Türkiye’de Karbon Yoğunluğunun Azaltılmasında Dijitalleşme, Finansal Gelişme, Ticaret Açıklığı ve Ekonomik Büyümenin Rolü

Selin Dinçer; Fatih Akın

doi:10.47103/bilturk.1986137

EN TR

The Role of Digitalization, Financial Development, Trade Openness, and Economic Growth in Reducing Carbon Intensity in Türkiye

Abstract

The increasing environmental problems and their impacts on a global scale necessitate the alignment of economic activities with environmental sustainability, making the examination of factors affecting environmental degradation a crucial research topic. In recent years, the acceleration of digital transformation processes, the deepening of financial markets, the increase in international trade volume, and the prominence of the sustainability dimension of economic growth have made it necessary to re-evaluate the fundamental factors affecting environmental degradation. In this context, this study examines the effects of digitalization, financial development, trade openness, and economic growth on carbon intensity in Türkiye during the 1992-2024 period using the Fourier Augmented ARDL (FAARDL) method. FAARDL findings reveal a significant long-term relationship between the variables. The findings show that economic growth and trade openness reduce carbon intensity, while financial development and internet use increase carbon intensity. These results indicate that in Türkiye, economic growth and foreign trade can improve environmental performance through increased productivity and technology transfer, but the channeling of financial resources into energy-intensive sectors and digitalization's increased energy demand can have negative effects on carbon intensity.

Keywords

Carbon Intensity, Digitalization, Trade Openness, Financial Development, Economic Growth

Türkiye’de Karbon Yoğunluğunun Azaltılmasında Dijitalleşme, Finansal Gelişme, Ticaret Açıklığı ve Ekonomik Büyümenin Rolü

Abstract

Küresel ölçekte artan çevre sorunları ve etkileri, iktisadi faaliyetlerin çevresel sürdürülebilirlik ile uyumlu hale getirilmesini zorunlu kılarken, çevresel tahribatı etkileyen faktörlerin incelenmesi önemli bir araştırma konusu haline getirmiştir. Son yıllarda dijital dönüşüm süreçlerinin hız kazanması, finansal piyasaların derinleşmesi, uluslararası ticaret hacmindeki artış ve ekonomik büyümenin sürdürülebilirlik boyutunun ön plana çıkması, çevresel tahribatı etkileyen temel faktörlerin yeniden değerlendirilmesini gerekli kılmıştır. Bu eksende çalışmada Türkiye’de 1992-2024 döneminde dijitalleşme, finansal gelişme, ticaret açıklığı ve ekonomik büyümenin karbon yoğunluğu üzerindeki etkileri Fourier Augmented ARDL (FAARDL) yöntemi ile incelenmektedir. FAARDL bulguları değişkenler arasında uzun dönemde anlamlı bir ilişki bulunduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Bulgular, ekonomik büyüme ve ticari açıklığın karbon yoğunluğunu azalttığını, buna karşılık finansal gelişme ile internet kullanımının karbon yoğunluğunu artırdığını ortaya koymaktadır. Bu sonuçlar, Türkiye'de ekonomik büyüme ve dış ticaretin verimlilik artışı ile teknoloji transferi yoluyla çevresel performansı iyileştirebildiğini, ancak finansal kaynakların enerji yoğun sektörlere yönelmesi ve dijitalleşmenin enerji talebini artırması nedeniyle karbon yoğunluğu üzerinde olumsuz etkiler oluşturabildiğini göstermektedir.

Keywords

Karbon Yoğunluğu, Dijitalleşme, Ticari Açıklık, Finansal Gelişme, Ekonomik Büyüme

References

Adeshola, I., Usman, O., Agoyi, M., Awosusi, A. A., & Adebayo, T. S. (2024). Digitalization and the environment: The role of information and communication technology and environmental taxes in European countries. In Natural Resources Forum, 48 (4), 1088-1108. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Afesorgbor, S. K., & Demena, B. A. (2022). Trade openness and environmental emissions: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Environmental and Resource Economics, 81(2), 287-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-021-00627-0
Akın, F., & Özgün, F. (2024). Impact of internet use on ecological footprint: Panel data analysis for Fragile Five countries (Brazil, India, Indonesia, South Africa, and Turkiye). Problemy Ekorozwoju, 19(2), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.5979
Alvarado, R., & Toledo, E. (2017). Environmental degradation and economic growth: evidence for a developing country. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 19(4), 1205-1218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9790-y
Antonini, C. (2024). Accounting digitalization in the quest for environmental sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 66, https://doi.org/101399. 10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101399
Aşıcı, A. A. (2013). Economic growth and its impact on environment: A panel data analysis. Ecological indicators, 24, 324-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.06.019
Azam, M. (2019). Relationship between energy, investment, human capital, environment, and economic growth in four BRICS countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(33), 34388-34400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06533-9
Baek, J., & Kim, H. S. (2013). Is economic growth good or bad for the environment? Empirical evidence from Korea. Energy Economics, 36, 744-749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.11.020
Baloch, M. A., Ozturk, I., Bekun, F. V., & Khan, D. (2021). Modeling the dynamic linkage between financial development, energy innovation, and environmental quality: does globalization matter?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 176-184. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2615
Becker, R., Enders, W., & Lee, J. (2006). A stationarity test in the presence of an unknown number of smooth breaks. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 27(3), 381–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.2006.00478.x

Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366a), 427-431 https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1979.10482531
Enders, W., & Lee, J. (2012). The flexible Fourier form and Dickey–Fuller type unit root tests. Economics Letters, 117(1), 196–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.04.081
Feroz, A. K., Zo, H., & Chiravuri, A. (2021). Digital transformation and environmental sustainability: A review and research agenda. Sustainability, 13(3), 1530. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031530
Ganda, F. (2019). The environmental impacts of financial development in OECD countries: a panel GMM approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(7), 6758-6772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04143-z
Haq, I. U., & Huo, C. (2023). Digital strategy and environmental performance: the mediating role of digitalization in SMEs. Digital Economy and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44265-023-00010-5
Jalil, A., & Feridun, M. (2011). The impact of growth, energy and financial development on the environment in China: a cointegration analysis. Energy Economics, 33(2), 284-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.10.003
Ke, J., Jahanger, A., Yang, B., Usman, M., & Ren, F. (2022). Digitalization, financial development, trade, and carbon emissions; implication of pollution haven hypothesis during globalization mode. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 873880. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.873880
Le, N. M. T., & Luu, V. P. (2026). Government Spending, Renewable Energy and Green Growth: Evidence from Vietnam. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 16(2), 355. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.22511
Li, F., Chang, T., Wang, M.-C., & Zhou, J. (2022). The relationship between health expenditure, CO2 emissions, and economic growth in the BRICS countries—based on the Fourier ARDL model. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(7), 10908–10927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17900-w
Li, S., Zhang, J., & Ma, Y. (2015). Financial development, environmental quality and economic growth. Sustainability, 7(7), 9395-9416. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7079395
Li, Z., Li, N., & Wen, H. (2021). Digital economy and environmental quality: Evidence from 217 cities in China. Sustainability, 13(14), 8058. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13148058
Maji, I. K. (2017). The link between trade openness and deforestation for environmental quality in Nigeria. GeoJournal, 82(1), 131-138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-015-9678-7
Martínez, J. M. G., Puertas, R., Martín, J. M. M., & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2022). Digitalization, innovation and environmental policies aimed at achieving sustainable production. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 32, 92-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.03.035
McNown, R., Sam, C. Y., & Goh, S. K. (2018). Bootstrapping the autoregressive distributed lag test for cointegration. Applied Economics, 50(13), 1509-1521. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1366643
Murshed, M. (2018). International tourism demand in Bangladesh: An ARDL bounds test approach. Journal of Tourism Management Research, 5(1), 50-67. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.31.2018.51.50.67
Ozcan, B., Tzeremes, P. G., & Tzeremes, N. G. (2020). Energy consumption, economic growth and environmental degradation in OECD countries. Economic Modelling, 84, 203-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.04.010
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. ve Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616
Phillips, P. C. ve Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/75.2.335
Quan, Z., Xu, X., Jiang, J., Wang, W., Xue, Y., & Jiang, L. (2025). Unveiling the impact of aging on environmental sustainability in China: New insights from the Fourier ARDL approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 373, 123438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123438
Salahuddin, M., Alam, K., & Ozturk, I. (2016). The effects of Internet usage and economic growth on CO2 emissions in OECD countries: A panel investigation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62, 1226-1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.018
Salam, M., & Xu, Y. (2022). Trade openness and environment: A panel data analysis for 88 selected BRI countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(16), 23249-23263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17037-w
Sam, C. Y., McNown, R., & Goh, S. K. (2019). An augmented outoregressive distributed lag bounds test for cointegration, Economic Modelling, 80, 130-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.11.001
Sareen, S., & Haarstad, H. (2021). Digitalization as a driver of transformative environmental innovation. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 41, 93-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.09.016
Syed, Q. R., Durani, F., Kisswani, K. M., Alola, A. A., Siddiqui, A., & Anwar, A. (2024). Testing natural resource curse hypothesis amidst geopolitical risk: Global evidence using novel Fourier augmented ARDL approach. Resources Policy, 88, 104317 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104317
Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2022). Does trade openness mitigate the environmental degradation in South Africa?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(13), 19352-19377. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11356-021-17193-z
Van Tran, N. (2020). The environmental effects of trade openness in developing countries: conflict or cooperation?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(16), 19783-19797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08352-9
Wen, H., Lee, C. C., & Song, Z. (2021). Digitalization and environment: how does ICT affect enterprise environmental performance?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(39), 54826-54841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14474-5
World Bank. (2026). World Development Indicators. World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org/
Xiong, J., & Xu, D. (2021). Relationship between energy consumption, economic growth and environmental pollution in China. Environmental Research, 194, 110718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.110718
Xu, B., Li, S., Afzal, A., Mirza, N., & Zhang, M. (2022). The impact of financial development on environmental sustainability: A European perspective. Resources Policy, 78, 102814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102814
Zaidi, S. A. H., Zafar, M. W., Shahbaz, M., & Hou, F. (2019). Dynamic linkages between globalization, financial development and carbon emissions: evidence from Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 533-543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.210 Zakaria, M., & Bibi, S. (2019). Financial development and environment in South Asia: the role of institutional quality. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(8), 7926-7937. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-019-04284-1

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Macroeconomics (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Selin Dinçer ^*
0000-0003-3233-493X
Türkiye

Fatih Akın
0000-0002-7741-4004
Türkiye

Publication Date

July 30, 2026

Submission Date

July 3, 2026

Acceptance Date

July 21, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 8

DOI

https://doi.org/10.47103/bilturk.1986137

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA63ER22BH

APA

Dinçer, S., & Akın, F. (2026). Türkiye’de Karbon Yoğunluğunun Azaltılmasında Dijitalleşme, Finansal Gelişme, Ticaret Açıklığı ve Ekonomik Büyümenin Rolü. BİLTÜRK Journal of Economics and Related Studies, 8, 259-276. https://doi.org/10.47103/bilturk.1986137

AMA

1.Dinçer S, Akın F. Türkiye’de Karbon Yoğunluğunun Azaltılmasında Dijitalleşme, Finansal Gelişme, Ticaret Açıklığı ve Ekonomik Büyümenin Rolü. BILTURK. 2026;8:259-276. doi:10.47103/bilturk.1986137

Chicago

Dinçer, Selin, and Fatih Akın. 2026. “Türkiye’de Karbon Yoğunluğunun Azaltılmasında Dijitalleşme, Finansal Gelişme, Ticaret Açıklığı Ve Ekonomik Büyümenin Rolü”. BİLTÜRK Journal of Economics and Related Studies 8 (July): 259-76. https://doi.org/10.47103/bilturk.1986137.

EndNote

Dinçer S, Akın F (July 1, 2026) Türkiye’de Karbon Yoğunluğunun Azaltılmasında Dijitalleşme, Finansal Gelişme, Ticaret Açıklığı ve Ekonomik Büyümenin Rolü. BİLTÜRK Journal of Economics and Related Studies 8 259–276.

IEEE

[1]S. Dinçer and F. Akın, “Türkiye’de Karbon Yoğunluğunun Azaltılmasında Dijitalleşme, Finansal Gelişme, Ticaret Açıklığı ve Ekonomik Büyümenin Rolü”, BILTURK, vol. 8, pp. 259–276, July 2026, doi: 10.47103/bilturk.1986137.

ISNAD

Dinçer, Selin - Akın, Fatih. “Türkiye’de Karbon Yoğunluğunun Azaltılmasında Dijitalleşme, Finansal Gelişme, Ticaret Açıklığı Ve Ekonomik Büyümenin Rolü”. BİLTÜRK Journal of Economics and Related Studies 8 (July 1, 2026): 259-276. https://doi.org/10.47103/bilturk.1986137.

JAMA

1.Dinçer S, Akın F. Türkiye’de Karbon Yoğunluğunun Azaltılmasında Dijitalleşme, Finansal Gelişme, Ticaret Açıklığı ve Ekonomik Büyümenin Rolü. BILTURK. 2026;8:259–276.

MLA

Dinçer, Selin, and Fatih Akın. “Türkiye’de Karbon Yoğunluğunun Azaltılmasında Dijitalleşme, Finansal Gelişme, Ticaret Açıklığı Ve Ekonomik Büyümenin Rolü”. BİLTÜRK Journal of Economics and Related Studies, vol. 8, July 2026, pp. 259-76, doi:10.47103/bilturk.1986137.

Vancouver

1.Selin Dinçer, Fatih Akın. Türkiye’de Karbon Yoğunluğunun Azaltılmasında Dijitalleşme, Finansal Gelişme, Ticaret Açıklığı ve Ekonomik Büyümenin Rolü. BILTURK. 2026 Jul. 1;8:259-76. doi:10.47103/bilturk.1986137

Aim & Scope

Author Guidelines

Manuscript Submission

Articles not published or submitted for publication elsewhere accept in either Turkish or English.

Manuscripts should not exceed single-spaced 20 A4 pages with the Times New Roman 12-font character size.

Only DergiPark platform welcomes for article submissions.

https://dergipark.org.tr/journal/2848/submission/start

The first page

Title Page

The title page should include:

The name(s) of the author(s)

A concise and informative title

The affiliation(s) and address(es) of the author(s)

The e-mail address, and telephone number(s) of the corresponding author

If available, the 16-digit ORCID of the author(s)

https://orcid.org/

Abstract

Please provide an abstract of 100 to 250 words. The abstract should not contain any undefined abbreviations or unspecified references.

Keywords

Please provide 2 to 4 keywords which can be used for indexing purposes.

Classification code

JEL

An appropriate number of JEL codes should be provided. This classification system is prepared and published by the Journal of Economic Literature, see

https://www.aeaweb.org/econlit/jelCodes.php?view=jel

Text

Text Formatting

Manuscripts should be submitted in Word files.

Headings

Please use the decimal system of headings with no more than three levels.

Abbreviations

Abbreviations should be defined at first mention and used consistently thereafter.

Footnotes

Footnotes can be used to give additional information, which may include the citation of a reference included in the reference list. They should not consist solely of a reference citation, and they should never include the bibliographic details of a reference. They should also not contain any figures or tables.

Footnotes to the text are numbered consecutively; those to tables should be indicated by superscript lower-case letters (or asterisks for significance values and other statistical data). Footnotes to the title or the authors of the article are not given reference symbols.

Always use footnotes instead of endnotes.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements of people, grants, funds, etc. should be placed in a separate section on the title page. The names of funding organizations should be written in full.

Tables

Tables, figures and graphs should be numbered consecutively and contain full references. The titles of the tables, figures and graphs should place at the heading of them; the references of tables, figures and graphs should place at the bottom of them. Decimals should separate by a comma. Equations should number consecutively. Equation numbers should appear in parentheses at the right margin. The full derivation of the formulas (if abridged in the text) should provide on a separate sheet for referee use.

Citation

Please follow the APA guidelines for choosing heading levels, style, citation and references.

Ethical Principles and Publication Policy

Peer Review Process and Publication Policy

All manuscripts are initially screened for relevance, originality, and contribution by the editors. Only manuscripts of sufficient quality that meet the scope of the Anadolu Economics will be sent out to two referees for double-blind reviewing. The reviewers are selected according to their expertise by the editors. The reviewers should not have collaborated with any of the authors before and all reviewers should be from different institutions to the authors. Reviewers are expected to provide a detailed point-by-point review. On the basis of reviewer comments, the Editors may recommend acceptance, revision, or rejection of a manuscript. The Editor in Chief considers all the returned reviews before making an overall decision. If the reviews differ widely, the Editors may invite an additional reviewer so as to get an extra opinion before making a decision. After review of the manuscript by at least two independent reviewers, in addition to the views of the Editor, the decision is relayed to the authors. If accepted, the paper is sent to production. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the Editor in Chief should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article.

While the views of external reviewers are of primary influence on editorial decisions, the Editorial Board remains responsible for final decisions to or not to publish submitted manuscripts.

Plagiarism Policy

BİLTÜRK, The Journal of Economics and Related Studies will not tolerate any form of plagiarism and duplicate (redundant) publication. Hence, the authors should check the manuscript content before submitting it to the Journal. Manuscripts are screened for plagiarism by the co-editors for all the submissions using a software before publishing online. If the manuscript is found to have an unacceptable level of similarity, it will be rejected and the author will be informed that the manuscript is not accepted to be published in the Journal.

Ethical Principals and Responsibilities

BİLTÜRK, The Journal of Economics and Related Studies works hard to ensure the content of the journal is ethically sound. To achieve that goal, we closely follow the advice laid out in the guidelines and flowcharts on the COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) website.

Ethical approval must have been obtained from the appropriate ethics committee to confirm the study meets ethical standards. Any research using qualitative or quantitative approaches that requires data collection from participants using questionnaires or interviews must be approved by an ethical committee. A statement to confirm this must be included in the first page of the manuscript in a separate section entitled “Compliance with Ethical Standards” when submitting a paper, which must provide details of the name of the ethics committee and reference/permit numbers where available. Otherwise, "ethical committee approval is not required" should be written for studies that do not require ethical committee approval.

Ethical responsibilities for the Authors:

1. All submitted works to BİLTÜRK, The Journal of Economics and Related Studies must be entirely original and used sources and materials should be appropriately cited. Any attempt of plagiarism should be followed by the rejection of the submitted manuscript.

2. The manuscripts should not have appeared elsewhere, and should not be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by the Journal.

3. Authors should not submit the same work or describe essentially the same research in more than one journal.

4. The authors acknowledge that any part of the article does not violate the copyrights of other real and legal entity.

Ethical responsibilities for the Reviewers:

1. The reviewers are bound to treat information regarding manuscripts submitted by authors as privileged information and keep them confidential.
2. In evaluating the submitted works, the reviewers should limit themselves only to the scientific content.

3. Reviewers should immediately notify the editors of Anadolu Economics of any misconduct on the part of any author(s) (e.g. plagiarism, any other unethical activities).

Ethical responsibilities for the Editors:

1. Editors are obliged to make decisions based solely on the scientific evaluation of the article, regardless of the authors' origin, including the authors' ethnicity, political views, and religion.

2. Editors will not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, and the publisher. Any manuscripts received for review are confidential documents and should be treated as such.

3. In case of suspicion of misconduct, plagiarism or other unethical activities related to the authors, Editors are obliged to manage the process within the framework of the relevant recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

4. In case of a suspicion of ghost, guest or gift authership, Editors are obliged to manage the process within the framework of the relevant recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

5. In case of a suspicion of conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships/connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers, Editors are obliged to manage the process within the framework of the relevant recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Unethical Behavior

Should you encounter any unethical act or content in BİLTÜRK, The Journal of Economics and Related Studies apart from the ethical responsibilities listed above, please notify the journal by e-mail at bilturkdergi@gmail.com

Price Policy

Indexes

Journal Boards

Editors in Chief

Mehmet ŞENGÜR

Macroeconomics, Growth, Development Economics

Selami SEZGIN

Development Economics - Macro, Policy of Treasury, Development Economics, Public Economy, Defence Studies, Public Finance

Editors

Başak S. KIROĞLU

Mathematical Economics, Macroeconomics, Microeconomics, Behavioural Economy, Public Economy, Defence Studies

Fatih DEYNELI

Law and Economy, Budget and Financial Planning

Editorial Boards

Yasin ACAR

Applied Microeconometrics, Policy of Treasury, Environmental Economy, Health Economy, Public Finance

Cem IŞIK

Macroeconomic Theory

Naci Tolga SARUÇ

Policy of Treasury, Public Economics - Public Choice, Fiscal Sociology, Budget and Financial Planning, Government Accounting, Public Finance, Financial Law, Theory of Treasury, Finance Studies (Other)

Seyil NAJIMUDINOVA

Human Resources Management, Strategy, Management and Organisational Behaviour (Other)

AT

Aynura TURDALIYEVA

Regional Economy

Mehmet ASUTAY

Comparative Economic Systems, Ecological Economics, Political Economy Theory, Heterodox Economics, Islamic Economy, Institutional Economics Theory, Radical Economy, International Finance, Economic Thought, Circular Economy

EK

Erdal Tanas KARAGÖL

Employment, Development Economics - Macro, Informal Economy, Social Justice, Social Welfare Policies

Junus GANIEV

Growth, Inflation, Foreign Trade

SA

Semra ALTINGÖZ

Budget and Financial Planning

Şennur SEZGIN

Macroeconomic Theory, Microeconomic Theory, Growth, Inflation, Cyclical Fluctuations, Policy of Treasury, Migration Economics, Defence Studies

Seyfi YILDIZ

Public Finance, Financial Law

Ahmet AK

Islamic Economy, Law and Economy, Sociology of Law, Economic Sociology, Conflict Resolution in International Relations, Finance Studies, Public Finance, Financial Law, Theory of Treasury

Eda YEŞIL

Budget and Financial Planning

Sejma AYDIN

International Finance, Financial Economy, Behavioural Finance, Financial Econometrics, Finance and Investment (Other), Financial Accounting, Entrepreneurship

Ferda HALICIOĞLU

Applied Macroeconometrics, International Economics (Other), Health Economy, Tourism Economics, Applied Economics (Other)

Rukiye ŞAMCI KARADENIZ

Econometric and Statistical Methods, Mathematical Economics, Financial Mathematics

EE

Etem Hakan ERGEÇ

Political Economy Theory, Monetary-Banking, Islamic Finance

Yaprak TAVMAN

Cyclical Fluctuations, Policy of Treasury, Monetary Policy, Monetary-Banking

Jülide YILDIRIM

Econometrics Theory

Mehmet ŞENTÜRK

Macroeconomic Theory, Growth, Inflation, Informal Economy, Monetary Policy

BILTÜRK Journal of Economics and Related Studies Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) altında çalışmaktadır.

Türkiye’de Karbon Yoğunluğunun Azaltılmasında Dijitalleşme, Finansal Gelişme, Ticaret Açıklığı ve Ekonomik Büyümenin Rolü

The Role of Digitalization, Financial Development, Trade Openness, and Economic Growth in Reducing Carbon Intensity in Türkiye

Abstract

Keywords

Türkiye’de Karbon Yoğunluğunun Azaltılmasında Dijitalleşme, Finansal Gelişme, Ticaret Açıklığı ve Ekonomik Büyümenin Rolü

Abstract

Keywords

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite

Aim & Scope

Author Guidelines

Ethical Principles and Publication Policy

Price Policy

Indexes

Citation Indexes

Other Indexes

Journal Boards

Editors in Chief

Editors

Editorial Boards