1. Kilman L, Zekveld A, Hallgren M, Ronnberg J. Native and
non-native speech perception by hearing-impaired listeners
in noise- and speech maskers. Trends Hear [Internet].
2015;24:19. Available from: http://tia.sagepub.com/cgi/
doi/10.1177/2331216515579127. [CrossRef]
2. Faulkner KF, Pisoni DB. Some observations about cochlear
implants: challenges and future directions. Neurosci Discov [Internet].
2013;1:9. Available from: http://www.hoajonline.com/
neuroscience/2052-6946/1/9
3. Kordus M, Tyler RS, Żera J, Oleson JJ. An Influence of directional
microphones on the speech intelligibility and spatial perception
by cochlear implant users. Arch Acoust [Internet]. 2015;1:40(1).
Available from: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/aoa.2015.40.
issue-1/aoa-2015-0010/aoa-2015-0010.xml [CrossRef]
4. Wimmer W, Weder S, Caversaccio M, Kompis M. Speech intelligibility
in noise with a Pinna effect imitating Cochlear implant
processor. Otol Neurotol [Internet]. 2015 Sep;1. Available from:
http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:la
ndingpage&an=00129492-900000000-97507
5. Hu W, Swanson BA, Heller GZ. A statistical method for the
analysis of speech intelligibility tests. Li L, editor. PLoS One
[Internet]. 2015 Jul 6;10:e0132409. Available from: http://
dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132409
6. Cervera T, González-Alvarez J. Test of Spanish sentences to
measure speech intelligibility in noise conditions. Behav Res
Methods [Internet]. 2011 17;43:459–67. Available from: http://
www.springerlink.com/index/10.3758/s13428-011-0063-2.
[CrossRef]
7. Puglisi GE, Warzybok A, Hochmuth S, Visentin C, Astolfi A,
Prodi N, et al. An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation
of speech intelligibility in noise. Int J Audiol [Internet]. 2015
May 15;54(sup2):44-50. Available from: http://www.fa2014.
agh.edu.pl/fa2014_cd/article/RS/R03C_6.pdf
8. Kollmeier B, Warzybok A, Hochmuth S, Zokoll M, Uslar VN,
Brand T, et al. The multilingual matrix test: principles, applications
and comparison across languages: a review. Int J Audiol
[Internet]. 2015 May 18;54(sup2):3-16. Available from:
9. Zokoll MA, Hochmuth S, Fidan D, Wagener KC, Ergenç İ, Kollmeier
B. Speech intelligibility tests for the Turkish language.
In: 15th Annual Conference of the German Audiology Society.
Erlangen/Germany; 2012. p.138.
10. Houben R, Dreschler WA. Optimization of the Dutch matrix test
by random selection of sentences from a preselected subset. Trends
Hear [Internet]. 2015 May 11;19. Available from: http://tia.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/2331216515583138.
[CrossRef]
11. Zokoll MA, Fidan D, Türkyılmaz D, Hochmuth S, Ergenç İ,
Sennaroğlu G, et al. Development and evaluation of the Turkish
matrix sentence test. Int J Audiol [Internet]. 2015 May
7;54(sup2):51–61. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/
doi/full/10.3109/14992027.2015.1074735
12. Wagener K, Kühne V, Kollmeier B. Entwicklung und Evaluation
eines Satztests für die deutsche Sprache I: Design des Oldenburger
Satztests. Z Audiol 1999;38:4-15.
13. Wimmer W, Caversaccio M, Kompis M. Speech intelligibility in
noise with a single-unit cochlear implant audio processor. Otol
Neurotol 2015;36:1197-202. [CrossRef]
14. Hey M, Hocke T, Hedderich J, Müller-Deile J. Investigation of
a matrix sentence test in noise: reproducibility and discrimination
function in cochlear implant patients. Int J Audiol [Internet].
2014;53:895-902. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/
doi/full/10.3109/14992027.2014.938368. [CrossRef]
15. Dietz A, Buschermöhle M, Aarnisalo AA, Vanhanen A,
Hyyrynen T, Aaltonen O, et al. The development and evaluation
of the Finnish Matrix Sentence Test for speech intelligibility assessment.
Acta Otolaryngol 2014;134: 728-37. [CrossRef
Assessment of the Speech Intelligibility Performance of Post Lingual Cochlear Implant Users at Different Signal-to-Noise Ratios Using the Turkish Matrix Test
Year 2016,
Volume: 33 Issue: 5, 532 - 538, 01.09.2016
Background: Spoken word recognition and speech perception tests in quiet are being used as a routine in assessment of the benefit which children and adult cochlear implant users receive from their devices. Cochlear implant users generally demonstrate high level performances in these test materials as they are able to achieve high level speech perception ability in quiet situations. Although these test materials provide valuable information regarding Cochlear Implant (CI) users’ performances in optimal listening conditions, they do not give realistic information regarding performances in adverse listening conditions, which is the case in the everyday environment. Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the speech intelligibility performance of post lingual CI users in the presence of noise at different signal-to-noise ratio with the Matrix Test developed for Turkish language. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: The thirty post lingual implant user adult subjects, who had been using implants for a minimum of one year, were evaluated with Turkish Matrix test. Subjects’ speech intelligibility was measured using the adaptive and non-adaptive Matrix Test in quiet and noisy environments. Results: The results of the study show a correlation between Pure Tone Average (PTA) values of the subjects and Matrix test Speech Reception Threshold (SRT) values in the quiet. Hence, it is possible to asses PTA values of CI users using the Matrix Test also. However, no correlations were found between Matrix SRT values in the quiet and Matrix SRT values in noise. Similarly, the correlation between PTA values and intelligibility scores in noise was also not significant. Therefore, it may not be possible to assess the intelligibility performance of CI users using test batteries performed in quiet conditions. Conclusion: The Matrix Test can be used to assess the benefit of CI users from their systems in everyday life, since it is possible to perform intelligibility test with the Matrix test using a material that CI users experience in their everyday life and it is possible to assess their difficulty in speech discrimination in noisy conditions they have to cope with.
1. Kilman L, Zekveld A, Hallgren M, Ronnberg J. Native and
non-native speech perception by hearing-impaired listeners
in noise- and speech maskers. Trends Hear [Internet].
2015;24:19. Available from: http://tia.sagepub.com/cgi/
doi/10.1177/2331216515579127. [CrossRef]
2. Faulkner KF, Pisoni DB. Some observations about cochlear
implants: challenges and future directions. Neurosci Discov [Internet].
2013;1:9. Available from: http://www.hoajonline.com/
neuroscience/2052-6946/1/9
3. Kordus M, Tyler RS, Żera J, Oleson JJ. An Influence of directional
microphones on the speech intelligibility and spatial perception
by cochlear implant users. Arch Acoust [Internet]. 2015;1:40(1).
Available from: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/aoa.2015.40.
issue-1/aoa-2015-0010/aoa-2015-0010.xml [CrossRef]
4. Wimmer W, Weder S, Caversaccio M, Kompis M. Speech intelligibility
in noise with a Pinna effect imitating Cochlear implant
processor. Otol Neurotol [Internet]. 2015 Sep;1. Available from:
http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:la
ndingpage&an=00129492-900000000-97507
5. Hu W, Swanson BA, Heller GZ. A statistical method for the
analysis of speech intelligibility tests. Li L, editor. PLoS One
[Internet]. 2015 Jul 6;10:e0132409. Available from: http://
dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132409
6. Cervera T, González-Alvarez J. Test of Spanish sentences to
measure speech intelligibility in noise conditions. Behav Res
Methods [Internet]. 2011 17;43:459–67. Available from: http://
www.springerlink.com/index/10.3758/s13428-011-0063-2.
[CrossRef]
7. Puglisi GE, Warzybok A, Hochmuth S, Visentin C, Astolfi A,
Prodi N, et al. An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation
of speech intelligibility in noise. Int J Audiol [Internet]. 2015
May 15;54(sup2):44-50. Available from: http://www.fa2014.
agh.edu.pl/fa2014_cd/article/RS/R03C_6.pdf
8. Kollmeier B, Warzybok A, Hochmuth S, Zokoll M, Uslar VN,
Brand T, et al. The multilingual matrix test: principles, applications
and comparison across languages: a review. Int J Audiol
[Internet]. 2015 May 18;54(sup2):3-16. Available from:
9. Zokoll MA, Hochmuth S, Fidan D, Wagener KC, Ergenç İ, Kollmeier
B. Speech intelligibility tests for the Turkish language.
In: 15th Annual Conference of the German Audiology Society.
Erlangen/Germany; 2012. p.138.
10. Houben R, Dreschler WA. Optimization of the Dutch matrix test
by random selection of sentences from a preselected subset. Trends
Hear [Internet]. 2015 May 11;19. Available from: http://tia.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/2331216515583138.
[CrossRef]
11. Zokoll MA, Fidan D, Türkyılmaz D, Hochmuth S, Ergenç İ,
Sennaroğlu G, et al. Development and evaluation of the Turkish
matrix sentence test. Int J Audiol [Internet]. 2015 May
7;54(sup2):51–61. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/
doi/full/10.3109/14992027.2015.1074735
12. Wagener K, Kühne V, Kollmeier B. Entwicklung und Evaluation
eines Satztests für die deutsche Sprache I: Design des Oldenburger
Satztests. Z Audiol 1999;38:4-15.
13. Wimmer W, Caversaccio M, Kompis M. Speech intelligibility in
noise with a single-unit cochlear implant audio processor. Otol
Neurotol 2015;36:1197-202. [CrossRef]
14. Hey M, Hocke T, Hedderich J, Müller-Deile J. Investigation of
a matrix sentence test in noise: reproducibility and discrimination
function in cochlear implant patients. Int J Audiol [Internet].
2014;53:895-902. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/
doi/full/10.3109/14992027.2014.938368. [CrossRef]
15. Dietz A, Buschermöhle M, Aarnisalo AA, Vanhanen A,
Hyyrynen T, Aaltonen O, et al. The development and evaluation
of the Finnish Matrix Sentence Test for speech intelligibility assessment.
Acta Otolaryngol 2014;134: 728-37. [CrossRef
Polat, Z., Bulut, E., & Ataş, A. (2016). Assessment of the Speech Intelligibility Performance of Post Lingual Cochlear Implant Users at Different Signal-to-Noise Ratios Using the Turkish Matrix Test. Balkan Medical Journal, 33(5), 532-538.
AMA
Polat Z, Bulut E, Ataş A. Assessment of the Speech Intelligibility Performance of Post Lingual Cochlear Implant Users at Different Signal-to-Noise Ratios Using the Turkish Matrix Test. Balkan Medical Journal. September 2016;33(5):532-538.
Chicago
Polat, Zahra, Erdoğan Bulut, and Ahmet Ataş. “Assessment of the Speech Intelligibility Performance of Post Lingual Cochlear Implant Users at Different Signal-to-Noise Ratios Using the Turkish Matrix Test”. Balkan Medical Journal 33, no. 5 (September 2016): 532-38.
EndNote
Polat Z, Bulut E, Ataş A (September 1, 2016) Assessment of the Speech Intelligibility Performance of Post Lingual Cochlear Implant Users at Different Signal-to-Noise Ratios Using the Turkish Matrix Test. Balkan Medical Journal 33 5 532–538.
IEEE
Z. Polat, E. Bulut, and A. Ataş, “Assessment of the Speech Intelligibility Performance of Post Lingual Cochlear Implant Users at Different Signal-to-Noise Ratios Using the Turkish Matrix Test”, Balkan Medical Journal, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 532–538, 2016.
ISNAD
Polat, Zahra et al. “Assessment of the Speech Intelligibility Performance of Post Lingual Cochlear Implant Users at Different Signal-to-Noise Ratios Using the Turkish Matrix Test”. Balkan Medical Journal 33/5 (September 2016), 532-538.
JAMA
Polat Z, Bulut E, Ataş A. Assessment of the Speech Intelligibility Performance of Post Lingual Cochlear Implant Users at Different Signal-to-Noise Ratios Using the Turkish Matrix Test. Balkan Medical Journal. 2016;33:532–538.
MLA
Polat, Zahra et al. “Assessment of the Speech Intelligibility Performance of Post Lingual Cochlear Implant Users at Different Signal-to-Noise Ratios Using the Turkish Matrix Test”. Balkan Medical Journal, vol. 33, no. 5, 2016, pp. 532-8.
Vancouver
Polat Z, Bulut E, Ataş A. Assessment of the Speech Intelligibility Performance of Post Lingual Cochlear Implant Users at Different Signal-to-Noise Ratios Using the Turkish Matrix Test. Balkan Medical Journal. 2016;33(5):532-8.