ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN FİZİKSEL AKTİVİTELERİ, BESLENME ALIŞKANLIKLARI VE VÜCUT KOMPOZİSYONLARI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİNİN ARAŞTIRILMASI

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı üniversite öğrencilerinin fiziksel aktivitelerini adımsayar ile belirlemek ve fiziksel aktivite ile vücut kompozisyonu ve enerji tüketimi arasındaki ilişkisini incelemektir. Araştırmaya toplam 1113 kadın ve erkek üniversite öğrencisi katıldı. Deneklerin fiziksel aktiviteleri günlük adım sayısının adımsayar Yamax PW610 ile ölçülmesi yöntemi uygulandı. Vücut kompozisyonu belirlenmesinde Bioimpedance yöntemi kullanıldı Tanita BC-418MA . Araştırmaya katılan kadın ve erkek üniversite öğrencilerinin ortalama günlük adım sayıları sırasıyla 8020±3117 adım/gün ve 8652±3258 adım/gün olarak belirlendi p =0.05 . Kadın ve erkek üniversite öğrencilerinin sırasıyla günlük adım sayısı ile VKİ r = -.115 ve -.129 , SağBYY r = -.110 ve -.131 ve SolBYY r = -.119 ve -.103 , arasında istatistiksel olarak negatif anlamlı ilişki bulunmaktadır. Günlük adım sayısı ile Enerji Tüketimi r = .026 ve .022 arasında ise istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ilişki bulunmamaktadır. Sonuç olarak, üniversite öğrencilerinin fiziksel aktivite seviyeleri yetersiz ve erkek öğrencilerinin günlük adım sayıları kadınlara göre daha yüksek olduğu. Ayrıca günlük adım sayısı ile vücut yağ yüzdesi arasında negatif ilişki bulunmaktadır.

Keywords

• yürüyüş,vücut kompozisyonu,enerji tüketimi,adımsayar

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, NUTRITION HABITS AND BODY COMPOSITION OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to determine the physical activity levels of university students with a pedometer and investigate into the relationship between the physical activity and body composition and energy intake. A total of 1113 female and male university students participated in the present study. Pedometer determining the number of daily step was used to assess physical activity of subjects Yamax PW610 . Body composition was analyzed by bioelectrical impedance method Tanita BC-418MA . Mean±SD number of daily steps of female and male students were found 8020±3117 steps/day and 8652±3258 steps/day, respectively. Between female and male subjects there was inversely correlation between the number of daily steps and BMI r = -.115 and -.129 , right leg fat percentage r = -.110 and -.131 , left leg fat percentage r = -.119 and -.103 p

Keywords

• ambulatory activity,body composition,energy consumption,pedometer

References

1. Assessment of Free-living 9.
2. Hatano, Y., “Prevalence and Use of Pedometer” Research Journal of Walking, 1(1). pp. 45-54, 1997.
3. Hornbuckle, L.M., Bassett, D.R. & Thompson, D.L. “Pedometer Composition Women” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 37(6). pp.1069-1074, 2005. in African American
4. Keating, X.D., Guan, J., Pinero, J.C. & Bridges, D.M. “A Meta Analysis of College Students’ Physical Activity Behaviors”. Journal of American College Health. 54. pp.116–125. 2005.
5. Kohl, H.W., Lee, I.M., Vuori, I.M., Wheeler, F.C., Bauman, A., Sallis, J.F. “Physical Activity and Public Health: the Emergence of a Sub Discipline” Journal of Physical Activity and Health. 3. pp. 344– 364. 2006.
6. Krumm, E.M., Dessieux, O.L., Andrews, P. & Thompson, D.L., “The Relationship Between Daily Steps and Body Composition in Postmenopausal Women” Journal of Women Health (Larchmt). 15(2). pp. 202-210, 2006.
7. Leslie, E., Fotheringham, M.J., Owen, N., Bauman, A. “Age related Differences in Physical Activity Level of Young Adults” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 33. pp.255–258, 2001.
8. Lowry, R., Galuska, D.A., Fulton, J.E., et al. “Physical Activity, Food Choice, and Weight Management Goals and Practices among US College Students” American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 18. pp.18– 27, 2000.

9. Lubans, D.R., Morgan, P.J. & Tudor-Locke, C., “A Systematic Review of Studies Using Pedometers to Promote Physical Activity Among Youth” Preventive Medicine. 48(4). pp. 307-315, 2009.
10. Malina, R.M., Adherence to Physical Activity from Childhood to Adulthood: A Perspective from Tracking Studies” Quest. 53. pp.346–355. 2001.
11. Mckeever, W.F. “A New Family Handedness Sample with Findings Consistent With X-Linked Transmission” British Journal of Psychology. 91 ( Pt 1). pp. 21–39, 2000. 20. Pereira, M.A., Folsom, A.R., Mcgovern, P.G., Carpenter, M., Arnett, D.K., Liao, D., Szklo, M. & Hutchinson, R.G., “Physical Activity and Incident Hypertension In Black and White Adults: The Atherosclerosis Preventive Medicine, 28(3). pp. 304-312., 1999.
12. Peters, M., Reimers, S., Manning, J.T., “Hand Preference for Writing and Associations With Selected DemoFigure and Behavioral Variables In 255,100 Subjects: The BBC Internet Study” Brain and Cognition. 62. pp.177–89. 2006.
13. Raymond, M., Pontier, D., Dufour, A.B., Moller, A.P, “Frequency-Dependent Handedness in Humans” Processos Biology Science. 263, pp.1627–1633. 1996. Maintenance of Left
14. Rowlands, A.V., Eston, R.G. & Ingledew, D.K., “Relationship Fitnessand Body Fat In 8- To 10-Yr-Old Children” Journal of Applied Physiology, 86(4). 1428-1435. 1999.
15. Sallis, J.F., “Age-Related Decline In Physical Activity: A Synthesis of Human and Animal Studies” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 32. pp.1598– 1600, 2000.
16. Schneider, P.L., Crouter, S.E. & Bassett, D.R., “Pedometer Measueres of Free-Living Physical Activity: Comparison of 13 Models” Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 36(2). pp. 331-335, 2004. 26. Sirard, J.R. & Pate, R.R. “Physical Activity Assessment in Children and Adolescents” Sports Medicine. 31(6). pp. 439-454. 2001.
17. Sisson, S.B., Mcclain, J.J. & Tudor-Locke, C.
18. “Campus Walkability, Pedometer-Determined Steps
19. and Moderate-To-Vigorous Physical Activity: A
20. Comparison of 2 University Campuses” Journal
21. American College Health. 56(5). pp. 585-592. 2008.
22. Strath, S.J., Swartz, A.M. & Cashin, S.E. “Ambulatory Physical Activity Profiles of Older Adults” Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 17(1). pp. 46-56. 2009. 29. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı
23. Temel Sağlık Hizmetleri
24. Müdürlüğü, “Türkiye Obezite Ile Mücadele Programı
25. ve Eylem Planı (2008-2012)”, Ankara. 2009.
26. Sparling, P.B., Snow, T.K., “Physical Activity Patterns In Recent College Alumni” Research Quarterly in Exercise and Sport. 73. pp. 200–205. 2002.
27. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health. Government Printing Office. 2000. D.C.: U.S.
28. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services., “Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General”. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 1996.
29. Tudor-Locke, C., “Taking Steps Toward Increased Physical Activity: Using Pedometers to Measure and Motivate” Research Digest, 3(17). pp. 1-8. 2002.
30. Tudor-Locke, C., Ainsworth, B.E., Whitt, M.C., Thompson, R.W., Addy, C.L., & Jones, D.A., The Relationship Ambulatory Variables. International Journal of Obesity, 25(11). pp. 1571-1578. 2001.
31. Pedometer-Determined Activity and Body Composition
32. Tudor-Locke, C. & Bassett, D.R., “How Many Steps/Day Are Enough? Preliminary Pedometer Indices for Public Health” Sports Medicine. 34(1). pp. 1-8. 2004.
33. Tudor-Locke, C., Burkett, L., Reis, J.P., Ainsworth, B.E., Macera, C.A. & Wilson, D.K ., “How Many Days of Pedometer Monitoring Predict Weekly Physical Activity In Adults?” Preventive Medicine. 40(3). pp.293-298. 2005.
34. Tudor-Locke, C., Johnson, W.D. & Katzmarzyk, P.T., “Accelerometer Determined Steps/Day In US Adults” Medicine and Science In Sports and Exercise. 41(7). pp. 1384-1391, 2009.
35. Tudor-Locke, C., Ainsworth, B.E., Kirtland, K.A., Kimsey, Pedometer-Determined Physical Activity” Medicine and Science In Sports and Exercise, 36(9). pp. 1567-1573. 2004. S.A., Macera, C.A., Reis, J.P. & J.P., “Descriptive Epidemiology of
36. Valanou, E.M., Bamia, C. & Trichopoulou, A., “Methodology of Physical Activity and Energy Expenditure Assessment” A Review Journal of Public Health. 14(2). pp.58-65, 2006. 40. Vincent, S.D. & Error In Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science. 7(1). pp.19-24.2003. “Determining Pedometers” Digital
37. Westerterp, K.R., “Assessment of Physical Activity: A Critical Appraisal” European Journal of Applied Physiology, 105(6). pp. 823-828. 2009.
38. WMADH, “World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects”. American Medical Association. 284. pp. 3043- 3045, 2000. Journal of the