Determination of the Relationship of Harmonization Ratio and Some Yield Characteristics with Grain Yield in Barley

Year 2024, , 471 - 476, 15.09.2024

Abdulkadir Tanrıkulu

https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1500833

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to calculate the harmonization ratio before and after the flowering period (GFPtt/VPtt) in barley depending on thermal times, to determine the vegetative period (VP) and grain filling period (GFP) values for higher grain yield (GY) capacity and the possibility of using these qualities as adaptation and selection criteria and to determine the relationship between HR and GY calculated according to phenological periods depending on thermal times under Kahramanmaraş conditions. The experiments were carried out between 2014 and 2016 for 2 successive years with 3 replicates according to the randomized completed block design with 9 genotypes. Phenological traits such as VP, GFP, GY and days to maturity (DM) were measured in relation to thermal times. According to the results, genotypes were found to be significantly different in terms of harmonization ratio in barley. Considering the two-year averages, the highest grain yields were determined as Samyeli (534.3 kg da-1) and Şahin-91 (532.8 kg da-1). The lowest grain yields were determined as Kendal (404.9 kg da-1) and Sur-93 (416.9 kg da-1). The highest harmonization ratios were determined as Samyeli (0.753) and Kendal (0.672), the lowest harmonization ratios were determined as Şahin-91 (0.486) and Athena*Yabani (0.558). Although there was a general relationship between grain yield and harmonization ratio, some genotypes had values outside this trend.

Keywords

Harmonization ratio, Vegetative period, Grain filling period, Yield, Barley

References

• Akkaya A, Dokuyucu T, Kara R, Akçura M. 2006. Harmonization ratio of post-pre-anthesis durations by thermal times for durum wheat cultivars in a Mediterranean environment. European J Agron, 24(4): 404-408.
• Anonymous. 2015. Kahramanmaraş eastern Mediterranean gateway agricultural research institute directorate. Soil-Water Resources Soil Analysis Laboratory Results, Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, ss: 5.
• Anonymous. 2016. Climate values of Kahramanmaraş meteorological station. https://adana.mgm.gov.tr/gozlem-sebekesi.aspx?i=KAHRAMANMARAS (Accessed date: April 01, 2023).
• Anonymus. 2022. Bitkisel üretim istatistikleri. Turkish statistical institutes. https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr. (Accessed date: February 18, 2023).
• Balouchi HR, Sarvestani T, Sanavy SM. 2005. Agronomic factors on selected hulless barley genotypes. J Agron, 4(4): 333-339.
• Bell MJ, Wright GC. 1998. Effect of wet soil during early season ratoon establishment on sugarcane grown under different trash management systems in southern canelands. Experimental-Agri, 34(1): 113-124.
• Bleidere M, Zute S, Brunava L, Bobere N, Jākobsone I. 2013. Yield and grain quality of hulless spring barley in field trials under different nitrogen management conditions. Latvian Acad Sci. Section B. Natur Exact Applied Sci, 67(3): 229-235.
• Choelho DT, Dale RF. 1980. An energy-crop growth variable and temperature function for predicting corn growth and development: Planting to silking. Agronomy J. 72: 503-510.
• FAO. 2020. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL. (Accessed date: March 17, 2022).
• Gebeyehou G, Knott DR, Baker RJ. 1982. Rate and duration of filling in durum wheat cultivars. Crop Sci, 22: 337-340.
• Gündüzalp F. 1992. Nitrogenous substances. II. Barley-Malt Seminar, May 25-27, Konya, Türkiye, pp: 44-45.
• Kandemir N. 2004. Determination of suitable malting barley varieties in Tokat-Kazova conditions. Gaziosmanpaşa Univ Zir Fak J, 21(2): 94-100, Tokat.
• Kenar D, Şehirali S. 2001. Effect of different sowing times on yield and yield criteria of 2 and 6 row barley varieties. Turkey 4th Field Crops Congress, September 17-21, Tekirdag, Türkiye, pp: 177-182.
• Kılınç M, Kırtok Y, Yağbasanlar T. 1992. Research on the development of barley varieties suitable for Çukurova conditions. 2nd Barley Malt Seminar, May 25-27, Konya, Türkiye, pp. 205-218.
• Kırtok Y, Genç İ. 1979. Research on yield and yield elements of barley varieties of different origin under Çukurova conditions. Çukurova Üniv Fac Agri Yearbook, pp: 54.
• Kiniry JR, Keener ME. 1982. An enzyme kinetic equation to estimate maize development rates. Agronomy J, 74(1): 115-179.
• Lopez Castaneda C, Richards RA. 1994. Variation in temperate cereals in rain fed environments. Part II. Phasic Develop Growth. Field Crops Res, 37: 63-75.
• Mayers JD, Lawn RJ, Byth DE. 1991. Adaptation of soybean (Glycinemax L. Merrill) to the dry season of the tropics. II. Effects of Genotype and Environment on Biomass and Seed Yield. Australian J Agri Res, 42(3): 517-530.
• Naylor REL, Su J. 1998. Plant development in triticale cv. lasko at different sowing dates. J Agri Sci, 130(3): 297-306.
• Öztürk A, Çağlar Ö, Tufan A. 2001. Adaptation of some barley varieties to Erzurum conditions. Atatürk Univ Fac Agri J, 32(2): 109-115.
• Öztürk İ, Avcı R, Kahraman T. 2007. Determination of yield and yield components and some quality characteristics of some barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) varieties grown in thrace region. Uludağ Univ Zir Fak Dergi, 21(1): 59-68.
• SAS Institute. 1999. SAS/STAT user's guide. 8th Version, SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
• Sirat A, Sezer İ. 2017a. Determination of yield, yield components and some quality characteristics of some two-row barley (Hordeum vulgare conv.distichon) varieties grown in bafra plain. J Tekirdağ Fac Agri, 14 (01): 77-87.
• Sirat A, Sezer İ. 2017b. Investigation of yield, yield elements and some quality characteristics of some two-row barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) varieties under Samsun ecological conditions. Acad J Agri, 6(1): 23-34.
• Sönmez AC, Yüksel S. 2019. Determination of yield and some physiological characteristics of advanced barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes under Eskişehir conditions. KSU Agri Nature J, 22(Supplementary Issue 1): 60-68.
• TUIK. 2021a. Turkish statistical institute. http://tuik.gov.tr (accessed date: April 01, 2023).
• TUIK. 2021b. Merkezi dağıtım sistemi. https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?locale=tr (accessed date: April 01, 2023).
• Vaksmann M, Traore SB, Kouressy M, Coulibaly H, Reyniers FN. 1998. The future of photoperiodical cereals for sustainable production in the semi arid tropics. Cornell University Press, New York, USA, pp: 1998 – 270.
• Wang CP, Pan ZF, Nima ZX, Tang YW, Cai P, Liang JJ, Yu MQ. 2011. Starch granule-associated proteins of hull-less barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) from the Qinghai Tibet plateau in China. J Sci Food Agri, 91(4): 616-624.