Evaluation of Parameters Affecting Measurement Quality of Dynamic Contour Tonometry

Year 2011, Volume: 2011 Issue: 3, 229 - 231, 01.03.2011

Baran Gencer Vuslat Gürlü

https://doi.org/10.5174/tutfd.2010.03504.2

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate factors affecting measurement quality of dynamic contour tonometry (DCT). Material and Methods: Three hundred patients took part in this prospective clinical study. For each patient, measurements for one eye were included in the study. Of the participants, 116 had ocular hypertension, 114 had glaucoma, and 70 had normal eyes. We used automatic refractokeratometry, ultrasonic pachimetry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, and DCT measurements to investigate the effects of age, corneal astigmatism, refractive error, central corneal thickness (CCT), intraocular pressures (IOP), and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) on DCT measurement quality (Q). Logistic regression analysis was used for statistical analysis. Results: For 159 patients, the DCT Q score was 1 (group 1). For the remaining 141 patients, the Q score was 2–3 (group 2). The following values were determined for the two groups, respectively: mean age 58.9±9.9 and 61.4±10.6; mean corneal astigmatisms −0.78±0.67 and −0.92±0.77 diopter; mean spherical equivalents 0.33±1.87 and −0.01±2.02 diopter; mean CCT 547.0±35.2 and 549±38.7 μm. Measurements with DCT provided mean IOPs of 18.5±3.70 and 21.27±6.19 mm Hg and mean OPA 3.5±1.4 and 3.2±1.2 mm Hg. By logistic regression analysis, we determined that the parameters affecting measurement quality were age, DCT measurement level, and OPA (p=0.015, p=0.000, and p=0.000, respectively). Conclusion: High IOP values, advanced age, and low OPA values can lead to decreased DCT measurement quality.

Keywords

Dynamic contour tonometry, ocular rigidity, Q score

Evaluation of Parameters Affecting Measurement Quality of Dynamic Contour Tonometry

Abstract

References

• Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann- type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 1993;38:1-30. [CrossRef]
• Bhan A, Browning AC, Shah S, Hamilton R, Dave D, Dua HS. Ef- fect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with the pneumotonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer and Tono-Pen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:1389-92.
• Li Q, Li M, Fan Z, Wang N. The influence of central corneal thick- ness and corneal curvature and axial length on the measurement of intraocular pressure. Yan Ke Xue Bao 2002;18:176-80.
• Brandt JD, Beiser JA, Kass MA, Gordon MO. Central corneal thickness in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS). Ophthalmology 2001;108:1779-88. [CrossRef]
• Johnson M, Kass MA, Moses RA, Grodzki WJ. Increased corneal thickness simulating elevated intraocular pressure. Arch Ophthal- mol 1978;96:664- 5.
• Bron AM, Creuzot-Garcher C, Goudeau-Boutillon S, d’Athis P. Falsely elevated intraocular pressure due to increased central cor- neal thickness. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1999;237:220-4. [CrossRef]
• Kanngiester HE, Nee M, Kniestedt C, et al. Simulation of dynamic contour tonometry compared to in-vitro study revealing minimal influence of corneal radius and astigmatism. The theoretical foundations of dynamic contour tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:2641.
• Punjabi OS, Kniestedt C, Stamper RL, Lin SC. Dynamic con- tour tonometry: principle and use. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2006;34:837-40. [CrossRef]
• Pache M, Wilmsmeyer S, Lautebach S, Funk J. Dynamic contour to- nometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005;243:763-7. [CrossRef]
• Schneider E, Grehn F. Intraocular pressure measurement-Com- parison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applana- tion tonometry. J Glaucoma 2006;15:2-6. [CrossRef]
• Kniestedt C, Nee M, Stamper RL. Dynamic contour tonometry: a comparative study on human cadaver eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:1287-93. [CrossRef]
• Karahan E, Günenç Ü, Arıkan G, Ergin MH. Goldmann aplanasyon tonometresi ve paskal dinamik kontur tonometrenin karşılaştırılması ve merkezi kornea kalınlığının göz içi basıncı ölçümlerine etkisi. Glokom-Katarakt 2009;4:150-6.
• Eser E, Başer EF, Seymenoğlu G. Dinamik kontur tonometre, nonkontakt tonometre, tonopen ve goldmann aplanasyon to- nometresi ile göz içi basıncı ölçümlerinin santral kornea kalınlığı ile ilişkisi. Glokom- Katarakt 2008;3:107-12.
• Pascal User Manual CDRom. Version 2.0, November 2004.p.51-2.
• Pallikaris IG, Kymionis GD, Ginis HS, Kounis GA, Tsilimbaris MK. Ocular rigidity in living human eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:409-14.
• Ytteborg J. The effect of intraocular pressure on rigidity coefficient in the human eye. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1960;38:548-61. [CrossRef]
• Eisenlohr JE, Langham ME, Maumenee AE. Manometric studies of the pressure-volume relationship in living and enucleated eyes of in- dividual human subject. Br J Ophthalmol 1962;46:536-48. [CrossRef]
• Geyer O, Silver DM, Mathalon N, Massey AD. Gender and age effects on pulsatile ocular blood flow. Ophthalmic Res 2003;35:247-50. [CrossRef] Gencer et al.
• Measurement Quality of Dynamic Contour Tonometry 231 2011; 28: 229-31