BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2016, Volume: 33 Issue: 5, 552 - 555, 01.09.2016

Abstract

References

  • 1. Calli C, Pinar E, Oncel S, Tatar B, Tuncbilek MA. Measurements of the facial recess anatomy: implications for sparing the facial nerve and chorda tympani during posterior tympanotomy. Ear Nose Throat J 2010;89:490-4.
  • 2. Hamamoto M, Murakami G, Kataura A. Topographical relationships among the facial nerve, chorda tympani nerve and round window with special reference to the approach route for cochlear implant surgery. Clin Anat 2000;13:251-6. [CrossRef]
  • 3. Cohen NL, Hoffman RA. Complications of cochlear implant surgery in adults and children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991;100:708-11. [CrossRef]
  • 4. Zrunek M, Lischka M, Hochmair-Desoyer I, Burian K. Dimensions of the scala tympani in relation to the diameters of multichannel electrodes. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1980;229:159-65. [CrossRef]
  • 5. Todt I, Basta D, Ernst A. Does the surgical approach in cochlear implantation influence the occurance of postoperative vertigo. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;138:8-12. [CrossRef]
  • 6. Gudis DA, Montes M, Bigelow DC, Ruckenstein MJ. The round window: is it the cochleostomy of choice? Experience in 130 consecutive cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol 2012;33:1497-501. [CrossRef]
  • 7. Roland PS, Wright CG, Isaacson B. Cochlear implant electrode insertion: the round window revisited. Laryngoscope 2007;117:1397-402. [CrossRef]
  • 8. Wang L, Yang J, Jiang C, Zhang D. Cochlear implantation surgery in patients with narrow facial recess. Acta Otolaryngol 2013;133:935-8. [CrossRef]
  • 9. Zou T, Xie N, Guo M, Shu F, Zhang H. Applied anatomy of facial recess and posterior tympanum related to cochlear implantation. Lin Chung Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 2012;26:445-8.
  • 10. Wang H, Shan X, Meng Z, Sun H, Zhao L. Anatomical measurements and clinical applications through facial recess approach. Lin Chung Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 2013;27:708-11.
  • 11. Leong AC, Jiang D, Agger A, Fitzgerald-O’Connor A. Evaluation of round window accessibility to cochlear implant insertion. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013;270:1237-42. [CrossRef]
  • 12. Lee DH, Kim JK, Seo JH, Lee BJ. Anatomic limitations of posterior tympanotomy: What is the major radiologic determinant for the view field through posterior tympanotomy? J Craniofac Surg 2012;23:817-20. [CrossRef]
  • 13. Muren C, Wadin K, Wilbrand HF. Anatomic variations of the chorda tympani canal. Acta otolaryngol 1990;110:261-5. [CrossRef]
  • 14. Franz BK, Clark GM, Bloom DM. Surgical anatomy of the round window with special reference to cochlear implantation. J Laryngol Otol 1987;101:97-102. [CrossRef]
  • 15. Aslan A, Mutlu C, Celik O, Govsa F, Ozgur T, Egrilmez M. Surgical implications of anatomical landmarks on the lateral surface of the mastoid bone. Surg Radiol Anat 2004;26:263-7. [CrossRef]

Revisiting the Anatomy of the Facial Recess: The Boundaries of the Round Window Exposure

Year 2016, Volume: 33 Issue: 5, 552 - 555, 01.09.2016

Abstract

Background: The exposure of the round window (RW) through the facial recess (FR) is sometimes partial. The anatomic variations that alter RW exposure during cochleostomy have not been clearly defined to date. Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the best FR position in which to achieve the widest exposure of the RW niche and to define the topographic relationship between two other important anatomical structures, the facial nerve (FN) and the chorda tympani (CT). Study Design: Cadaver study. Methods: Twenty-four temporal bones were included in the study. Anterior and posterior epitympanectomy and posterior tympanotomy were performed after mastoidectomy. Bone was removed until the FN and CT were skeletonized and the CT branching point was visible. Two pictures were taken. The first was taken when the facial recess was at its widest exposure, while the second was taken when the RW niche was maximally exposed through the facial recess. Various measurements were taken. Results: The RW niche was totally visible in 19 temporal bones (79.2%). The RW was partially visible in the remaining five bones (20.8%). The unexposed part of the RW lay posteromedial to the FN in these five bones. While the branching point of the CT could be visualized in all cases at the widest exposure of RW, the part of the FN distal to the branching point was hidden in eight subjects (33.3%) under the posterior wall of the external ear canal. Conclusions: The RW niche was totally visible in most of the temporal bones. The RW lay posteromedial to the FN in some cases and total exposure was impossible.

References

  • 1. Calli C, Pinar E, Oncel S, Tatar B, Tuncbilek MA. Measurements of the facial recess anatomy: implications for sparing the facial nerve and chorda tympani during posterior tympanotomy. Ear Nose Throat J 2010;89:490-4.
  • 2. Hamamoto M, Murakami G, Kataura A. Topographical relationships among the facial nerve, chorda tympani nerve and round window with special reference to the approach route for cochlear implant surgery. Clin Anat 2000;13:251-6. [CrossRef]
  • 3. Cohen NL, Hoffman RA. Complications of cochlear implant surgery in adults and children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991;100:708-11. [CrossRef]
  • 4. Zrunek M, Lischka M, Hochmair-Desoyer I, Burian K. Dimensions of the scala tympani in relation to the diameters of multichannel electrodes. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1980;229:159-65. [CrossRef]
  • 5. Todt I, Basta D, Ernst A. Does the surgical approach in cochlear implantation influence the occurance of postoperative vertigo. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;138:8-12. [CrossRef]
  • 6. Gudis DA, Montes M, Bigelow DC, Ruckenstein MJ. The round window: is it the cochleostomy of choice? Experience in 130 consecutive cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol 2012;33:1497-501. [CrossRef]
  • 7. Roland PS, Wright CG, Isaacson B. Cochlear implant electrode insertion: the round window revisited. Laryngoscope 2007;117:1397-402. [CrossRef]
  • 8. Wang L, Yang J, Jiang C, Zhang D. Cochlear implantation surgery in patients with narrow facial recess. Acta Otolaryngol 2013;133:935-8. [CrossRef]
  • 9. Zou T, Xie N, Guo M, Shu F, Zhang H. Applied anatomy of facial recess and posterior tympanum related to cochlear implantation. Lin Chung Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 2012;26:445-8.
  • 10. Wang H, Shan X, Meng Z, Sun H, Zhao L. Anatomical measurements and clinical applications through facial recess approach. Lin Chung Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 2013;27:708-11.
  • 11. Leong AC, Jiang D, Agger A, Fitzgerald-O’Connor A. Evaluation of round window accessibility to cochlear implant insertion. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013;270:1237-42. [CrossRef]
  • 12. Lee DH, Kim JK, Seo JH, Lee BJ. Anatomic limitations of posterior tympanotomy: What is the major radiologic determinant for the view field through posterior tympanotomy? J Craniofac Surg 2012;23:817-20. [CrossRef]
  • 13. Muren C, Wadin K, Wilbrand HF. Anatomic variations of the chorda tympani canal. Acta otolaryngol 1990;110:261-5. [CrossRef]
  • 14. Franz BK, Clark GM, Bloom DM. Surgical anatomy of the round window with special reference to cochlear implantation. J Laryngol Otol 1987;101:97-102. [CrossRef]
  • 15. Aslan A, Mutlu C, Celik O, Govsa F, Ozgur T, Egrilmez M. Surgical implications of anatomical landmarks on the lateral surface of the mastoid bone. Surg Radiol Anat 2004;26:263-7. [CrossRef]
There are 15 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA77PM69FT
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Kerem Öztürk This is me

Sercan Göde This is me

Servet Çelik This is me

Mustafa Orhan This is me

Okan Bilge This is me

Cem Bilgen This is me

Tayfun Kirazlı This is me

Canan Y. Saylam This is me

Publication Date September 1, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016 Volume: 33 Issue: 5

Cite

APA Öztürk, K., Göde, S., Çelik, S., Orhan, M., et al. (2016). Revisiting the Anatomy of the Facial Recess: The Boundaries of the Round Window Exposure. Balkan Medical Journal, 33(5), 552-555.
AMA Öztürk K, Göde S, Çelik S, Orhan M, Bilge O, Bilgen C, Kirazlı T, Saylam CY. Revisiting the Anatomy of the Facial Recess: The Boundaries of the Round Window Exposure. Balkan Medical Journal. September 2016;33(5):552-555.
Chicago Öztürk, Kerem, Sercan Göde, Servet Çelik, Mustafa Orhan, Okan Bilge, Cem Bilgen, Tayfun Kirazlı, and Canan Y. Saylam. “Revisiting the Anatomy of the Facial Recess: The Boundaries of the Round Window Exposure”. Balkan Medical Journal 33, no. 5 (September 2016): 552-55.
EndNote Öztürk K, Göde S, Çelik S, Orhan M, Bilge O, Bilgen C, Kirazlı T, Saylam CY (September 1, 2016) Revisiting the Anatomy of the Facial Recess: The Boundaries of the Round Window Exposure. Balkan Medical Journal 33 5 552–555.
IEEE K. Öztürk, S. Göde, S. Çelik, M. Orhan, O. Bilge, C. Bilgen, T. Kirazlı, and C. . Y. Saylam, “Revisiting the Anatomy of the Facial Recess: The Boundaries of the Round Window Exposure”, Balkan Medical Journal, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 552–555, 2016.
ISNAD Öztürk, Kerem et al. “Revisiting the Anatomy of the Facial Recess: The Boundaries of the Round Window Exposure”. Balkan Medical Journal 33/5 (September 2016), 552-555.
JAMA Öztürk K, Göde S, Çelik S, Orhan M, Bilge O, Bilgen C, Kirazlı T, Saylam CY. Revisiting the Anatomy of the Facial Recess: The Boundaries of the Round Window Exposure. Balkan Medical Journal. 2016;33:552–555.
MLA Öztürk, Kerem et al. “Revisiting the Anatomy of the Facial Recess: The Boundaries of the Round Window Exposure”. Balkan Medical Journal, vol. 33, no. 5, 2016, pp. 552-5.
Vancouver Öztürk K, Göde S, Çelik S, Orhan M, Bilge O, Bilgen C, Kirazlı T, Saylam CY. Revisiting the Anatomy of the Facial Recess: The Boundaries of the Round Window Exposure. Balkan Medical Journal. 2016;33(5):552-5.