Abstract
Scientific studies can be described as “a planned and systematic
effort based on evidence for the solution of any health
problems using data with high degree of accuracy” (1). The
main aims are to quantify disease prevalence, and compare
interventions, predictions, association assessments or etiology
assessments (2). A scientific study requires good planning
including research protocol, ethical approval, data collection,
data analysis, interpretation of data analysis results and publication.
This study can help authors understand study designs
in medicine.
Scientific studies can be classified as “Basic Studies”, “Observational
Studies”, “Experimental (Interventional) Studies”,
“Economic Evaluations” and “Meta-Analysis – Systematic
Review”, as shown in Figure 1.
References
- 1. Sut N. How can we improve the quality of scientific research and publications? Guidelines for authors, editors, and reviewers. Balk Med J 2013;30:134-5. [CrossR
- 2. Altman D. Introduction to study design 2014 [14.10.2014]. Available from: http://www.equator-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/ Introduction-to-study-design-Doug-Altman.pdf.
- 3. Rohrig B, du Prel JB, Wachtlin D, Blettner M. Types of study in medical research: part 3 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. Dtsch Arzteblatt Int 2009;106:262-8.
- 4. İskit AB. İlaçlarla yapılan gözlemsel (farmakoepidemiyolojik) çalışmalar kılavuzu. İKU Dergisi 2008;20:25-33.
- 5. Dawson B, Trapp RG. Basic and clinical biostatistics. New York: Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill; 2004.
- 6. Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, Moher D, Sox H, Riley D, et al. The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case report guideline development. J Clin Epidemiol 2014;67:46-51. [CrossRef]
- 7. Friedman LM, Furberg CD, DeMets DL. Fundamentals of clinical trials. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1998. [CrossRef]
- 8. Berger ML, Bingefors K, Hedblom EC, Pashos CL, Torrance GW. Healt care cost, quality, and outcomes. NJ: ISPOR; 2003.
- 9. Hunink M, Glasziou P. Decision making in health and medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
- 10. Pandis N. The evidence pyramid and introduction to randomized controlled trials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:446-7. [CrossRef]
Abstract
References
- 1. Sut N. How can we improve the quality of scientific research and publications? Guidelines for authors, editors, and reviewers. Balk Med J 2013;30:134-5. [CrossR
- 2. Altman D. Introduction to study design 2014 [14.10.2014]. Available from: http://www.equator-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/ Introduction-to-study-design-Doug-Altman.pdf.
- 3. Rohrig B, du Prel JB, Wachtlin D, Blettner M. Types of study in medical research: part 3 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. Dtsch Arzteblatt Int 2009;106:262-8.
- 4. İskit AB. İlaçlarla yapılan gözlemsel (farmakoepidemiyolojik) çalışmalar kılavuzu. İKU Dergisi 2008;20:25-33.
- 5. Dawson B, Trapp RG. Basic and clinical biostatistics. New York: Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill; 2004.
- 6. Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, Moher D, Sox H, Riley D, et al. The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case report guideline development. J Clin Epidemiol 2014;67:46-51. [CrossRef]
- 7. Friedman LM, Furberg CD, DeMets DL. Fundamentals of clinical trials. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1998. [CrossRef]
- 8. Berger ML, Bingefors K, Hedblom EC, Pashos CL, Torrance GW. Healt care cost, quality, and outcomes. NJ: ISPOR; 2003.
- 9. Hunink M, Glasziou P. Decision making in health and medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
- 10. Pandis N. The evidence pyramid and introduction to randomized controlled trials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:446-7. [CrossRef]
Details
| Other ID | JA27GK22PV |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | October 1, 2014 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2014 Volume: 31 Issue: 4 |