A Bibliometric Analysis of Class III Malocclusions in Orthognathic Surgery Publication Trends From 1987 To 2023

Year 2024, , 47 - 57, 30.04.2024

Ali Kiki , Aybuke Asena Atasever İşler , Kübra Betül Uylaş , Abdulvahit Erdem

https://doi.org/10.58605/bingolsaglik.1460464

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to conduct bibliometric analysis on orthognathic surgery in class III malocclusions, a frequently investigated topic in orthodontics.
Methods: The study analyzed all articles in the Web of Science database from March 1987 to June 2023 using VOSviewer software (version 1.6.14). Initially, all 1173 articles were analyzed in the Web of Science browser and later exported for further analysis in the VOSviewer program. The VOSviewer program was utilized to map relationship networks based on co-authorship, co-occurrence, citation, bibliographic coupling, or co-citation links. Additionally, the study examined the distribution of publications by year, analyzed articles related to keywords, identified authors with the most publications on these topics, and compiled the 10 most cited articles containing the words "orthognathic surgery" and "class III" in the title, abstract, and keywords using the Web of Science browser.
Results: The most publications on these topics were published in 2022. Seung-Hak Baek was the most cited author (413 citations). Chang Gung University ranked highest in terms of citations (729 citations) and had the most extensive publication record (60 articles) in the bibliometric network map. South Korea led in both article production (227 articles) and citation count (2587 citations).
Conclusions: Orthognathic surgery for class III malocclusion has gained significant attention over the years due to technological advancements and increasing aesthetic concerns among patients. The interest in this field is expected to grow, leading to more studies exploring related applications and topics.

Keywords

Orthognathic Surgery, Class III, Bibliometrics

Ortognatik Cerrahide Sınıf III Maloklüzyonlarının Bibliyometrik Analizi: 1987-2023

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, ortodontide sıklıkla araştırılan bir konu olan sınıf III maloklüzyonlarda ortognatik cerrahi üzerine bibliyometrik analiz yapmaktır.
Metot: Çalışmada, Mart 1987'den Haziran 2023'e kadar Web of Science veri tabanındaki tüm makaleler VOSviewer yazılımı (1.6.14 sürümü) kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Başlangıçta, 1173 makalenin tamamı Web of Science tarayıcısında analiz edilmiş ve daha sonra VOSviewer programında daha fazla analiz için dışa aktarılmıştır. VOSviewer programı, ortak yazarlık, ortak oluşum, atıf, bibliyografik bağlantı veya ortak atıf bağlantılarına dayalı ilişki ağlarını haritalamak için kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada ayrıca, yayınların yıllara göre dağılımı incelenmiş, anahtar kelimelerle ilgili makaleler analiz edilmiş, bu konularda en çok yayını olan yazarlar belirlenmiş ve Web of Science tarayıcısı kullanılarak başlık, özet ve anahtar kelimelerde "ortognatik cerrahi" ve "sınıf III" kelimelerini içeren en çok atıf alan 10 makale derlenmiştir.
Bulgular: Bu konularda en çok yayın 2022 yılında yayımlanmıştır. Seung-Hak Baek en çok atıf alan yazardır (413 atıf). Chang Gung Üniversitesi atıflar açısından en üst sırada yer almaktadır (729 atıf) ve bibliyometrik ağ haritasında en kapsamlı yayın kaydına (60 makale) sahiptir. Güney Kore hem makale üretiminde (227 makale) hem de atıf sayısında (2587 atıf) önde gelen ülkedir.
Sonuç: Sınıf III maloklüzyon için ortognatik cerrahi, teknolojik gelişmeler ve hastalar arasında artan estetik kaygılar nedeniyle yıllar içinde büyük ilgi görmüştür. Bu alana olan ilginin artması ve ilgili uygulamaları ve konuları araştıran daha fazla çalışmaya yol açması beklenmektedir.

Keywords

Orthognathic Surgery, Class III, Bibliometrics

References

• 1. Graber TM, Rakosi T, Petrovic AG, Proffit. Dentofacial orthopedics with functional appliances. Second ed. Mosby, St. Louis. (1997).
• 2. Guyer EC, McNamara JA Jr, Behrents RG. Components of class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents. Angle Orthod. 1986;56:7-30.
• 3. Jacobson A, Evans WG, Preston CB, Sadowsky PL. Mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1974;66:140-171.
• 4. Mcnamara JA, Mermigos J, Full CA, et al. An orthopedic approach to the treatment of class III malocclusion in young patients. J Clin Orthod. 1990;21:598-608.
• 5. Baik HS. Clinical results of the maxillary protraction in Korean children. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1995;108:583-592.
• 6. Nanda R. Protraction of the maxillofacial complex. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1980;98:47-55.
• 7. Ngan P, Hagg U, Yu C, et al. Treatment response to maxillary expansion and protraction. European Journal of Orthodontics. 1996;18:151-168.
• 8. Ellis EE, Mcnamara JA Jr. Components of adult class III malocclusion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1984;42:295-305.
• 9. Jayaratne YS, Zwahlen RA. The evolution of dental journals from 2003 to 2012: a bibliometric analysis. 2015;10(3):e0119503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119503. PMID: 25781486; PMCID: PMC4363896.
• 10. Larsen PO, Von Ins M. The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 2010;84(3):575-603.
• 11. Pandis N, Polychronopaulou A, Makou M, et al. Reporting of research quality characteristics of studies published in 6 major clinical dental specialty journals. J. Evid. Based Dent. Pract. 2011;11:75- 83.
• 12. Van Eck N, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84(2), 523-538. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146- 3
• 13. Perillo L, Vitale M, Masucci C, et al. Comparisons of two protocols for the early treatment of class III dentoskeletal disharmony. Eur J Orthod. 2016;38(1):51-6.
• 14. Jamilian A, Cannavale R, Piancino MG, et al. Methodological quality and outcome of systematic reviews reporting on orthopedic treatment for class III malocclusion: an overview of systematic reviews. J Orthod. 2016;43:102-20.
• 15. Showkatbakhsh R, Jamilian A, Ghassemi M, et al. The effects of facemask and reverse chin cup on maxillary deficient patients. J Orthod. 2012;39:95-101.
• 16. Ngan P, Wilmes B, Drescher D, et al. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment. Prog Orthod. 2015;16:26.
• 17. Perillo L, Femminella B, Farronato D, et al. Do malocclusion and Helkimo Index ≥ 5 correlate with body posture? J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38:242-52.
• 18. Hong M, Kim MJ, Shin HJ, et al. Three-dimensional surgical accuracy between virtually planned and actual surgical movements of the maxilla in two-jaw orthognathic surgery. Korean J Orthod. 2020;50(5):293-303. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2020.50.5.293. PMID: 32938822; PMCID: PMC7500567.
• 19. Jandali, D., Barrera, J. E. Recent advances in orthognathic surgery. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery. 2020;28(4):246-250. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000638
• 20. Moore, D. US population estimated at 334,233,854. America Counts: Stories behind the Numbers. 2023.
• 21. Gao Y, Niddam J, Noel W, et al. Comparison of aesthetic facial criteria between Caucasian and East Asian female populations: An esthetic surgeon's perspective. Asian J Surg. 2018;41(1):4-11. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.07.007. PMID: 27630035.
• 22. Fabi SG, Park JY, Ho WWS, et al. Aesthetic considerations for treating the Asian patient: Thriving in diversity international roundtable series. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023;22:1805-1813. doi:10.1111/jocd.15787.
• 23. Kim YJ, Lee BK. Recent Trends in Orthognathic Surgery in Asia. Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics. 2021;29(4), 549-566.
• 24. Piao Y, Kim SJ, Yu HS, et al. Five-year investigation of a large orthodontic patient population at a dental hospital in South Korea. Korean J Orthod. 2016;46(3):137-45. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2016.46.3.137. PMID: 27226959; PMCID: PMC4879316.
• 25. Larson BE. Orthodontic preparation for orthognathic surgery. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics, 2014;26(4), 441-458.
• 26. Alpan D. Combining accelerated orthodontics with orthognathic surgery to reduce overall treatment time. Orthodontics Practice US, 2018;9(5),39-43.
• 27. Seo HJ, Choi YK. Current trends in orthognathic surgery. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2021;22(6):287-295. doi 10.7181/acfs.2021.00598. PMID: 34974683; PMCID: PMC8721433.
• 28. Huang CS, Hsu SS, Chen YR. Systematic review of the surgery-first approach in orthognathic surgery. Biomed J. 2014;37(4):184-90. doi:10.4103/2319-4170.126863. PMID: 25116713.
• 29. Zinser MJ, Mischkowski RA, Sailer HF, et al. Computer-assisted orthognathic surgery: feasibility study using multiple CAD/CAM surgical splints. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;113:673-87.
• 30. Grillo R. Orthognathic Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Cited Articles. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery: official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 2021;79(11), 2339–2349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2021.06.004
• 31. Wong, K.F., Lam, X.Y., Jiang, Y. et al. Artificial intelligence in orthodontics and orthognathic surgery: a bibliometric analysis of the 100 most-cited articles. Head Face Med 2023;19-38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-023-00383-0.
• 32. Yang, L. C., Liu, F. H., Liu, C. M., Yu, C. H., & Chang, Y. C. Bibliometric analysis of top-cited articles in Journal of Dental Sciences. Journal of dental sciences, 2023;18(1), 338–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2022.09.017.