Roma’nın İmparatorluk ve Emperyalizm Konusundaki Tutumları: Tarihi Bir Bakış

Abstract

Roma tarihçileri ve siyasal yorumcuları, imparatorluğun kuruluşu ve sürdürülmesinin beraberinde getirdiği sorunların fazlasıyla farkındaydılar. Çoğu zaman Roma’nın emperyal yönetimdeki ikiyüzlülüğünü, imparatorluğun mağdurlarının ağzından dile getirdiler. Bunun en bariz örnekleri, Tacitus’un Calgacus’u (Agricola 30.5–6), Sallust’un Mithridates’i (Histories 4.69M) ve Caesar’ın Critognatus’udur (de Bello Gallico 7.77). Roma siyasal elitinin, en azından ideolojik düzeyde, imparatorluğa dair tutumlarında savundukları belli bir etik davranış kodu ile Roma’nın emperyalist genişleme pratiği kapsamında uyguladığı çeşitli şiddet biçimleri arasında rahatsız edici bir gerilim mevcuttu. Roma emperyalizminin doğasını anlamak, şüphesiz, Cumhuriyet ve erken İmparatorluk tarihi çalışmalarında sürekli bir odak noktası olmuştur. Bu alandaki araştırmalar, Roma’nın içsel yapıları ve tartışmalarına derinlemesine yoğunlaşmaktan, Roma’yı çok daha geniş bir sistemin parçası olarak görmeyi amaçlayan realist uluslararası ilişkiler teorilerinin uygulanmasına kadar farklı yönelimler göstermiştir. Roma emperyalizmini anlamamız önündeki en büyük zorluklardan biri, Roma dış politikasının nasıl kavramsallaştırılacağı meselesidir; nitekim bu konuyu ele alışımız, tarihçilerin başvurduğu kaynaklar tarafından anlaşılabilir biçimde şekillendirilmiştir. Edebi kaynaklarda imparatorluk fikirlerine yönelik retorik düzeydeki ilgilenim, emperyalist genişlemenin ideolojik yönlerini muhtemelen gölgelemiştir. Bu makale, tarihsel bir bakış açısından yürütülen tartışmalara giriş işlevi görmekte ve bu ciltte yer alan Roma emperyalizmine dair arkeolojik incelemelere arka plan sağlayacak genel eğilimleri özetleyen bir çerçeve sunmayı amaçlamaktadır.

Keywords

• Emperyalizm
• Geç Roma Cumhuriyeti
• İmparatorluk Retoriği
• İmparatorluk İnşası

Roman attitudes to empire and imperialism: the view from history

Abstract

Roman historians and political commentators were remarkably self-aware of the issues that the creation and maintenance of their empire brought, frequently presenting Rome’s hypocrisy of imperial rule through the mouths of the victims of empire: the most obvious examples being Tacitus’ Calgacus (Agricola 30-5-6), Sallust’s Mithridates (Histories 4.69M), and Caesar’s Critognatus (de Bello Gallico 7.77). There existed an uneasy tension between a certain code of ethical conduct, which the political elite upheld, at least ideologically, in their attitudes to empire, and the various forms of violence meted out as part of Rome’s practice of imperialist expansion. Understanding the nature of Roman imperialism has, of course, be a constant focus of Republican and early Imperial history. Studies in this area have swung from a deep focus on Rome’s internal structures and debates, to the application of realist IR theories seeking to view Rome as part of a much larger system. A major challenge to our understanding of Roman imperialism is the issue of the conceptualization of Roman foreign policy, and indeed our exploration of the issues has been understandably shaped by the sources that historians have engaged with. The rhetorical engagement with ideas of empire in the literary sources has potentially obscured ideological aspects of imperialist expansion. This paper serves as a way into the debates from an historical perspective, to provide an overarching framework of recent trends as background for the archaeological examinations of Roman imperialism in this volume.

Keywords

• Imperialism
• Late Republican Rome
• Rhetoric of empire
• Empire-Building

References

1. Appian (2019). Roman history, volume III (B. McGing, Ed. & Trans.). Loeb Classical Library 4., MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Appian (2020). Roman history, volume IV: Civil wars, books 1–2 (B. McGing, Ed. & Trans.). Loeb Classical Library 5., MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Brunt, P. A. (1990). Roman imperial themes. Clarendon Press.
4. Burton, P. (2011). Friendship and empire: Roman diplomacy and imperialism in the middle republic (353–146 B.C.). Cambridge University Press.
5. Caesar (2014). Gallic war (H. J. Edwards, Trans.). Loeb Classical Library 72., MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Cicero (n.d.). Epistulae ad atticum; epistulae ad familiares; de legibus; de officiis; pro lege manilia.
7. Cicero (1965). Cicero’s letters to Atticus. volume I. 68-59 B.C., 1-45 (Books I and II) (D. R. Shackleton Bailey, Ed.). Cambridge University Press.
8. Cornell, T. J. (1993). The end of Roman imperial expansion. In J. Rich & G. Shipley (Eds.), War and society in the Roman world (pp. 139-170). Routledge.

9. Cornwell, H. (2015). The king who would be prefect: Authority and identity in the Cottian Alps. Journal of Roman Studies, 105, 41–72.
10. Cornwell, H. (2017). Pax and the politics of peace: Republic to principate. Oxford University Press.
11. Dio Cassius (1914). Roman history, volume III: Books 36-40. (E. Cary & Herbert B. Foster, Trans.). Loeb Classical Library 53., MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Eckstein, A. (2006). Mediterranean anarchy, interstate war, and the rise of Rome. University of California Press.
13. Eckstein, A. (2008). Rome enters the Greek East: From anarchy to hierarchy in the Hellenistic Mediterranean, 230–170 B.C. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
14. Florus. Epitome of Roman history. (E. S. Forster, Trans.). Loeb Classical Library 231., MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Griffin, M. (2008). Iure plectimur: The Roman critique of Roman imperialism. In T. C. Brennan & H. I. Flower (Eds.), East & West: Papers in ancient history presented to Glen W. Bowersock (pp. 85–111). MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Harries, J. (2007). Law and crime in the Roman world. Cambridge University Press.
17. Harris, W. V. (1979). War and imperialism in Republican Rome, 237–70 B.C. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
18. Harris, W. V. (2016). Roman power: A thousand years of empire. Cambridge University Press.
19. Herodian (1969). History of the empire, volume I: Books 1-4 (C. R. Whittaker, Trans.). Loeb Classical Library 454., MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Jacquemin, A., Mulliez, D., & Rougemont, G. (2012). Choix d’inscriptions de Delphes. Athens: École française d’Athènes.
21. Josephus (1927). The Jewish war, volume I: Books 1-2. (H. St. J. Thackeray, Trans.). Loeb Classical Library 203., MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Livy, Julius Obsequens (1959). History of Rome, volume XIV: Summaries. fragments. Julius obsequens. general index. (A. C. Schlesinger, Trans.). Loeb Classical Library 404., MA: Harvard University Press.
23. Matthews, L. (2015). A man-made humanitarian crisis: Augustus and the Salassi. In T. Ñaco del Hoyo, R. Riera, & D. Gomez-Castro (Eds.), Ancient disasters and crisis management in classical antiquity (pp. 99–120). University of Gdansk Press.
24. Maurus Servius Honoratus (1881). In vergilii carmina comentarii. Servii grammatici qui feruntur in vergilii carmina commentarii. (George Thilo et Hermann Hagen, Ed.). Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.
25. Memnon of Heraclea. (n.d.). History of Heraclea (via Photius).
26. Moreau, P. (1982). A propos de la publication de la lex Gabinia Calpurnia de Délos. In F. Coarelli, D. Musti, & H. Solin (Eds.), Delo e l’Italia (pp. 91–100). Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei.
27. Morrell, K. (2015). Cato, Caesar, and the Germani. Antichthon, 49, 73–93.
28. Morrell, K. (2017). Pompey, Cato, and the governance of the Roman Empire. Oxford University Press.
29. Ñaco del Hoyo, T., & López Sánchez, F. (Eds.). (2018). War, warlords, and interstate relations in the ancient Mediterranean. Leiden: Brill.
30. Nicolet, C., Dumont, J.-C., Ferrary, J.-L., & Moreau, P. (Eds.). (1980). Insula Sacra: La loi Gabinia Calpurnia de Délos. Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei.
31. Petronius, Seneca (2020). Satyricon. apocolocyntosis. (G. Schmeling, Ed. & Trans.). Loeb Classical Library 15., MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Plutarch. (n.d.). Caesar; Sulla.
33. Plutarch (1916). Lives. volume 4. Alcibidaes and Coriolanus, Lysander and Sulla. (B. Perrin, Trans.). Loeb Classical Library 80., London: Heinemann; MA: Havard University Press.
34. Plutarch (1919). Lives. volume 7, Demosthenes and Cicero; Alexander and Caesar. (B. Perrin, Trans.). Loeb Classical Library 99., London: Heinemann; MA: Havard University Press.
35. Polybius (1922). The histories. volume 2 [fragments of books 3-4]. (W. R. Paton, Trans.). London: Heinemann; MA: Havard University Press.
36. Prag, J. R. W. (2017). Die Römische republik und der westen. In M. Haake & A.-C. Harders (Eds.), politische kultur und soziale struktur in der Römischen republik (pp. 287–308). Franz Steiner Verlag.
37. Revell, L. (2009). Roman imperialism and local identities. Cambridge University Press.
38. Richardson, J. (1987). The purpose of the Lex Calpurnia de Repetundis. Journal of Roman Studies, 77, 1-12.
39. Richardson, J. (2008). The language of empire: Rome and the idea of empire from the third century B.C. to the second century A.D. Cambridge University Press.
40. Sallust (2013). The war with Catiline; the war with Jugurtha (J. C. Rolfe, Trans.). Loeb Classical Library 116., MA: Harvard University Press.
41. Sallust (2015). Fragments of the histories: Letters to Caesar (J. T. Ramsey, Ed.). Loeb Classical Library 522., Cambridge University Press.
42. Sherk, R. (1969). Roman documents from the Greek East. MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
43. Suetonius (1998). Lives of the Caesars, volume 1. (J. C. Rolfe, Trans.). Loeb Classical Library 31., MA: Harvard University Press.
44. Tacitus (1914). Agricola. Germania. dialogue on oratory. (M. Hutton, W. Peterson, Trans.). Loeb Classical Library 35., MA: Harvard University Press.
45. Tacitus (1931). Histories: Books 4-5. annals: Books 1-3. (Clifford H. Moore & John Jackson, Trans.). Loeb Classical Library 249., MA: Harvard University Press.
46. Tacitus (1937). Annals: Books 4-6, 11-12. (J. Jackson, Trans.). Loeb Classical Library 312., MA: Harvard University Press.
47. Valerius Maximus (2000). Memorable doings and sayings, volume I: Books 1-5. (D. R. Shackleton Bailey, Ed. & Trans.). Loeb Classical Library 492., MA: Harvard University Press.
48. Woolf, G. (2000). Urbanization and its discontents in early Roman Gaul. In E. Fentress (Ed.), Romanization and the city (pp. 115–131). JRA Supplement 38.