Artistic Use of Compositional Variations of Waste Wood

Abstract

This study aims to explore the untapped potential of waste wood materials and investigate how their unique textures, patterns, and forms could be harnessed to create compelling outdoor art installations. As part of a qualitative research methodology, the study employs a case study and iterative design approach to explore the artistic potential and aesthetic value of waste wood in outdoor environments. An extensive collection process was undertaken, gathering various waste wood pieces from furniture shops. These samples were carefully cataloged based on their origin, wood type, dimensions, and distinguishing features. Through an iterative design approach, different arrangement techniques were explored to compose the waste wood fragments into larger sculptural forms that harmonized their irregular shapes and textures. Field studies were conducted to identify suitable outdoor locations where these ephemeral installations could be sensitively integrated while provoking dialogue on themes of temporality, renewal, and mankind's relationship with nature. The research reveals a profound duality within waste wood pieces – their discarded status juxtaposed against the intricate beauty of their details, grains, and organic imperfections. In conclusion, this research shows that waste wood art installation offers new perspectives on material reuse, encouraging a deeper appreciation for the overlooked beauty in discarded objects.

Keywords

• Art Installation
• Compositional Variations
• Exterior Space
• Mural
• Waste Wood

References

1. Abbadia, J. (2022, November 01). The impact of geographical bias on research and studies. Mind the graph. https://mindthegraph.com/blog/geographical-bias/ (30.05.2024).
2. Adhikari, S., Ozarska, B. (2018). Minimizing environmental impacts of timber products through the production process “from sawmill to final products”. Environmental Systems Research, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-018-0109-x
3. Ahen, F. & Amankwah‐Amoah, J. (2021). Sustainable waste management innovations in Africa: New perspectives and research agenda for improving global health. Sustainability, 13(12), 6646. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126646
4. Ahmad, F., Saeed, Q., Shah, S. S. H., Gondal, M. A., & Mumtaz, S. (2022). Environmental sustainability: Challenges and approaches. Natural Resources Conservation and Advances for Sustainability, 243-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-822976-7.00019-3
5. Akhator, P., Obanor, A., & Ugege, A. (2017). Nigerian wood waste: A potential resource for economic development. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 21 (2), 246. https://doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v21i2.4
6. Al-Yahyai, F. (2014). Practice-based research as an approach for seeing, re-seeing and creating artworks. International Journal of Education Through Art, 10(3), 287-302. https://doi.org/10.1386/eta.10.3.287_1
7. Alapieti, T., Mikkola, R., Pasanen, P., & Salonen, H. (2020). The influence of wooden interior materials on indoor environment: A review. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 78(4), 617-634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-020-01532-x
8. Alpak, E. M., Duzenli, T. & Çiğdem, A. (2019). The impact of public art on urban open spaces. International Congress on Landscape Architecture Research, 3(1), 15-19.

9. Art story. (2024, February 15). Environmental art. The Art Story. https://www.theartstory.org/movement/environmental-art/
10. Asamoah, O., Kuittinen, S., Danquah, J. A., Quartey, E. T., Bamwesigye, D., Boateng, C. M., … & Pappinen, A. (2020). Assessing wood waste by timber industry as a contributing factor to deforestation in Ghana. Forests, 11(9), 939. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11090939
11. Asenso, K., Issah, S. & Som, E. K. (2020). The use of visual arts in environmental conservation in Ghana: The case of Adams Saeed. Journal of African Art Education, 1(1), 66-83.
12. Awuni, S., Tabi-Agyei, E., Baah, O. P. K. & Adom, D. (2023). Repurposing wood waste for the production of wooden carved doors for environmental sustainability. Journal of Innovations in Art & Culture for Nature Conservation and Environmental Sustainability, 1(2), 80-97.
13. Bassey, B. A. & William, A. R. (2020). The arts of converting waste to wealth: Towards environmental sustainability in Nigeria. Central Asian Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Innovation, 1(3), 159-167. https://www.cas-press.com/article_111258_4e47523e1539faadaef2f4f9aaaa32bf.pdf
14. Berleant, A. (1992). The aesthetics of environment. Temple University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt14bs997
15. Berleant, A. (2005). Aesthetics and environment. Ashgate Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351163361
16. Besserer, A., Troilo, S., Girods, P., Rogaume, Y., & Brosse, N. (2021). Cascading recycling of wood waste: A review. Polymers, 13(11), 1752. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13111752
17. Boakye-Yiadom, F., Micah, V. K. B. & Donkor, E. K. (2022). Pseudo traditional wood sculptures in TTU, Ghana: A study of four works by an artist-lecturer. Journal of Arts and Humanities, 11(02), 24-35.
18. Bolderston, A. (2012). Conducting a research interview. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 43(1), 66-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2011.12.002
19. Bridgens, B., Powell, M., Farmer, G. T., Walsh, C., Reed, E. Y., Royapoor, M., … & Heidrich, O. (2018). Creative upcycling: reconnecting people, materials and place through making. Journal of Cleaner Production, 189, 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.317
20. Browne, X., Larsen, O. P., Friis, N. C., & Kühn, M. S. (2022). Material value(s): motivating the architectural application of waste wood. Architecture, Structures and Construction, 2(4), 575-584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44150-022-00065-6
21. Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z
22. Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., … & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652-661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
23. Carlson, A. (2000). Aesthetics and the environment: The appreciation of nature, art, and architecture. Routledge.
24. Carlson, A. (2023). Environmental aesthetics. In Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (Eds.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2023 Edition). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/environmental-aesthetics/> (30.05.2024).
25. Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh. (2024). Wabi-Sabi: The Japanese art of finding the beauty in imperfections. Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh. https://www.carnegielibrary.org/staff-picks/wabi-sabi-the-japanese-art-of-finding-the-beauty-in-imperfections/ (30.05.2024).
26. Cennamo, K. & Kalk, D. (2019). Real world instructional design: An iterative approach to designing learning experiences. Taylor & Francis.
27. Christensen, J. (2023). Possibility to reuse and recycle wood waste and construction and demolition wood waste. Master’s thesis, University of Boras.
28. Collins, C. S. & Stockton, C. M. (2018). The central role of theory in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1), 160940691879747. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918797475
29. Cooper, C., Lorenc, T., & Schauberger, U. (2021). What you see depends on where you sit: the effect of geographical location on web‐searching for systematic reviews: a case study. Research Synthesis Methods, 12(4), 557-570. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1485
30. de Souza Pinho, G. C., Calmon, J. L., Medeiros, D. L., Vieira, D., & Bravo, A. (2023). Wood waste management from the furniture industry: The environmental performances of recycling, energy recovery, and landfill treatments. Sustainability, 15(20), 14944. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014944
31. Debrah, J. K., Vidal, D. G., & Dinis, M. A. P. (2021). Raising awareness on solid waste management through formal education for sustainability: a developing countries evidence review. Recycling, 6(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling6010006
32. Donkor, E. K., Eshun, J. F. & Micah, V. K. B. (2021). Wood detritus: A functional concept in interior design. IDA: International Design and Art Journal, 3(2), 184-197.
33. Down, L. (2023, May 21). Environmental art: Sparking change through awareness. Arts, Artists, Artwork. https://artsartistsartwork.com/environmental-art-sparking-change-through-awareness/ (30.05.2024).
34. Drolet, M., Rose-Derouin, E., Leblanc, J., Ruest, M., & Williams‐Jones, B. (2022). Ethical issues in research: perceptions of researchers, research ethics board members and research ethics experts. Journal of Academic Ethics, 21(2), 269-292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-022-09455-3
35. Ellen MacArthur foundation. (2023, September 29). Making the most of materials: Africa’s skills in repair and repurposing point the way for the Global North. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/articles/making-the-most-of-materials (30.05.2024).
36. Emslie, L. (2015). Art on the ground: An exploration into human-nature relationships [Master’s thesis, University of Iceland, Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, Programme of Environment and Natural Resources].
37. Eshun, J. F., Potting, J., & Leemans, R. (2012). Wood waste minimization in the timber sector of Ghana: A systems approach to reduce environmental impact. Journal of Cleaner Production, 26, 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.025
38. Fahrion, D. (2024, February 19). Recycled wood products and the role they play in an effective waste management strategy. Waste control. https://wastecontrolinc.com/2024/02/19/recycled-wood-products/ (30.05.2024).
39. Foliente, G. C., Leicester, R. H., Wang, C., Mackenzie, C. & Cole, I. (2002). Durability design for wood construction. Forest Products Journal, 52(1), 10-19.
40. Gallagher, K. (2020). Wabi Sabi: the aesthetics of imperfection, impermanence and incompleteness. Amazon Digital Services LLC – Kdp.
41. Gesimer, H., Otto, T. & Warner, C. D. (Eds.) (2022). Impermanence: Exploring continuous change across cultures. UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111. 9781787358690
42. GGI Insights. (2024, March 9). Woodworking: The craftsmanship of precision and art. Gray Group International. https://www.graygroupintl.com/blog/woodworking (30.05.2024).
43. Greinert, A., Mrówczyńska, M., & Szefner, W. (2019). The use of waste biomass from the wood industry and municipal sources for energy production. Sustainability, 11(11), 3083. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113083
44. Gyabaah, D., Awuah, E., Antwi-Agyei, P., & Kuffour, R. A. (2023). Characterization of dumpsite waste of different ages in Ghana. Heliyon, 9(5), e15827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15827
45. Hans, R. (2024, January 20). Wood manufacturing & recycling. Deskera. https://www.deskera.com/blog/wood-manufacturing-recycling/ (30.05.2024).
46. Hauru, K., Koskinen, S., Kotze, D. J., & Lehvävirta, S. (2014). The effects of decaying logs on the aesthetic experience and acceptability of urban forests – Implications for forest management. Landscape and Urban Planning, 123, 114-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.12.014
47. Hester, L. (2023). Re-envisioning visionary art: An Inquiry into analytical psychology and art criticism. [PhD thesis, Technological University of the Shannon: Midlands Midwest].
48. Hill, C. A. S., Kymäläinen, M., & Rautkari, L. (2022). Review of the use of solid wood as an external cladding material in the built environment. Journal of Materials Science, 57(20), 9031-9076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-022-07211-x
49. Ibitoye, S. E., Mahamood, R. M., Jen, T., Loha, C., & Akinlabi, E. T. (2023). An overview of biomass solid fuels: biomass sources, processing methods, and morphological and microstructural properties. Journal of Bioresources and Bioproducts, 8(4), 333-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobab.2023.09.005
50. ILO Encyclopaedia. (2011, January 14). Tools, equipment and materials. ILO Encyclopaedia Occupational Health and Safety. https://www.iloencyclopaedia.org/part-xvi-62216/construction/itemlist/category/153-tools-equipment-and-materials (30.05.2024).
51. Iqbal, R., Raza, M. A. S., Valipour, M., Saleem, M. F., Zaheer, M. S., Ahmad, S., … & Nazar, M. A. (2020). Potential agricultural and environmental benefits of mulches—A review. Bulletin of the National Research Centre, 44(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-020-00290-3
52. Jahan, I., Zhang, G., Bhuiyan, M. & Navaratnam, S. (2022). Circular economy of construction and demolition wood waste—A theoretical framework approach. Sustainability, 14(17), 10478. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710478
53. Karnani, V. (2022, June 26). Spaces offcuts: Spacemaking from wood waste. Institute for Advanced Architecture of Catalonia (IAAC). https://www.iaacblog.com/programs/spaces-offcuts-spacemaking-wood-waste/ (30.05.2024).
54. Kempton, B. (2019). Wabi Sabi: Japanese wisdom for a perfectly imperfect life. HarperCollins.
55. Koval, S. (2024, January 31). Circular renaissance: Transforming waste into prosperity. Global Research and Consulting Group. https://insights.grcglobalgroup.com/circular-renaissance-transforming-waste-into-prosperity/ (30.05.2024).
56. Laleicke, P. (2018). Wood waste, the challenges of communication and innovation. BioResources, 13(2), 2182-2183.
57. Lee, R. (2022). The influence of Zen on contemporary aesthetics in decorative arts and interior design [Master’s thesis, Sotheby’s Institute of Art].
58. Lee, S. & Buck, L. (2020). Sustainable design approaches using waste furniture materials for design students. International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, 10-11 September 2020, Via Design, Via University College, Herning, Denmark.
59. Lee, S. Y., Sankaran, R., Chew, K. W., Tan, C. H., Krishnamoorthy, R., Chu, D., … & Show, P. L. (2019). Waste to bioenergy: A review on the recent conversion technologies. BMC Energy, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42500-019-0004-7
60. Levinson, J. (2005). Philosophical aesthetics: An overview. The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199279456.013.0001
61. Maier, D. (2021). Building materials made of wood waste a solution to achieve the sustainable development goals. Materials, 14(24), 7638. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247638
62. Mann, B. & Saultz, A. (2019). The role of place, geography, and geographic information systems in educational research. AERA Open, 5(3), 233285841986934. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419869340
63. Mark-Ng, E. (2019). Public art in outdoor space: How environmental art can influence notions of place. Honors Papers. https://digitalcommons.oberlin.edu/honors/130 (30.05.2024).
64. Marshall, C. (2010). A research design for studio-based research in art. Teaching Artist Journal, 8(2), 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/15411791003618597
65. Martínez-Mesa, J., González‐Chica, D. A., Duquia, R. P., Bonamigo, R. R., & Bastos, J. L. (2016). Sampling: how to select participants in my research study? Anais Brasileiros De Dermatologia, 91(3), 326-330. https://doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20165254
66. McArdle, T. (2024, February 11). Making art from nature. Art is fun. https://www.art-is-fun.com/art-from-nature (30.05.2024).
67. Michałowska, M. (2021). The Art of (Up) Recycling: How plastic debris has become a matter of art? Advances in Environmental and Engineering Research, 2(4), 12. https://doi.org/10.21926/aeer.2104025
68. Monier, V., Bignon, J. C., & Duchanois, G. (2013). Use of irregular wood components to design non-standard structures. Advanced Materials Research, 671-674, 2337-2343. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.671-674.2337
69. Moser, A. & Korstjens, I. (2017). Series: practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: sampling, data collection and analysis. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091
70. Munib, J. A. (2021). Utilizing the wood waste for eco-friendly mixed-media artwork. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 905(1), 012102. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/905/1/012102
71. Ngwena, C. (2018). What is Africanness? Contesting nativism in race, culture and sexualities. Pretoria University Law Press (PULP).
72. Pandey, S. (2022). Wood waste utilization and associated product development from under-utilized low-quality wood and its prospects in Nepal. SN Applied Sciences, 4(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-022-05061-5
73. Percy-Smith, B. & Carney, C. (2011). Using art installations as action research to engage children and communities in evaluating and redesigning city centre spaces. Educational Action Research, 19(1), 23-39.
74. Rahman, S. (2016). The advantages and disadvantages of using qualitative and quantitative approaches and methods in language “testing and assessment” research: A literature review. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 102. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n1p102
75. Rajor, A., Sharma, R. K., Sood, V. K., & Ramamurthy, V. (1996). A sawdust-derived soil conditioner promotes plant growth and improves water-holding capacity of different types of soils. Journal of Industrial Microbiology, 16(4), 237-240. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01570027
76. Ramage, M., Burridge, H. C., Busse‐Wicher, M., Fereday, G., Reynolds, T., Shah, D. U., … & Scherman, O. A. (2017). The wood from the trees: The use of timber in construction. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68, 333-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.107
77. Refahi, L. (2023, January 06). Art as a vector for environmental consciousness. Medium. https://medium.com/@smARTmagazine/art-as-a-vector-for-environmental-consciousness-8701afd4e0a6 (30.05.2024).
78. Reynolds, A. (2023, April 20). A comprehensive guide to ephemeral art. Ren creative works. https://adrianreynolds.ie/ephemeral-art/ (30.05.2024).
79. Rezania, S., Oryani, B., Nasrollahi, V. R., Darajeh, N., Lotfi Ghahroud, M., & Mehranzamir, K. (2023). Review on waste-to-energy approaches toward a circular economy in developed and developing countries. Processes, 11(9), 2566. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11092566
80. Russell, L. (2018, July 16). Being perfectly imperfect — The wisdom of Wabi-Sabi. Medium. https://medium.com/@lizrusselll/being-perfectly-imperfect-the-wisdom-of-wabi-sabi-2afdaa5a48bd (30.05.2024).
81. Siriyium, N. (2022, April 23). From waste to works of art: Our favorite sustainable artists. Impakter. https://impakter.com/waste-to-works-of-arts/ (31.05.2024).
82. Sunassee, A., Bokhoree, C., & Patrizio, A. (2021). Students’ empathy for the environment through eco-art place-based education: A review. Ecologies, 2(2), 214-247. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecologies2020013
83. Taelman, S. E., Tonini, D., Wandl, A., & Dewulf, J. (2018). A holistic sustainability framework for waste management in European cities: Concept development. Sustainability, 10(7), 2184. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072184
84. Takase, M., Kipkoech, R., Kibet, J., & Mugah, F. (2023). Possibility of efficient utilization of wood waste as a renewable energy resource in Ghana. Journal of Modern Green Energy, 2(3), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.53964/jmge.2023003
85. Terramai. (2024, January 24). Reclaimed wood: Discover its beauty, sustainability, and durability. Terramai. https://www.terramai.com/reclaimed-wood#gsc.tab=0 (31.05.2024).
86. Theos Timber Limited. (2018, September 21). Benefits of using reclaimed wood. Theos Timber Limited. https://noyekplywood.co.uk/benefits-using-reclaimed-wood/ (31.05.2024).
87. van Boeckel, J. (2014). At the heart of art and earth: An exploration of practices in arts-based environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 21(5), 801-802. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.959474 Welsch, C. (2021). New life for wood and plant waste. European Investment Bank.
88. Winandy, J. E. & Morrell, J. J. (2017). Improving the utility, performance, and durability of wood- and bio-based composites. Annals of Forest Science, 74(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-017-0625-2
89. Yamada, C. J. (2021). Architecture and the nature of materiality [PhD thesis, Graduate Division of the University of Hawai’i at MᾹnoa].
90. Yang, D. & Zhu, J. (2021). Recycling and value-added design of discarded wooden furniture. BioResources, 16(4), 6954-6964. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.16.4.6954-6964