Socioeconomic Effect of High Pathogenic Avian Influenza on Poultry Farmers in Rivers State, Nigeria

Year 2020, Volume: 3 Issue: 4, 286 - 289, 01.10.2020

Isaiah Oruene , Onyilofe Enejoh

Abstract

The study was carried out to evaluate the economic effect of the 2015 HPAI outbreak on poultry farmers in Rivers State, Nigeria. 44 farmers (farms) across three LGAs viz. Obio/Akpor (81.8%), Ikwerre (11.4%) and Port Harcourt City (6.8%) were affected, 23 (52.3%) of them being women and 21 (47.7%) men. The number of layers, broilers, turkeys and cockerels culled and compensated were 87,485 (₦47,808,250.00), 8,478 (₦3,190,950.00), 670 (₦467,500) and 65 (₦47,625.00) respectively. 27,900 eggs were destroyed and compensation of ₦209,250.00 was paid. Compensation was not paid for 23,565 layers, 1,480 broilers and 450 turkeys that died before reports were made. Although the Federal Government spent a whooping sum of ₦51,723,575.00 in paying compensation to the farmers, they lost ₦108,468,425.00 when considering the prevailing market price of the products at the time and value of the dead birds not compensated. They also lost an uncalculated amount on medication and veterinary consultations. Having lost their capital and considering that the waiting period was 2 years, 43% of the farmers were discouraged and never went back to poultry farming. To mitigate these effects in the future, I recommend therefore that poultry farmers should be trained to improve on and observe strict biosecurity measures to prevent the occurrence of the disease. In addition to having veterinarians attached to their farms, they should be taught the clinical signs of HPAI for early detection and reporting should outbreaks occurs. Farmers should as well be made to insure their farms to be covered during outbreaks and the Federal Government of Nigeria should improve on their compensation plans in the future to alleviate the sufferings of farmers.

Keywords

HPAI, Economic effect, Poultry, Farmers, Compensation, Discouraged

References

• Abdu PA, Wakawa AM, Sa‟idu L, Umoh JU. 2005. Avian influenza: A review. Nigerian Vet J, 26(1): 34-43.
• Acha PN, Szyfres B. 2003. (Pan American Health Organization 309). Zoonoses and communicable diseases common to man and animals. Volume 2. Chlamydiosis, rickettsioses and viroses.3rd ed. Washington DC: PAHO; Scientific and Technical Publication No. 580. Influenza; p. 155-172.
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]. Avian flu. CDC; 2015. URL: http://www.cdc.gov/flu/avianflu/ (20.03.2020).
• Ifende VI, Meseko CA, Odita CI, Akanbi BO, Moses GD, James AS, Barde IJ, Rimfa AG, Ugbe D, Shittu IA, Gado D, Olawuyi A, Joannis TM., Kubish PR, Muhammad LU, Okewole PA, Ahmed MS, Shamaki D. 2015. High pathogenic avian influenza in Nigeria: Overview of 2015 outbreaks. National Veterinary Research Institute Seminar Series.
• Monne, I, Joannis TM, Fusaro A, de Benedictis P, Lombin LH, Ularamu H, Egbuji A, Solomon P, Obi TU, Cattoli G, Capua I. 2008. Reassessment of avian influenza virus (H5N1) in poultry, Nigeria, 2007. Emerging Infect Diseases, 14(4): 637-640.
• NADIS INFO. 2006. Special avian flu edition. National Animal Disease Information and Surveillance (NADIS INFO) Bulletin. Pan African Programme for the Control of Epizootics (PACE). Federal Department of Livestock and Pest Control Services. No.9, pp.1-3.
• Obayelu AE. 2007. Socio-economic analysis of the impact of avian influenza epidemic on households poultry consumption and poultry industry in Nigeria. Empirical investigation of Kwara state. Livestock Res for Rural Dev, 19(1).
• Osakwe C. 2006. An Overview of the Avian Influenza in Nigeria, Being a Paper Presented at a One Day Workshop Held at Enugu, Nigeria.
• Swayne DE. 2003. Viral diseases of poultry. Program and Abstracts of the XIII Congres of the World Veterinary Poultry Association, July 19-23, Denver, USA, pp. 94.
• Ugwu DS. 2007. Economic impact of avian bird flu on the poultry industry in Nigeria. Pakistan J of Soc Sci, 4(4): 518-524.
• You L, Diao X. 2007. Assessing the Potential Impact of Avian Influenza on Poultry in West Africa: A Spatial Equilibrium analysis. 58(2): 348-367.