Evaluation of Different Rootstocks and Cultivars on Pruning Weight in Young Pear Trees

Year 2022, Volume: 5 Issue: 4, 440 - 447, 01.10.2022

Yakup Mert Kul Ahmet Öztürk Zaki A Faızı

https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1167288

Cited By: 1

Abstract

This study was carried out to evaluation of the effects on pruning weight (kg plant-1), cumulative pruning weight per plant (kg plant-1), and cumulative pruning weight per hectare (kg ha-1) of 3 quince rootstocks [Quince BA29 (BA29), Quince A (QA), Quince C (MC)] and 3 pear clonal rootstocks (Fox11, OHxF333, Farold 40) and pear seedling rootstocks grafted with 4 standard pear cultivars (‘Abate Fetel’, ‘Deveci’, ‘Santa Maria’, ‘Williams’) between 2019-2021 years. Rootstocks, cultivars, research years and their interactions significantly affected all examined parameters in the study, except for the interaction of year x rootstock x cultivar. Regarding rootstock averages, the highest pruning weight (kg plant-1) was observed from Fox 11, the lowest was in the BA29, QA, and MC quince rootstocks. Regardless of the cultivar averages, the highest pruning weight was in the ‘Deveci’, the lowest was in the ‘Santa Maria’ pear cultivar. The highest pruning weight (kg plant-1) was observed from ‘Deveci’/Fox11, and the lowest was in the ‘Williams’/QA, ‘Williams’/BA29, ‘Abate Fetel’/MC, and ‘Santa Maria’/MC combinations in terms of rootstock x cultivar interaction. The highest cumulative pruning weight per plant (kg) was determined in the ‘Deveci’/Fox11, the lowest was in the ‘Williams’/QA combination in terms of rootstock x cultivar interaction. Furthermore, the highest cumulative pruning weight per hectare (kg) was determined in the ‘Deveci’/Fox11, the lowest was in the ‘Williams’/QA, ‘Williams’/BA29, ‘Abate Fetel’/MC, ‘Santa Maria’/MC, and ‘Santa Maria’/Seedling combination in terms of rootstock x cultivar interaction. Except for the pear seedling rootstock, quince clone rootstocks generally had lower all pruning weight traits than pear clone rootstocks in the study. It can be said that the weaker development of quince rootstocks compared to pear rootstocks causes this situation. According to the results of this study carried out on young pear trees, it can be said that quince rootstocks are somewhat advantageous due to less pruning labor and cost.

Keywords

Pear, Rootstock, Cultivar, Cumulative pruning weight, Pruning weight

Supporting Institution

Ondokuz Mayıs University Scientific Research Projects (OMU-BAP)

Project Number

PYO.ZRT.1906.15.008

Thanks

This study was carried out in the ‘Modern Pear Orchard’ established in 2018 with the project code PYO.ZRT.1906.15.008 supported by the Project Management Office of Ondokuz Mayıs University (OMU-BAP). We thank the Ondokuz Mayis University Project Management Office for supporting the project.

References

• Almeida GK, Fioravanço JC, Marodin GAB. 2020. Vegetative growth and productive performance of ‘Abate Fetel’ and ‘Rocha’ pear trees on quince rootstocks. Pesqui Agropecu Bras, 55: e01306. DOI: 10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2020.v55.01306.
• Badrulhisham N, Othman N. 2017. Knowledge in tree pruning for sustainable practices in urban. Proc Soc Behav Sci, 234: 210-217.
• Boeykens A, Withouck H, Van CR, Vanden BM, Schoofs H, Remy S. 2018. The phenolic composition and antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of apple and pear pruning wood residues. 12th world congress on polyphenols applications, October 25-28, 2018, Bonn, Germany.
• Clingeleffer P, Morales N, Davis H, Smith H. 2019. The significance of scion × rootstock interactions. OENO-One, 2: 335-346. DOI: 10.20870/oeno-one.2019.53.2.2438.
• FAOSTAT. 2022. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Production of pears. URL: http://faostat3.fao.org/faostat-gateway/go/to/download/Q/QC/E (access date: July 20, 2022).
• Fathallah FA. 2010. Musculoskeletal disorders in labor-intensive agriculture. App Ergonomics, 6: 738-743.
• Gallardo K, Taylor M, Hinman H. 2009. Cost estimates of establishing and producing gala apples in Washington. Washington State University, Washington, US.
• Genç S, Soysal Mİ. 2018. Parametric and nonparametric post hoc tests. BSJ Eng Sci, 1(1): 18-27.
• Gercekcioglu R, Gencer S, Oz O. 2014. Tokat ekolojisinde yetiştirilen “Eşme” ve “Limon” ayva (Cydonia vulgaris L.) çeşitlerinin bitkisel ve pomolojik özellikleri. Tarım Bil Araş Derg, 7(1): 1-5.
• Giacobbo CL, Fachinello JC, Pazzin D, Gazolla AN. 2008. The Growth characteristics of pear trees of the cultivar ‘packham’s triumph’ on different rootstocks in the pelotas region. RS Brazil Acta Hortic, 800: 639-644.
• Giacobbo CL, Neto AG, Pazzin D. 2010. The assessment of different rootstocks to the pear tree cultivar ‘Carrick’. Acta Hortic, 872: 353-358.
• Gurpinder K, Amarjeet K, Shamsher S. 2018. Effect of severity of pruning on growth, yield and quality in soft pear cv. Punjab Nectar. Progress Hortic, 50: 1-2.
• Hawerroth FJ, Petri JL. 2011. Controle do desenvolvimento vegetativo em macieira e pereira. Fortaleza: Embrapa Agroindústria Trop Documentos, 147: 36.
• Iglesias I, Asin L. 2011. Agronomical performance and fruit quality of ‘Conference’ pear grafted on clonal quince and pear rootstocks. Acta Hortic, 903: 439-442.
• Jackson JE. 2003. Biology of apples and pears Biology of Horticultural Crops. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp: 76.
• Kurt T, Öztürk A, Faizi ZA. 2022. Survival rate of young pear trees in different rootstock and cultivar combinations under field conditions: Preliminary results. Anadolu J Agric Sci, 37(2): 405-420. DOI: 10.7161/omuanajas.1091137.
• Larsen FE, Fritts R. 1984. Rootstocks influence (1965- 1980) on yield efficiency and tree size of `Bartlett' and ‘d’Anjou’ pear. Sci Hortic, 24: 271-278.
• Lombard PB, Westwood MN. 1987. Pear rootstocks, in Rootstocks for Fruit Crops. eds R. C. Rom and R. F. Carlson. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, NY, US, pp: 145-183.
• Maas F. 2008. Evaluation of Pyrus and quince rootstocks for high-density pear orchards. Acta Hortic, 800: 599-610.
• Massai R, Loreti F, Fei C. 2008. Growth and yield of ‘Conference’ pears grafted on quince and pear rootstocks. Acta Hortic, 800: 617-624.
• McClymont L, Goodwin I, Whitfield D, O’Connell M. 2021. Effects of rootstock, tree density and training system on early growth, yield and fruit quality of blush pear. Hortscience, 56(11): 1408-1415. DOI: 10.21273/HORTSCI16146-21.
• Musacchi S, Ancarani V, Gamberini A, Gaddoni M, Grandi M, Sansavini S. 2005. Response of training system planting density and cultivar in pear. Acta Hortic, 671: 463-469.
• North M, de Kock K, Booyse M. 2015. Effect of rootstock on ‘Forelle’ pear (Pyrus communis L.) growth and production. S Afr J Plant Soil, 32(2): 65-70.
• Özbek S. 1978. Özel meyvecilik. Çukurova Üniversitesi Yayınları, Adana, Türkiye, pp: 128.
• Ozturk A, Ozturk B. 2014. The rootstock influences growth and development of ‘Deveci’ pear. Turkish J Agri Natur Sci, 1(1): 1049-1053.
• Pasa M, Schmitz S, Silva JD, Giovanaz CP. 2017. Performance of ‘Carrick’ pear grafted on quince rootstocks. Agropecuária Catarinense, 30: 57-60.
• Pasa MS, Fachinello JC, Junior HFR, Franceschi E, Herter FG, da Silva CP, de Souza ALK. 2016. Prohexadione calcium controls shoot growth of pear trees under mild winter conditions. J Curr Crop Sci Technol, 22: 40-49.
• Rom RC, Carlson RF. 1987. Rootstocks for fruit crops. John Wiley & Sons, New York, US, pp: 494.
• Rufato L, Marcon Filho JL, Marodin GAB, Kretzschmar AA, Miqueluti DJ. 2012. Intensidade e épocas de poda verde em pereira 'Abate Fetel' sobre dois porta-enxertos. Rev Bras Frutic, 34: 475-481.
• Sansavini S, Musacchi S. 1994. Canopy architecture, training and pruning in the modern European pear orchards: An overview. Acta Hortic, (367): 152-172. DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.1994.367.20.
• Sharma S, Rehalia AS, Sharma SD. 2009. Vegetative growth restriction in pome and stone fruits. Agric Rev, 30(1): 13-23.
• TSMS. 2022. Türkish statistical meteorological service. URL: https://www.mgm.gov.tr/eng/forecast-cities.aspx (access date: 23 July, 2022).
• Urbina V, Dalmases J, Pascual M, Dalmau R. 2003. Performance of `Williams' pear on five rootstocks. J Hortic Sci Biotech, 78 (2): 193-196.
• Webster T. 2002. Dwarfing rootstocks: past, present and future. Compact Fruit Tree, 35: 67-72.