Some Environmental Factors Causing First Calving Difficulties in Holstein Friesian Cattle

Year 2024, , 335 - 338, 15.07.2024

Arzu Özdemir

https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1459275

Abstract

Calving efficiency, an important target in cattle breeding, has been negatively affected by some environmental factors. Therefore, calving difficulty creates negative economic consequences. In this study, it was aimed to investigate the relationship between the first calving difficulty in Holstein Friesian (HF) cows in terms of management and origin factors. The material of the research consists of 1475 calving difficulty records from 5 different enterprises engaged in HF breeding, located in the Central Anatolia Region of Türkiye, covering the years from 2013 to 2019. The scoring system used to determine calving difficulty: normal without intervention (NB), normal with intervention (NBI), difficult/intervention with equipment (DB), and abnormal birth (AB). In the calving difficulty analysis, the management factor is classified as 1-2-3-4-5 and the origin of the cow is classified as 1 (foreign origin) and 2 (native origin). No findings were observed for NBI scores. Total NB, DB, and AB scores were 1250 (84.74%), 192 (13.01), and 33 (2.25%), respectively. Chi-square test was performed to test the differences among farms. Among the enterprises, the highest NB rate was observed in the 5th enterprise with 90.07%, the minimum DB rate was observed in the 5th enterprise with 8.45%, and the AB rate was at least 0.66% in the 1st enterprise. The difference between farms was significant for calving difficulty (P<0.01). Cow origin was not significant on the calving difficulty score. While the NB rates in foreign-origin and native-origin animals were 86.36% and 84.64%, and the DB rates were 13.64% and 12.97%, respectively. The AB score was not seen in foreign-originated cows, but the AB rate was 2.39% in native-origin cows. To reduce the calving difficulties in enterprises, it may be recommended to determine management procedures appropriate to the region and enterprise and to determine semen suitable for the breed, age, and size of the heifer.

Keywords

Calving difficulty, First calving, Animal origin, Holstein Friesian

Ethical Statement

Ethics committee approval was not required for this study because there was no study on animals or humans.

Thanks

We thank the farm owners for their assistance in collecting this data.

References

• Bayram B, Topal M, Aksakal V, Önk K. 2015. Investigate the effects of non-genetic factors on calving difficulty and stillbirth rate in Holstein Friesian cattle using the CHAID analysis. Kafkas Univ Fac Vet Med, 21(5): 645-652.
• Dekkers JC. 1994. Optimal breeding strategies for calving ease. J Dairy Sci, 77(11): 3441-3453.
• Dematawewa CMB, Berger PJ. 1997. Effect of dystocia on yield, fertility, and cow losses and an economic evaluation of dystocia scores for Holsteins. J Dairy Sci, 80: 754-761.
• Erdoğan G. 2023. İneklerde güç doğumlara elle müdahale ve fetotomi. Sabuncu A, editör. Ruminantlarda Güç Doğumlar ve Doğuma Müdahaleler. 1. Baskı. Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri, ss: 51-56.
• Gevrekçi Y, Akbaş Y. 2014. Bir eşikli özellik olarak buzağılama güçlüğünün analizi. Ege Üniv Zir Fak Derg, 51(3): 237-241.
• Kaymakçı M. 1987. Sığırlarda buzağılama zorluğu. Hayv. Ür, 24(1): 7-12.
• Kräusslich H. 1981. Rinderzucht (6. Aufl.). Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, pp: 145.
• Lombard JE, Garry FB, Tomlinson SM, Garber LP. 2007. Impacts of dystocia on health and survival of dairy calves. J Dairy Sci, 90: 1751-1760.
• Mee JF. 2008. Prevalence and risk factors for dystocia in dairy cattle: A review. Vet J, 176: 93-101.
• Meijering A. 1984. Dystocia and stillbirth in cattle - A review of causes, relations and implications. Livest Prod Sci, 11(2): 143-177.
• Meyer CL, Berger PJ, Koehler KJ, Thompson JR, Sattler CG. 2001. Phenotypic trends in incidence of stillbirth for Holsteins in the United States. J Dairy Sci, 84: 515-523.
• Philipsson J, Foulley JL, Lederer J, Liboriussen T, Osinga A. 1979. Sire evaluation standards and breeding strategies for limiting dystocia and stillbirth. Report of an EEC/EAAP working group. Livest Prod Sci, 6(2): 111-127.
• Sakar ÇM, Ünal İ, Yılmaz MA, Çökülgen T, Yıldırır ZT. 2022. Comparison of some herd life and reproductive parameters of Anatolian Black and culture breed cows. Large Anim Rev, 28(6): 299-305.
• SPSS. 1999. SPSS base 10.0 user's guide. SPSS inc., Chicago, IL, USA.
• Strapáková, E., Candrák, J., Strapák, P. 2023. Analysis of calving ease and stillbirth and their impact on the length of functional productive life in Slovak Holstein Cattle. Animals, 13(9), 1496.