BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2017, Volume: 34 Issue: 2, 165 - 167, 01.03.2017

Abstract

References

  • 1. Herrington HC, Weber SM, Andersen PE. Modern management of laryngotracheal stenosis. Laryngoscope 2006;116:1553-7.
  • 2. Grillo HC. Development of tracheal surgery: a historical review. Part 1: techniques of tracheal surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:610-9.
  • 3. Bauer TL, Steiner KV. Virtual bronchoscopy: clinical applications and limitations. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2007;16:323-8.
  • 4. Taha MS, Mostafa BE, Fahmy M, Ghaffar MK, Ghany EA. Spiral CT virtual bronchoscopy with multiplanar reformatting in the evaluation of postintubation tracheal stenosis: comparison between endoscopic, radiological and surgical findings. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2009;266:863-6.
  • 5. Nakache G, Primov-Fever A, Alon EE, Wolf M. Predicting outcome in tracheal and cricotracheal segmental resection. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015;272:1471-5.
  • 6. Rubikas R, Matukaityte I, Jelisiejevas JJ, Rackauskas M. Surgical treatment of non-malignant laryngotracheal stenosis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014;271:2481-7.
  • 7. Deckard N, Yeh J, Soares DJ, Criddle M, Stachler R, Coticchia J. Utility of two-stage laryngotracheal reconstruction in the management of subglottic stenosis in adults. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2013;122:322-9.

Cricotracheal Resection in a Patient with Severe Subglottic Stenosis - Advantages of a Temporary Non-Cannulated Tracheostomy

Year 2017, Volume: 34 Issue: 2, 165 - 167, 01.03.2017

Abstract

Background: Stenosis in the area of the cricotracheal
segment is still a challenging problem to be dealt with.
Post-intubational cases mark an increase in recent years
due to the advances in intensive care, thoracic surgery
and neurosurgery departments.
Case Report: This paper describes a case report of
a patient with severe subglottic stenosis (grade III
according to the Cotton-Myer scale), introduces a
new option in cricotracheal resections - postoperative
temporary non-cannulated tracheostomy and describes
its advantages.
Conclusion: This variation of classical operative
techniques provides additional fixation of the trachea,
thus relieving any transitory tension on the anastomosis;
acts as a valve and decreases the air-pressure in the
upper airways during coughing and sneezing in the postoperative
period; and is an easy ac

References

  • 1. Herrington HC, Weber SM, Andersen PE. Modern management of laryngotracheal stenosis. Laryngoscope 2006;116:1553-7.
  • 2. Grillo HC. Development of tracheal surgery: a historical review. Part 1: techniques of tracheal surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:610-9.
  • 3. Bauer TL, Steiner KV. Virtual bronchoscopy: clinical applications and limitations. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2007;16:323-8.
  • 4. Taha MS, Mostafa BE, Fahmy M, Ghaffar MK, Ghany EA. Spiral CT virtual bronchoscopy with multiplanar reformatting in the evaluation of postintubation tracheal stenosis: comparison between endoscopic, radiological and surgical findings. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2009;266:863-6.
  • 5. Nakache G, Primov-Fever A, Alon EE, Wolf M. Predicting outcome in tracheal and cricotracheal segmental resection. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015;272:1471-5.
  • 6. Rubikas R, Matukaityte I, Jelisiejevas JJ, Rackauskas M. Surgical treatment of non-malignant laryngotracheal stenosis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014;271:2481-7.
  • 7. Deckard N, Yeh J, Soares DJ, Criddle M, Stachler R, Coticchia J. Utility of two-stage laryngotracheal reconstruction in the management of subglottic stenosis in adults. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2013;122:322-9.
There are 7 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA57YD23VJ
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Todor Miroslavov Popov This is me

Tzvetomir Marinov This is me

Julian Rangachev This is me

Dimitar Konov This is me

Maya Belitova This is me

Publication Date March 1, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 34 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Popov, T. M., Marinov, T., Rangachev, J., Konov, D., et al. (2017). Cricotracheal Resection in a Patient with Severe Subglottic Stenosis - Advantages of a Temporary Non-Cannulated Tracheostomy. Balkan Medical Journal, 34(2), 165-167.
AMA Popov TM, Marinov T, Rangachev J, Konov D, Belitova M. Cricotracheal Resection in a Patient with Severe Subglottic Stenosis - Advantages of a Temporary Non-Cannulated Tracheostomy. Balkan Medical Journal. March 2017;34(2):165-167.
Chicago Popov, Todor Miroslavov, Tzvetomir Marinov, Julian Rangachev, Dimitar Konov, and Maya Belitova. “Cricotracheal Resection in a Patient With Severe Subglottic Stenosis - Advantages of a Temporary Non-Cannulated Tracheostomy”. Balkan Medical Journal 34, no. 2 (March 2017): 165-67.
EndNote Popov TM, Marinov T, Rangachev J, Konov D, Belitova M (March 1, 2017) Cricotracheal Resection in a Patient with Severe Subglottic Stenosis - Advantages of a Temporary Non-Cannulated Tracheostomy. Balkan Medical Journal 34 2 165–167.
IEEE T. M. Popov, T. Marinov, J. Rangachev, D. Konov, and M. Belitova, “Cricotracheal Resection in a Patient with Severe Subglottic Stenosis - Advantages of a Temporary Non-Cannulated Tracheostomy”, Balkan Medical Journal, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 165–167, 2017.
ISNAD Popov, Todor Miroslavov et al. “Cricotracheal Resection in a Patient With Severe Subglottic Stenosis - Advantages of a Temporary Non-Cannulated Tracheostomy”. Balkan Medical Journal 34/2 (March 2017), 165-167.
JAMA Popov TM, Marinov T, Rangachev J, Konov D, Belitova M. Cricotracheal Resection in a Patient with Severe Subglottic Stenosis - Advantages of a Temporary Non-Cannulated Tracheostomy. Balkan Medical Journal. 2017;34:165–167.
MLA Popov, Todor Miroslavov et al. “Cricotracheal Resection in a Patient With Severe Subglottic Stenosis - Advantages of a Temporary Non-Cannulated Tracheostomy”. Balkan Medical Journal, vol. 34, no. 2, 2017, pp. 165-7.
Vancouver Popov TM, Marinov T, Rangachev J, Konov D, Belitova M. Cricotracheal Resection in a Patient with Severe Subglottic Stenosis - Advantages of a Temporary Non-Cannulated Tracheostomy. Balkan Medical Journal. 2017;34(2):165-7.