Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Determining Regression Models for Photosynthesis and Stomatal Resistance as Affected by Temperature and Light Intensity in Tomato (Lycopersicon Esculentum Mill.) and Eggplant (Solanum Melongena L.) Grown in Glasshouses

Year 2023, , 281 - 286, 01.05.2023
https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1231830

Abstract

This study was carried out to examine the relationships between net leaf photosynthesis and temperature and light intensity, between stomatal resistance and temperature and light intensity in tomato and aubergine grown with a range temperature from 10 to 30 °C and different light intensities from 3 to 7 MJm-2 d-1. The study was carried out in a six-compartment greenhouse (size 4 m * 8 m), the temperature of which can be controlled by air conditioning, on tomato and eggplant plants. Each of the six greenhouse compartments was set to have maximum temperatures of 10, 12, 16, 18, 20 and 24 °C. Commercial varieties named "Counter" for tomato and "Bonica" for eggplant were used. "Fisons M2" commercial compost was used in all growing media and nutrient was applied equally. In the study, different sowing and planting dates were applied to benefit from natural light conditions (between 3 and 7 MJm-2d-1). Average temperature in each compartment was recorded using a 'Combine' data logger at 15 minute intervals. A porometer (Delta-T device, MT -3) was used to measure the stomatal resistance of tomato and eggplant leaves. The stomatal resistance measurements of the plants were made at the same time of the day (between 11.00-13.00) at 15-day intervals at the top, middle and lower levels of the crown of four different plants in different environmental conditions. In tomato, leaf photosynthesis increased curvilinearly with temperatures up to about 20.5 °C at low light intensity and declined at higher temperatures. The highest photosynthesis was obtained from the plants grown at a temperature of 22.5 °C and 7 MJm-2d-1 light intensity. The lowest photosynthesis was at 10 °C and 3 MJm-2d-1. In aubergine, at low light intensities, net photosynthesis increased curvilinearly up to 23 °C while it increased up to 20 °C at high light intensities and declined at higher temperatures. Maximum net leaf photosynthesis was found to be greater in tomato than aubergine.

Supporting Institution

..

Project Number

...

Thanks

I am very grateful to Prof Dr Sezgin UZUN for the generous support of this research. I remember with respect to my deep feelings and I wish Allah’s mercy to him.

References

  • Acock B, Charles-Edwards DA, Fitter DJ, Hand DW, Ludwig LJ, Wilson-Warren J, Withers AC. 1978. The contribution of leaves from different levels within a tomato crop to canopy net photosynthesis: An experimental examination of two canopy models. J Exp Bot, 29: 815-827.
  • Acock B. 1991. Modelling canopy photosynthetic response to carbon dioxide, light interception, temperature and leaf traits. Crop Sci Soc Amer, 19: 41-55.
  • Atherton JG, Harris GP. 1986. The tomato crop. Chapman and Hall, London, UK, pp: 167-200.
  • Bar-Tsur A, Rudich J, Bravdo B. 1985. Photosynthesis, transpiration and stomatal resistance to gas exchange in tomato plants under high temperatures. J Hort Sci, 60(3): 405-410.
  • Bertin N, Heuvelink E. 1993. Dry matter production in a tomato crop: Comparison of two simulation models. J Hort Sci, 68: 995-1011.
  • Brunetti C, George RM, Tattini M, Field K, Davey MP. 2013. Metabolomics in plant environmental physiology. J Exp Bot, 64: 4011–4020
  • Cockshull KE, Graves CJ, Cave CRJ. 1992. The influence of shading on yield of glasshouse tomatoes. J Hort Sci, 67(1): 11-24.
  • Dayan E, Keulen H, Jones JW, Zipori I, Shmuel D, Challa H. 1993. Development, calibration and validation of a greenhouse tomato growth model. I. Description of the model. Agric Sys, 43: 165-183.
  • Dorais M, Andre G, Trudel MJ. 1991. Annual greenhouse tomato production under sequential intercropping system using supplemental light. Scientia Hort, 45: 225- 234.
  • Evans JR. 1989. Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants. Oecologia, 78: 9–19
  • Gomez KA, Gomez AA. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, New York, USA, 2nd ed., pp: 690.
  • Grimstad SO. 1995. Low temperature pulse affects growth and development of young cucumber and tomato plants. J Hort Sci, 70: 75-80.
  • Heuvelink E, Bertin N. 1994. Dry matter partitioning in a tomato crop: Comparison of two simulation models. J Hort Sci, 69(5): 885-903.
  • Jones HG, Sutherland RA. 1991. Stomatal control of xylem embolism. Plant Cell Environ, 14(6): 607-612.
  • Jovanovic NZ, Annandale JG. 2000. Crop growth model parameters of 19 summer vegetable cultivars for use in mechanistic irrigation scheduling models. Water SA, 26(1): 67-76.
  • Novoa R, Loomis RS. 1981. Nitrogen and plant production. Plant Soil, 58: 177-204.
  • Özkaraman F. 2004. The quantitative effect of temperature, light and different pruning systems on the growth, developmentand yield of melon (Cucumis melo L.) grown in greenhouses. PhD thesis, Ondokuz Mayis University, Institute of Science, Samsun, Türkiye, pp: 203-204.
  • Pearson S, Hadley P, Wheldon AE. 1994. A model of the effects of temperature on the growth and development of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. botrytis). Scientia Hort, 59: 91-106.
  • Pozo A, Dennett MD. 1991. Modelling the effect of leaf nitrogen content on crop photosynthesis and radiation use efficiency Issue:26 Page:285-289 Agricultural Botany, University of Reading,
  • Prusinkiewicz P. 2004. Modeling plant growth and development. Current opinion in plant biology, 7(1), 79-83.
  • Rand RH, Cooke JR. 1980. A Comprehensive model for C02 assimilation in leaves. ASAE, 23(3): 601-607
  • Seligman N.G. 1990. The crop model record, theoretical production ecology: Reflections and prospects. Pudoc Wageningen, Nederland, Amsterdam, pp: 249-263.
  • Tuzet A, Perrier A, Leuning, R. 2003. A coupled model of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration. Plant Cell Environ, 26(7): 1097-1116.
  • Uzun S. 1996. The quantitative effects of temperature and the light environment on growth, development and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum, Mill.) and eggplant (Solanum melongena, L.). PhD Thesis, University of Reading, Berkshire, England, pp: 472.
  • Uzun S. 2006. The quantitative effects of temperature and light on the number of leaves preceding the first fruiting inflorescence on the stem of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum, Mill.) and aubergine (Solanum melongena L.). Scientia Hort, 109(2): 142-146.
Year 2023, , 281 - 286, 01.05.2023
https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1231830

Abstract

Project Number

...

References

  • Acock B, Charles-Edwards DA, Fitter DJ, Hand DW, Ludwig LJ, Wilson-Warren J, Withers AC. 1978. The contribution of leaves from different levels within a tomato crop to canopy net photosynthesis: An experimental examination of two canopy models. J Exp Bot, 29: 815-827.
  • Acock B. 1991. Modelling canopy photosynthetic response to carbon dioxide, light interception, temperature and leaf traits. Crop Sci Soc Amer, 19: 41-55.
  • Atherton JG, Harris GP. 1986. The tomato crop. Chapman and Hall, London, UK, pp: 167-200.
  • Bar-Tsur A, Rudich J, Bravdo B. 1985. Photosynthesis, transpiration and stomatal resistance to gas exchange in tomato plants under high temperatures. J Hort Sci, 60(3): 405-410.
  • Bertin N, Heuvelink E. 1993. Dry matter production in a tomato crop: Comparison of two simulation models. J Hort Sci, 68: 995-1011.
  • Brunetti C, George RM, Tattini M, Field K, Davey MP. 2013. Metabolomics in plant environmental physiology. J Exp Bot, 64: 4011–4020
  • Cockshull KE, Graves CJ, Cave CRJ. 1992. The influence of shading on yield of glasshouse tomatoes. J Hort Sci, 67(1): 11-24.
  • Dayan E, Keulen H, Jones JW, Zipori I, Shmuel D, Challa H. 1993. Development, calibration and validation of a greenhouse tomato growth model. I. Description of the model. Agric Sys, 43: 165-183.
  • Dorais M, Andre G, Trudel MJ. 1991. Annual greenhouse tomato production under sequential intercropping system using supplemental light. Scientia Hort, 45: 225- 234.
  • Evans JR. 1989. Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants. Oecologia, 78: 9–19
  • Gomez KA, Gomez AA. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, New York, USA, 2nd ed., pp: 690.
  • Grimstad SO. 1995. Low temperature pulse affects growth and development of young cucumber and tomato plants. J Hort Sci, 70: 75-80.
  • Heuvelink E, Bertin N. 1994. Dry matter partitioning in a tomato crop: Comparison of two simulation models. J Hort Sci, 69(5): 885-903.
  • Jones HG, Sutherland RA. 1991. Stomatal control of xylem embolism. Plant Cell Environ, 14(6): 607-612.
  • Jovanovic NZ, Annandale JG. 2000. Crop growth model parameters of 19 summer vegetable cultivars for use in mechanistic irrigation scheduling models. Water SA, 26(1): 67-76.
  • Novoa R, Loomis RS. 1981. Nitrogen and plant production. Plant Soil, 58: 177-204.
  • Özkaraman F. 2004. The quantitative effect of temperature, light and different pruning systems on the growth, developmentand yield of melon (Cucumis melo L.) grown in greenhouses. PhD thesis, Ondokuz Mayis University, Institute of Science, Samsun, Türkiye, pp: 203-204.
  • Pearson S, Hadley P, Wheldon AE. 1994. A model of the effects of temperature on the growth and development of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. botrytis). Scientia Hort, 59: 91-106.
  • Pozo A, Dennett MD. 1991. Modelling the effect of leaf nitrogen content on crop photosynthesis and radiation use efficiency Issue:26 Page:285-289 Agricultural Botany, University of Reading,
  • Prusinkiewicz P. 2004. Modeling plant growth and development. Current opinion in plant biology, 7(1), 79-83.
  • Rand RH, Cooke JR. 1980. A Comprehensive model for C02 assimilation in leaves. ASAE, 23(3): 601-607
  • Seligman N.G. 1990. The crop model record, theoretical production ecology: Reflections and prospects. Pudoc Wageningen, Nederland, Amsterdam, pp: 249-263.
  • Tuzet A, Perrier A, Leuning, R. 2003. A coupled model of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration. Plant Cell Environ, 26(7): 1097-1116.
  • Uzun S. 1996. The quantitative effects of temperature and the light environment on growth, development and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum, Mill.) and eggplant (Solanum melongena, L.). PhD Thesis, University of Reading, Berkshire, England, pp: 472.
  • Uzun S. 2006. The quantitative effects of temperature and light on the number of leaves preceding the first fruiting inflorescence on the stem of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum, Mill.) and aubergine (Solanum melongena L.). Scientia Hort, 109(2): 142-146.
There are 25 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Agricultural Engineering
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Fikret Özkaraman 0000-0002-9907-4848

Project Number ...
Early Pub Date April 30, 2023
Publication Date May 1, 2023
Submission Date January 10, 2023
Acceptance Date March 15, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023

Cite

APA Özkaraman, F. (2023). Determining Regression Models for Photosynthesis and Stomatal Resistance as Affected by Temperature and Light Intensity in Tomato (Lycopersicon Esculentum Mill.) and Eggplant (Solanum Melongena L.) Grown in Glasshouses. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, 6(3), 281-286. https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1231830

                                                  24890