Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2023, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 8 - 16, 21.06.2023

Abstract

References

  • [1] M. C. Solan, M. Lemon and S. P. Bendall, “The surgical anatomy of the dorsomedial cutaneous nerve of the hallux”, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 83-B(2):250-252, 2001, https://doi:10.1302/0301-620X.83B2.0830250.
  • [2] D. J. Magee, “Orthopedic Physical Assessment”, Gait Assessment. W.B.Saunders Company, Toronto, 1997. pp 362-376.
  • [3] M. J. Coughlin and A. R. Mann, 7th ed., Surgery of the Foot and Ankle, Volume vols. 1 and 2, 1999, Mann Mosby, St. Louis, p. 783 and 1605 page
  • [4] G. H. Albrecht, “The pathology and treatment of hallux valgus”, Russ Vrach, 10:14, 1911, Russian.
  • [5] P. W. Lapidus, “Operative correction of the metatarsus varus primus in hallux valgus”, Surg Gynecol Obstet, 58(183-191), 16, 1934.
  • [6] P. D. Symeonidis and J. G. Anderson, “Original and Modified Lapidus Procedures: Proposals for a New Terminology”, J Bone Joint Surg Am. 17;103(4):e15. 2021 Feb, https://doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01010.
  • [7] D. López-López, R. Larrainzar-Garijo, R. B. De-Bengoa-Vallejo, M. E. Losa-Iglesias and J. Bayod-López, “Effectiveness of the Lapidus plate system in foot surgery: A PRISMA compliant systematic review”, Int Wound J. 19(3): 507-514, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13649
  • [8] M. Myerson, S. Allon and W. McGarvey, “Metatarsocuneiform Arthrodesis for Management of Hallux Valgus and Metatarsus Primus Varus”, Foot & Ankle. 13(3):107-115, 1992, https://doi:10.1177/107110079201300301
  • [9] B. J. Sangeorzan and S. T. Hansen, “Modified Lapidus Procedure for Hallux Valgus”, Foot & Ankle. 9(6):262-266, 1989, https://doi:10.1177/107110078900900602.
  • [10] R. Kunovsky, J. Kocis, T. Navrat, P. Vosynek, T. Pink, M. Joukal and I. Cizmar, “Lapidus arthrodesis in combination with arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint-biomechanical cadaver study comparing two methods of fixation”, Biomedical Papers of the Medical Faculty of Palacky University in Olomouc. 166(3), 2022 Sep 1, https://doi: 10.5507/bp.2021.025
  • [11] D. A. Cohen, B. G. Parks and L. C. Schon, “Screw Fixation Compared to H-Locking Plate Fixation for First Metatarsocuneiform Arthrodesis: A Biomechanical Study”, Foot & Ankle International. 26(11):984-989, 2005, https://doi:10.1177/107110070502601114
  • [12] M. O. Akkurt, “Modifiye lapidus prosedürünün uzun dönem sonuçları”, Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 18-22, Mar. 2020, doi:10.18663/tjcl.689886
  • [13] B. Baravarian and R. Ben-Ad, “Contemporary approaches and advancements to the Lapidus procedure”, Clinics in podiatric medicine and surgery, 31(2), 299–308, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpm.2014.01.001.
  • [14] M. D. Sorensen, C. F. Hyer and G. C. Berlet, “Results of lapidus arthrodesis and locked plating with early weight bearing”, Foot Ankle Spec. 2(5):227-33, 2009 Oct, https://doi: 10.1177/1938640009348389.
  • [15] J. M. Cottom, J. S. Baker, “Comparison of locking plate with interfragmentary screw versus plantarly applied anatomic locking plate for Lapidus arthrodesis: a biomechanical cadaveric study”, Foot Ankle Spec. 10:227-231, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1938640016676341.
  • [16] K. E. Roth, J. Peters, I. Schmidtmann, U. Maus, D. Stephan and P. Augat, “Intraosseous fixation compared to plantar plate fixation for first metatarsocuneiform arthrodesis: a cadaveric biomechanical analysis”, Foot Ankle Int. 35:1209-1216, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100714547082
  • [17] P. Dayton, R. Santrock, M. Kauwe, et al, “Progression of healing on serial radiographs following first ray arthrodesis in the foot using a Biplanar plating technique without compression”, J Foot Ankle Surg. 58:427-433, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2018.09.001
  • [18] J. M. Cottom and A. M. Vora, “Fixation of Lapidus arthrodesis with a plantar interfragmentary screw and medial locking plate: a report of 88 cases”, J Foot Ankle Surg. 52:465-469, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2013.02.013.
  • [19] K. Klos, P. Simons, A. S. Hajduk, et al, “Plantar versus dorsomedial locked plating for Lapidus arthrodesis: a biomechanical comparison”, Foot Ankle Int. 32:1081-1085, 2011, https://doi.org/10. 3113/FAI.2011.1081.
  • [20] J. R. Baxter, S. B. Mani, J. Y. Chan, E. Vulcano and S. J. Ellis, “Crossedscrews provide greater tarsometatarsal fusion stability compared to compression plates”, Foot Ankle Spec. 8:95-100, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/1938640014543358.
  • [21] F. Hess and C. Sommer, “Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of the distal fibula with the locking compression plate: first experience of 20 cases”, Journal of orthopaedic trauma 25.2: 110-115, 2011, https://doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181d9e875.
  • [22] K. Öner, S. Durusoy and A. Özer, “Is the fracture morphology in the sagittal plane important in determining the ideal placement of the lag screw in intertrochanteric femoral fractures?: Ideal lag screw placement in intertrochanteric fractures in the sagittal plane”, Injury, 52.3: 562-568, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.023
  • [23] Z. Zhao, T. Yan, W. Guo, R. Yang and X. Tang, “Is double-strut fibula ankle arthrodesis a reliable reconstruction for bone defect after distal tibia tumor resection?—a finite element study based on promising clinical outcomes”, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 16(1):1-0, 2021 Dec, https://doi:10.1186/s13018-021-02362-0
  • [24] J. Li, Y. Wei and M. Wei, “Finite Element Analysis of the Effect of Talar Osteochondral Defects of Different Depths on Ankle Joint Stability”, Med Sci Monit. 26:e921823, 2020 Aug 21, https://doi: 10.12659/MSM.921823.
  • [25] L. E. Claes, C. A. Heigele, C. Neidlinger-Wilke, D. Kaspar, W. Seidl, K. J. Margevicius and P. Augat, “Effects of mechanical factors on the fracture healing process”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 355:S132-47, 1998 Oct 1.

Lapidus Artrodezinde 4 ve 6 Delikli Plaka Kullanımının Sabitleme Üzerindeki Etkisi

Year 2023, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 8 - 16, 21.06.2023

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, 4 delikli, 4 kalın vidalı ve 6 delikli, 6 ince vidalı medial 3 boyutlu model plakalarla sabitlenmiş 2 farklı lapidus artrodezinin, sonlu elemanlar yöntemi ile bilgisayar ortamında yükleme analizi sonrası oluşan artrodez stabilitesini ve plaka gerilmesini belirleyerek sabitleme üzerindeki etkilerini ortaya koymaktır. Böylece lapidus cerrahisinin daha kararlı olması için plak tasarımının önemi gösterilmektedir. Hallux valgus tedavisi için kullanılan Lapidus artrodezinde kaynamama, yanlış kaynama, implant başarısızlığı gibi çeşitli komplikasyonlar eşlik edebilir. Bu çalışmada yapılan modelleme ile sabitleme yöntemlerinden biri olan plak tasarımının bu gibi komplikasyonlarla ilişkileri gösterilmiştir. Bu amaçla, üç boyutlu (3B) bir sonlu eleman kemik modeli oluşturulmuştur. Oluşturulan sonlu eleman modelinde cerrahi teknikteki gibi, ayak 1. parmak metatars ile medial cuneiform eklem artrodezinin tesbiti için 2 farklı tasarımdaki medial 4 delikli ve 6 delikli plak kompresyon vidaları ile artrodez tesbiti sağlanmıştır. Plaklar artrodez hattının distalinden 2 vida veya 3 vida ayak 1. Metatarsa, proksimalinden medial cuneiforma 2 vida veya 3 vida tutacak şekilde yerleştirilmiştir. En iyi ağ yoğunluğu ile birlikte 3B modellerin Sonlu Elemanlar modelleri Ansys Workbench 2020R2 Sonlu Elemanlar yazılımı kullanılmak suretiyle verilen yüklemeler altında statik analizleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu çalışmada, Sonlu Elemanlar Analizi sonuçları von Mises gerilmesi ve artrodez aralığının yer değiştirmesi şeklinde verilmiştir. Lapidus artrodezinde sabitleme için kullanılan 2 farklı plak tasarımının (4 ve 6 delikli ) karşılaştırılmasında plaktaki gerilme ve toplam yer değiştirme miktarının 4 delikli plakta daha az olduğu görülmüştür. Bu çalışma ile kullanılan 4 delikli ve kalın vidalı tasarımın lapidus artrodezi için 6 delikli ince vidalı tasarıma göre daha uygun olduğu belirlenmiştir.

References

  • [1] M. C. Solan, M. Lemon and S. P. Bendall, “The surgical anatomy of the dorsomedial cutaneous nerve of the hallux”, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 83-B(2):250-252, 2001, https://doi:10.1302/0301-620X.83B2.0830250.
  • [2] D. J. Magee, “Orthopedic Physical Assessment”, Gait Assessment. W.B.Saunders Company, Toronto, 1997. pp 362-376.
  • [3] M. J. Coughlin and A. R. Mann, 7th ed., Surgery of the Foot and Ankle, Volume vols. 1 and 2, 1999, Mann Mosby, St. Louis, p. 783 and 1605 page
  • [4] G. H. Albrecht, “The pathology and treatment of hallux valgus”, Russ Vrach, 10:14, 1911, Russian.
  • [5] P. W. Lapidus, “Operative correction of the metatarsus varus primus in hallux valgus”, Surg Gynecol Obstet, 58(183-191), 16, 1934.
  • [6] P. D. Symeonidis and J. G. Anderson, “Original and Modified Lapidus Procedures: Proposals for a New Terminology”, J Bone Joint Surg Am. 17;103(4):e15. 2021 Feb, https://doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01010.
  • [7] D. López-López, R. Larrainzar-Garijo, R. B. De-Bengoa-Vallejo, M. E. Losa-Iglesias and J. Bayod-López, “Effectiveness of the Lapidus plate system in foot surgery: A PRISMA compliant systematic review”, Int Wound J. 19(3): 507-514, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13649
  • [8] M. Myerson, S. Allon and W. McGarvey, “Metatarsocuneiform Arthrodesis for Management of Hallux Valgus and Metatarsus Primus Varus”, Foot & Ankle. 13(3):107-115, 1992, https://doi:10.1177/107110079201300301
  • [9] B. J. Sangeorzan and S. T. Hansen, “Modified Lapidus Procedure for Hallux Valgus”, Foot & Ankle. 9(6):262-266, 1989, https://doi:10.1177/107110078900900602.
  • [10] R. Kunovsky, J. Kocis, T. Navrat, P. Vosynek, T. Pink, M. Joukal and I. Cizmar, “Lapidus arthrodesis in combination with arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint-biomechanical cadaver study comparing two methods of fixation”, Biomedical Papers of the Medical Faculty of Palacky University in Olomouc. 166(3), 2022 Sep 1, https://doi: 10.5507/bp.2021.025
  • [11] D. A. Cohen, B. G. Parks and L. C. Schon, “Screw Fixation Compared to H-Locking Plate Fixation for First Metatarsocuneiform Arthrodesis: A Biomechanical Study”, Foot & Ankle International. 26(11):984-989, 2005, https://doi:10.1177/107110070502601114
  • [12] M. O. Akkurt, “Modifiye lapidus prosedürünün uzun dönem sonuçları”, Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 18-22, Mar. 2020, doi:10.18663/tjcl.689886
  • [13] B. Baravarian and R. Ben-Ad, “Contemporary approaches and advancements to the Lapidus procedure”, Clinics in podiatric medicine and surgery, 31(2), 299–308, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpm.2014.01.001.
  • [14] M. D. Sorensen, C. F. Hyer and G. C. Berlet, “Results of lapidus arthrodesis and locked plating with early weight bearing”, Foot Ankle Spec. 2(5):227-33, 2009 Oct, https://doi: 10.1177/1938640009348389.
  • [15] J. M. Cottom, J. S. Baker, “Comparison of locking plate with interfragmentary screw versus plantarly applied anatomic locking plate for Lapidus arthrodesis: a biomechanical cadaveric study”, Foot Ankle Spec. 10:227-231, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1938640016676341.
  • [16] K. E. Roth, J. Peters, I. Schmidtmann, U. Maus, D. Stephan and P. Augat, “Intraosseous fixation compared to plantar plate fixation for first metatarsocuneiform arthrodesis: a cadaveric biomechanical analysis”, Foot Ankle Int. 35:1209-1216, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100714547082
  • [17] P. Dayton, R. Santrock, M. Kauwe, et al, “Progression of healing on serial radiographs following first ray arthrodesis in the foot using a Biplanar plating technique without compression”, J Foot Ankle Surg. 58:427-433, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2018.09.001
  • [18] J. M. Cottom and A. M. Vora, “Fixation of Lapidus arthrodesis with a plantar interfragmentary screw and medial locking plate: a report of 88 cases”, J Foot Ankle Surg. 52:465-469, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2013.02.013.
  • [19] K. Klos, P. Simons, A. S. Hajduk, et al, “Plantar versus dorsomedial locked plating for Lapidus arthrodesis: a biomechanical comparison”, Foot Ankle Int. 32:1081-1085, 2011, https://doi.org/10. 3113/FAI.2011.1081.
  • [20] J. R. Baxter, S. B. Mani, J. Y. Chan, E. Vulcano and S. J. Ellis, “Crossedscrews provide greater tarsometatarsal fusion stability compared to compression plates”, Foot Ankle Spec. 8:95-100, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/1938640014543358.
  • [21] F. Hess and C. Sommer, “Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of the distal fibula with the locking compression plate: first experience of 20 cases”, Journal of orthopaedic trauma 25.2: 110-115, 2011, https://doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181d9e875.
  • [22] K. Öner, S. Durusoy and A. Özer, “Is the fracture morphology in the sagittal plane important in determining the ideal placement of the lag screw in intertrochanteric femoral fractures?: Ideal lag screw placement in intertrochanteric fractures in the sagittal plane”, Injury, 52.3: 562-568, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.023
  • [23] Z. Zhao, T. Yan, W. Guo, R. Yang and X. Tang, “Is double-strut fibula ankle arthrodesis a reliable reconstruction for bone defect after distal tibia tumor resection?—a finite element study based on promising clinical outcomes”, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 16(1):1-0, 2021 Dec, https://doi:10.1186/s13018-021-02362-0
  • [24] J. Li, Y. Wei and M. Wei, “Finite Element Analysis of the Effect of Talar Osteochondral Defects of Different Depths on Ankle Joint Stability”, Med Sci Monit. 26:e921823, 2020 Aug 21, https://doi: 10.12659/MSM.921823.
  • [25] L. E. Claes, C. A. Heigele, C. Neidlinger-Wilke, D. Kaspar, W. Seidl, K. J. Margevicius and P. Augat, “Effects of mechanical factors on the fracture healing process”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 355:S132-47, 1998 Oct 1.
There are 25 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Alaettin Özer 0000-0002-3499-1215

Hacı Ali Olçar 0000-0002-3097-3677

Halil Burak Mutu 0000-0002-0679-5874

Publication Date June 21, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023 Volume: 2 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Özer, A., Olçar, H. A., & Mutu, H. B. (2023). Lapidus Artrodezinde 4 ve 6 Delikli Plaka Kullanımının Sabitleme Üzerindeki Etkisi. Bozok Journal of Engineering and Architecture, 2(1), 8-16.
AMA Özer A, Olçar HA, Mutu HB. Lapidus Artrodezinde 4 ve 6 Delikli Plaka Kullanımının Sabitleme Üzerindeki Etkisi. BJEA. June 2023;2(1):8-16.
Chicago Özer, Alaettin, Hacı Ali Olçar, and Halil Burak Mutu. “Lapidus Artrodezinde 4 Ve 6 Delikli Plaka Kullanımının Sabitleme Üzerindeki Etkisi”. Bozok Journal of Engineering and Architecture 2, no. 1 (June 2023): 8-16.
EndNote Özer A, Olçar HA, Mutu HB (June 1, 2023) Lapidus Artrodezinde 4 ve 6 Delikli Plaka Kullanımının Sabitleme Üzerindeki Etkisi. Bozok Journal of Engineering and Architecture 2 1 8–16.
IEEE A. Özer, H. A. Olçar, and H. B. Mutu, “Lapidus Artrodezinde 4 ve 6 Delikli Plaka Kullanımının Sabitleme Üzerindeki Etkisi”, BJEA, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 8–16, 2023.
ISNAD Özer, Alaettin et al. “Lapidus Artrodezinde 4 Ve 6 Delikli Plaka Kullanımının Sabitleme Üzerindeki Etkisi”. Bozok Journal of Engineering and Architecture 2/1 (June 2023), 8-16.
JAMA Özer A, Olçar HA, Mutu HB. Lapidus Artrodezinde 4 ve 6 Delikli Plaka Kullanımının Sabitleme Üzerindeki Etkisi. BJEA. 2023;2:8–16.
MLA Özer, Alaettin et al. “Lapidus Artrodezinde 4 Ve 6 Delikli Plaka Kullanımının Sabitleme Üzerindeki Etkisi”. Bozok Journal of Engineering and Architecture, vol. 2, no. 1, 2023, pp. 8-16.
Vancouver Özer A, Olçar HA, Mutu HB. Lapidus Artrodezinde 4 ve 6 Delikli Plaka Kullanımının Sabitleme Üzerindeki Etkisi. BJEA. 2023;2(1):8-16.