinde örneklemin, öncelikle kentin nesnel yaşam kalitesi göstergelerinde bir iyileşme sağladığı ve bu iyileşmenin ağırlıklı olarak altyapı, ulaşım, çevre ve yönetişim gibi akıllı kent göstergelerinde görüldüğü ortaya konulmuştur.
Katkı/Farklılıklar - Geniş kapsamlı literatür incelemesi ve ampirik bulgulardan destekle bu çalışmada akıllı kent kavramı, “bir kentin kendi iç dinamiklerine yönelen ve o kentin öncelikleri doğrultusunda teknolojik gelişmelerden, çeşitli veri kaynaklarından ve doğru bir süreç çerçevesinde elde edinilen bilgiden paydaşlarının yaşam kalitesi standartlarını iyileştirmek için faydalanan kent yönetim stratejisi” şeklinde tanımlanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Akıllı Kent, Yaşam Kalitesi, Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri, Veri, Bilgi

Destekleyen Kurum

YOK

Proje Numarası

YOK

Teşekkür

YOK

Quality of Life in Smart Cities: A Research on Smart City Practices of Sakarya Metro-politan Municipality

Öz

Purpose - This study sought to settle the question, “How can smart city strategies contribute to improving the urban quality of life?”
Methodology/Approach/Design - Sakarya Metropolitan Municipality (SMM) was found worthy of this single case study since it has become the very first to prepare a smart city strategy and action plan among local governments in Turkey. In addition to face-to-face interviews with 23 personnel holding various positions within SMM, the municipality’s strategic plan (SASEP) and official news bulletin (Gündüz-Gece) were subjected to content analysis. During this field research, the observation notes were utilized to interpret the findings of the content analysis.
Findings - The findings revealed that SMM adopts a data-driven smart city strategy. It was also discovered that, thanks to this strategy, SMM provided an improvement primarily in the objective quality of life indicators of the city, particularly visible in smart city indicators such as infrastructure, transportation, environment, and governance.
Originality/Value - Based on the extensive literature review and empirical findings, the concept “smart city” was brought a definition as “a city management strategy that addresses the internal dynamics of the city and makes use of technological developments, various data sources, and the knowledge obtained by deploying an appropriate process to improve the quality of life of its stakeholders in line with the priorities.”

Anahtar Kelimeler

Smart City, Quality of Life, ICTs, Data, Knowledge

Proje Numarası

YOK

Kaynakça

• Ardito, L., Ferraris, A., Petruzzelli, A. M., Bresciani, S., Giudi-ce, M. D. (2019). “The Role of Universities in the Knowledge Management of Smart City Projects”, Technological Forecas-ting&Social Change, c.142, ss.312–321.
• Baldock, J. C. (2014). “Social Policy, Social Welfare, and the Welfare State”, Baldock, J., C., Manning, N., Vickerstaff, S. (ed.), Social Policy, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, ss.8–26.
• Bawa, M., Caganova, D., Szilva, I. (2016). “Importance of Inter-net of Things and Big Data in Building Smart City and What Would Be Its Challenges”, Leon-Garicia, A., vd. (ed.), Smart City 360°, Toronto: Springer, ss.605–616.
• Bronstein, Z. (2009). “Industry and the Smart City”, Dissent, c.56(3), ss.27–34.
• Bunders, D. J. ve Varró, K. (2019). “Problematizing Data-Driven Urban Practices: Insights from Five Dutch Smart Cities”, Ci-ties, c.93, ss.145–152.
• Campbell, A., Converse, R., Rodgers, W. (1976). The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations and Satisfacti-ons, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
• Captevila, I. ve Zarlenga, M. I. (2015). “Smart City or Smart Ci-tizens? The Barcelona Case”, Journal of Strategy and Mana-gement, c.8(3), ss.266–282.
• Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C. F., Nijkamp, P. (2011). “Smart Cities in Europe”, Journal of Urban Technology, c.8(2), ss.65–82.
• Carayannis, E. G. ve Campbell, D. F. (2012). Mode 3 Knowledge Production in Quadruple Helix Innovation Sys-tems, New York: Springer.
• Carvalho, L. (2014). “Smart Cities from Scratch? A Socio-Technical Perspective”, Cambridge Journal of Regions Eco-nomy and Society, c.8, ss.43–60.
• Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., Pardo, T. A., Scholl, H. J. (2012). “Understan-ding Smart Cities: An Integrative Framework”, 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, ss.2289–2297.
• Chowdhury, S. N. ve Dhawan, S. (2016). “Evaluation of Key Performance Indicators of Smart Cities by Delphi Analysis”, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Recent Trends in Electronics, Information&Communication Technology (RTEICT) Proceedings, India, ss.337–342.
• Cocchia, A. (2014). “Smart and Digital City: A Systematic Litera-ture Review”, Dameri, R. P., Rosenthal-Sabroux, C. (ed.), Smart City: How to Create Public and Economic Value with High Technology in Urban Space, London: Springer, ss.13–44.
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research De-sign: Choosing Among Five Approaches, California: Sage Publications.
• Creswell, J. W. (2016). Araştırma Deseni: Nitel, Nicel ve Kar-ma Yöntem Yaklaşımları, (çev. ed. Selçuk Beşir Demir), An-kara: Eğiten Kitap.
• Dameri, R. P. (2017). Smart City Implementation: Creating Economic and Public Value in Innovative Urban Systems, Switzerland: Springer.
• Davenport, T. H. (2014). Big Data at Work: Dispelling the Myths, Uncovering the Opportunities, USA: Harvard Busi-ness School Publishing.
• Dünya Çevre ve Kalkınma Komisyonu (1991). Ortak Gelece-ğimiz, (çev. Belkıs Çırakçı), Ankara: Türkiye Çevre Sorunları Vakfı Yayını.
• Etzkowitz, H. ve Leydesdorff, L. (1995). “The Triple Helix-University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge-based Economic Development”, Glycoconjugate Journal, c.14(1), ss.14–19.
• Fernandez-Anez, V. (2016). “Stakeholders Approach to Smart Cities: A Survey on Smart City Definitions”, Alba, E., Chica-no, F., Luque, G. (ed.), Smart Cities, Cham: Springer, ss.157–167.
• Frith, J. (2017). “Big Data, Technical Communication, and the Smart City”, Journal of Business and Technical Communi-cation, c.31(2), ss.168–187.
• Galdon-Clavell, G. (2013). “(Not so) Smart Cities? : The Drivers, Impact and Risks of Surveillance-Enabled Smart Environ-ments”, Science and Public Policy, c.40, ss.717–723.
• Gerald, Y. (2019). “Smart Cities - The Rise of Aggregated Open Data Portals”,https://insights.rlist.io/2019/10/smart-cities-rise-of-aggregated-open.html (Erişim Tarihi: 24 Aralık 2021).
• Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanovi, N., Meijers, E. (2007). Smart Cities: Ranking of European Medium-sized Cities, Austria: Centre of Regional Science (SRF).
• Giffinger, R., Haindlmaier, G., Kramar, H. (2010). “The Role of Rankings in Growing City Competition”, Urban Research and Practice, c.3, ss.299–312.
• Goodspeed, R. (2014). “Smart Cities: Moving Beyond Urban Cy-bernetics to Tackle Wicked Problems”, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, c.8, ss. 79–92.
• Gross, B. M. (1966). The State of Nation: Social System Acco-unting, London: Tavistock Publications.
• Gündüz-Gece (2021) “Gündüz Gece Bülteni Sayılar: 1-24” https://www.sakarya.bel.tr/tr/Sayfa/gunduz-gece-bulteni/30 (Erişim Tarihi: 25 Aralık 2021).
• Hall, R. E. (2000). “The Vision of a Smart City”, 2nd Internatio-nal Life Extension Technology Workshop, Paris.
• Hollands, R. G. (2008). “Will the Real Smart City Please Stand up?”, City, c.12(3), ss.303–320.
• IBM (2008). A Vision of Smarter Cities: How Cities Can Lead the Way into a Prosperous and Sustainable Future, USA: IBM Global Services.
• Kemp, R., Schot, J., Hoogma, R. (1998). “Regime Shifts to Sus-tainability Through Process of Niche Formation: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management”, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, c.10(2), ss.175–198.
• Kendall, J. (2012). “Voluntary Welfare”, Alcock, P., Haux, T., May, M., Wright, S. (ed.), The Students Companion to So-cial Policy, London: Wiley-Blackwell, ss.263–268.
• Khan Z., Anjum, A., Soomro, K., Tahir, M. A. (2015). “Towards Cloud Based Big Data Analytics for Smart Future Cities”, 2013 IEEE/ACM 6th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing Proceedings, ss.381–386.
• Kitchin, R. (2015). “Making Sense of Smart Cities: Addressing Present Shortcomings”, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Eco-nomy and Society, c.8, ss.131–136.
• Kourtit, K. ve Nijkamp, P. (2012). “Smart Cities in the Innova-tion Age”, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Sci-ence Research, c.25(2), ss.93–95.
• Kourtit, K. ve Nijkamp, P. (2017). “A Big Data Dashboard Arc-hitecture for a Computable Intelligent City”, BDC: Circular City and Cultural Heritage Interplay, c.17(1), ss.23–34.
• Leydesdorff, L., Deakin, M. (2011). “The Triple-Helix Model of Smart Cities: A Neo-Evolutionary Perspective”, Journal of Urban Technology, c.18(2), ss.53–63.
• Madakam, S., Ramaswamy, R., Date, H. (2017). “Quality of Li-fe @ Palava Smart City: A Case Study”, Global Business Re-view, c.20(3), ss.708–742.
• Marans, R. W. ve Stimson, R. (2011). “An Overview of Quality of Urban Life”, Marans, R. W., Stimson, R. (ed.), Investiga-ting Quality of Urban Life: Theory, Methods, and Empiri-cal Research, New York: Springer, ss.1–29.
• Marrone, M. ve Hammerle, M. (2018). “Smart Cities: A Review and Analysis of Stakeholders’ Literature”, Bus Inf Syst Eng, c.60(3), ss.197–213.
• Mello Rose, F. (2021). “Activity Types, Thematic Domains, and Stakeholder Constellations: Explaining Civil Society Involve-ment in Amsterdam’s Smart City”, European Planning Stu-dies, ss. 1–19.
• Merriam, S. B. (2013). Nitel Araştırma: Desen ve Uygulamalar İçin Bir Rehber, (çev. ed. Selahattin Turan), Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
• Muellerleile, C., Robertson, S. L. (2018). “Digital Weberianism: Bureaucracy, Information, and the Techno-rationality of Neoli-beral Capitalism”, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, c.25(1), ss.187–216.
• Odendaal, N. (2003). “Information and Communication Techno-logy and Local Governance: Understanding the Difference between Cities in Developed and Emerging Economies”, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, c.27, ss. 585–607.
• Özdemir, A. (2022). Yaşam Kalitesinin İyileştirilmesinde Akıllı Kent Stratejileri: Sakarya Büyükşehir Belediyesi Örneği ve Yerel Yönetimler İçin Bir Model Önerisi, Doktora Tezi, (Da-nışman: M. Çağlar ÖZDEMİR), Sakarya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
• Özdemir, A., Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P. (2019). “Social Policy in Smart Cities: The Forgotten Dimension”, Komninos, N., Kak-deri, C. (ed.), Smart Cities in the Post-algorithmic Era: In-tegrating Technologies, Platforms and Governance, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing, ss.235–261.
• Punch, K. F. (2011). Sosyal Araştırmalara Giriş: Nitel ve Nicel Yaklaşımlar, (çev. Dursun Bayrak, H. Bader Arslan, Zeynep Akyüz), Ankara: Siyasal Kitapevi.
• Rabari, C. ve Storper, M. (2015). “The Digital Skin of Cities: Urban Theory and Research in the Age of the Sensored and Metered City, Ubiquitous Computing and Big Data”, Camb-ridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, c.8, ss.27–42.
• Ragnedda, M. ve Muschert, G. (ed.) (2013). The Digital Divide: The Internet and Social Inequality in International Perspec-tive, London: Routledge.
• SASEP (2019). “Sakarya Akıllı Şehir Stratejisi ve Eylem Planı (SASEP) 2019-2023”, https://www.sakarya.bel.tr/uploads/stratejik/Lm9uovzWve.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 1 Mayıs 2021).
• Shapiro, J. M. (2006). “Smart Cities: Quality of Life, Producti-vity, and the Growth Effects of Human Capital”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, c.88(2), ss.324–335.
• Suryotrisongko, H., Kusuma, R. C., Ginardi, R. V. H. (2017). “Four-Hospitality: Friendly Smart City Design for Disability”, Procedia Computer Science, c.124, ss.615–623.
• Topak, O. (2012). Refah Devleti ve Kapitalizm: 2000’li Yıllar-da Türkiye’de Refah Devleti, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
• Vanolo, A. (2014). “Smartmentality: The Smart City as Discipli-nary Strategy”, Urban Studies, c.51(5), ss.883–898.
• Vhaduri, S. ve Poellabauer, C. (2016). “Design and Implementa-tion of a Remotely Configurable and Manageable Well-being Study”, Leon-Garicia, A., vd. (ed.), Smart City 360°, Toronto: Springer, ss.179–191.
• Wang, R., Chen, F., Chen, Z., Li, T., Harari, G. (2014). “Stu-dent Life: Assessing Mental Health, Academic Performance and Behavioural Trends of College Students Using Smartpho-nes”, ACM UbiComp’14 Proceedings, ss.3–14.
• Watson, D. ve Clark, L. A. (1999). The PANAS-X Manual for the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded Form, Ames: The University of Iowa Publishing. Watson, J. B. (1925). Behaviorism, New York: W.W. Nor-ton&Company.
• Yang, L., Li, W., Ge, Y., Fu, X., Gravina, R., Fortino, G. (2014). “People-centric Service for mHealth of Wheelchair Users in Smart Cities”, Fortino G., Trunfio P. (ed.), Internet of Things Based on Smart Objects: Internet of Things (Tech-nology, Communications and Computing), Cham: Springer, ss.163–179.
• Yin, R. K. (ed.), (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, California: Sage Publications.