LEGAL CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN REGULATING FREE AND OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE WITHIN THE EUROPEAN UNION

Year 2024, , 1 - 20, 04.09.2024

Muhammed Furkan Akıncı

https://doi.org/10.69800/blr.1467329

Abstract

This paper investigates the intricate link that exists between Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) and the legal and regulatory framework that exists inside the European Union. The study illustrates the problems and possibilities given by this dynamic area by charting the growth of FOSS from its ideological roots to its current standing as a significant economic and technical force. The paper examines the policy steps taken by the European Union to encourage the use of FOSS in public administration, as well as the influence that new technologies, such as artificial intelligence, have had on the ecology of FOSS. In addition, it digs into the legal complications that surround FOSS, including concerns about licensing and the enforcement of copyright. In its conclusion, the paper provides policy proposals with the goal of fostering a sustainable and thriving FOSS ecosystem inside the European Union while maintaining a balance between the need for innovation and regulatory control.

Keywords

Free and Open Source Software, FOSS, European Union, eGovernment, public administration, open source software adoption, cyber resilience act, artificial intelligence act, AI, copyright

AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ'NDE ÖZGÜR VE AÇIK KAYNAK KODLU YAZILIMLARIN DÜZENLENMESİNDEKİ YASAL ZORLUKLAR VE FIRSATLAR

Abstract

Bu kapsamlı çalışma, Özgür ve Açık Kaynak Kodlu Yazılımın (AKKY) ile Avrupa Birliği içinde var olan yasal ve düzenleyici çerçeve arasında var olan karmaşık bağlantıyı araştırmaktadır. Çalışma, AKKY’nin ideolojik köklerinden önemli bir ekonomik ve teknik güç olarak mevcut konumuna kadar büyümesinin haritasını çıkararak bu dinamik alanın sunduğu sorunları ve olasılıkları göstermektedir. Çalışma, Avrupa Birliği'nin kamu yönetiminde AKKY kullanımını teşvik etmek için attığı politika adımlarının yanı sıra yapay zekâ gibi yeni teknolojilerin AKKY ekolojisi üzerindeki etkisini incelemektedir. Buna ek olarak, lisanslama ve telif hakkının uygulanması ile ilgili endişeler de dahil olmak üzere AKKY’ı çevreleyen yasal komplikasyonları araştırmaktadır. Sonuç bölümünde ise, Avrupa Birliği içinde sürdürülebilir ve gelişen bir AKKY ekosistemini teşvik etmek ve aynı zamanda inovasyon ihtiyacı ile düzenleyici kontrol arasında bir denge sağlamak amacıyla politika önerileri sunmaktadır.

Keywords

açık kaynak kodlu yazılım, Avrupa Birliği, eDevlet girişimleri, idari otoritelerde açık kaynak kod kullanımı, siber direnç yasası, yapay zekâ yasası, telif hakkı

References

• Aksoy-Yurdagul D, ‘The Impact of Open Source Software Commercialization on Firm Value’ (2015) 22 Industry and Innovation 1
• ‘Apache License, Version 2.0’ <https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html> accessed 4 June 2024 Bain M, ‘Software Interactions and the GPL’ (2010) 2 International Free and Open Source Software Law Review 168
• Bert-Erboul C and Vonortas N, ‘Personal and Social Proximity: Shaping Leadership in a Free Software Project’ (18 September 2018) <https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3251327> accessed 16 July 2024
• Bitzer J and Geishecker I, ‘Who Contributes Voluntarily to OSS? An Investigation among German IT Employees’ (2010) 39 Research Policy 165
• Bitzer J, Schrettl W and Schröder PJH, ‘Intrinsic Motivation in Open Source Software Development’ (2007) 35 Journal of Comparative Economics 160
• ‘BSD Overview’ <https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/Darwin/Conceptual/KernelProgramming/BSD/BSD.html> accessed 4 June 2024
• Cusumano M and others, ‘Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software’, Script-ed, vol 3 (2007)
• Dahlander L and Magnusson MG, ‘Relationships between Open Source Software Companies and Communities: Observations from Nordic Firms’ (2005) 34 Research Policy 481
• ‘EUPL [European Union Public Licence]’ <https://eupl.eu/> accessed 4 June 2024
• ‘Europe 2020: Commission Proposes New Economic Strategy in Europe.’ (European Commission - European Commission) <https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_10_225> accessed 4 June 2024
• European Commission. Directorate General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology., The Impact of Open Source Software and Hardware on Technological Independence, Competitiveness and Innovation in the EU Economy: Final Study Report. (Publications Office 2021) <https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2759/430161>
• Fitzgerald B, ‘The Transformation of Open Source Software’ (2006) 30 MIS Quarterly 587
• Gardler R and Walli SR, ‘Evolving Perspective on Community and Governance’ in Amanda Brock (ed), Open Source Law, Policy and Practice (Oxford University Press 2022) <https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198862345.003.0002>
• ‘GNU General Public License v1.0 - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation’ <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-1.0.html> accessed 4 June 2024
• Hertel G, Niedner S and Herrmann S, ‘Motivation of Software Developers in Open Source Projects: An Internet-Based Survey of Contributors to the Linux Kernel’ (2003) 32 Research Policy 1159
• Hillenius G, ‘City of Munich: “Migration to Sustainable Desktop Completed Successfully”’ (28 May 2013) <https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/open-source-observatory-osor/news/city-munich-migration> accessed 4 June 2024
• Hillenius G, ‘French Gendarmerie: “Open Source Desktop Lowers TCO by 40%”’ (30 September 2013) <https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/open-source-observatory-osor/news/french-gendarmerie-open-sou> accessed 4 June 2024
• ‘History of the Mozilla Project’ (Mozilla) <https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/history/> accessed 4 June 2024
• Hu D and others, ‘Multi-Reviewing Pull-Requests: An Exploratory Study on GitHub OSS Projects’ (2019) 115 Information and Software Technology 1
• Jaeger T, ‘Enforcement of the GNU GPL in Germany and Europe’ (2010) 1 JIPITEC <http://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-1-1-2010/2419>
• Kraut RE and others, ‘Understanding Effects of Proximity on Collaboration: Implications for Technologies to Support Remote Collaborative Work’, Distributed work (Boston Review 2002)
• Lakhani K and Wolf RG, ‘Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects’ [2003] SSRN Electronic Journal <http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=443040> accessed 18 August 2024
• Lerner J and Schankerman M, The Comingled Code: Open Source and Economic Development (The MIT Press 2010)
• Lerner J and Tirole J, ‘Some Simple Economics of Open Source’ (2002) 50 The Journal of Industrial Economics 197
• ‘Linus Torvalds Biography by The Linux Information Project’ <https://www.linfo.org/linus.html> accessed 4 June 2024
• Madey G, Freeh V and Tynan R, ‘The Open Source Software Development Phenomenon: An Analysis Based on Social Network Theory’ [2002] Eighth Americas Conference on Information Systems
• Montagnani ML and Borghi M, ‘Promises and Pitfalls of the European Copyright Law Harmonization Process’, The European Union and the Culture Industries (Routledge 2016)
• ‘NETSCAPE ANNOUNCES PLANS TO MAKE NEXT-GENERATION COMMUNICATOR SOURCE CODE AVAILABLE FREE ON THE NET’ <https://web.archive.org/web/20021001071727/wp.netscape.com/newsref/pr/newsrelease558.html> accessed 4 June 2024
• O’Mahony S and Ferraro F, ‘The Emergence of Governance in an Open Source Community’ (2007) 50 Academy of Management Journal 1079
• Raymond ES, The Cathedral & the Bazaar by Eric S. Raymond (2001) Paperback
• ‘Report on Europe and the Global Information Society: Recommendations of the High-Level Group on the Information Society to the Corfu European Council. Bulletin of the European Union, Supplement No. 2/94. [Followup to the White Paper] (Commonly Called the Bangemann Report)’ (1994) <https://aei.pitt.edu/1199/> accessed 4 June 2024
• Rosen LE, Open Source Licensing: Software Freedom and Intellectual Property Law (Prentice Hall PTR 2005)
• Rossi C and Bonaccorsi A, ‘Intrinsic Motivations and Profit-Oriented Firms in Open Source Software: Do Firms Practise What They Preach?’ in Jürgen Bitzer and Philipp JH Schröder (eds), The Economics of Open Source Software Development (Elsevier 2006)
• Shah SK, ‘Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development’ (2006) 52 Management Science 1000
• Sinnreich A, ‘Copyleft and Copyfight’, The Essential Guide to Intellectual Property (Yale University Press 2019)
• Smith PM, ‘Copyright, Contract, and Licensing in Open Source’ in Amanda Brock (ed), Open Source Law, Policy and Practice (Oxford University Press 2022) <https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198862345.003.0003>
• ‘The GNU General Public License v3.0 - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation’ <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html> accessed 4 June 2024
• ‘The GNU Manifesto - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation’ <https://www.gnu.org/gnu/manifesto.html> accessed 4 June 2024
• ‘The Open Source Definition’ (Open Source Initiative, 7 July 2006) <https://opensource.org/osd> accessed 4 June 2024
• Valimaki M, ‘Dual Licensing in Open Source Software Industry’ [2002] SSRN Electronic Journal von Krogh G and others, ‘Carrots and Rainbows: Motivation and Social Practice in Open Source Software Development’ (2012) 36 MIS Quarterly 649
• Vujovic S and Ulhøi JP, ‘An Organizational Perspective on Free and Open Source Software Development’ in Jürgen Bitzer and Philipp JH Schröder (eds), The Economics of Open Source Software Development (Elsevier 2006)
• Waitzer JM and Paul R, ‘Scaling Social Impact: When Everybody Contributes, Everybody Wins’ (2011) 6 Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization 143
• Walden I, ‘Open Source as Philosophy, Methodology, and Commerce: Using Law with Attitude’ in Amanda Brock (ed), Open Source Law, Policy and Practice (Oxford University Press 2022) <https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198862345.003.0001>
• West J and O’Mahony S, ‘The Role of Participation Architecture in Growing Sponsored Open Source Communities’ (2008) 15 Industry & Innovation 145
• ‘What Is Free Software? - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation’ <https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html> accessed 4 June 2024
• ‘Why Open Source Misses the Point of Free Software - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation’ <https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html> accessed 4 June 2024
• Wichmann T., ‘Firms’ Open Source Activities: Motivations and Policy Implications. Free/Libre and Open Source Software: Survey and Study’ (2002)