Review
BibTex RIS Cite

Evaluation of Water Quality Monitoring Studies: Current Status and Practices

Year 2025, Volume: 8 Issue: 3, 431 - 439, 15.05.2025
https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1675629

Abstract

Water quality monitoring studies are of great importance for the sustainable use and protection of water resources. These studies entail the periodic measurement of physical, chemical, and biological parameters in water resources. These assessments are particularly crucial for the identification of alterations in surface and groundwater, and for the regulation of biological, chemical, and physical parameters within water bodies. This systematic observation process facilitates the implementation of effective management decisions by providing a comprehensive assessment of the current status of water bodies. The Water Framework Directive is widely acknowledged as a foundational document for the preservation and management of water resources within the European Union. It has played a pivotal role in the development of methodological approaches for the monitoring of water quality and the enhancement of data networks. The directive enables the precise evaluation of water resources contamination and environmental hazards. Water quality monitoring is also crucial for the early detection of water pollution and the timely implementation of interventions. These monitoring processes also reveal the impacts of agricultural, urban, and industrial activities on water resources. The objective of this study is to provide a comparative evaluation of water quality monitoring activities conducted under the European Union Water Framework Directive and those carried out in Türkiye. In this context, the institutional and legal infrastructure in Türkiye has been examined, and the compatibility of existing structures with the Water Framework Directive has been analyzed. In Türkiye, the responsibility for water quality monitoring is divided among various institutional bodies. It is evident that establishing precise responsibilities and operational domains for these institutions will enable more expeditious and effective access to the requisite data. The study also offers solution proposals and policy recommendations for improving water quality monitoring systems in Türkiye.

References

  • Çakmak B, Torun E. 2023. Konya kapalı havzası sulama şebekelerinde tarımsal su ayak izinin değerlendirilmesi. Harran Tarım Gıda Bilim Derg, 27(2): 239-252. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3043144
  • European Commission. 2015. Technical Report – WFD CIS guidance No. 29: "Monitoring of surface water status: A guidance document on monitoring of the ecological status and ecological potential of surface waters. Brussels, Belgium, pp: 36.
  • European Commission. 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European parliament and of the council establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities. Brussels, Belgium, pp: 38.
  • Gökalp Z, Çakmak B. 2016. Agricultural water management in Türkiye: past-present-future. Curr Trends Nat Sci, 5(9): 133-138.
  • Gültaş HT, Ahi Y, Çakmak B. 2025. Assessment of water resources status using the water footprint concept: The case of Tekirdağ province. BSJ Agri. 8(2): 186-193 https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1624100
  • Hering D, Borja A, Carstensen J, Carvalho L, Elliott M. 2010. The European water framework directive: A critical review of the improvements in the water quality and management across Europe. Sci Total Environ, 408(19): 4007-4019.
  • SKYB. 2018. Su kaynakları yönetimi ve güvenliği özel ihtisas komisyonu. On birinci kalkınma planı (2019-2023). Su kaynakları yönetimi ve güvenliği özel ihtisas komisyonu raporu. URL: https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/SuKaynaklariYonetimi_ve_GuvenligiOzelIhtisasKomisyonuRaporu.pdf (accessed date: March 23, 2025).
  • SYGM. 2021. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı Su Yönetimi Genel Müdürlüğü. Tarım sektöründe su verimliliğine ilişkin metodolojik rehber. Ankara, Türkiye, pp:92.
  • SYGM. 2025. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı Su Yönetimi Genel Müdürlüğü. URL: https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/SYGM/Menu/39/Devam-Eden-Projeler (accessed date: March 23, 2025).
  • Torun E, Çakmak B. 2024. Evaluation of water efficiency in agriculture: the case of konya closed basin. Irrigat Drain, 73: 1470–1482.
  • TÜİK Population Projections, 2023-2100. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Population-Projections-2023-2100-53699&dil=2#:~:text=The%20population%20of%20the%20country,below%2077%20million%20in%202100 (accessed date: March 23, 2025).
  • Yurtseven E, Çakmak B, Kesmez D, Polat HE. 2010. Tarımsal atık suların sulamada yeniden kullanılması. In: TMMOB Ziraat Mühendisleri Odası Türkiye Ziraat Mühendisliği VII.Teknik Kongresi, 11-15 Ocak, Ankara, Türkiye, ss:135-154.

Evaluation of Water Quality Monitoring Studies: Current Status and Practices

Year 2025, Volume: 8 Issue: 3, 431 - 439, 15.05.2025
https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1675629

Abstract

Water quality monitoring studies are of great importance for the sustainable use and protection of water resources. These studies entail the periodic measurement of physical, chemical, and biological parameters in water resources. These assessments are particularly crucial for the identification of alterations in surface and groundwater, and for the regulation of biological, chemical, and physical parameters within water bodies. This systematic observation process facilitates the implementation of effective management decisions by providing a comprehensive assessment of the current status of water bodies. The Water Framework Directive is widely acknowledged as a foundational document for the preservation and management of water resources within the European Union. It has played a pivotal role in the development of methodological approaches for the monitoring of water quality and the enhancement of data networks. The directive enables the precise evaluation of water resources contamination and environmental hazards. Water quality monitoring is also crucial for the early detection of water pollution and the timely implementation of interventions. These monitoring processes also reveal the impacts of agricultural, urban, and industrial activities on water resources. The objective of this study is to provide a comparative evaluation of water quality monitoring activities conducted under the European Union Water Framework Directive and those carried out in Türkiye. In this context, the institutional and legal infrastructure in Türkiye has been examined, and the compatibility of existing structures with the Water Framework Directive has been analyzed. In Türkiye, the responsibility for water quality monitoring is divided among various institutional bodies. It is evident that establishing precise responsibilities and operational domains for these institutions will enable more expeditious and effective access to the requisite data. The study also offers solution proposals and policy recommendations for improving water quality monitoring systems in Türkiye.

References

  • Çakmak B, Torun E. 2023. Konya kapalı havzası sulama şebekelerinde tarımsal su ayak izinin değerlendirilmesi. Harran Tarım Gıda Bilim Derg, 27(2): 239-252. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3043144
  • European Commission. 2015. Technical Report – WFD CIS guidance No. 29: "Monitoring of surface water status: A guidance document on monitoring of the ecological status and ecological potential of surface waters. Brussels, Belgium, pp: 36.
  • European Commission. 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European parliament and of the council establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities. Brussels, Belgium, pp: 38.
  • Gökalp Z, Çakmak B. 2016. Agricultural water management in Türkiye: past-present-future. Curr Trends Nat Sci, 5(9): 133-138.
  • Gültaş HT, Ahi Y, Çakmak B. 2025. Assessment of water resources status using the water footprint concept: The case of Tekirdağ province. BSJ Agri. 8(2): 186-193 https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1624100
  • Hering D, Borja A, Carstensen J, Carvalho L, Elliott M. 2010. The European water framework directive: A critical review of the improvements in the water quality and management across Europe. Sci Total Environ, 408(19): 4007-4019.
  • SKYB. 2018. Su kaynakları yönetimi ve güvenliği özel ihtisas komisyonu. On birinci kalkınma planı (2019-2023). Su kaynakları yönetimi ve güvenliği özel ihtisas komisyonu raporu. URL: https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/SuKaynaklariYonetimi_ve_GuvenligiOzelIhtisasKomisyonuRaporu.pdf (accessed date: March 23, 2025).
  • SYGM. 2021. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı Su Yönetimi Genel Müdürlüğü. Tarım sektöründe su verimliliğine ilişkin metodolojik rehber. Ankara, Türkiye, pp:92.
  • SYGM. 2025. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı Su Yönetimi Genel Müdürlüğü. URL: https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/SYGM/Menu/39/Devam-Eden-Projeler (accessed date: March 23, 2025).
  • Torun E, Çakmak B. 2024. Evaluation of water efficiency in agriculture: the case of konya closed basin. Irrigat Drain, 73: 1470–1482.
  • TÜİK Population Projections, 2023-2100. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Population-Projections-2023-2100-53699&dil=2#:~:text=The%20population%20of%20the%20country,below%2077%20million%20in%202100 (accessed date: March 23, 2025).
  • Yurtseven E, Çakmak B, Kesmez D, Polat HE. 2010. Tarımsal atık suların sulamada yeniden kullanılması. In: TMMOB Ziraat Mühendisleri Odası Türkiye Ziraat Mühendisliği VII.Teknik Kongresi, 11-15 Ocak, Ankara, Türkiye, ss:135-154.
There are 12 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Irrigation Water Quality
Journal Section Reviews
Authors

Sertan Avcı 0000-0003-2872-0563

Engin Yurtseven 0000-0001-6789-8810

Publication Date May 15, 2025
Submission Date April 14, 2025
Acceptance Date May 6, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 8 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Avcı, S., & Yurtseven, E. (2025). Evaluation of Water Quality Monitoring Studies: Current Status and Practices. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, 8(3), 431-439. https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1675629

                                                  24890